Labette (KS) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Labette (KS) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Labette (KS)
7,272
Total Investors in Labette (KS)
2,543
Investor Owned SFR in Labette (KS)
2,700(37.1%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,298
SFR Owned
2,107
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
245
SFR Owned
607
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,700 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Labette County Investor Market: 37% Ownership Rate, Dominated by Cash-Heavy Landlords Amidst Transaction Freeze
Investors own 2,700 SFR properties, representing a significant 37.1% of the market in Labette County, KS. The market is overwhelmingly controlled by individual 'mom-and-pop' landlords (84.0% of holdings) who own their properties with 100% cash. Recent market activity has halted, with zero landlord purchases or sales recorded in the most recent quarter.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 2,700 properties, 37.1% of the market, with 78% held by individuals.
A striking 100% of these investor-owned properties are held in cash, with zero financed. The portfolio is heavily rental-focused, with 2,588 of the 2,700 properties (95.9%) listed as rented. Individual landlords outnumber companies by more than 9-to-1 (2,298 vs 245).
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No recent transaction data is available for a price comparison between landlords and homeowners.
The absence of landlord purchase activity in recent quarters prevents any analysis of acquisition price trends or the typical discount investors might receive compared to traditional homebuyers. Data for 2020-2023 also shows no recorded purchases by the current landlord cohort.
Current Quarter Purchases
The Labette County market saw zero SFR purchases by landlords in Q4 2025.
With a total of zero SFR properties purchased across the entire market, landlords' market share for the quarter was 0%. Consequently, there was no purchasing activity from mom-and-pop or institutional tiers, and no new landlords entered the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 84.0% of investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone account for 55.5% of all investor-owned housing. In stark contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have a negligible presence, holding just 2 properties, or 0.1% of the investor portfolio. No pricing data by tier is available.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies assume majority ownership at the 6-10 property tier, despite individuals dominating smaller portfolios.
While individuals own 91.9% of single-property portfolios, a crossover occurs in the 6-10 property tier, where companies own 50.5%. Company ownership becomes even more concentrated in the 21-50 property tier, reaching 68.5%.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with the 67357 zip code containing 64.1% of all investor-owned properties.
The 67357 zip code contains 1,732 investor-owned SFRs. However, the highest rate of investor ownership is in zip code 67336, where investors own 47.1% of the housing stock. The top five regions by count are all different from the top five by percentage, except for 67357.
Historical Transactions
Historical transaction data is unavailable, preventing analysis of net buyer/seller status.
Without buy and sell transaction counts over time, it is not possible to determine if landlords have been net accumulators or sellers. Similarly, data on landlord-to-landlord transactions and average buy/sell price margins is not available for this market.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 0.0% of transactions in Q4 2025, reflecting a market-wide freeze.
With zero total transactions in the quarter, there was no activity to analyze by tier. Consequently, there were no inter-landlord trades, and no price comparison can be made between different investor sizes.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 2,700 properties, 37.1% of the market, with 78% held by individuals.
Detailed Findings

Real estate investors hold a significant footprint in Labette County, owning 2,700 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, which constitutes 37.1% of the total 7,272 SFRs in the market.

Individual investors are the definitive market force, controlling 2,107 properties, or 78.0% of the investor-owned portfolio. In contrast, company-owned holdings amount to 607 properties (22.5%).

This individual dominance is also reflected in the entity count, with 2,298 individual landlords compared to just 245 company landlords, highlighting a market built on small-scale ownership.

A critical feature of this market is its complete lack of leverage. A full 100% of the 2,700 investor-owned properties are designated as cash-held, with zero properties reported as financed.

The portfolio is overwhelmingly geared towards generating rental income. Of the 2,700 properties, 2,588 (95.9%) are classified as rented, signaling a mature, buy-and-hold strategy among local investors.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No recent transaction data is available for a price comparison between landlords and homeowners.
Detailed Findings

An analysis of acquisition pricing is not possible due to a lack of recent transaction data in Labette County. There were no recorded SFR purchases by either landlords or traditional homeowners in the most recent quarter.

This absence of data makes it impossible to calculate the typical price gap or potential discount that investors may achieve compared to the general market.

Historical data is also sparse, with records indicating zero properties were purchased by the current cohort of landlords between 2020 and 2023.

Consequently, trends in price appreciation from the pandemic-era housing boom to the present cannot be determined for this specific market.

The lack of transactional velocity is the primary finding, suggesting a stable, low-turnover market rather than one with active, ongoing acquisitions.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
The Labette County market saw zero SFR purchases by landlords in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Market activity came to a complete standstill in Q4 2025, with zero SFR purchases recorded in Labette County. This applies to all buyer types, including investors and traditional homeowners.

As a result, landlords acquired 0 properties, accounting for 0.0% of all market activity during the quarter.

Analysis by tier reveals no activity across the board. Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) and institutional investors (1000+ properties) both recorded zero purchases.

The lack of Tier 01 (single-property) purchases indicates that no new landlords entered the market during this period.

This freeze in acquisition activity suggests a period of market stabilization or a lack of available inventory, profoundly impacting investor growth strategies in the short term.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 84.0% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Labette County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords, owning between 1 and 10 properties, collectively control 84.0% of all investor-owned SFRs.

The single-property landlord tier is the bedrock of the market, alone accounting for 1,547 properties, a 55.5% majority share of the entire investor portfolio.

Mid-size landlords (11-100 properties) represent a smaller but notable segment, holding a combined 15.7% of the portfolio.

At the opposite end of the spectrum, large and institutional investors have a minimal footprint. The large tier (101-1000 properties) holds just 4 properties (0.1%), and the institutional tier (1000+ properties) owns only 2 properties (0.1%).

This ownership structure highlights a market characterized by widespread, decentralized ownership rather than institutional consolidation. Pricing data by tier is unavailable due to the lack of recent transactions.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Key Insight
Companies assume majority ownership at the 6-10 property tier, despite individuals dominating smaller portfolios.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the foundation of the market, overwhelmingly controlling the smaller portfolio tiers. They own 91.9% of single-property holdings and 83.5% of two-property portfolios.

A distinct shift in ownership structure occurs as portfolios grow. The crossover point is the 6-10 property tier, where companies take a slight majority, owning 95 properties (50.5%) compared to individuals' 93 properties (49.5%).

Company dominance becomes more pronounced in larger tiers. For investors with 21-50 properties, companies own 161 properties, representing a 68.5% majority share.

This pattern indicates that while individuals are more numerous, entities structured as companies are utilized for scaling real estate investing operations into larger portfolios.

Pricing differences between owner types cannot be assessed, as there was no purchasing activity in the recent quarter.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with the 67357 zip code containing 64.1% of all investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic concentration is a defining feature of the Labette County investor market. A single zip code, KS-Labette-67357, is home to 1,732 investor-owned properties, which accounts for 64.1% of the county's entire investor portfolio.

While 67357 leads dramatically in raw count, it does not have the highest penetration rate. That distinction belongs to KS-Labette-67336, where investors own 47.1% of the SFR properties.

The list of top regions by investor ownership percentage includes 67336 (47.1%), 67330 (40.6%), and 67342 (39.3%), indicating several pockets with exceptionally high rental density.

There is a clear distinction between concentration by volume and by rate. The zip code with the most properties (67357) has an ownership rate of 37.6%, nearly 10 percentage points lower than the leader by rate (67336).

This data reveals that investment is not uniformly distributed; instead, it is clustered in specific sub-markets, each with its own unique investor density.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Key Insight
Historical transaction data is unavailable, preventing analysis of net buyer/seller status.
Detailed Findings

A historical analysis of landlord transactions in Labette County cannot be conducted, as the necessary data on past buys and sells is not available.

This lack of data precludes the calculation of a buy-to-sell ratio, which would determine whether landlords as a group have been net buyers or net sellers over time.

It is also not possible to assess the liquidity within the investor market, as the percentage of transactions that are landlord-to-landlord is unknown.

Similarly, an analysis of implied profit margins is unfeasible without historical average buy and sell prices.

The primary takeaway is that the market's historical velocity and transaction dynamics remain opaque, reinforcing the picture of a stable, low-turnover environment presented by current data.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 0.0% of transactions in Q4 2025, reflecting a market-wide freeze.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, the transaction market in Labette County was completely inactive, with a total of 0 SFR transactions recorded.

As a result, landlords participated in 0 transactions, holding a 0.0% share of market activity.

No transaction volume was observed across any of the nine investor tiers, from single-property landlords to institutional owners.

This lack of activity means there were no purchases from other landlords, a key indicator of internal market liquidity. The percentage of properties bought from other landlords was 0% for all tiers.

An analysis of purchasing power and strategy by tier is not possible, as the average purchase price for all tiers was $0. The data points to a period of universal inactivity among all market participants.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Labette County's investor market is a cash-funded stronghold, with 37% of homes investor-owned and activity frozen.
Holdings
Investors own 2,700 SFR properties in Labette County, KS, representing 37.1% of the market. Ownership is dominated by individual investors, who hold 2,107 of these properties (78.0%), compared to 607 (22.5%) owned by companies.
Pricing
No landlord purchase activity was recorded in the most recent quarter, making a price comparison against traditional homeowners unavailable and signaling a halt in transactions.
Activity
Q4 2025 was completely static, with landlords purchasing zero properties and accounting for 0.0% of all sales. No new landlords entered the market during this period of inactivity.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) assert overwhelming control with 84.0% of investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) have a nearly nonexistent share at 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors command portfolios under six properties, but companies become the majority owners in the 6-10 property tier and solidify their dominance in larger portfolios.
Transactions
With zero transactions in Q4 2025, the net buyer or seller status for landlords is neutral. Historical data to establish a longer-term trend is unavailable for this market.
Market Narrative

In Labette County, KS, the market reports show a landscape shaped by established, small-scale investors. They own a substantial 2,700 SFR properties, which is 37.1% of the county's entire SFR housing stock. This market is overwhelmingly controlled by 2,298 individual landlords, who own 78.0% of the investor portfolio. The structure is firmly rooted in 'mom-and-pop' ownership, as investors with 1-10 properties control 84.0% of all landlord-held homes, while institutional capital has a negligible presence of just 0.1%.

The behavior of these investors points to a mature, stable, and remarkably debt-free market. A full 100% of the 2,700 investor-owned properties are held with cash, indicating a low-risk, long-term hold strategy. This stability is further evidenced by a complete freeze in recent market activity. There were zero purchases by landlords in Q4 2025, precluding any price analysis against homeowners and signaling a pause in acquisitions across the board. The market appears to operate on low turnover rather than speculative buying and selling.

The key takeaway for Labette County is that it is a market of significant investor penetration but minimal velocity. It is a stronghold for cash-backed, individual landlords who are deeply embedded in the local housing ecosystem. The lack of recent transactions suggests that current owners are content to hold their rental assets, and there is little inventory moving between investors or from the open market. This environment is ideal for stability but offers few opportunities for new investors seeking to acquire properties quickly.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 05:14 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Labette (KS)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Labette (KS) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ks-labette/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.