Rogers (OK) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Rogers (OK) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Rogers (OK)
28,254
Total Investors in Rogers (OK)
3,766
Investor Owned SFR in Rogers (OK)
3,374(11.9%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
3,165
SFR Owned
2,356
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
601
SFR Owned
1,075
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 3,374 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Landlords Dominate Rogers County with 87.8% Ownership as Market Cools with Net Selling Activity in Q1
Investors own 3,374 SFR properties in Rogers County, 11.9% of the market, with mom-and-pop landlords controlling 87.8% versus just 1.0% for institutional firms. In Q1 2026, landlords secured a massive 50.2% discount compared to homeowners, but the market showed signs of cooling as investors became net sellers for the first time since before 2024.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 3,374 SFRs in Rogers County, with individuals holding a dominant 69.8% share (2,356 properties).
The majority of investor properties are owned free-and-clear, with 2,454 cash-owned properties compared to 920 that are financed. Investor portfolios are heavily rental-focused, with 3,220 properties, or 95.4% of all holdings, classified as rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords in Q1 2026 acquired properties for $171,054, a staggering 50.2% discount compared to traditional homeowners at $343,646.
The price gap between landlords and homeowners widened dramatically in Q1 2026 to 50.2%, a sharp increase from the 18.0% discount observed in Q3 2025. This suggests a shift toward acquiring properties at significantly lower price points.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords accounted for 6.0% of all SFR purchases in Q4 2025, acquiring 17 of the 284 homes sold.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) drove nearly all investor activity, making up 15 of the 17 purchases (88.2%). In contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties made zero acquisitions in the quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 87.8% of all investor-owned SFRs in Rogers County.
In stark contrast, institutional investors with portfolios of 1,000 or more properties own just 1.0% of the investor-held housing stock, a total of 35 properties. Pricing data by tier was not available to compare acquisition costs.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, capturing a 55.8% share of ownership in that segment.
This marks a clear crossover point, as individuals dominate smaller tiers with an 86.3% share of single-property portfolios and a 64.2% share of 3-5 property portfolios. Data on price differences by owner type was not available.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity in Rogers County is heavily concentrated in the 74017 zip code, which holds 1,413 investor-owned properties.
However, the highest rate of investor ownership is found in the 74016 zip code, where investors own 23.6% of all SFRs. The 74017 area, despite having the highest count, has a lower rate of 17.6%.
Historical Transactions
The landlord market shifted from being net buyers in 2025 (net +50 properties) to net sellers in Q1 2026 (net -4 properties).
This cooling trend was led by institutional investors, who were already net sellers in 2025 (net -1 property) after being net buyers in 2024. Overall transaction volume has also slowed, with 269 buys in 2024 declining to 164 in 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords participated in just 5.2% of all market transactions in Q1 2026, with 22 transactions out of a total of 425.
All 22 transactions were conducted by mom-and-pop landlords (portfolios under 100 properties), as institutional investors made zero purchases or sales. Single-property landlords were the most active, accounting for 17 of the 22 transactions.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 3,374 SFRs in Rogers County, with individuals holding a dominant 69.8% share (2,356 properties).
Detailed Findings

In Rogers County, individual real estate investors form the backbone of the rental market, owning 2,356 of the 3,374 investor-held SFRs, a 69.8% share. This is further reflected in the number of landlords, where individuals (3,165) outnumber companies (601) by more than five to one.

A significant majority of investor-owned properties are held without financing. Cash purchases account for 2,454 properties, representing 72.7% of the entire investor portfolio and nearly triple the 920 properties that are financed, indicating a low-leverage strategy among local investors.

The investor portfolio is overwhelmingly geared towards rentals. Of the 3,374 properties owned by investors, 3,220 are rented, which translates to a 95.4% rental concentration. This high figure underscores a clear focus on buy-and-hold strategies rather than speculation.

Company-owned portfolios, while smaller in number, show a slightly different composition compared to individual holdings, though specific breakdowns were not available. The overall market structure points to a mature rental landscape dominated by established, cash-heavy individual owners.

The total landlord footprint in Rogers County stands at 3,374 properties, representing 11.9% of the 28,254 total SFRs in the market. This level of penetration shows a significant, yet not overwhelming, investor presence in the local housing ecosystem.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords in Q1 2026 acquired properties for $171,054, a staggering 50.2% discount compared to traditional homeowners at $343,646.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords achieved a remarkable pricing advantage, paying an average of $171,054 per property. This was $172,592 less than the average traditional homeowner price of $343,646, representing a massive 50.2% discount and signaling a focus on distressed or off-market assets.

The discount for investors has not been consistent; it has widened significantly over the past year. The 50.2% gap in Q1 2026 is a substantial increase from discounts of 18.0% in Q3 2025 and 22.3% in Q2 2025, indicating a recent and aggressive shift in acquisition strategy.

Despite the low acquisition price in Q1, overall property values have appreciated since the pandemic era. The average price during 2020-2023 was $205,726, while 2025 prices averaged $258,165, showing underlying market growth before the Q1 pricing anomaly.

The acquisition data from section6-1.csv reported zero properties purchased across all recent timeframes, which is inconsistent with transaction data from other sections. However, the pricing comparison data clearly indicates the significant discount landlords achieved on the properties they did acquire.

This widening price gap suggests that as the market gets more expensive for traditional buyers, investors are successfully finding opportunities far below market rate, potentially targeting properties that require renovation or are sourced through non-traditional channels.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords accounted for 6.0% of all SFR purchases in Q4 2025, acquiring 17 of the 284 homes sold.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing activity in Rogers County represented a small fraction of the market in Q4 2025, with landlords buying 17 of the 284 total SFRs sold, a 6.0% market share. This indicates that traditional homebuyers were the primary drivers of market activity.

The market for new rental properties is almost exclusively fueled by small investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were responsible for 88.2% of all investor purchases, acquiring 15 properties. Institutional investors (Tier 09) were completely inactive, with zero purchases.

New entrants are a key component of the investor landscape. In Q4, 17 new single-property landlord entities entered the market, acquiring 13 properties. This accounts for 76.5% of all investor-purchased properties, highlighting a healthy influx of first-time investors.

Mid-size landlords showed minimal acquisition activity. Only two properties were purchased by investors in the 11-50 property tiers, reinforcing that growth is concentrated at the smallest end of the investor spectrum.

The data paints a clear picture of a grassroots investor market where large-scale buyers are absent, and market share is built one or two properties at a time by local individuals and small businesses.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 87.8% of all investor-owned SFRs in Rogers County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Rogers County is unequivocally dominated by small-scale operators. Landlords with 1-10 properties, often called mom-and-pops, own a combined 87.8% of the 3,374 investor-owned SFRs, demonstrating a highly fragmented market structure.

Single-property landlords are the largest single group, owning 2,189 properties. This represents 63.1% of all investor-owned homes, meaning nearly two-thirds of the local rental stock is provided by landlords with just one investment property.

Institutional ownership is almost non-existent, defying the common narrative of corporate consolidation. The 1,000+ property tier holds just 35 properties, or 1.0% of the total, indicating that large-scale capital has a negligible footprint in the county.

Mid-size landlords (11-100 properties) constitute a small but present segment, collectively owning 325 properties, or 9.4% of the investor portfolio. This group bridges the gap between small operators and large institutions.

The distribution of ownership is heavily skewed towards the smallest investors, with Tiers 01-04 (1-10 properties) making up 87.8% of holdings, while all tiers above that (11+ properties) collectively own just 12.2%.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, capturing a 55.8% share of ownership in that segment.
Detailed Findings

A distinct strategic shift occurs as investor portfolios grow in Rogers County. While individuals dominate the entry-level tiers, companies take majority control starting with portfolios of 6-10 properties, where they own 120 properties (55.8%) compared to individuals' 95 properties (44.2%).

Individual investors are the primary force in smaller portfolios. They own 1,921 (86.3%) of single-property investments and 256 (64.2%) of properties in the 3-5 unit tier, showing that the path to becoming a landlord typically starts with personal ownership.

Company ownership becomes increasingly prevalent with scale. In the 11-20 property tier, companies own 126 properties, an overwhelming 88.7% share, solidifying their control over mid-sized portfolios.

This crossover point suggests that as operational complexity and capital requirements increase, investors tend to formalize their operations under a corporate structure to manage assets and liability more effectively.

The data clearly illustrates two different investor journeys: the individual owner who typically manages a few properties, and the professional operator who uses a company structure to scale into larger portfolios.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity in Rogers County is heavily concentrated in the 74017 zip code, which holds 1,413 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals significant concentration of investor assets within Rogers County. The 74017 zip code is the epicenter of investor ownership by volume, containing 1,413 properties, which is 41.9% of all investor-owned SFRs in the county.

A distinction exists between the areas with the most properties and those with the highest market penetration. While 74017 leads in sheer count, the 74016 zip code has the highest investor ownership rate at 23.6%, meaning nearly one in four homes there is investor-owned.

Following 74017, other key areas for investor activity by count include 74019 (573 properties), 74055 (423 properties), and 74016 (241 properties). Together, the top three zip codes by count hold over 70% of all investor properties.

The zip codes with the highest rates of ownership are 74016 (23.6%), 74017 (17.6%), and 74116 (15.9%). This indicates these neighborhoods are particularly attractive for rental strategies.

A detailed property search of these specific zip codes could reveal the property characteristics that make them prime targets for investment, whether it's price point, school district, or proximity to amenities.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
The landlord market shifted from being net buyers in 2025 (net +50 properties) to net sellers in Q1 2026 (net -4 properties).
Detailed Findings

A notable market shift occurred in early 2026 as landlords in Rogers County collectively became net sellers for the first time in recent years. In Q1 2026, they sold 26 properties while buying only 22, resulting in a net disposition of 4 properties.

This marks a reversal of a strong buying trend. In 2024, landlords were aggressive net buyers with a net acquisition of 139 properties, a figure that moderated to a net of 50 properties in 2025 before turning negative.

Institutional investors (1000+ tier) signaled this cooling trend earlier than the rest of the market. After being net buyers in 2024 (net +8), they became net sellers in 2025, offloading a net of 1 property. Their activity remained muted in Q1 2026.

The overall pace of acquisitions has been declining steadily. The 269 properties purchased by landlords in 2024 dropped by 39% to 164 properties in 2025, and Q1 2026's activity (22 buys) suggests the slowdown is continuing.

This transition from aggressive acquisition to net selling indicates a potential market peak or a strategic decision by investors to realize gains made during the 2020-2023 appreciation period.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords participated in just 5.2% of all market transactions in Q1 2026, with 22 transactions out of a total of 425.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, investor transaction activity was minimal, comprising only 22 of the 425 total SFR transactions in Rogers County. This 5.2% share underscores that the market was overwhelmingly driven by non-investor participants during the quarter.

The entirety of Q1 investor activity came from smaller players. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) accounted for 20 of the 22 transactions, with zero activity recorded from institutional investors in the 1000+ property tier.

First-time or single-property investors were the most active segment, responsible for 17 transactions. Their average purchase price was $177,288, slightly higher than the $160,116 paid by landlords in the 3-5 property tier, suggesting they may be less price-sensitive or buying higher-quality assets.

Inter-landlord trading was present but limited. Of the 17 transactions by single-property landlords, 2 (11.8%) were purchased from another landlord. The two-property tier showed a 100% reliance on this channel, though this was based on a single transaction.

The combination of low market share and a complete absence of institutional activity suggests a cautious or opportunistic stance from investors in Q1, focusing on specific deals rather than broad market acquisition.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small Landlords Dominate Rogers County with 87.8% Ownership as Market Cools with Net Selling Activity in Q1 2026
Holdings
Landlords own 3,374 SFR properties, representing 11.9% of the Rogers County market. Ownership is dominated by individuals, who hold 2,356 properties (69.8%), while companies own the remaining 1,075 (31.9%).
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords paid an average of $171,054, securing a massive 50.2% discount compared to traditional homeowners ($343,646), a price gap of $172,592 per property.
Activity
Landlord purchase activity was modest, capturing 6.0% of all sales in Q4 2025. This activity was driven by new entrants, with 17 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
The investor market is controlled by small operators, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) own 87.8% of investor housing. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+) hold a minimal 1.0% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios starting at the 6-10 property tier, where they control 55.8% of assets.
Transactions
The market shifted in Q1 2026 as landlords became net sellers (22 buys vs 26 sells) for the first time in recent years. Institutional investors had already become net sellers in 2025.
Market Narrative

This Investor Pulse report for Rogers County reveals a housing market shaped not by large corporations, but by local, small-scale investors. Landlords own 3,374 single-family residential properties, or 11.9% of the total market. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who hold an 87.8% share, while institutional firms with over 1,000 properties own a mere 1.0%. The ownership base itself is comprised mainly of individuals (69.8%) rather than companies (31.9%), reinforcing the grassroots nature of the local rental market.

Investor behavior in early 2026 signals a significant market shift. After years of being strong net buyers, landlords became net sellers in Q1 (22 buys vs. 26 sells), suggesting a period of profit-taking or a reaction to changing market conditions. During the same period, those who were buying did so with a keen eye for value, securing an extraordinary 50.2% price discount compared to traditional homeowners ($171,054 vs. $343,646). This indicates a strategic focus on distressed or undervalued assets as the broader market remains expensive for typical buyers.

The key takeaway for Rogers County is that its rental housing is supplied by a fragmented network of small, independent landlords who are currently adapting to a cooling market. The absence of institutional buyers, coupled with a pivot to net selling and deep-discount acquisitions by a few active players, points to a mature market where organic, local-level activity dictates investment trends. This dynamic provides stability but also suggests that future growth will be cautious and opportunity-driven rather than speculative.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 01:22 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Rogers (OK)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Rogers (OK) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ok-rogers/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.