Hancock (IL) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Hancock (IL) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Hancock (IL)
6,394
Total Investors in Hancock (IL)
962
Investor Owned SFR in Hancock (IL)
816(12.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
908
SFR Owned
766
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
54
SFR Owned
63
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 816 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Hancock County with 99.2% Ownership, Buying at a 29% Discount
Investors own 816 SFR properties in Hancock County, IL, representing 12.8% of the market. This ownership is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (99.2%), with individuals holding 93.9% of the portfolio. In Q1 2026, these investors purchased properties for 29.0% less than traditional homeowners and remain strong net buyers while institutional investors are entirely absent from the market.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individuals own 93.9% of the 816 investor-held properties in Hancock County.
The investor market is overwhelmingly cash-based, with 801 properties owned outright versus only 15 being financed. Of the 816 investor properties, 779 are confirmed rentals, indicating a 95.5% focus on non-owner-occupied strategies.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords in Q1 2026 paid 29.0% less than homeowners, a $33,334 average discount.
The price advantage for landlords fluctuates significantly, having been as high as a 41.5% discount ($45,831) in Q3 2025. Landlord acquisition prices have remained relatively flat, with the Q1 2026 average of $81,800 closely mirroring the 2020-2023 average of $80,242.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 17.6% of all SFR properties sold in the last quarter.
Mom-and-pop landlords drove nearly all activity, accounting for 8 of the 9 investor purchases (88.9%). Institutional investors made zero acquisitions, while 10 new single-property landlords entered the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 99.2% of investor-owned SFRs.
Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible presence, owning just 1 property, or 0.1% of the investor-owned market. The single largest group is first-time landlords, with the single-property tier alone accounting for 68.4% of all investor housing.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate ownership across every portfolio size tier.
There is no crossover point where companies become the majority owners; even in the 6-10 property tier, individuals own 50 of 51 properties (98.0%). Company ownership is most prominent in the 2-property tier, yet still only accounts for 11.8% of properties.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is concentrated in the 62321 zip code, which holds 167 investor-owned homes.
The top 5 zip codes by property count contain 58.8% of all investor-owned SFRs, indicating significant geographic clustering. However, the areas with the highest investor penetration rates, like 62326 at 33.3%, are smaller markets and differ from the volume leaders.
Historical Transactions
Landlords remain aggressive net buyers, acquiring 2.75 properties for every 1 sold in Q1 2026.
This net-buyer trend is consistent, with landlords adding a net 21 properties in 2025 and 33 in 2024. Institutional investors (1000+ tier) are completely dormant, with zero buy or sell transactions recorded in any recent period.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords participated in 16.2% of all Q1 property transactions, acquiring 11 homes.
New, single-property landlords drove the market, accounting for 10 of the 11 investor transactions at an average price of $81,800. Critically, 100% of these investor purchases were from the open market, with zero properties acquired from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individuals own 93.9% of the 816 investor-held properties in Hancock County.
Detailed Findings

In Hancock County, investors own 816 Single-Family Residential properties, which constitutes 12.8% of the total 6,394 SFRs. This signifies a moderate but notable investor presence in the local housing market.

Ownership is overwhelmingly dominated by individuals rather than companies. Individual landlords hold 766 properties, a commanding 93.9% of the investor portfolio, compared to just 63 properties (7.7%) owned by companies.

The landlord landscape is similarly skewed, with 908 individual landlords making up the vast majority of the 962 total investors. This ratio underscores that the market is driven by small-scale, local players, not large corporations.

A striking financial characteristic of this market is its reliance on cash. An overwhelming 801 investor-owned properties were acquired with cash, while only 15 are currently financed, revealing a low-leverage, high-equity investment environment.

The portfolio is heavily focused on rental income, with 779 of the 816 properties being rented out. This 95.5% rental rate confirms that the primary strategy for investors in Hancock County is providing long-term housing rather than short-term speculation.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords in Q1 2026 paid 29.0% less than homeowners, a $33,334 average discount.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Hancock County demonstrate a consistent ability to acquire properties at a significant discount compared to traditional homeowners. In the first quarter of 2026, landlords paid an average of $81,800, which is 29.0% less than the $115,134 paid by homeowners, representing a substantial $33,334 price advantage per property.

This price gap, while significant, has shown considerable volatility over the past year. The discount peaked in Q3 2025 when landlords paid 41.5% less ($64,591 vs. $110,422), a staggering $45,831 difference. This suggests that investors are highly opportunistic, capitalizing on market conditions to secure favorable prices.

Acquisition prices for landlords have remained remarkably stable since the pandemic-era boom. The Q1 2026 average price of $81,800 is only slightly above the average of $80,242 recorded between 2020 and 2023, indicating minimal price appreciation for investor-targeted assets in the recent period.

Comparing across quarters reveals a dynamic negotiation landscape. The 29.0% discount in Q1 2026 is a marked increase from the 20.3% discount seen in Q1 2025, suggesting that the buying advantage for investors has strengthened over the past year.

This persistent pricing advantage highlights a key operational strength of local investors, who likely leverage market knowledge, cash offers, and deal-sourcing strategies to purchase properties well below the typical market rate for retail homebuyers.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 17.6% of all SFR properties sold in the last quarter.
Detailed Findings

In the fourth quarter of 2025, investor activity accounted for 17.6% of all SFR sales in Hancock County, with landlords acquiring 9 of the 51 properties sold. This share indicates a steady and significant, but not dominant, level of purchasing from the investor community.

The acquisition activity was almost entirely driven by the smallest investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) were responsible for 8 of the 9 purchases, representing 88.9% of all investor buying. This highlights the grassroots nature of market activity.

New entrants are a key feature of the current market. Ten new landlord entities, each purchasing their first property, accounted for 8 of the 9 total acquisitions. This signals a healthy influx of new, small-scale participants in the local rental market.

In stark contrast, large-scale and institutional investors (owning 1000+ properties) were completely absent from the purchasing landscape, making zero acquisitions in the quarter. This reinforces the narrative of a market dominated by local players.

The data reveals that the engine of real estate investing in Hancock County is not institutional capital but rather the continual formation of new, single-property landlords building their portfolios from the ground up.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 99.2% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure in Hancock County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1 to 10 properties, control 99.2% of all investor-owned SFRs, a near-total market saturation.

This finding decisively challenges the narrative of corporate landlord dominance. Institutional investors with portfolios of over 1,000 properties have a virtually nonexistent footprint, holding just a single property which represents only 0.1% of the investor market.

The foundation of the investor market is built on entry-level participants. Landlords owning just one property (Tier 01) represent the largest single cohort, holding 582 properties, or 68.4% of the entire investor-owned portfolio.

As portfolio sizes increase, the number of properties drops off sharply. The combined mid-size and large tiers (11+ properties) collectively own less than 1% of the investor-held housing stock, further cementing the market's small-scale character.

This distribution reveals a highly fragmented and decentralized rental market where the vast majority of rental housing is provided by local, small-portfolio individuals rather than large, consolidated entities.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate ownership across every portfolio size tier.
Detailed Findings

In Hancock County, individual investors maintain majority control across every single investor tier, from single-property owners to the largest local portfolios. This pattern indicates a market structure fundamentally built on personal ownership rather than corporate investment vehicles.

Unlike in larger metro areas, there is no discernible crossover point where company ownership surpasses individual ownership. In fact, company presence remains minimal even as portfolio sizes grow. For example, in the 6-10 property tier, individuals own 50 of the 51 properties (98.0%).

The highest concentration of company-owned properties is found in the two-property tier, where they hold 10 properties, representing just 11.8% of that segment. This suggests that even when investors begin to scale, they predominantly do so under personal names.

For single-property landlords, the split is 93.9% individual (554 properties) to 6.1% company (36 properties), setting the tone for the rest of the market. This structure points to a preference for simplicity and direct control among local landlords.

The data clearly shows that the path to building a rental portfolio in Hancock County is one followed by individuals, with corporate structures being a niche strategy rather than a standard practice for growth.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is concentrated in the 62321 zip code, which holds 167 investor-owned homes.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals a high concentration of investor ownership within a few key areas of Hancock County. The zip code 62321 is the epicenter of activity, with 167 investor-owned properties, the highest raw count in the county.

A small number of zip codes account for a majority of the investment portfolio. The top five areas by count (62321, 62341, 61450, 62330, and 62311) collectively hold 480 properties, representing 58.8% of all investor-owned SFRs in the county.

A key finding emerges when contrasting property counts with ownership rates. The zip codes with the highest percentage of investor ownership are not the same as those with the highest volume. For instance, 62326 has the highest penetration at 33.3%, while the volume leader 62321 has a more modest rate of 12.1%.

This distinction highlights different investment dynamics. High-volume areas like 62321 and 62341 represent larger, more established rental markets, while high-percentage areas like 62326 and 62374 (21.1%) indicate smaller communities with a greater saturation of rental properties.

This analysis, based on detailed assessor data, shows that investors are not evenly distributed but instead focus their capital in specific sub-markets, creating pockets of high rental density.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords remain aggressive net buyers, acquiring 2.75 properties for every 1 sold in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Transaction data reveals that Hancock County landlords are consistently in an accumulation phase. In the first quarter of 2026, they demonstrated a strong net-buyer position, purchasing 11 properties while selling only 4, a buy-to-sell ratio of 2.75x.

This pattern of portfolio growth is not a recent phenomenon. Throughout 2025, investors were also net buyers, with 35 acquisitions against 14 dispositions for a net gain of 21 properties. The trend was even stronger in 2024, which saw a net increase of 33 properties (49 buys vs. 16 sells).

Institutional investors are entirely absent from the transaction market. The data shows zero purchases and zero sales for the 1000+ property tier across all timeframes, indicating that large-scale capital is neither entering nor exiting Hancock County.

The consistent net-positive acquisition trend among local landlords signals strong confidence in the local rental market. They are actively expanding their holdings rather than liquidating assets.

This transactional behavior reinforces the market's overall character: one driven by local investors steadily building their portfolios over time, with no influence from large, institutional players who might otherwise introduce market volatility.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords participated in 16.2% of all Q1 property transactions, acquiring 11 homes.
Detailed Findings

In the first quarter of 2026, landlords were a significant force in the market, involved in 16.2% of all SFR transactions. They completed 11 purchases out of a total of 68 county-wide sales during this period.

Activity was almost exclusively concentrated at the entry level of the market. Investors purchasing their first property (Tier 01) were responsible for 10 of the 11 total landlord transactions, underscoring the importance of new market entrants.

These new landlords acquired properties at an average price of $81,800. This price point, significantly below the average homeowner price, suggests they are targeting a specific segment of affordable housing stock for their initial investments.

A crucial finding is the source of these acquisitions. None of the 11 properties purchased by investors in Q1 were bought from other landlords. This 0% inter-landlord transaction rate indicates that investors are acquiring their inventory from traditional homeowners, not from an internal investor-to-investor marketplace.

This transactional behavior shows a market where investors are expanding the total rental pool by converting owner-occupied housing, rather than simply trading existing rental assets among themselves.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Hancock County's housing market is defined by local investors, who control 99.2% of rentals and buy at a 29% discount.
Holdings
Landlords own 816 SFR properties, representing 12.8% of Hancock County's market, with individual investors overwhelmingly holding 766 of these homes (93.9%) compared to companies' 63 (7.7%).
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords paid an average of $81,800, securing a 29.0% discount compared to the $115,134 paid by traditional homeowners, a savings of $33,334 per property.
Activity
Landlords purchased 17.6% of homes sold last quarter, with activity dominated by new entrants as 10 new single-property landlords entered the market, accounting for 88.9% of investor buys.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) have near-total control of the market with 99.2% of investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+) own just 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the dominant force across all portfolio sizes, with companies failing to achieve majority ownership in any tier and holding only 7.7% of the total investor portfolio.
Transactions
Investors are strong net buyers with a 2.75x buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 (11 buys vs 4 sells), while institutional investors are completely inactive with zero recorded transactions.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Hancock County, IL, is a definitive portrait of a market powered by local, individual participants. Investors control 816 single-family homes, or 12.8% of the total market, a significant but not dominant share. The structure of this ownership base is the key story: 93.9% of these properties are held by individual investors, not corporations. This is further reflected in the tier distribution, where mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 99.2% of the investor-owned housing stock, while institutional capital is functionally nonexistent with a 0.1% share. This market dynamic, detailed in our Investor Pulse reports, illustrates a highly fragmented and community-based rental ecosystem.

Investor behavior in Hancock County is characterized by strategic acquisitions and consistent portfolio growth. In Q1 2026, landlords showcased their market savvy by purchasing homes at an average price of $81,800, a remarkable 29.0% discount compared to the $115,134 paid by traditional homeowners. This activity is largely fueled by new entrants, with 10 new single-property landlords joining the market in the last quarter. Transactionally, investors are firmly in an accumulation phase, operating as strong net buyers with a 2.75-to-1 buy/sell ratio in Q1. All of this activity occurs without any participation from institutional investors, who remain completely dormant on both the buy and sell sides.

The primary takeaway for Hancock County is that its rental market is stable, localized, and growing organically through the efforts of small-scale investors. The absence of institutional players insulates it from the volatility of large-scale capital flows, while the consistent entry of new landlords ensures a steady supply of rental housing. These investors are not trading assets among themselves but are actively acquiring properties from the general market, converting them into rental units. This creates a resilient market structure dependent on the financial health and strategic decisions of hundreds of individual community stakeholders rather than a handful of corporate boardrooms.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 04:06 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Hancock (IL)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Hancock (IL) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-il-hancock/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.