Kendall (IL) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Kendall (IL) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Kendall (IL)
41,305
Total Investors in Kendall (IL)
9,696
Investor Owned SFR in Kendall (IL)
6,816(16.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
9,095
SFR Owned
5,994
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
601
SFR Owned
963
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 6,816 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Kendall County with 94% Ownership as Institutions Retreat
Investors own 6,816 SFR properties in Kendall County (16.5% of the market), with small, individual landlords controlling 94.4% of that portfolio. In Q1, landlords secured a 6.9% price discount compared to homeowners and were aggressive net buyers (250 buys vs 26 sells), while institutional investors were net sellers.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 6,816 SFR properties, with individuals holding 87.9% of the portfolio.
The vast majority of investor-owned homes (6,726 of 6,816) are rented, indicating a strong focus on providing housing. Investor portfolios are heavily leveraged, with 4,743 properties financed compared to 2,073 owned with cash.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 6.9% less than homeowners in Q1, a discount of $27,676 per property.
The price advantage for landlords is volatile, as they paid a 7.1% premium just two quarters earlier in Q3 2025. This fluctuation suggests that investors are opportunistic, securing discounts when available but willing to pay more to acquire desirable properties.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords dominated Q4 activity, purchasing 180 of 270 homes sold, a 66.7% market share.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) accounted for 96.1% of all investor purchases, buying 174 properties. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) acquired only a single property.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 94.4% of investor-owned housing stock.
Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties own just 3.4% of the investor portfolio (234 homes). Single-property landlords are the bedrock of the market, alone owning 84.5% of all investor-held SFRs (5,875 properties).
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners only in larger portfolios of 21-50 properties.
Individuals overwhelmingly own smaller portfolios, accounting for 93.1% of single-property holdings and 73.5% of two-property holdings. At the 21-50 property tier, company ownership jumps to 82.4%, marking a clear shift in business structure as portfolios scale.
Geographic Distribution
Investor ownership is concentrated in Yorkville (60560) and Oswego (60543), with 3,544 properties.
While Yorkville and Oswego lead in raw numbers, smaller zip codes show much higher saturation. Lisbon (60536) has a 60.0% investor ownership rate, and Bristol (60511) has a 50.0% rate, indicating hyper-focused investment pockets.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 9.6x buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 2026.
This strong acquisition trend is long-term, with a 9.4x ratio in 2025 and a 10.1x ratio in 2024. In a direct reversal, institutional investors are net sellers, disposing of more properties than they acquired in both Q1 2026 and throughout 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords drove 65.4% of all market transactions in Q1, purchasing 250 of 382 properties.
Institutional buyers paid a 28.1% premium over new mom-and-pop investors in Q1, at $490,000 versus $382,646. Most investors (92.9% of new landlords) are buying from the open market, not from other landlords, signaling net growth for the rental sector.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 6,816 SFR properties, with individuals holding 87.9% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

In Kendall County, investors hold a significant 16.5% of the Single-Family Residential (SFR) market, totaling 6,816 properties out of 41,305. This demonstrates a substantial footprint for real estate investing in the local housing ecosystem.

The ownership structure is overwhelmingly dominated by 9,095 individual landlords who own 5,994 properties, or 87.9% of the investor-owned market. In contrast, 601 companies own just 963 properties, representing 14.1% of the portfolio, which challenges the narrative of corporate dominance in this area.

A striking 98.7% of investor-owned properties (6,726 out of 6,816) are classified as rented, confirming that the primary activity of these landlords is providing rental housing to the community. This high rental penetration underscores their role in the local housing supply.

Financing is the preferred method for portfolio building, with 69.6% of investor-owned properties (4,743) carrying a mortgage. Cash purchases account for the remaining 2,073 properties, suggesting that leverage is a key strategy for growth among Kendall County investors.

The data reveals a market comprised of many small players. With 9,696 distinct landlord entities owning 6,816 properties, the average portfolio size is very small, reinforcing the 'mom-and-pop' character of the local investor landscape.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 6.9% less than homeowners in Q1, a discount of $27,676 per property.
Detailed Findings

In the first quarter of 2026, landlords demonstrated a distinct pricing advantage, acquiring properties for an average of $371,710. This was $27,676, or 6.9%, below the $399,386 average paid by traditional homeowners, showcasing a capacity to find and secure better deals.

However, this landlord discount is not a consistent market feature. The trend has been highly volatile, with investors paying a 7.1% premium ($28,370) in Q3 2025 and a 5.2% premium ($18,743) in Q1 2025. This variability suggests investors adapt their pricing strategies based on changing market conditions and inventory levels.

Acquisition prices have appreciated significantly since the 2020-2023 period, when the average landlord purchase price was $351,936. The Q1 2026 average of $371,710 reflects a notable increase in property values over the past few years.

Comparing prices across years reveals steady growth. The average landlord acquisition price rose from $403,580 in 2024 to $407,324 in 2025, a modest but clear upward trend in asset values within investor portfolios.

The fluctuating gap between landlord and homeowner prices indicates a dynamic market where investors are not simply passive, low-price buyers. At times, they are willing to outbid homeowners for strategic acquisitions, as seen in multiple quarters of 2025.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords dominated Q4 activity, purchasing 180 of 270 homes sold, a 66.7% market share.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing was exceptionally strong in Q4, with landlords acquiring 180 out of 270 total SFRs sold in Kendall County. This represents a commanding 66.7% of all market transactions, signaling a period of aggressive portfolio expansion.

The acquisition activity was almost entirely driven by small investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) purchased 174 properties, making up 96.1% of the investor total and underscoring their role as the primary source of demand in the market.

New entrants flooded the market, with 226 new single-property landlord entities acquiring 164 homes. This tier alone constituted 90.6% of all investor purchases, highlighting a robust pipeline of new individuals beginning their investment journeys.

In stark contrast, institutional-level activity was negligible. The 1000+ property tier investors purchased just one property during the entire quarter, representing only 0.6% of investor acquisitions. This minimal presence dispels any notion of large-scale corporate buying in this market.

Mid-size landlords (11-1000 properties) also showed limited buying activity, collectively purchasing only 7 properties. The data clearly shows that Q4's high investor market share was a result of broad activity from small-scale players, not concentrated buying from large firms.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 94.4% of investor-owned housing stock.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Kendall County is fundamentally a small-scale operation. Landlords with portfolios of 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) collectively own 6,563 SFRs, which amounts to a staggering 94.4% of the entire investor-owned housing supply.

Dispelling common narratives of institutional dominance, investors in the 1,000+ property tier own a mere 234 homes. This represents just 3.4% of the investor-owned market, a fractional share compared to the vast holdings of smaller landlords.

The single-property landlord (Tier 01) is the most significant segment, with 5,875 properties representing 84.5% of all investor holdings. This highlights that the typical investor journey in this market begins and often stays at a very small scale.

The distribution of ownership is heavily skewed towards the smallest tiers. After the single-property tier, ownership drops sharply to 3.9% for two-property landlords and 4.9% for those owning 3-5 properties, reinforcing the fragmented nature of the market.

The combined share of all mid-to-large investors (11 to 1000+ properties) is only 5.6%. This structure suggests a highly decentralized rental market, resilient against the actions of any single large entity and primarily shaped by local, individual decision-makers.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners only in larger portfolios of 21-50 properties.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the backbone of the Kendall County rental market, especially in smaller portfolio tiers. They own 93.1% of all single-property investor homes (5,575 properties) and 73.5% of two-property portfolios (200 properties).

A distinct crossover point occurs as investors scale their operations. While individuals maintain a majority in the 6-10 property tier (56.8%), companies become the dominant entity type in the 21-50 property tier, owning 14 out of 17 properties (82.4%).

This pattern suggests a natural business progression where investors incorporate as their portfolios grow larger and more complex. The near-even split in the 11-20 property tier (54.4% individual vs. 45.6% company) appears to be the transition zone for this structural shift.

Even at smaller scales, company ownership is present, accounting for 28.2% of properties in the 3-5 home tier. This indicates that some investors choose to incorporate early in their journey for liability or financial reasons.

The data clearly shows two different investor profiles: the typical individual who owns 1-5 properties and the more professionalized operator who uses a company structure to manage portfolios exceeding 10-20 properties. Understanding this distinction is key to analyzing market behavior.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor ownership is concentrated in Yorkville (60560) and Oswego (60543), with 3,544 properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographically, investor activity in Kendall County is heavily concentrated in two zip codes: 60560 (Yorkville) with 1,802 investor-owned properties and 60543 (Oswego) with 1,742. Together, these two areas account for over half of all investor-owned SFRs in the county.

The highest counts do not necessarily correlate with the highest market penetration. While 60560 has the most investor properties, its ownership rate is 19.1%. In contrast, the much smaller 60536 (Lisbon) boasts a 60.0% investor ownership rate, making it the most saturated market by percentage.

Several smaller zip codes exhibit extremely high concentrations of rental properties. Following Lisbon, 60511 (Bristol) has a 50.0% rate, 60554 (Sandwich) has a 44.4% rate, and 60537 (Millbrook) has a 43.5% rate. This pattern points to targeted investment strategies in specific micro-markets.

The top five zip codes by sheer volume of investor properties are 60560 (Yorkville), 60543 (Oswego), 60538 (Montgomery), 60545 (Plano), and 60431 (Joliet). These areas represent the core of large-scale rental portfolio development in the county.

The divergence between leadership in count versus percentage reveals different investor approaches. Some investors may target larger, more liquid markets like Yorkville and Oswego for scale, while others focus on smaller communities to achieve higher market control and saturation.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 9.6x buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Kendall County are in a phase of strong portfolio growth, acting as decisive net buyers. In Q1 2026, they acquired 250 properties while selling only 26, resulting in a net gain of 224 properties and a buy-to-sell ratio of 9.6 to 1.

This net buying behavior is a consistent, multi-year trend. In 2025, investors bought 1,855 SFRs and sold 197 (a 9.4x ratio), and in 2024, they bought 2,169 and sold 215 (a 10.1x ratio). This sustained accumulation signals strong confidence in the local market.

Institutional investors (1000+ tier) are moving in the opposite direction. They were net sellers in Q1 2026, with 1 purchase and 2 sales. This follows their trend from 2025, where they purchased only 1 property but sold 5, indicating a strategy of divestment or portfolio rebalancing in this specific county.

The divergence is stark: while the broad market of smaller, local investors is actively expanding its footprint, the largest national players are reducing their exposure in Kendall County. This highlights a fundamental difference in strategy and market outlook between the two groups.

The high volume of acquisitions compared to dispositions suggests that the majority of investors are focused on long-term holds rather than short-term flips. The consistent net accumulation of properties points to a market driven by buy-and-hold strategies aimed at generating rental income.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords drove 65.4% of all market transactions in Q1, purchasing 250 of 382 properties.
Detailed Findings

In Q1, landlords were the dominant force in the Kendall County real estate market, participating in 250 of the 382 total SFR transactions. This 65.4% share of activity underscores their critical role in providing market liquidity and setting price floors.

A clear pricing disparity exists between investor tiers. The single institutional purchase in Q1 was at $490,000, which is 28.1% higher than the $382,646 average paid by the 226 new, single-property landlords. This suggests larger players may target higher-value assets or pay a premium for specific properties.

Mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04) accounted for the overwhelming majority of transactions, with 240 purchases. This compares to just one purchase by an institutional investor, confirming that market activity is driven from the bottom up.

Inter-landlord trading activity is relatively low, particularly among new investors. Only 7.1% of properties bought by single-property landlords came from other investors. This indicates that the vast majority of acquisitions are new additions to the overall rental stock, rather than properties churning between existing investors.

The smallest investors are not necessarily getting the best price. The single transaction in the 6-10 property tier was for just $88,000, while medium-sized investors also purchased properties below the Tier 01 average, showing a wide range of pricing strategies across different sub-markets and property types.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small, individual investors command 94% of Kendall County's rental market, expanding portfolios as institutions divest.
Holdings
Landlords own 6,816 SFR properties, representing 16.5% of Kendall County's market. Ownership is dominated by individual investors, who hold 5,994 properties (87.9%), while companies own 963 (14.1%).
Pricing
In Q1, landlords paid an average of $371,710, securing a 6.9% discount compared to traditional homeowners, a savings of $27,676 per property.
Activity
Investors captured 66.7% of all sales in Q4, with 226 new single-property landlord entities entering the market. Mom-and-pop landlords drove 96.1% of all investor purchase activity.
Market Share
The market is highly decentralized, with small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 94.4% of investor housing. In contrast, large institutional investors (1000+) own just 3.4%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors own the vast majority of small portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 21-50 properties, marking a clear point of professionalization.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 9.6x buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 (250 buys vs 26 sells), while institutional investors are net sellers (1 buy vs 2 sells), signaling a strategic retreat.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Kendall County, Illinois, is defined by the overwhelming presence of small, individual operators. These investors own 6,816 Single-Family Residential properties, a 16.5% share of the total market. The structure defies the narrative of corporate consolidation, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 94.4% of the investor-owned housing stock. Individual investors hold 87.9% of these properties, while the largest institutional firms account for a mere 3.4%, painting a picture of a deeply fragmented and decentralized rental market.

Investor behavior in the first quarter of 2026 was characterized by aggressive acquisition and strategic deal-making. Landlords were involved in 65.4% of all market transactions, acting as decisive net buyers with a 9.6-to-1 buy/sell ratio. They successfully secured a 6.9% price discount compared to traditional homeowners, acquiring properties for an average of $27,676 less. In a striking contrast, institutional investors signaled a retreat from the market, operating as net sellers during the same period. This divergence highlights a market where local players are doubling down while national firms are divesting.

The key takeaway from this investor pulse report is that Kendall County's rental market is resilient and locally driven. The influx of 226 new single-property landlords in the last quarter alone indicates a healthy and accessible entry point for new investors. The market's stability and growth are supported by the long-term, buy-and-hold strategies of thousands of individual owners, not the portfolio decisions of a few large corporations. This dynamic suggests that the future of the local housing market will continue to be shaped by the collective actions of these mom-and-pop investors.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 04:10 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Kendall (IL)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Kendall (IL) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-il-kendall/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.