Sedgwick (KS) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Sedgwick (KS) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Sedgwick (KS)
155,835
Total Investors in Sedgwick (KS)
27,698
Investor Owned SFR in Sedgwick (KS)
30,169(19.4%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
24,040
SFR Owned
20,141
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
3,658
SFR Owned
10,300
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 30,169 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-pop investors dominate Sedgwick County, securing properties at a 28.1% discount to homeowners.
Investors own 30,169 SFR properties in Sedgwick County (19.4% of the market), with mom-and-pop landlords controlling a staggering 83.6% versus just 0.2% for institutional firms. In Q1 2026, investors were net buyers, acquiring 18.0% of all properties sold while paying an average of $85,453 less than traditional homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors hold 30,169 SFRs in Sedgwick County, with individuals owning 66.8% of the portfolio.
The investor portfolio is largely owned free-and-clear, with cash purchases (19,684) nearly double the number of financed properties (10,485). Ownership is heavily concentrated among individual landlords, who represent 24,040 of the 27,698 total investor entities in the county.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q1 2026, investors paid $218,673 on average, a 28.1% discount compared to homeowners at $304,126.
This massive $85,453 price gap is a dramatic shift from early 2025, when landlords paid a 1.1% premium. The discount widened significantly from the 5.0% and 6.3% observed in mid-2025, indicating a strong buyer's advantage for investors in the current market.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 20.2% of all single-family homes sold in Sedgwick County in Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) drove this activity, accounting for 299 acquisitions, or 78.3% of all investor purchases. In contrast, institutional investors with 1,000+ properties made up only 1.6% of investor buying activity, with just 6 purchases.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) own 83.6% of all investor-held SFRs in Sedgwick County.
This small-investor dominance is a defining feature of the market. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) control a minuscule 0.2% of the investor-owned housing stock, or just 66 properties in total.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the dominant owner type in portfolios of 6-10 properties, owning 65.7% of homes in that tier.
While individuals own 88.4% of single-property portfolios, their share steadily declines as portfolio size increases. In the 21-50 property tier, company ownership reaches a commanding 94.5%.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated in specific zip codes, with 67213 leading at 2,551 investor-owned properties.
Two zip codes, 67055 and 67031, exhibit the highest investor penetration rate at 50.0%. Zip code 67213 not only has the highest count but also a high ownership rate of 37.4%.
Historical Transactions
Investors in Sedgwick County are consistent net buyers, acquiring 444 properties while selling only 229 in Q1 2026.
This net buying trend has been stable, with investors adding a net 746 properties in 2025 and 1,206 in 2024. Institutional investors (1,000+ tier) mirror this pattern, remaining net buyers with 7 acquisitions versus 3 sales in Q1 2026.
Current Quarter Transactions
Investors were involved in 18.0% of all single-family home transactions in Q1 2026, purchasing 444 properties.
Institutional investors demonstrated strategic purchasing, paying $169,098 on average, 22.5% less than new single-property investors ($218,331). Larger investors were also more likely to buy from other landlords, with 28.6% of institutional purchases sourced from existing investors.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors hold 30,169 SFRs in Sedgwick County, with individuals owning 66.8% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Investors own 30,169 single-family residential properties in Sedgwick County, KS, accounting for 19.4% of the total 155,835 SFRs in the market. This significant market share highlights the role of real estate investing in the local housing ecosystem.

Individual investors are the primary force in the market, owning 20,141 properties (66.8%), while companies own the remaining 10,300 (34.1%). This 2-to-1 ratio underscores that the typical landlord is a person, not a large corporation.

The ownership structure is further reflected in the entity count, where 24,040 individual landlords vastly outnumber the 3,658 company landlords. This indicates that while companies may own slightly larger portfolios on average, the market is overwhelmingly composed of small, independent operators.

A significant portion of the investor-owned portfolio is held without financing. There are 19,684 cash-owned properties compared to 10,485 financed ones, revealing that many investors have substantial equity and are not highly leveraged.

The vast majority of these properties (28,910) are classified as rented, confirming their use as investment assets providing housing to the community rather than for owner occupancy.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q1 2026, investors paid $218,673 on average, a 28.1% discount compared to homeowners at $304,126.
Detailed Findings

A stark pricing advantage for investors emerged in the first quarter of 2026. Landlords acquired properties for an average of $218,673, which is $85,453 less than the $304,126 paid by traditional homeowners, representing a substantial 28.1% discount.

This pricing gap marks a significant trend reversal from the previous year. In Q1 2025, landlords actually paid a slight premium of 1.1% more than homeowners. The discount then began to appear and grow through 2025, from 5.0% in Q2 to 6.3% in Q3, before expanding dramatically in the new year.

The current discount suggests investors are adept at finding undervalued properties or negotiating more favorable terms, a crucial advantage in a competitive market.

Historical data shows a clear pattern of price appreciation. The average acquisition price during the 2020-2023 period was $186,163, which rose to $256,495 in 2024, signaling strong market growth over the past several years.

The significant widening of the landlord-homeowner price gap in Q1 2026 is the most critical trend, indicating a shift in market dynamics that strongly favors knowledgeable investors.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 20.2% of all single-family homes sold in Sedgwick County in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

In the fourth quarter of 2025, investors were a powerful force in the Sedgwick County market, acquiring 375 of the 1,857 total SFRs sold. This represents a 20.2% market share, demonstrating continued and significant demand from the investor segment.

The overwhelming majority of this purchasing activity came from small-scale landlords. Mom-and-pop investors (owning 1-10 properties) were responsible for 299 of these purchases, a commanding 78.3% share of all landlord acquisitions.

First-time or single-property investors were the most active group, with 216 new entities acquiring 174 properties. This highlights a steady influx of new participants into the rental market.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) had a minimal impact on the market, purchasing only 6 properties. This accounts for a mere 1.6% of investor acquisitions and challenges the narrative of large corporations dominating home sales.

Mid-size investors also showed notable activity, particularly the 21-50 property tier, which acquired 52 properties, representing 13.6% of investor purchases and the second most active tier.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) own 83.6% of all investor-held SFRs in Sedgwick County.
Detailed Findings

The ownership landscape in Sedgwick County is defined by the prevalence of small investors. Mom-and-pop landlords, who own between 1 and 10 properties, collectively control 83.6% of the 30,169 investor-owned SFRs.

Landlords with just a single rental property (Tier 01) represent the largest segment by far, owning 17,163 properties, which is 54.7% of the entire investor portfolio. This underscores the fragmented nature of the rental market and the importance of individual owners.

In contrast to their dominant ownership share, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have a negligible footprint. They own just 66 properties, amounting to only 0.2% of the investor-owned market, a figure that refutes any notion of widespread institutional control in this county.

Mid-size landlords (11-100 properties) hold a combined 9.0% of the portfolio, filling an important niche between the smallest and largest players.

This distribution reveals that the local rental market is not controlled by Wall Street, but is instead supported by thousands of small, local operators. Analysis of these holdings often relies on comprehensive property datasets to track ownership across different tiers.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the dominant owner type in portfolios of 6-10 properties, owning 65.7% of homes in that tier.
Detailed Findings

A clear pattern emerges when analyzing ownership by entity type across portfolio sizes. Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the smaller end of the market, holding 88.4% of single-property portfolios and 73.1% of two-property portfolios.

The crossover point where companies become the majority owner occurs in the 6-10 property tier (Tier 04). In this segment, companies own 1,475 properties (65.7%) compared to the 769 (34.3%) owned by individuals. This signals the portfolio size where investors typically formalize their operations under a corporate structure.

As portfolios grow, company ownership becomes increasingly concentrated. For investors with 11-20 properties, companies own 76.0% of the homes. This figure jumps to an overwhelming 94.5% for the 21-50 property tier.

This trend shows a distinct life cycle for real estate investors: they often start as individuals and incorporate as their holdings expand to mitigate liability and manage operations more formally.

Even at the smallest tier, companies are present, owning 2,007 single-property investments (11.6%), suggesting some investors begin with a corporate structure from their very first purchase.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated in specific zip codes, with 67213 leading at 2,551 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Sedgwick County is not evenly distributed but is instead highly concentrated in specific zip codes. The 67213 zip code contains the highest number of investor-owned properties, with 2,551 homes held by landlords.

Following closely behind is 67211, with 2,340 investor-owned properties. These two areas alone represent a significant portion of the total investor portfolio in the county, indicating they are primary targets for rental investment.

When measured by ownership rate, the markets of 67055 and 67031 stand out, with investors owning 50.0% of the SFR stock in each. This level of penetration suggests these are mature rental markets where investors play a critical role in the local housing supply.

The areas with the highest counts also show high penetration rates. In 67213, the 2,551 investor properties make up 37.4% of the local market, while the 2,340 properties in 67211 account for a 35.9% share.

Understanding these geographic concentrations requires detailed assessor data, which reveals where investment capital is flowing and which communities have a higher proportion of rental housing.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Investors in Sedgwick County are consistent net buyers, acquiring 444 properties while selling only 229 in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Transaction data reveals that investors are actively accumulating properties in Sedgwick County. In the first quarter of 2026, landlords were strong net buyers, with 444 purchases and only 229 sales, resulting in a net gain of 215 properties to their portfolios.

This is not a new phenomenon but a consistent, multi-year trend. Throughout 2025, investors bought 1,871 properties and sold 1,125 for a net increase of 746. This followed an even stronger year in 2024, when they added a net 1,206 properties.

The largest institutional investors (1000+ tier) are also in accumulation mode, contrary to trends seen in some other markets. In Q1 2026, they acquired 7 properties and sold only 3. This pattern holds for previous periods, with net acquisitions of 12 properties in 2025 and 11 in 2024.

The sustained net buying activity across all investor types signals strong confidence in the Sedgwick County rental market and its long-term prospects.

This consistent accumulation indicates a market where investors are choosing to hold and expand their portfolios rather than divest, contributing to the growing share of rental housing.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Investors were involved in 18.0% of all single-family home transactions in Q1 2026, purchasing 444 properties.
Detailed Findings

During the first quarter of 2026, landlords were a significant presence in the market, participating in 444 of the 2,468 total SFR transactions. This activity gives them an 18.0% share of all transactions for the quarter.

A clear pricing advantage exists for larger, more experienced investors. Institutional buyers (1000+ tier) paid an average of $169,098 per property. This is 22.5% less than the $218,331 paid by first-time, single-property landlords, highlighting the value of scale and market expertise.

The highest average price was paid by mid-size landlords in the 51-100 property tier, who spent an average of $541,975, suggesting a focus on higher-value assets in that specific segment.

Inter-landlord trading is a notable feature of the market, especially for larger players. Institutional investors sourced 28.6% of their acquisitions from other landlords, as did medium-large investors. This indicates a liquid secondary market where portfolios are traded between operators.

In contrast, new single-property buyers were less likely to purchase from existing landlords, with only 10.8% of their acquisitions coming from that channel, suggesting they are more often competing with traditional homebuyers for inventory.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords control 83.6% of Sedgwick County's investor market and are buying at a 28.1% discount.
Holdings
Landlords own 30,169 SFR properties, representing 19.4% of Sedgwick County's market. Individual investors hold a commanding 66.8% of this portfolio (20,141 properties), with companies owning the remaining 33.2%.
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords paid an average of 28.1% less than traditional homeowners, securing an $85,453 discount per property ($218,673 vs $304,126). This price gap widened dramatically from just 6.3% in Q3 2025.
Activity
Investors purchased 18.0% of all homes sold in Q1 2026, with mom-and-pop buyers (1-10 properties) accounting for 356 of the 444 landlord transactions. The market saw 216 new single-property landlords enter during Q4 2025.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly dominate the rental market, controlling 83.6% of investor-owned housing. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) own just 0.2%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors form the backbone of the market, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios starting at the 6-10 property tier. By the 21-50 property tier, company ownership reaches 94.5%.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 1.94x buy/sell ratio in Q1 2026 (444 buys vs 229 sells). Institutional investors are also accumulating properties, with a net positive position of 7 buys versus 3 sells.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Sedgwick County, KS, is robust and overwhelmingly dominated by small, individual investors. Landlords own 30,169 properties, which constitutes 19.4% of the county's total SFR housing stock. The defining characteristic of this market is its fragmentation: 'mom-and-pop' landlords (owning 1-10 properties) control a massive 83.6% of the investor-owned portfolio. In stark contrast, large institutional firms (1,000+ properties) have a negligible presence, holding just 0.2%. Ownership is primarily in the hands of individuals, who account for 66.8% of investor properties and 86.8% of all landlord entities, as detailed in these Investor Pulse reports.

In terms of recent activity, investors are demonstrating strong confidence and a distinct strategic advantage. During Q1 2026, they purchased 18.0% of all homes sold and did so at a remarkable 28.1% discount compared to traditional homeowners, saving an average of $85,453 per property. This price advantage has widened significantly over the past year. Furthermore, investors across all tiers are in a period of accumulation. Landlords were net buyers with a 1.94-to-1 buy/sell ratio in Q1, a trend consistent with previous years. Even the largest institutional players are expanding their local portfolios, signaling a bullish outlook on the Sedgwick County market.

The key takeaway from this analysis is that the Sedgwick County rental market is not a story of corporate dominance, but one of widespread, grassroots investment. The market's health is driven by thousands of small operators who are actively growing their portfolios and proving adept at securing properties below the prices paid by typical homebuyers. This dynamic suggests a stable and decentralized rental supply, with opportunities for both new and experienced investors to participate. Continuous monitoring through comprehensive market reports will be crucial to tracking how these trends evolve in the coming quarters.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 05:26 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Sedgwick (KS)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Sedgwick (KS) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ks-sedgwick/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.