Fillmore (MN) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Fillmore (MN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Fillmore (MN)
8,375
Total Investors in Fillmore (MN)
1,109
Investor Owned SFR in Fillmore (MN)
930(11.1%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
943
SFR Owned
750
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
166
SFR Owned
187
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 930 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Fillmore County with 99.4% Ownership, Buying at a 49.8% Discount
Investors own 930 single-family properties in Fillmore County, representing 11.1% of the market. Small, local landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 99.4% of this portfolio, while institutional ownership is negligible at 0.1%. In Q1 2026, landlords secured properties for 49.8% less than traditional homeowners and continued to be net buyers in the market.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 930 SFR properties in Fillmore County, with individuals holding 80.6%.
The vast majority of investor-owned homes are held with cash (759 properties) rather than financing (171 properties). Nearly all properties in the investor portfolio are actively rented (897 properties), indicating a strong focus on generating rental income.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 49.8% less than homeowners in Q1 2026, a discount of $136,903.
The price gap is highly volatile, swinging from a 41.9% landlord discount in Q3 2025 to a 57.0% premium paid by landlords in Q2 2025. This volatility points to a market with inconsistent purchasing patterns or few transactions, where individual deals can heavily skew quarterly averages.
Current Quarter Purchases
In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 10.1% of all homes sold in Fillmore County.
Activity was driven exclusively by 'mom-and-pop' landlords, who accounted for 100% of the 7 investor purchases. No institutional investors (1,000+ properties) made any acquisitions during the quarter. The market also saw 6 new entities enter at the single-property level.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 99.4% of investor-owned homes.
In stark contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties own just 0.1% of the portfolio, or a single property. Landlords owning only one property represent the largest single segment, holding 76.9% of all investor-owned SFRs in the county.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority property owners starting in the 6-10 property tier.
While individuals dominate the smaller tiers, owning 83.1% of single-property portfolios, companies take majority control at the 6-10 property level with a 56.0% share. This marks the clear crossover point where business entities begin to scale more effectively.
Geographic Distribution
Investor ownership is highly concentrated, with three zip codes holding 39.2% of properties.
The zip code 55949 has the highest number of investor-owned homes at 138. However, the highest penetration rate is in 55961, where investors own 17.9% of the housing stock. This highlights a difference between total volume and market saturation.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are consistent net buyers, while the lone institutional investor is neutral or selling.
In 2025, landlords acquired a net of 34 properties (50 buys vs 16 sells). This trend continued in Q1 2026 with 9 buys and 7 sells. In contrast, the institutional tier showed no growth, with one purchase and one sale in 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords participated in 8.9% of all property transactions in Q1 2026.
New, single-property landlords are paying a premium, with an average purchase price of $171,667. A remarkable 66.7% of their acquisitions were from other landlords, indicating a very active secondary market among investors.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 930 SFR properties in Fillmore County, with individuals holding 80.6%.
Detailed Findings

In Fillmore County, investors hold a portfolio of 930 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, accounting for 11.1% of the total 8,375 SFRs in the market.

Ownership is overwhelmingly dominated by 943 individual investors, who control 750 properties, or 80.6% of the investor-owned inventory. In contrast, 166 company investors own the remaining 187 properties (20.1%), highlighting the market's reliance on small-scale real estate investing.

The investor portfolio is heavily geared towards rental income, with 897 properties classified as rented. This represents 96.5% of all investor-owned homes, signaling a clear strategy of buy-and-hold for cash flow rather than short-term speculation.

A significant financial pattern emerges from the data: 759 properties (81.6% of the portfolio) are owned outright with cash. This compares to just 171 properties (18.4%) that are financed, suggesting that investors in this market are well-capitalized and less reliant on leverage.

The structure of the landlord base, with 943 individuals compared to 166 companies, reinforces the 'mom-and-pop' character of the Fillmore County rental market. This distribution is a key finding from the property ownership by owner type report.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 49.8% less than homeowners in Q1 2026, a discount of $136,903.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Fillmore County demonstrated a significant pricing advantage in the first quarter of 2026, acquiring properties for an average of $138,034. This was 49.8% less than the $274,937 average paid by traditional homeowners, representing a substantial discount of $136,903 per property.

However, this discount has not been consistent over the past year, showing extreme volatility. In Q3 2025, landlords also secured a large discount of 41.9% ($110,927), but this was preceded by a surprising Q2 2025 where they paid a 57.0% premium, or $163,995 more than homeowners.

The sharp fluctuations in the landlord-homeowner price gap suggest that investor purchasing is sporadic and may be influenced by off-market deals or distressed asset acquisitions that are not typical of the broader retail market. The low transaction volume for investors means that a few atypical purchases can dramatically alter the quarterly averages.

Comparing recent activity to the pandemic era (2020-2023), landlord acquisition prices have cooled from the $209,609 average seen during that period. The Q1 2026 average of $138,034 indicates a significant market correction or a shift in the type of assets being targeted by investors.

This pricing behavior highlights a key strategy for investors: capitalizing on opportunities to purchase well below the market rate. The ability to find and close on these discounted properties is a primary driver of their activity in Fillmore County.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 10.1% of all homes sold in Fillmore County.
Detailed Findings

During the fourth quarter of 2025, investors acquired 7 of the 69 total SFR properties sold in Fillmore County, capturing 10.1% of the market's purchase activity.

The entirety of this purchasing activity came from small-scale 'mom-and-pop' investors. Those in the 1-10 property tiers accounted for 100% of landlord acquisitions, with zero properties purchased by institutional investors (Tier 09).

New entrants were a key feature of the quarter. Investors in the single-property tier, representing those just beginning their portfolio, were the most active, purchasing 4 properties (57.1% of the landlord total). This activity was spread across 6 distinct entities.

The second most active group was small landlords in the 3-5 property tier, who purchased the remaining 3 properties (42.9% of the landlord total) across 2 entities.

This data confirms that the growth in investor ownership in Fillmore County is being fueled from the ground up by local, small-scale buyers, rather than large, corporate entities. There is no evidence of institutional capital flowing into the county's SFR market in Q4 2025.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 99.4% of investor-owned homes.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Fillmore County is overwhelmingly dominated by small landlords. Those owning between 1 and 10 properties (Tiers 01-04) collectively control 99.4% of all investor-owned SFRs, a near-total market share.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the bedrock of the local rental market. This tier alone accounts for 739 properties, representing a massive 76.9% share of the entire investor portfolio.

The scale of ownership drops off sharply in larger tiers. Landlords with two properties hold a 7.4% share, and those with 3-5 properties hold 12.5%. Combined, the first three tiers account for 96.8% of all investor-held housing.

Media narratives often focus on large institutional investors, but their presence in Fillmore County is statistically insignificant. The institutional tier (1,000+ properties) owns just a single property, accounting for only 0.1% of the investor market share.

This distribution underscores a hyper-localized market structure, where the rental housing supply is provided almost exclusively by community-level investors rather than large corporations. This is a crucial insight for understanding market dynamics and is often explored in Investor Pulse reports.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority property owners starting in the 6-10 property tier.
Detailed Findings

While individual landlords own the vast majority of properties overall (80.6%), ownership structure shifts decisively as portfolios grow. Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, holding 14 properties for a 56.0% share, compared to the 11 properties (44.0%) held by individuals in that same tier.

This crossover point signals a strategic shift where investors are more likely to formalize their operations under a corporate entity as their holdings expand. For smaller portfolios, individual ownership is the standard.

In the foundational single-property tier, individuals own 619 homes (83.1%) versus 126 for companies (16.9%). This pattern of individual dominance continues through the two-property tier (83.1% individual) and the 3-5 property tier (75.8% individual).

The data clearly illustrates a lifecycle of real estate investor operations in Fillmore County. Portfolios are typically started and grown under personal names before transitioning to a more formal company structure for portfolios exceeding five properties.

This trend shows that while the market is defined by 'mom-and-pop' investors, a segment of these operators adopts more sophisticated business structures as they achieve a certain scale of operation.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor ownership is highly concentrated, with three zip codes holding 39.2% of properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Fillmore County is not evenly distributed but is instead highly concentrated in a few key areas. The top three zip codes by property count (55949, 55965, and 55939) collectively contain 365 investor-owned SFRs, which is 39.2% of the county's total investor portfolio of 930 properties.

The zip code 55949 is the epicenter of investor ownership by volume, with 138 properties. This area also has a high ownership rate of 16.1%.

However, the highest rate of investor penetration is found in zip code 55961, where investors own 17.9% of all SFRs. This indicates a market with significant rental demand or investment opportunity relative to its size.

The top five regions by ownership rate are 55961 (17.9%), 55949 (16.1%), 55962 (15.5%), and 55939 (13.2%). Investors often use a property search tool to identify opportunities in these high-concentration areas.

This geographic analysis reveals specific pockets of high investor concentration within the county. Understanding the difference between high-volume and high-penetration areas is critical for identifying where rental markets are most established versus where they may be reaching saturation.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are consistent net buyers, while the lone institutional investor is neutral or selling.
Detailed Findings

Across all recent timeframes, the landlord community in Fillmore County has been a consistent net buyer, steadily adding to their portfolios. In Q1 2026, they acquired 9 properties while selling 7, resulting in a net gain of 2 properties.

This net buying activity was even more pronounced in previous periods. For the full year of 2025, landlords purchased 50 homes and sold only 16, a net acquisition of 34 properties. The activity in 2024 was stronger still, with 67 buys versus just 8 sells for a net gain of 59 properties.

In sharp contrast, the institutional tier (1,000+ properties) is not contributing to this growth. In 2025, this tier was perfectly neutral, with its transaction history showing one purchase and one sale for the entire year.

This divergence highlights two different market strategies. The broad base of smaller landlords is actively accumulating properties and expanding the county's rental stock. Meanwhile, the single institutional player is either holding steady or beginning a divestment phase.

The sustained net buying from mom-and-pop investors signals confidence in the local rental market's long-term prospects, a trend that is driving the gradual increase in investor market share.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords participated in 8.9% of all property transactions in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

In the first quarter of 2026, landlords were a party to 9 of the 101 total SFR transactions in Fillmore County, representing an 8.9% share of all market activity.

Transaction activity was entirely concentrated in the mom-and-pop tiers, with zero transactions recorded for institutional investors. New landlords entering the market (Tier 01) were the most active, accounting for 6 of the 9 total investor transactions.

A significant trend in sourcing is apparent: single-property investors heavily rely on purchasing from existing landlords. Of the 6 properties they bought, 4 came from other landlords, a high inter-landlord transaction rate of 66.7%.

New entrants appear to be paying a premium to acquire properties. The average purchase price for the single-property tier was $171,667. This is significantly higher than the $104,401 average paid by more established small landlords in the 3-5 property tier during the same period.

This suggests that new investors may be buying turnkey rental properties from existing operators at a higher price point, while more experienced landlords are finding more discounted opportunities, possibly through off-market channels.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Fillmore County with 99.4% Ownership, Buying Homes at a 49.8% Discount
Holdings
Landlords own 930 SFR properties in Fillmore County, representing 11.1% of the total market. Individual investors are the primary owners, holding 750 properties (80.6%), while companies own the remaining 187 (20.1%).
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords paid 49.8% less than traditional homeowners, securing an average discount of $136,903 per property ($138,034 vs. $274,937).
Activity
Landlords accounted for 10.1% of home purchases in Q4 2025, with activity driven entirely by mom-and-pop investors. This included 6 new single-property landlord entities entering the market.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 99.4% of investor-owned housing in the county. In contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) own just a single property, a 0.1% market share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in the 6-10 property tier, holding 56.0% of properties at that level.
Transactions
Landlords are net buyers, purchasing 9 homes while selling 7 in Q1 2026. The county's single institutional investor was neutral in 2025, with one purchase and one sale.
Market Narrative

The real estate investor market in Fillmore County, Minnesota, is fundamentally a story of the small, local landlord. Investors own 930 single-family homes, making up 11.1% of the county's total SFR housing stock. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by 'mom-and-pop' operators (1-10 properties), who own a staggering 99.4% of all investor properties. The market's backbone is the single-property landlord, who alone accounts for 76.9% of holdings. Ownership is primarily held by individuals (80.6%) rather than companies (20.1%), and institutional capital is virtually nonexistent, with a share of just 0.1%.

In terms of market activity, these small investors are strategic and effective. In Q1 2026, they purchased properties at a remarkable 49.8% discount compared to traditional homeowners, paying an average of $138,034 versus the homeowner's $274,937. This demonstrates an ability to find undervalued or off-market opportunities. Transaction data shows landlords are consistent net buyers, steadily increasing their holdings, a trend confirmed in Q1 2026 with 9 purchases against 7 sales. This growth is fueled by new entrants, with a high rate of property trading between existing landlords.

The key takeaway from the data is that Fillmore County's rental market is not driven by Wall Street but by Main Street. The dominance of local, individual investors creates a distinct market dynamic, characterized by deep local knowledge and a focus on long-term holds financed by cash. The minimal presence of institutional players suggests a market that may be too small or lacks the specific asset types they target. For anyone analyzing this market, from policymakers to local residents, understanding this hyper-localized, small-investor-driven structure is essential to grasping the future of its housing landscape.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 08:35 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Fillmore (MN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Fillmore (MN) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-mn-fillmore/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.