Yamhill (OR) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Yamhill (OR) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Yamhill (OR)
20,947
Total Investors in Yamhill (OR)
5,804
Investor Owned SFR in Yamhill (OR)
4,284(20.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
5,049
SFR Owned
3,574
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
755
SFR Owned
914
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 4,284 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Yamhill County with 96% Ownership, Securing Major Discounts
Investors own 21.4% of single-family homes in Yamhill County, with individual investors overwhelmingly controlling the market. In the most recent quarter, landlords purchased 20.6% of all homes sold, paying an average of 16.4% less than traditional homeowners. While landlords overall are strong net buyers, institutional activity remains minimal, underscoring the market's reliance on small-scale investors.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 4,488 homes in Yamhill County, with individuals holding 79.6% of the portfolio.
Of these properties, 2,506 were purchased with cash, compared to 1,778 that are financed. The portfolio is heavily focused on rentals, with 4,203 properties (93.6%) classified as rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured a 16.4% discount in Q1 2026, paying $82,013 less than homeowners on average.
This marks a significant reversal from mid-2025, when landlords were paying premiums of up to 4.0% over homeowners. The Q1 2026 landlord acquisition price of $418,937 is also lower than the average price during the 2020-2023 pandemic boom ($440,759).
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 20.6% of all single-family homes sold in Yamhill County in Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) drove this activity, accounting for 84.1% of all landlord purchases. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) made up just 4.5% of landlord acquisitions.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 96.4% of investor-owned homes.
Institutional investors (1000+ properties) own just 0.4%, or 20 homes, in the entire county. During Q1 transactions, these large institutions actually paid 10.8% more per property than first-time single-property landlords.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners once a portfolio size exceeds 6-10 properties.
While individuals own 86.5% of single-property portfolios, companies control 84.3% of portfolios in the 11-20 property range. Data was not available to compare acquisition prices between individuals and companies.
Geographic Distribution
The highest volume of investor-owned homes is in zip codes 97128 (1,537) and 97132 (1,042).
However, the highest concentration rates are elsewhere, with zip codes 97101 (54.2%), 97304 (50.0%), and 97140 (50.0%) showing the deepest investor penetration. This shows that high-volume areas are not the same as high-concentration areas.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Yamhill County are strong net buyers, acquiring 4.5 properties for every 1 they sold in Q1 2026.
This trend is consistent over time, with a 5.5x buy/sell ratio in 2025 and 6.2x in 2024. Institutional investors are also net buyers, though their activity is minimal, with 2 purchases and 1 sale in Q1.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 17.9% of all home transactions in Q1 2026, purchasing 54 properties.
Notably, institutional investors paid 10.8% more per home ($520,612) than first-time landlords ($469,800). Zero percent of these landlord purchases came from other investors, indicating all acquisitions were from the general market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 4,488 homes in Yamhill County, with individuals holding 79.6% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

In Yamhill County, investors hold a significant 21.4% of the single-family residential market, totaling 4,488 properties out of 20,947 total homes.

The market is defined by small-scale ownership, as individual investors own 3,574 properties, or 79.6% of the investor-owned housing stock, while companies own the remaining 914 properties (20.4%).

This individual dominance extends to the entity level, where 5,049 individual landlords operate, compared to just 755 company entities. This 6.7-to-1 ratio highlights the granular nature of real estate investing in the region.

Investment strategy appears to favor liquidity, with cash purchases (2,506 properties) outnumbering financed ones (1,778 properties). This suggests that many investors are operating without leverage.

The portfolio is clearly business-focused, with 4,203 of the 4,488 properties being rented, confirming that the vast majority of these holdings are actively used as rental units rather than secondary homes.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured a 16.4% discount in Q1 2026, paying $82,013 less than homeowners on average.
Detailed Findings

In a notable market shift, landlords in Yamhill County paid an average price of $418,937 in Q1 2026, which is 16.4% less than the $500,950 paid by traditional homeowners. This equates to a significant discount of $82,013 per property.

This discount represents a sharp reversal of recent trends. In Q2 and Q3 of 2025, landlords were paying premiums of 4.0% and 2.0% respectively, indicating a substantial change in purchasing power or strategy at the start of 2026.

The acquisition price for landlords in Q1 2026 is also below the average of the 2020-2023 period ($440,759), suggesting that recent acquisitions are happening at prices lower than those seen during the peak of the market frenzy.

While landlords demonstrated strong pricing advantages in the latest quarter, their purchasing activity was limited, with zero properties recorded as purchased across all of 2024 and 2025 in this dataset, followed by activity in Q1 2026.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 20.6% of all single-family homes sold in Yamhill County in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for 20.6% of the Yamhill County market in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 43 of the 209 total SFR properties sold.

The backbone of this purchasing activity was small landlords. Mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04) acquired 37 properties, representing a commanding 84.1% of all landlord purchases during the quarter.

New market entrants were a significant force, with 37 new single-property landlord entities acquiring 27 homes, signaling a healthy influx of first-time investors.

Mid-size landlords (11-1000 properties) also participated, purchasing 5 properties and making up 11.4% of the quarter's investor activity.

At the top end of the market, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties had a minimal impact, purchasing only 2 properties, which accounted for just 4.5% of landlord acquisitions.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 96.4% of investor-owned homes.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure in Yamhill County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale investors. Landlords with portfolios of 1-10 properties (mom-and-pops) own 96.4% of all investor-held single-family homes.

Single-property landlords alone (Tier 01) make up the largest segment, holding 3,445 properties, which is 77.3% of the entire investor market. This highlights the deeply fragmented nature of rental ownership.

In stark contrast, institutional investors with 1,000 or more properties have a negligible footprint, controlling just 20 homes, or 0.4% of the investor-owned stock. This challenges the narrative of large corporate dominance in the local market.

Analysis of recent transactions further reveals that size does not equate to better pricing. In Q1, the largest institutional buyers paid an average of $520,612 per property, while the smallest single-property landlords paid only $469,800.

This data confirms that the rental market in Yamhill County is supported by a broad base of local, small investors, with comprehensive property datasets revealing a market structure far from corporate consolidation.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners once a portfolio size exceeds 6-10 properties.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the foundation of the market, holding the vast majority of properties in smaller portfolios. They own 86.5% of single-property holdings and 73.3% of two-property portfolios.

A clear transition point occurs as portfolios grow. In the 6-10 property tier, ownership is nearly split, but companies emerge as the slight majority, holding 51.3% of properties compared to 48.7% for individuals.

Beyond this crossover point, company ownership rapidly accelerates. In the 11-20 property tier, companies control a commanding 84.3% of homes, indicating a strategic shift to corporate structures for managing larger portfolios.

This pattern suggests that while individuals are crucial for market entry and small-scale operations, professionalization and incorporation become standard as investment scales. This can be verified by analyzing detailed assessor data on owner names and types.

The largest investors in the market, those holding 1000+ properties, operate exclusively as companies, cementing the trend of corporate structures for large-scale real estate investment.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The highest volume of investor-owned homes is in zip codes 97128 (1,537) and 97132 (1,042).
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Yamhill County shows significant geographic concentration by property count. The zip code 97128 is the clear leader with 1,537 investor-owned properties, followed by 97132 with 1,042 properties.

However, the areas with the highest investor ownership rates are different from the volume leaders. Zip code 97101 has the highest concentration, with investors owning 54.2% of the housing stock, followed by 97304 and 97140, both at 50.0%.

This divergence indicates different market dynamics. While areas like 97128 may offer more total opportunities (18.8% investor rate), smaller zip codes like 97101 are more heavily saturated with investment properties.

The top five zip codes by count, including 97128, 97132, 97111, 97378, account for a substantial portion of the county's total investor-owned homes, making them key submarkets to watch.

Understanding these regional nuances through detailed market reports is crucial for identifying whether opportunities lie in large, moderately saturated markets or smaller, highly concentrated ones.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Yamhill County are strong net buyers, acquiring 4.5 properties for every 1 they sold in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Yamhill County are consistently in an accumulation phase, demonstrating a strong net-buyer position over the past several years. In Q1 2026, they purchased 54 properties while selling only 12, a ratio of 4.5 to 1.

This behavior is part of a longer-term trend of portfolio growth. In 2025, landlords bought 296 properties and sold 54 (a 5.5x ratio), and in 2024 they bought 305 and sold 49 (a 6.2x ratio).

Even the largest institutional investors (1000+ tier) are expanding their holdings, albeit on a much smaller scale. In Q1 2026, they were net buyers with 2 acquisitions and 1 sale.

The consistent, high buy-to-sell ratio across the entire investor market signals strong confidence in the Yamhill County single-family rental sector. It suggests investors are focused on long-term holds rather than short-term flips.

These findings, often highlighted in Investor Pulse reports, indicate a stable and growing rental market, with existing landlords expanding their portfolios rather than exiting.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 17.9% of all home transactions in Q1 2026, purchasing 54 properties.
Detailed Findings

In the first quarter of 2026, investors participated in 54 of the 302 total single-family home transactions in Yamhill County, capturing a 17.9% market share of activity.

A surprising pricing dynamic emerged among investor tiers. The smallest investors, single-property landlords, paid an average of $469,800, while the largest institutional buyers paid $520,612, a 10.8% premium. This suggests smaller buyers are finding better deals.

The price for mid-size landlords varied, with some of the lowest prices paid by those in the 21-50 property tier, who averaged just $157,500. This could be due to acquiring distressed or lower-value properties, which an automated valuation (AVM) could help clarify.

A critical finding from the quarter is the source of inventory. None of the 54 properties purchased by investors were acquired from other landlords. This 0% landlord-to-landlord transaction rate indicates that investors are sourcing properties from homeowners or new construction, not from portfolio churning within the investor community.

This lack of inter-investor trading suggests a market focused on fresh inventory and portfolio expansion rather than exchanging existing rental assets.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop investors own 96% of Yamhill County's rental homes and secure 16% discounts over homeowners.
Holdings
Landlords own 4,488 single-family properties in Yamhill County, representing 21.4% of the market. Individual investors are the dominant force, holding 79.6% of these properties, while companies own the remaining 20.4%.
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords achieved a significant 16.4% price advantage over traditional homeowners, paying an average of $418,937 compared to $500,950, a discount of $82,013 per home.
Activity
Investors purchased 20.6% of homes sold in the last quarter of 2025, with 37 new single-property landlord entities entering the market. Mom-and-pop investors drove 84.1% of this activity.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the market, owning 96.4% of all investor-held homes. In contrast, large institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a minimal 0.4% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners once a portfolio grows to the 6-10 property tier, signaling a shift to corporate structures for larger-scale investment.
Transactions
Investors are strong net buyers, with a 4.5-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 2026 (54 buys vs. 12 sells). Institutional investors are also in an accumulation phase, registering as net buyers.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Yamhill County, OR is fundamentally shaped by small, individual investors, not large corporations. These landlords own 4,488 homes, making up 21.4% of the county's total single-family housing stock. Ownership is highly fragmented; individual investors hold 79.6% of these properties, and 'mom-and-pop' landlords with 1-10 homes control a staggering 96.4% of the investor market. In stark contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have a negligible presence, owning just 0.4% of the rental inventory. This structure challenges the common narrative of Wall Street's dominance and points to a market built on local, small-scale enterprise, a trend seen in many detailed property ownership by owner type report analyses.

Investor behavior in the most recent quarters reveals both savvy and strength. In Q1 2026, landlords secured a remarkable 16.4% discount compared to traditional homeowners, a sharp reversal from mid-2025 when they were paying premiums. This suggests a disciplined purchasing strategy. They remain in a strong accumulation phase, buying 4.5 homes for every one they sell. This activity is fueled by new entrants, with 37 new single-property landlords joining the market in the last recorded quarter. Interestingly, these smaller investors are achieving better prices than their institutional counterparts, who paid nearly 11% more for acquisitions in Q1.

The key takeaway for the Yamhill County housing market is its stability and reliance on a broad base of local capital. The market is not driven by the buy-sell churn of large proptech platforms but by a long-term, buy-and-hold strategy executed by thousands of individual owners. The lack of landlord-to-landlord transactions indicates that growth comes from acquiring properties from the general market, not from portfolio trading. This dynamic suggests a mature rental market where small investors provide a consistent and significant portion of the housing supply, operating with a clear financial advantage over other buyers.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 01:38 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Yamhill (OR)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Yamhill (OR) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-or-yamhill/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.