Marion (OR) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Marion (OR) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Marion (OR)
78,927
Total Investors in Marion (OR)
11,842
Investor Owned SFR in Marion (OR)
9,025(11.4%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
10,476
SFR Owned
7,741
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
1,366
SFR Owned
1,852
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 9,025 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Marion County's Market While Institutions Retreat as Net Sellers
In Marion County, investors own 9,025 SFR properties, representing 11.4% of the market. Small landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 97.0% of this portfolio, while institutional investors hold a mere 0.4%. In Q1, landlords secured properties at an 8.7% discount compared to homeowners, but while the overall market saw investors as strong net buyers, institutional players were net sellers, divesting their local holdings.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 9,025 SFRs in Marion County, with individual landlords holding a dominant 85.8% share.
The investor portfolio is nearly evenly split between cash (4,651 properties) and financed acquisitions (4,374 properties). An overwhelming majority of investor-held properties (8,612) are classified as rented, confirming their use as investment assets.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q1 2026, Marion County landlords paid 8.7% less than homeowners, a discount of $41,759 per property.
The landlord purchasing discount has widened dramatically, jumping from just 0.9% in Q2 2025 to 8.7% in Q1 2026. This trend suggests landlords are finding better deals in the current market. The data does not differentiate pricing between individual and company landlords.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 22.9% of all Marion County SFRs sold in Q4 2025, purchasing 149 properties.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) dominated Q4 activity, accounting for 89.8% of all investor purchases. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) made up just 0.6% of acquisitions, buying a single property.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords in Marion County control a staggering 97.0% of all investor-owned SFRs.
The institutional investor footprint is minimal, with the 1000+ property tier owning just 35 homes, or 0.4% of the investor-owned market. Single-property landlords alone make up the largest segment, holding 6,953 properties (73.8%).
Ownership by Tier & Type
In Marion County, companies become the majority owners at the 11-20 property tier, holding 90.8% of homes.
Individual landlords dominate smaller portfolios, owning 87.7% of single-property investments and 76.8% of two-property portfolios. The shift to corporate structures happens as portfolios scale, with individuals owning just 9.2% of properties in the 11-20 tier.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity in Marion County is concentrated in Salem's 97301 zip code, with 1,632 properties.
While 97301 has the highest count, the 97342 zip code has the highest penetration rate, with 51.0% of all homes being investor-owned. The top five zip codes by count all have investor ownership rates between 10.1% and 13.8%.
Historical Transactions
While landlords are strong net buyers in Marion County, institutional investors are actively selling, with a net loss of 4 properties in Q1 2026.
Overall, landlords bought 199 properties and sold only 46 in Q1 2026, showing strong market accumulation. This trend is consistent, with 919 buys vs 218 sells in 2025. In contrast, institutional investors sold 5 properties while buying only 1 in Q1.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 21.0% of all Marion County SFR transactions in Q1 2026, totaling 199 purchases.
A massive price gap emerged between tiers: single-property landlords paid an average of $472,209, while the lone institutional buyer paid just $246,267, a 47.8% difference. New landlords sourced only 8.0% of their properties from other investors.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 9,025 SFRs in Marion County, with individual landlords holding a dominant 85.8% share.
Detailed Findings

In Marion County, investors hold a significant 9,025 single-family residential properties, making up 11.4% of the total 78,927 SFRs in the market. This establishes a notable footprint for real estate investing activity in the region.

Individual investors are the primary force, owning 7,741 properties or 85.8% of the investor portfolio. In contrast, company-owned holdings total 1,852 properties (20.5%), highlighting the market's reliance on smaller, non-corporate landlords.

The ownership structure is supported by 11,842 distinct landlord entities, of which 10,476 are individuals and 1,366 are companies. This 7.7-to-1 ratio of individual-to-company landlords underscores the granular nature of the rental market.

Financing strategies among investors are almost perfectly balanced. Of the total portfolio, 4,651 properties are owned outright (cash), while a nearly equal 4,374 properties are financed, indicating a diverse approach to capital allocation.

The investment focus is clear, with 8,612 properties identified as rented. This demonstrates that the vast majority of the 9,025 investor-owned homes are actively serving as rental housing for the community.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q1 2026, Marion County landlords paid 8.7% less than homeowners, a discount of $41,759 per property.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Marion County demonstrated a strong pricing advantage in Q1 2026, acquiring properties for an average of $438,401. This is a significant 8.7% less than the $480,160 paid by traditional homeowners, translating to a direct savings of $41,759 per transaction.

The price gap between landlords and homeowners has expanded significantly over the past year. The Q1 2026 discount of 8.7% marks a substantial increase from the minimal 0.9% discount observed in Q2 2025, when landlords paid $497,438 versus the homeowner price of $502,036.

This widening discount suggests that market conditions are becoming more favorable for investors, who may be capitalizing on opportunities not available to or sought by traditional buyers. The trend moved from a $4,598 gap in Q2 2025 to a $41,759 gap in Q1 2026.

While recent prices show a dip in Q1 2026, the long-term trend reflects significant appreciation. The pandemic-era (2020-2023) average acquisition price of $410,490 has risen to an average of $475,955 in 2024, indicating robust market growth over the period.

Across all recent quarters, investors have consistently paid less than homeowners, pointing to a persistent strategic advantage, whether through negotiating power, access to off-market deals, or targeting different types of properties.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 22.9% of all Marion County SFRs sold in Q4 2025, purchasing 149 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for 22.9% of the Marion County market in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing 149 of the 652 total SFRs sold. This demonstrates that more than one in five homes sold during the quarter were acquired for investment purposes.

The backbone of this activity is new and small-scale investors. The single-property tier alone purchased 105 properties (66.9% of the landlord total), driven by 136 new entities entering the market, signaling a healthy influx of first-time landlords.

Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04), were responsible for 141 of the 149 investor purchases. This represents an overwhelming 89.8% share of acquisition activity, confirming their role as the primary drivers of the rental market.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) had a negligible impact on the market, acquiring just one property, which amounts to only 0.6% of all landlord purchases for the quarter.

Mid-size landlords (11-1000 properties) also played a minor role, collectively purchasing only 18 properties. The data clearly shows that Q4 2025 acquisition volume was almost entirely concentrated in the smallest investor tiers.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords in Marion County control a staggering 97.0% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Marion County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) control 97.0% of all investor-held SFRs, a figure that challenges the narrative of large corporate ownership.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the largest single bloc, owning 6,953 properties. This accounts for 73.8% of the entire investor-owned housing stock, highlighting the critical role of first-time and small investors.

In total, the four mom-and-pop tiers (Tiers 01-04) collectively own 9,132 properties. This concentration at the smaller end of the market underscores a highly fragmented ownership base rather than a consolidated one.

Conversely, institutional investors with portfolios exceeding 1,000 properties have a very small presence, owning just 35 properties in Marion County. This represents a mere 0.4% of the investor market, indicating they are not a significant factor in local housing.

Mid-size landlords (11-1000 properties) also hold a small fraction of the market, collectively owning 282 properties, or just 3.0% of the investor portfolio. The ownership structure is clearly and decisively weighted toward individuals and small businesses. This kind of detailed breakdown is available in our property ownership by owner type report.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
In Marion County, companies become the majority owners at the 11-20 property tier, holding 90.8% of homes.
Detailed Findings

Ownership structure in Marion County shows a clear divergence based on portfolio size. While individual investors command the overall market, companies become the dominant owners in larger portfolios, a transition that crystallizes in the 11-20 property tier.

At the smallest scale, individuals are preeminent. They own 6,417 (87.7%) of single-property investments and 633 (76.8%) of two-property portfolios. This demonstrates that the entry-level of the market is primarily driven by personal investment.

The crossover point where ownership strategy shifts occurs as portfolios grow. In the 6-10 property tier, ownership is nearly split, with individuals holding 54.8% and companies holding 45.2%.

Beyond ten properties, corporate structures take over decisively. In the 11-20 property tier, companies own 119 properties, a commanding 90.8% share, while individuals own just 12 properties (9.2%). This suggests a professionalization of operations as scale increases.

This pattern reveals a lifecycle of real estate investor activity: individuals initiate and build small portfolios, but scaling beyond 10 properties typically involves forming a corporate entity for management and liability purposes.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity in Marion County is concentrated in Salem's 97301 zip code, with 1,632 properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis of Marion County reveals specific pockets of high investor concentration. The 97301 zip code in Salem is the epicenter of activity by volume, containing 1,632 investor-owned properties, which constitutes 13.8% of its housing stock.

Following 97301, other Salem-area zip codes like 97302 (1,225 properties), 97303 (1,093 properties), and 97306 (937 properties) show the highest counts of investor ownership. This points to a clear focus on the urban core of the county.

However, the highest concentration rate is found outside the core, in the 97342 zip code, where an astonishing 51.0% of homes are investor-owned. This indicates a very different market dynamic, likely driven by a high proportion of rental properties or vacation homes.

Other areas with high investor penetration include 97350 (44.4%), 97346 (30.5%), and 97360 (30.2%). These regions, while having fewer total investor properties, represent markets where investors have an outsized presence relative to traditional homeowners.

This distinction between high-volume and high-penetration areas is critical. While Salem's core has the most units, smaller surrounding communities have a housing market more heavily defined by investor ownership. A property search in these areas would yield a high number of non-owner-occupied homes.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
While landlords are strong net buyers in Marion County, institutional investors are actively selling, with a net loss of 4 properties in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Transaction data for Marion County reveals a stark divergence in strategy between the overall investor market and its institutional segment. Landlords as a whole are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 199 properties while selling only 46 in Q1 2026, resulting in a net gain of 153 properties.

This accumulation trend is not new. In 2025, investors added a net 701 properties to their portfolios (919 buys vs. 218 sells), and in 2024 they added a net 699 properties (902 buys vs. 203 sells), signaling sustained confidence in the local market.

However, institutional investors (1000+ tier) are moving in the opposite direction. In Q1 2026, they were net sellers, divesting 5 properties while acquiring only 1. This continues a pattern of retreat, as they were also net sellers in 2025 (9 buys vs. 10 sells) and 2024 (4 buys vs. 10 sells).

This trend suggests that while small and mid-size investors are deepening their investment in Marion County, the largest national players are strategically reducing their exposure. The market's growth is being fueled from the bottom up, not the top down.

The opposing movements imply different market outlooks or goals. Small investors appear bullish on local appreciation and rental demand, whereas large institutions may be reallocating capital to other markets or liquidating assets after a period of holding.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 21.0% of all Marion County SFR transactions in Q1 2026, totaling 199 purchases.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlord activity comprised 21.0% of all single-family residential transactions in Marion County, with investors purchasing 199 of the 947 properties sold. This highlights their consistent role as a major source of housing demand.

The quarter was defined by the activity of new and small investors. The single-property tier alone accounted for 137 of the 199 transactions, reaffirming that market entry by new landlords is the primary driver of investor purchasing volume.

A dramatic pricing disparity was evident across investor tiers. First-time landlords (Tier 01) paid the highest average price at $472,209 per property. In sharp contrast, the single institutional acquisition (Tier 09) was priced at just $246,267, a 47.8% lower price point, suggesting a focus on completely different asset types or distress levels.

This price spread reveals distinct acquisition strategies. Smaller investors appear to be competing for market-rate properties, while larger players target lower-cost assets, potentially through bulk deals or acquisitions requiring significant renovation.

Inter-landlord trading was not a major factor, especially for new entrants. Only 8.0% of properties bought by single-property landlords came from other investors, indicating they are primarily acquiring homes from traditional homeowners or new construction.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords build portfolios in Marion County, controlling 97% of investor housing as institutions exit.
Holdings
Investors own 9,025 SFR properties in Marion County (11.4% of the market), with individual investors holding a commanding 7,741 properties (85.8%) compared to 1,852 (20.5%) for companies.
Pricing
In Q1, landlords secured an 8.7% pricing advantage over traditional homeowners, paying an average of $438,401 versus $480,160, a savings of $41,759 per home.
Activity
Landlords purchased 22.9% of homes sold in Q4 2025, an effort led by 136 new single-property landlords who acquired 105 properties, dominating acquisition activity.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 97.0% of investor-owned housing in Marion County, while institutional investors (1000+) own just 0.4%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are dominant in smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios starting at the 11-20 property tier, where they own 90.8% of assets.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers, acquiring 199 properties and selling 46 in Q1, but institutional investors are net sellers, having sold 5 properties while buying only 1.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Marion County, Oregon is fundamentally shaped by small, individual investors. They own a significant 9,025 properties, representing 11.4% of all SFR housing. This portfolio is not controlled by Wall Street, but by local operators; individual landlords own 85.8% of these homes, and 'mom-and-pop' investors with 1-10 properties control a staggering 97.0% of the entire investor-owned stock. In contrast, institutional firms with over 1,000 properties have a negligible footprint of just 0.4%, a key finding from our latest Investor Pulse reports.

In terms of behavior, these small investors are actively growing their portfolios. In the most recent quarter, landlords were involved in 21.0% of all transactions and demonstrated a keen eye for value, securing an 8.7% discount compared to traditional homeowners, a savings of over $41,000 per property. This activity is fueled by a constant stream of new entrants, with 136 new single-property landlords entering the market in Q4 2025 alone. The transaction data reveals a clear trend: while the broader investor market is in a phase of strong accumulation, institutional players are in retreat, consistently selling more properties than they buy.

The key takeaway for Marion County is that its rental housing market is robust, decentralized, and growing from the ground up. The narrative of large corporations buying up homes does not apply here. Instead, the market's health and direction are dictated by thousands of individual and small-business investors who are consistently buying, holding, and managing local properties. This dynamic suggests a market with deep community ties, where investment strategies are driven by local knowledge rather than national portfolio allocation decisions.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 01:33 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Marion (OR)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Marion (OR) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-or-marion/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.