Monroe (IL) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Monroe (IL) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Monroe (IL)
11,332
Total Investors in Monroe (IL)
1,485
Investor Owned SFR in Monroe (IL)
1,218(10.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,205
SFR Owned
884
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
280
SFR Owned
379
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,218 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Monroe County, Controlling 99.4% of Rental Homes While Institutions are Absent
Investors own 10.7% of Monroe County's single-family homes, with small, local landlords making up 99.4% of that ownership. In Q1, landlords were highly active, purchasing 39.0% of homes sold at a 12.9% discount compared to homeowners. This activity is driven entirely by small investors, as institutional firms are effectively absent from the market.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,218 homes in Monroe County, with individuals holding a 72.6% majority.
The majority (769 properties) of the investor portfolio was acquired with cash, compared to 449 that are financed. Of the total portfolio, 1,169 properties are classified as rentals. This demonstrates a strong rental focus and financial stability within the investor community.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Monroe County landlords paid 12.9% less than homeowners in Q1, a $38,054 discount.
The landlord discount has been volatile, swinging from an 8.7% premium in Q2 2025 to a 13.2% discount in Q3 2025, showing fluctuating market leverage. Landlord acquisition prices in Q1 2026 ($257,487) show a slight increase from the 2020-2023 average of $253,701, indicating modest price appreciation.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 39.0% of all home purchases in the last quarter.
Mom-and-pop landlords accounted for 100% of these acquisitions, with zero purchases from institutional investors. The market saw 35 new, single-property landlords enter, representing 86.7% of all investor buying activity.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) control 99.4% of rental housing in Monroe County.
In stark contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties own just 0.1% of the investor-held market, which amounts to a single property. Single-property landlords alone make up the largest segment, owning 900 properties or 72.2% of all investor-owned homes.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the dominant owner type at the 6-10 property tier, holding 95.0% of assets.
Individual investors overwhelmingly control smaller portfolios, owning 730 single-property rentals (78.2% of that tier). The data shows a clear pattern of incorporation as investors scale their portfolios, with the crossover to majority-company ownership occurring after the 5-property mark.
Geographic Distribution
The 62298 zip code has the most investor-owned homes at 579, while 62256 has the highest density.
The 62256 zip code demonstrates the highest investor concentration, with a 65.5% ownership rate. Following 62298 in total property count are 62236 (304 properties) and 62295 (81 properties). High-density zip codes after 62256 include 62279 (37.1%) and 62277 (20.8%).
Historical Transactions
Monroe County landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 43 properties while selling only 6 in Q1 2026.
This strong trend of accumulation is consistent, with a buy-to-sell ratio of 9.3x for the full year 2025 (271 buys vs 29 sells). No transaction data was recorded for institutional investors, aligning with their minimal presence in the county.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 36.1% of all Q1 property transactions in Monroe County.
Additional findings pending.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,218 homes in Monroe County, with individuals holding a 72.6% majority.
Detailed Findings

In Monroe County, investors hold a significant portfolio of 1,218 Single Family Residential (SFR) properties, representing 10.7% of the total market. This ownership is heavily skewed towards private individuals rather than corporations. Individual investors own 884 properties, accounting for 72.6% of the investor-owned housing stock, while companies own the remaining 379 properties (31.1%).

The landlord landscape is composed of 1,485 distinct entities, with 1,205 being individuals and 280 being companies. This 4.3-to-1 ratio of individual to company landlords underscores the granular, small-scale nature of real estate investing in the county.

A strong indicator of market health and investor strategy is the financing breakdown of these holdings. A substantial portion of the portfolio, 769 properties, is owned outright with cash. This compares to 449 properties that carry financing, suggesting many local investors are operating with low leverage.

The primary use for these properties is clear, with 1,169 of the 1,218 properties identified as rented. This high rental penetration confirms that the vast majority of investor-owned homes are actively contributing to the local rental supply.

Comparing owner types, both individual and company investors primarily focus on rentals. The higher prevalence of cash-owned properties points to a mature and stable investor base that is less susceptible to interest rate fluctuations.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Monroe County landlords paid 12.9% less than homeowners in Q1, a $38,054 discount.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Monroe County demonstrated a distinct pricing advantage in the first quarter of 2026. They acquired properties at an average price of $257,487, which is 12.9% less than the $295,541 paid by traditional homeowners. This resulted in a significant average discount of $38,054 per property.

However, this discount is not a market constant. An analysis of recent quarters reveals significant volatility in purchasing power. For instance, in Q2 2025, investors paid an 8.7% premium over homeowners ($346,757 vs. $319,097). This shifted dramatically in the following quarter, Q3 2025, when investors secured a 13.2% discount, highlighting the dynamic nature of market opportunities.

The long-term price trend indicates steady appreciation in the market. The average acquisition price for landlords in Q1 2026 ($257,487) is higher than the average price paid during the 2020-2023 period ($253,701), signaling sustained value growth in the region's housing market.

This ability to purchase below the typical market rate, even if inconsistent, is a key strategic advantage for investors. It allows for better capitalization rates and creates an instant equity buffer upon acquisition, which is a cornerstone of a successful investment strategy.

The fluctuation between a premium and a discount quarter-over-quarter suggests that investors are highly responsive to specific market conditions, potentially targeting properties that traditional buyers may overlook or capitalizing on opportunities for quicker, off-market transactions.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 39.0% of all home purchases in the last quarter.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity surged in the last quarter, with landlords acquiring 30 of the 77 total SFRs sold in Monroe County. This represents a substantial 39.0% market share of all purchases, indicating a period of aggressive portfolio growth for local investors.

The composition of these buyers is remarkably uniform: 100% of the 30 properties were purchased by mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) were completely absent from the purchasing landscape, registering zero acquisitions.

A key driver of this activity was the entry of new investors into the market. Landlords purchasing their very first rental property (Tier 01) accounted for 26 of the 30 acquisitions. This influx of 35 new landlord entities highlights the accessibility and appeal of the Monroe County market for first-time investors.

The dominance of the single-property tier, which made up 86.7% of investor purchases, signals a healthy, ground-level interest in real estate as an investment vehicle. This contrasts sharply with markets dominated by large-scale portfolio acquisitions.

The remaining small-scale activity was distributed among landlords in the 2-property, 3-5 property, and 6-10 property tiers, reinforcing that the entirety of recent market growth is attributable to small, local operators.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) control 99.4% of rental housing in Monroe County.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure of investment properties in Monroe County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) control a staggering 99.4% of the entire investor-owned SFR market. This finding directly refutes any narrative of large-scale corporate consolidation in the local rental scene.

Dissecting this further, single-property landlords (Tier 01) are the bedrock of the market, owning 900 properties, which constitutes 72.2% of all investor holdings. This highlights that the typical landlord in the county is a local individual with a single rental unit.

The next largest segment is small landlords with 3-5 properties, who own 201 homes (16.1% of the market). All other tiers of mom-and-pop investors collectively hold the remaining small percentage, solidifying the market's grassroots character.

On the other end of the spectrum, institutional-scale investors (1,000+ properties) have a negligible presence. They control just 0.1% of the market, equivalent to a single property. Similarly, large and mid-size landlords (11-1000 properties) collectively own less than 0.6% of the portfolio.

This distribution underscores a market defined by widespread, individual participation rather than centralized ownership. The data clearly shows that the rental housing supply in Monroe County is provided by a diverse group of small, local operators, not by large Wall Street firms.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the dominant owner type at the 6-10 property tier, holding 95.0% of assets.
Detailed Findings

While individual investors dominate the overall ownership count in Monroe County, a clear strategic shift occurs as portfolios grow. Companies become the majority owner in the 6-10 property tier, controlling 38 of the 40 properties (95.0%) in that bracket. This indicates a distinct crossover point where investors choose to incorporate for liability protection and operational efficiency.

At the entry level, individual ownership is the standard. Individuals own 730 (78.2%) of the 900 single-property rentals. This share gradually decreases as portfolio size increases; individuals own 53.8% of two-property portfolios and 56.9% of 3-5 property portfolios.

The tier holding 6-10 properties represents a crucial threshold. The dramatic shift to 95.0% company ownership in this tier suggests that scaling beyond five properties is a trigger for forming a legal entity like an LLC. This is a common strategy for serious investors to separate personal and business assets.

Interestingly, in the very small mid-size tiers, the pattern is less clear due to low sample sizes. For example, individuals own 100% of the three properties in the 11-20 tier, while the 21-50 tier is split 50/50 between an individual and a company. This reflects the highly fragmented and individualistic nature of the local market even at slightly larger scales.

This analysis reveals a lifecycle of an investor in Monroe County: starting as an individual, and, upon reaching a certain scale (around 6 properties), formalizing their operations under a company structure.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 62298 zip code has the most investor-owned homes at 579, while 62256 has the highest density.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Monroe County shows significant geographic concentration, with a few key zip codes attracting the bulk of investment. The zip code 62298 is the clear leader in volume, hosting 579 investor-owned SFR properties. This is followed by 62236 with 304 properties and 62295 with 81 properties.

However, a different story emerges when analyzing ownership as a percentage of the total housing stock. The 62256 zip code has the highest investor penetration rate by a large margin, with investors owning 65.5% of the SFRs in that area. This indicates a market that is heavily defined by rental properties.

Other areas with high investor concentration include 62279 (37.1% ownership rate) and 62277 (20.8% ownership rate). These figures are substantially higher than the county-wide average of 10.7%, pointing to specific neighborhoods that are particularly attractive to landlords.

The distinction between leaders by count and leaders by percentage is crucial. While 62298 has the most rentals, its 10.7% ownership rate is average for the county. In contrast, areas like 62256 have a much smaller number of total properties, but investors own the majority of them, suggesting a different market dynamic entirely.

This geographic analysis reveals distinct investment strategies. Some investors are focused on accumulating properties in the largest, most liquid submarkets, while others concentrate their holdings to achieve high market share in smaller, potentially less competitive areas.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Monroe County landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 43 properties while selling only 6 in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Transaction data for Monroe County reveals that landlords are firmly in an accumulation phase, consistently buying far more properties than they sell. In the first quarter of 2026, investors purchased 43 SFRs while selling only 6, resulting in a net gain of 37 properties to the rental market and a buy-to-sell ratio of over 7-to-1.

This behavior is not a recent anomaly but part of a sustained trend. For the full year of 2025, landlords acquired 271 properties and sold just 29, a ratio of 9.3 buys for every sale. This indicates strong and sustained confidence in the local market reports and its prospects for long-term growth.

The pattern holds for 2024 as well, where 156 properties were bought against only 19 sold. The consistent, high-volume net buying across multiple years points to a strategic, long-term expansion of rental portfolios throughout the county.

Notably, there is no transactional activity recorded for institutional investors (1,000+ property tier). This lack of buying or selling from large-scale players confirms that the market's transactional velocity is driven entirely by mom-and-pop and mid-size investors.

The high net-buyer status suggests that the investor-owned share of the market is actively growing. Landlords are not just replacing sold properties; they are significantly expanding the overall pool of rental housing in Monroe County.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 36.1% of all Q1 property transactions in Monroe County.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords played a major role in market liquidity, participating in 43 of the 119 total SFR transactions. This 36.1% share demonstrates that investors are a primary source of demand in the Monroe County housing market.

The activity was heavily concentrated at the smallest end of the investor spectrum. Landlords purchasing their first rental property (Tier 01) were responsible for 35 of the 43 transactions. This highlights that market dynamism is being fueled by new entrants rather than the expansion of existing large portfolios.

Pricing strategies varied by tier, though the sample size for larger tiers is small. The most active group, single-property buyers, paid an average of $271,243 per home. This is higher than landlords in the 3-5 property tier, who paid an average of $91,667, suggesting they may be targeting different types of properties or neighborhoods.

An important finding is the source of these purchases. Only 2.9% of properties bought by single-property landlords came from other investors. This low level of inter-landlord trading means that new investors are overwhelmingly buying their properties from traditional homeowners, directly converting owner-occupied housing into rental stock.

All 43 transactions were conducted by mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04), with zero transactions from institutional buyers. This reinforces that the transactional market, like the ownership market, is entirely a small-investor phenomenon in Monroe County.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Monroe County, Controlling 99.4% of Rental Homes While Institutions are Absent
Holdings
Investors own 1,218 SFR properties, 10.7% of Monroe County's market, with individual investors holding 884 (72.6%) and companies owning 379 (31.1%).
Pricing
In Q1, landlords paid 12.9% less than homeowners, securing an average discount of $38,054 per property ($257,487 vs $295,541).
Activity
Landlords purchased 39.0% of all homes sold last quarter (30 properties), with 35 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 99.4% of investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) own just 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies take majority control in portfolios with 6-10 properties (95.0% share).
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 7.2x buy/sell ratio in Q1 2026 (43 buys vs 6 sells), with no transactional activity from institutions.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Monroe County, IL is fundamentally a story of the local, small-scale investor. Analysis of property ownership reveals that investors hold 1,218 homes, or 10.7% of the total SFR market. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who own a staggering 99.4% of all investor-held properties. Individual investors, rather than corporations, form the backbone of this group, owning 72.6% of the rental stock. Institutional investors, in contrast, have a negligible footprint, owning just a single property in the entire county.

Investor behavior in Monroe County is characterized by aggressive acquisition and savvy pricing. In the most recent quarter, landlords captured 39.0% of all home sales, a significant share driven almost entirely by new entrants purchasing their first rental property. These investors demonstrated a distinct pricing advantage, paying 12.9% less than traditional homeowners in Q1, an average savings of $38,054. Furthermore, transaction data shows landlords are confident net buyers, acquiring 7.2 properties for every one they sold in Q1, a consistent trend of portfolio expansion observed over the past several years.

The key takeaway from this Investor Pulse report is that the Monroe County rental market is decentralized, locally controlled, and growing from the ground up. The narrative of corporate consolidation of housing does not apply here. Instead, the market's health and growth are driven by individuals and small businesses, often entering the market for the first time. This dynamic suggests a stable rental supply provided by a diverse base of community-level stakeholders, a crucial factor for the local housing ecosystem.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 04:18 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Monroe (IL)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Monroe (IL) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-il-monroe/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.