Bannock (ID) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Bannock (ID) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Bannock (ID)
25,132
Total Investors in Bannock (ID)
3,291
Investor Owned SFR in Bannock (ID)
3,016(12.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,834
SFR Owned
2,305
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
457
SFR Owned
769
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 3,016 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Bannock County, Owning 91.9% of Rentals as Institutions Retreat
Investors own 3,016 SFR properties in Bannock County, representing 12.0% of the market. Small landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 91.9% of this portfolio, while institutional investors own just 0.3%. In Q1 2026, landlords purchased 14.3% of all homes sold, securing them at a 26.9% discount compared to traditional homeowners, even as institutional players became net sellers.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 3,016 properties (12.0% of the market), with individuals holding 76.4%.
Of the investor-owned portfolio, 1,833 properties (60.8%) are owned free-and-clear with cash, compared to 1,183 (39.2%) that are financed. The portfolio is heavily rental-focused, with 2,883 properties classified as non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 26.9% less than homeowners in Q1, an average discount of $107,573.
This Q1 discount marks a sharp reversal from Q1 2025, when landlords paid a 0.8% premium. The price gap has widened significantly, from a $37,938 discount in Q3 2025 to $107,573 in Q1 2026, showing an increasing price advantage for investors.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 46 homes in the last quarter, capturing 14.3% of all sales.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) dominated acquisition activity, accounting for 32 purchases, or 69.6% of the investor total. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) made only a single purchase (2.2%).
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) own 91.9% of all investor-held SFRs.
This overwhelming majority leaves just 0.3% of the investor-owned housing stock under the control of institutional (1000+) landlords. The market structure is defined by 1,970 single-property landlords who alone control 62.6% of all rental homes.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owner at the 11-20 property tier, signaling a professionalization threshold.
While individuals own 85.5% of single-property portfolios, companies control 72.8% of portfolios in the 11-20 property range. This trend accelerates in larger tiers, with companies owning over 95% of properties in portfolios larger than 100 units.
Geographic Distribution
The 83201 zip code contains the most investor properties at 1,383, but 83246 has the highest concentration at 41.9%.
The top three zip codes by sheer volume of investor-owned homes (83201, 83202, 83204) contain a combined 2,520 properties, representing 83.6% of all investor holdings in the county. However, the highest saturation is in smaller zip codes like 83246 and 83281 (18.6%).
Historical Transactions
Landlords are active net buyers with a 2.15x buy-to-sell ratio in Q1, but institutional investors were net sellers.
In Q1 2026, the overall landlord market acquired 58 properties while selling only 27. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+ tier) sold two properties and purchased only one during the same period.
Current Quarter Transactions
Investors were involved in 11.8% of all Q1 transactions, with single-property landlords buying at the lowest prices.
New, single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active, accounting for 35 transactions at an average price of just $223,968. This is significantly lower than the prices paid by larger tiers, such as small landlords (3-5 properties) who averaged $831,250.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 3,016 properties (12.0% of the market), with individuals holding 76.4%.
Detailed Findings

In Bannock County, investors hold a total of 3,016 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, which constitutes 12.0% of the total 25,132 SFRs in the market. This highlights a significant, yet not majority, presence of real estate investing activity in the local housing ecosystem.

Individual investors are the primary drivers of the rental market, owning 2,305 properties, or 76.4% of the total investor portfolio. In contrast, company-owned entities hold 769 properties, representing the remaining 25.5%, demonstrating that the market is primarily composed of smaller-scale operators rather than large corporations.

A strong indicator of financial health in the investor market is the prevalence of cash ownership. A majority of investor-held properties, 1,833 homes (60.8%), are owned outright without a mortgage. This compares to 1,183 properties (39.2%) that are financed, suggesting many investors have significant equity and lower debt exposure.

The investor landlord community consists of 3,291 distinct entities. This group is overwhelmingly composed of individuals (2,834) versus companies (457), reinforcing the 'mom-and-pop' character of the local rental market.

The core purpose of these holdings is clear, with 2,883 of the 3,016 properties being non-owner-occupied. This 95.6% rental concentration underscores the role these investors play in providing housing supply for tenants in Bannock County.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 26.9% less than homeowners in Q1, an average discount of $107,573.
Detailed Findings

In the first quarter of 2026, landlords in Bannock County achieved a substantial pricing advantage, purchasing properties for an average of $292,139. This was $107,573, or 26.9%, below the $399,712 average paid by traditional homeowners, indicating a strong ability to find and secure undervalued assets.

The pricing dynamic has shifted dramatically in favor of investors over the past year. In Q1 2025, landlords actually paid a slight premium of $3,101 (0.8%) compared to homeowners. The emergence of the current 26.9% discount represents a significant market change, potentially signaling a softening in certain segments of the market that investors are capitalizing on.

This trend of a widening price gap is a recent development. The discount expanded from 9.6% ($37,938) in Q3 2025 and 20.7% ($82,754) in Q2 2025 to the current high of 26.9%. This pattern suggests that investors' purchasing power and negotiation leverage relative to retail buyers has consistently grown.

Despite recent market cooling, property values remain elevated compared to the pandemic era. The average landlord acquisition price during the 2020-2023 boom was $261,499. The current Q1 2026 average of $292,139 reflects an 11.7% appreciation from that period.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 46 homes in the last quarter, capturing 14.3% of all sales.
Detailed Findings

During the most recent quarter of market activity, landlords were significant players, acquiring 46 of the 321 total SFRs sold in Bannock County. This represents a 14.3% market share of all purchases, demonstrating sustained investor demand for residential properties.

The backbone of this purchasing activity came from small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, were responsible for 32 of the 46 investor acquisitions, a commanding 69.6% share. This highlights that the market's momentum is driven by local, smaller operators.

New entrants are a key feature of the current market. The single-property tier saw 32 new entities purchase 25 homes, making up 54.3% of all investor-bought properties. This influx of first-time landlords signals a healthy and accessible entry point into the rental market.

In stark contrast to the activity of smaller landlords, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties had a minimal impact. This tier accounted for the purchase of only one property, representing just 2.2% of investor acquisitions, challenging the narrative of large corporations dominating the market.

Mid-size landlords also contributed to the activity, with those owning 11-100 properties acquiring a combined 10 properties. However, their 21.7% share of purchases remains well below that of the mom-and-pop segment.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) own 91.9% of all investor-held SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure of Bannock County's rental market is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale investors. Landlords owning 1 to 10 properties, often called 'mom-and-pops,' control a massive 91.9% of the 3,016 investor-owned SFRs. This concentration underscores the hyper-local and fragmented nature of the rental landscape.

Single-property landlords form the bedrock of the market. This group alone, comprising 1,970 entities, owns 1,970 properties, which accounts for 62.6% of the entire investor-owned housing supply. This signifies that the typical landlord is a community member with one rental property, not a distant corporation.

The influence of large institutional investors is minimal, bordering on statistically insignificant. The 1000+ property tier holds just 9 properties in total, representing only 0.3% of the investor market. This finding directly counters the common perception of a market being bought up by large-scale corporate interests.

Mid-size investors (11-1000 properties) hold the remaining portion of the market, but their share is also modest. Combined, these operators own 246 properties, or 7.8% of the investor-owned total. Even when combined, their footprint is dwarfed by the mom-and-pop segment.

The data reveals a clear market structure: a very broad base of small investors, a small contingent of mid-sized operators, and a negligible presence of institutional capital. This structure has significant implications for market stability, rental pricing, and local housing policy.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owner at the 11-20 property tier, signaling a professionalization threshold.
Detailed Findings

A clear organizational shift occurs as investors scale their portfolios in Bannock County. While individuals overwhelmingly dominate smaller portfolios, companies become the majority owners once a portfolio reaches the 11-20 property tier, holding 72.8% of properties in that segment compared to just 27.2% for individuals.

For smaller landlords, individual ownership is the norm. Individuals own 85.5% of single-property portfolios and 75.8% of two-property portfolios. This structure persists until the 6-10 property tier, which is the last bracket where individuals maintain a majority (57.1%).

The transition to corporate structures is nearly absolute at larger scales. In the 21-50 property tier, companies own 98.4% of the assets. For portfolios exceeding 100 properties, company ownership reaches 95.2%, indicating that formal business structures are essential for managing larger rental operations.

This crossover point from individual to company control at the 11-20 property mark suggests a key threshold. It likely reflects the point where the complexities of property management, financing, and liability protection make incorporating a business entity a practical necessity for growth.

Even within the smallest tiers, a corporate presence exists. Companies own 289 single-property rentals (14.5% of the tier), showing that some investors utilize a formal business structure from their very first purchase.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 83201 zip code contains the most investor properties at 1,383, but 83246 has the highest concentration at 41.9%.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Bannock County is highly concentrated geographically, with the 83201 zip code alone accounting for 1,383 investor-owned properties. This single area represents 45.8% of all investor-held SFRs in the county, making it the undisputed hub of rental activity by volume.

A distinction exists between the areas with the most rentals and those with the highest density of them. While 83201 leads in count, the 83246 zip code has the highest investor ownership rate at 41.9%, meaning more than two out of every five homes there are investor-owned. This indicates a market with a fundamentally different character than the county average of 12.0%.

The top three zip codes by property count (83201, 83202, and 83204) collectively contain 2,520 properties. This accounts for a remarkable 83.6% of all investor-owned homes in Bannock County, demonstrating that investor activity is not evenly distributed but focused on key submarkets.

Following 83246, other areas with high investor saturation include 83281 (18.6%) and 83234 (15.1%). These zip codes, while having fewer total rental properties, have a higher proportion of their housing stock dedicated to rentals compared to the county as a whole.

This analysis of granular assessor data reveals two distinct types of investor markets within the county: high-volume urban/suburban centers and high-concentration rural or specialized submarkets. Understanding this difference is crucial for identifying distinct investment opportunities and risks.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are active net buyers with a 2.15x buy-to-sell ratio in Q1, but institutional investors were net sellers.
Detailed Findings

The landlord market in Bannock County remains in a strong accumulation phase, with investors acting as net buyers. In Q1 2026, they purchased 58 properties while selling only 27, resulting in a net gain of 31 properties and a buy-to-sell ratio of 2.15x. This signals continued confidence and capital deployment into the local market.

This net buying trend has been consistent over the past year. In 2025, landlords acquired 201 properties and sold 107 (a net gain of 94), and in 2024 they acquired 242 while selling just 73 (a net gain of 169). The market has consistently absorbed more properties into rental portfolios than it has released.

A significant divergence in strategy is apparent between the broader market and its largest players. While the overall market is buying, institutional investors (1000+ tier) were net sellers in Q1 2026, divesting of two properties while acquiring only one. This could indicate a strategic portfolio rebalancing or a bearish outlook from large-scale capital.

However, the institutional net seller position is a very recent development. For the full year of 2025, this same tier was a net buyer, acquiring 13 properties and selling only 5. The Q1 2026 shift, though based on a small transaction volume, marks a notable change in direction for this influential segment.

Transaction data, like the kind found in comprehensive property datasets, shows that smaller and mid-size landlords are currently driving the market's growth, while the largest players are taking a more cautious, or even divestment-focused, stance.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Investors were involved in 11.8% of all Q1 transactions, with single-property landlords buying at the lowest prices.
Detailed Findings

In the first quarter of 2026, landlords participated in 58 of the 491 total SFR transactions in Bannock County, making up 11.8% of all market activity. This demonstrates a steady and significant presence of investors in the day-to-day flow of real estate deals.

The most active buyers were new and aspiring landlords. The single-property (Tier 01) segment dominated the quarter's activity, engaging in 35 transactions. This group's activity was more than double that of all other investor tiers combined.

A clear pattern emerges in pricing strategy: the smallest investors are buying the most affordable properties. Tier 01 landlords purchased homes at an average price of $223,968. This is substantially lower than prices paid by larger investors, such as the 3-5 property tier ($831,250) and the 101-1000 property tier ($328,594).

Trading between investors is a feature of the market, particularly for larger players. The institutional (1000+) investor's single purchase in Q1 was from another landlord. Likewise, 50.0% of purchases by medium-large (51-100) landlords and 40.0% by small-medium (21-50) landlords came from existing investors, suggesting a liquid market for established rental properties.

Conversely, new landlords are primarily buying from homeowners. Only 5.7% (2 of 35) of purchases by single-property investors were from other landlords. This indicates they are bringing new housing stock into the rental pool rather than just recirculating existing rental assets.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small, local landlords control 91.9% of Bannock County's rental market, actively buying at a 27% discount as institutions sell.
Holdings
Investors own 3,016 SFR properties in Bannock County, representing 12.0% of the market. Individual investors are the dominant force, holding 76.4% of these properties (2,305 homes), while companies own the remaining 23.5% (769 homes).
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords secured properties at a significant 26.9% discount compared to traditional homeowners, paying an average of $292,139 versus the homeowner's $399,712, a price advantage of $107,573 per property.
Activity
Landlords purchased 14.3% of all homes sold last quarter, with small, single-property investors driving the activity. This segment accounted for 54.3% of all investor purchases, with 32 new landlord entities entering the market.
Market Share
The rental market is defined by small operators, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling an overwhelming 91.9% of investor housing. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) own just 0.3% of the portfolio.
Ownership Type
Individual ownership is standard for smaller portfolios, but a clear shift occurs at the 11-20 property tier, where companies become the majority owners (72.8%). This indicates a professionalization threshold as portfolios grow.
Transactions
Overall, landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 2.15x buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 (58 buys vs 27 sells). However, institutional investors are moving in the opposite direction, acting as net sellers (1 buy vs 2 sells) in the same period.
Market Narrative

The real estate investment landscape in Bannock County, ID, is unequivocally shaped by small, independent operators. Investors own 3,016 single-family homes, accounting for 12.0% of the total market. The defining characteristic of this ownership is its fragmentation: individual 'mom-and-pop' landlords (owning 1-10 properties) control a staggering 91.9% of the investor-owned housing stock. This leaves a mere 0.3% for institutional investors (1,000+ properties), directly challenging the narrative of a corporate takeover. The market's foundation rests on 2,834 individual landlords compared to just 457 companies, reinforcing that the typical rental owner is a local stakeholder, not a remote entity.

Investor behavior in Q1 2026 reveals a market of savvy operators capitalizing on favorable conditions. Landlords acquired 14.3% of all properties sold, and did so at an average price of $292,139, a remarkable 26.9% discount compared to the $399,712 paid by traditional homeowners. This price advantage signals a sophisticated ability to identify value. Transaction patterns show a clear divergence: the market as a whole is in accumulation mode, with a 2.15x buy-to-sell ratio, while the tiny institutional segment has pivoted to become net sellers. This suggests that while smaller investors see opportunity, the largest players may be reallocating capital elsewhere.

The key takeaway from this Investor Pulse report is the resilience and dominance of the small landlord. New entrants are flowing into the market, buying affordable properties and expanding the rental pool, while the largest, most-capitalized players are retreating. This dynamic suggests a healthy, accessible market for new investors and a stable rental environment less susceptible to the strategic shifts of large corporations. For anyone analyzing the Bannock County housing market, understanding this deeply entrenched 'mom-and-pop' structure is critical to forecasting future trends.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 01:57 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Bannock (ID)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Bannock (ID) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-id-bannock/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.