Ward (ND) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Ward (ND) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Ward (ND)
20,867
Total Investors in Ward (ND)
5,796
Investor Owned SFR in Ward (ND)
5,909(28.3%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
4,818
SFR Owned
3,976
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
978
SFR Owned
2,013
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 5,909 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Landlords Dominate Ward County, Owning 87% of Investor SFRs and Capturing 32% of Quarterly Sales
Investors own 5,909 SFR properties in Ward County, representing a significant 28.3% of the market. This portfolio is dominated by individual investors (67.3%) and small mom-and-pop landlords who control 87.0% of investor-owned housing. In the last quarter, landlords were highly active, purchasing 31.8% of all homes sold, and are consistently net buyers in the market.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 5,909 SFR properties in Ward County, with individuals holding 67.3% of the portfolio.
Cash remains a popular acquisition method, with 4,160 properties owned outright compared to 1,749 financed properties. The investor portfolio is overwhelmingly rental-focused, with 5,776 rented properties. There are 4,818 individual landlords compared to 978 company landlords.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlord pricing is volatile, paying a 5.7% premium in Q1 2026 after securing deep discounts in prior quarters.
In Q1 2026, landlords paid an average of $343,322 versus the homeowner price of $324,938. This reverses a trend from 2025 where landlords saw discounts as high as 25.2% ($76,066) in Q1 2025 and 16.4% ($54,907) in Q3 2025. The data reflects inconsistent purchasing activity quarter over quarter.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 31.8% of all Q4 2025 home purchases in Ward County, buying 69 properties.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) drove this activity, accounting for 95.7% of all landlord purchases. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) made up just 4.3% of investor buying activity, acquiring 3 homes.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 87.0% of investor-owned properties, while institutions own just 0.2%.
The market is defined by small investors, with single-property landlords alone owning 3,622 properties, or 59.5% of the entire investor portfolio. Institutional investors hold a portfolio of just 15 properties in Ward County.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, capturing 65.1% of that segment.
While individuals dominate smaller portfolios, owning 83.1% of single-property holdings, companies scale more effectively. In the 11-20 property tier, companies own 80.2% of the properties, showing a clear trend toward professionalization as portfolios grow.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated in two zip codes, 58701 and 58703, which hold over 4,200 properties.
The 58701 zip code contains 2,446 investor-owned properties with a 25.6% ownership rate. However, smaller zip codes like 58779 show much higher penetration, with investors owning 71.6% of the SFR housing stock.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Ward County are strong net buyers, acquiring 81 properties while selling only 17 in Q1 2026.
This trend is consistent, with a buy-to-sell ratio of 4.0 in 2025 (411 buys vs 102 sells) and 4.9 in 2024 (521 buys vs 106 sells). Even institutional investors, who were net sellers in 2024, have become net buyers in 2025 and beyond.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 27.3% of all Q1 2026 transactions, with institutional buyers paying 52.4% less than new landlords.
Institutional investors paid an average price of just $163,914, a massive discount compared to the $344,345 average paid by single-property landlords. Inter-landlord trading is rare; only 1.7% of purchases by new landlords came from another investor.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 5,909 SFR properties in Ward County, with individuals holding 67.3% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant footprint in Ward County, owning 5,909 single-family residential properties, which constitutes 28.3% of the total 20,867 SFRs in the market.

The ownership structure is heavily skewed towards individuals over corporations. Individual investors own 3,976 properties, or 67.3% of the landlord portfolio, while companies own the remaining 2,013 properties (34.1%).

This individual dominance is also reflected in the entity count, with 4,818 individual landlords far outnumbering the 978 company landlords, highlighting the fragmented, small-scale nature of real estate investing in the region.

Financing strategies show a clear preference for cash. Investors own 4,160 properties with cash, more than double the 1,749 properties that are financed, signaling strong capital positions or a strategy of avoiding leverage.

The portfolio is clearly geared towards rental income, with 5,776 of the 5,909 properties classified as rented, demonstrating the primary business model for investors in Ward County.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlord pricing is volatile, paying a 5.7% premium in Q1 2026 after securing deep discounts in prior quarters.
Detailed Findings

Investor acquisition pricing in Ward County shows significant volatility, breaking from typical national trends. In Q1 2026, landlords paid an average of $343,322, a 5.7% premium of $18,384 over the traditional homeowner price of $324,938.

This recent premium marks a sharp reversal from 2025, where investors frequently secured properties at a substantial discount. For example, landlords paid 16.4% less than homeowners in Q3 2025 ($279,989 vs. $334,896) and a staggering 25.2% less in Q1 2025 ($226,021 vs. $302,087).

An extreme outlier occurred in Q2 2025, when the average landlord purchase price hit $476,764, a 42.8% premium over the homeowner price of $333,862. This suggests that low transaction volumes can be heavily skewed by a few high-value purchases.

The overall price trend for investors has been upward, with the average acquisition price rising from the $249,665 seen between 2020-2023 to over $295,000 in 2024 and 2025, before the spike in Q1 2026. This trend aligns with general market appreciation.

The fluctuating gap between landlord and homeowner prices indicates that investor purchasing power and strategy can shift dramatically from quarter to quarter, likely influenced by the specific inventory available and the small number of transactions.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 31.8% of all Q4 2025 home purchases in Ward County, buying 69 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investors were a powerful force in the Ward County market in Q4 2025, acquiring 69 of the 217 total SFRs sold, a market share of 31.8%.

The market's new entrants are almost exclusively small-scale investors. The single-property tier was the most active, with 58 new entities purchasing 49 properties, representing 70.0% of all investor acquisitions for the quarter.

Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) were responsible for the overwhelming majority of buying activity. Combined, Tiers 01-04 purchased 67 properties, which is 95.7% of the total for all investors.

Institutional investors (1000+ properties) had a minimal presence, purchasing only 3 properties in Q4. This represents just 4.3% of landlord buying activity, reinforcing that market dynamics are dictated by smaller players.

The data shows a healthy influx of new capital at the smallest scale, with two-property landlords also adding 11 properties to their portfolios, indicating that existing small investors are actively expanding.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 87.0% of investor-owned properties, while institutions own just 0.2%.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Ward County is unequivocally dominated by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04), control a combined 87.0% of all investor-owned SFRs.

First-time or single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the bedrock of the market, owning 3,622 properties. This single tier accounts for 59.5% of all investor-held housing, a larger share than all other eight tiers combined.

In stark contrast, institutional investors with portfolios of over 1,000 properties (Tier 09) have a negligible footprint. Their holdings total just 15 properties, representing only 0.2% of the investor market.

Mid-size landlords also play a relatively small role. Investors owning 11-100 properties (Tiers 05-07) collectively hold 765 properties, or 12.5% of the total investor portfolio.

This distribution debunks any narrative of large corporate consolidation in Ward County. The market's structure is highly fragmented and reliant on thousands of small, local investors, a key insight available through detailed assessor data.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, capturing 65.1% of that segment.
Detailed Findings

Ownership structure in Ward County evolves significantly as portfolio sizes increase. While individuals dominate the overall market, companies become the majority owners starting in the 6-10 property tier (Tier 04), where they hold 175 properties (65.1%) compared to 94 for individuals.

The smallest tiers are the domain of individual investors. Individuals own 3,042 (83.1%) of single-property landlord holdings and 410 (61.5%) of two-property portfolios.

The trend towards corporate ownership accelerates in the mid-size tiers. Companies own 80.2% of properties in the 11-20 unit tier and 71.7% in the 21-50 unit tier, indicating a clear shift to formal business structures for larger-scale operations.

This crossover point at just 6-10 properties suggests that investors who expand beyond a handful of units often adopt a corporate structure for liability, financing, or operational efficiency.

Even in the smallest tiers, companies maintain a foothold, owning 617 properties (16.9%) in the single-property tier, suggesting some investors start with a corporate entity from their very first purchase.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated in two zip codes, 58701 and 58703, which hold over 4,200 properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals that investor ownership in Ward County is heavily concentrated in its most populous areas. The 58701 zip code is the epicenter of activity, with 2,446 investor-owned properties, followed by 58703 with 1,762 properties.

Together, these two zip codes account for 4,208 properties, representing over 71% of the entire investor-owned portfolio in the county, demonstrating a clear focus on the Minot urban area.

While concentration by count is high in urban centers, the highest penetration rates are found in more rural zip codes. For instance, investors own 71.6% of the SFRs in 58779 and 68.3% in 58756, suggesting different investment strategies or market dynamics in these smaller communities.

The investor ownership rate in the top urban zip codes, 58701 (25.6%) and 58703 (23.3%), is significant but still far below the hyper-penetrated rural areas. This highlights a key distinction between where the most properties are (volume) versus where investors have the largest market share (rate).

The sparse data in some zip codes (e.g., 58716, 58721) indicates either very low housing stock or limited investor activity, further emphasizing the geographic concentration of investment capital.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords in Ward County are strong net buyers, acquiring 81 properties while selling only 17 in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Transaction data reveals a clear and sustained accumulation strategy among landlords in Ward County. In Q1 2026, investors were aggressive net buyers, with 81 purchases against only 17 sales, resulting in a net gain of 64 properties.

This pattern of net acquisition is a long-term trend. For the full year 2025, landlords bought 411 properties and sold 102 (a 4.0x buy/sell ratio), and in 2024 they bought 521 and sold 106 (a 4.9x ratio), consistently expanding their portfolios.

Institutional investors (1000+ tier) have recently shifted their strategy to align with this trend. After being net sellers in 2024 (8 buys vs. 9 sells), they became net buyers in 2025, acquiring 17 properties while selling only 6.

This renewed institutional buying, though small in volume, signals a reversal from a brief divestment period and a renewed confidence in the Ward County market.

The high volume of buying relative to selling across all investor types indicates a strong belief in future market appreciation and rental demand, with landlords focused on long-term holds rather than short-term flips. This trend is a key finding in our Investor Pulse reports.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 27.3% of all Q1 2026 transactions, with institutional buyers paying 52.4% less than new landlords.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords participated in 81 of the 297 total SFR transactions in Ward County, capturing a 27.3% share of all market activity.

A dramatic pricing disparity exists between investor tiers, revealing different acquisition strategies. Institutional investors (1000+ tier) acquired properties for an average of $163,914, while first-time single-property landlords paid an average of $344,345.

This price gap means institutional buyers are securing properties for 52.4% less than the smallest mom-and-pop investors, suggesting they are targeting distressed assets, buying in bulk, or operating in completely different sub-markets.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) dominated transaction volume, accounting for 78 of the 81 investor purchases, while institutional buyers made only 3 transactions.

The market shows little evidence of investor-to-investor trading. Among the most active group, single-property buyers, only 1.7% of their purchases (1 transaction) came from another landlord, indicating that most acquisitions are sourced directly from the homeowner market.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Ward County, Owning 87% of Investor-Held SFRs and Driving 32% of Market Activity
Holdings
Landlords own 5,909 SFR properties, a 28.3% share of the Ward County market. The portfolio is primarily held by individual investors, who own 3,976 properties (67.3%), compared to 2,013 (34.1%) for companies.
Pricing
In a notable Q1 2026 shift, landlords paid a 5.7% premium over homeowners ($343,322 vs $324,938), a reversal from previous quarters which saw landlord discounts as high as 25.2%.
Activity
Landlords were highly active in the latest quarter, purchasing 69 properties for a 31.8% share of all sales, with 58 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 87.0% of all investor-owned housing, while large institutional investors (1000+ properties) own a minimal 0.2% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors overwhelmingly control smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios starting at the 6-10 property tier (65.1% share).
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 4.8x buy/sell ratio in Q1 2026 (81 buys vs 17 sells), and institutional investors have also shifted back to being net buyers.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Ward County, North Dakota is defined by the dominance of small, individual investors. Landlords own 5,909 SFR properties, a substantial 28.3% of the total market, signaling deep investor penetration. This ownership is not concentrated in corporate hands; individual investors own 67.3% of the portfolio (3,976 properties). The market structure is highly fragmented, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 87.0% of investor housing, while institutional firms (1000+ properties) have a negligible 0.2% share.

Investor behavior reflects a strong commitment to accumulation. In the most recent quarter, landlords acquired 31.8% of all homes sold, with 58 new single-property investors entering the market. This group has been a consistent net buyer, with a 4.8-to-1 buy/sell ratio in Q1 2026. Pricing strategies show significant variance; after a period of securing discounts, landlords paid a 5.7% premium in Q1. However, a massive price gap exists between tiers, with institutional investors paying 52.4% less per property than new landlords ($163,914 vs. $344,345), suggesting they target different asset classes.

The key takeaway for Ward County is a robust and growing rental market driven by thousands of local entrepreneurs, not distant corporations. The trend of companies taking majority ownership in portfolios larger than five properties indicates a path to professionalization for successful investors. With landlords consistently acting as net buyers and a steady stream of new entrants, the investor share of the housing market is poised to grow, reinforcing their role as a primary source of rental housing supply in the region.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 11:13 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Ward (ND)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Ward (ND) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-nd-ward/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.