McKenzie (ND) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the McKenzie (ND) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in McKenzie (ND)
2,234
Total Investors in McKenzie (ND)
1,167
Investor Owned SFR in McKenzie (ND)
1,011(45.3%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,133
SFR Owned
980
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
34
SFR Owned
37
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,011 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate McKenzie County, Owning 99.7% of Rental Homes Amid Aggressive Accumulation
Investors own 1,011 SFR properties in McKenzie County, ND, representing a significant 45.3% of the total market. This ownership is almost entirely in the hands of small landlords (99.7%), with individuals controlling 96.9% of the properties. In the latest quarter, these investors captured 38.5% of all home purchases, securing a 16.4% price discount compared to traditional homeowners, and continue to be strong net buyers, adding 48 properties to their portfolios in 2025.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,011 SFR properties, with individual landlords holding a dominant 96.9% share.
The majority of investor-owned properties are held with cash (628) versus being financed (383). The portfolio is overwhelmingly rental-focused, with 1,005 of the 1,011 properties classified as non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured a 16.4% discount in Q1 2026, paying $65,119 less than homeowners per property.
The price advantage for landlords is highly volatile, swinging from a 35.0% premium ($144,581) in Q3 2025 to the current 16.4% discount. The acquisition price for landlords of $332,500 in Q1 2026 represents a significant increase from the 2020-2023 average of $280,888.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 38.5% of all single-family homes sold in the most recent quarter.
All investor acquisitions (100.0%) were made by mom-and-pop landlords, specifically 5 new single-property investors entering the market. Institutional buyers had zero purchasing activity.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 99.7% of investor-owned homes.
Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a negligible presence, owning just a single property, which accounts for 0.1% of the investor-owned market. Single-property landlords alone own 87.0% of all investor-held SFRs.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals overwhelmingly own properties across all tiers, holding 97.1% of single-property portfolios.
Companies fail to achieve majority ownership at any portfolio size, accounting for just 25.0% of properties even in the 6-10 unit tier. The data confirms a market almost entirely composed of individual, not corporate, landlords.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in three zip codes: 58854, 58831, and 58835.
The zip code 58854 alone contains 719 investor-owned properties. Certain smaller zip codes exhibit extremely high investor penetration rates, including 58801 (100.0%) and 58838 (70.6%).
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 50 properties while selling only 2 in 2025.
This accumulation trend is consistent year-over-year, with a similar pattern in 2024 where landlords bought 51 properties and sold only 3. No data is available for institutional transactions, reflecting their minimal market presence.
Current Quarter Transactions
Investors accounted for 38.5% of all property transactions in the most recent quarter.
All 5 of these transactions were made by new single-property investors, who paid an average price of $332,500. Notably, 100% of these purchases were from the open market, with zero properties acquired from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,011 SFR properties, with individual landlords holding a dominant 96.9% share.
Detailed Findings

In McKenzie County, ND, landlords have a substantial footprint, owning 1,011 single-family residential properties, which constitutes 45.3% of the total 2,234 SFRs in the market.

The ownership structure is overwhelmingly dominated by individuals rather than corporations. Individual investors own 980 properties (96.9% of the investor portfolio), while companies own just 37 properties (3.7%).

This individual dominance is also reflected in the entity count, where 1,133 of the 1,167 total landlords are individuals, reinforcing the 'mom-and-pop' character of the local real estate investing landscape.

A significant portion of the investor portfolio is owned outright, with 628 properties held with cash compared to 383 that are financed. This suggests a well-capitalized investor base that is less sensitive to interest rate fluctuations.

The portfolio is almost entirely dedicated to rentals, with 1,005 of the 1,011 properties being non-owner-occupied, underscoring the deep rental market focus of property investors in the county.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured a 16.4% discount in Q1 2026, paying $65,119 less than homeowners per property.
Detailed Findings

In the first quarter of 2026, landlords demonstrated a distinct pricing advantage, acquiring properties at an average of $332,500. This was 16.4% less than the $397,619 paid by traditional homeowners, translating to a substantial discount of $65,119 per property.

However, this discount marks a sharp reversal from previous quarters, indicating a volatile market. In Q3 2025, landlords paid a staggering 35.0% premium ($558,150 vs. $413,569), and in Q1 2025, they paid a 17.5% premium ($374,125 vs. $318,486), suggesting their purchasing strategy is highly opportunistic.

The market has seen very low transaction volume, with zero landlord purchases recorded in multiple recent quarters, including Q4 2025 and Q3 2025. This sparse activity can lead to dramatic swings in average pricing metrics.

Despite the recent discount, property values have appreciated significantly over the long term. The Q1 2026 landlord purchase price of $332,500 is 18.4% higher than the average price of $280,888 during the 2020-2023 period.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 38.5% of all single-family homes sold in the most recent quarter.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for a significant portion of the housing market in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing 5 of the 13 total SFRs sold, a market share of 38.5%.

The entirety of this purchasing activity was driven by the smallest investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) made 100% of the investor acquisitions, totaling 5 properties.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) were completely absent from the market, acquiring zero properties and underscoring the local, small-scale nature of real estate investment in the county.

Market growth is coming from new entrants, as all 5 properties were purchased by 5 different single-property landlords. This indicates a grassroots expansion of the rental market rather than consolidation by existing players.

The data reveals that the 'new landlord' segment is the primary engine of investor-driven housing demand in McKenzie County.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 99.7% of investor-owned homes.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in McKenzie County is the epitome of fragmentation, with mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) controlling 99.7% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) are the bedrock of the market, holding 891 properties, which represents 87.0% of the entire investor portfolio. This highlights the market's reliance on small, individual capital.

The narrative of large-scale corporate ownership does not apply here. Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties (Tier 09) own just one single property in the county, a share of only 0.1%.

Mid-size landlords are also exceedingly rare, with investors owning 11-1000 properties combined holding only 3 properties in total (a 0.3% share), further emphasizing the market's highly granular structure.

This distribution indicates a market characterized by widespread, small-scale participation rather than consolidation by large entities. This type of detailed property ownership by owner type report provides clarity on local market dynamics.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individuals overwhelmingly own properties across all tiers, holding 97.1% of single-property portfolios.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the dominant force across every single portfolio tier in McKenzie County, reinforcing the market's non-corporate character.

In the largest tier of single-property landlords, individuals own 868 of the 891 properties, a staggering 97.1% share, compared to just 2.9% for companies.

There is no crossover point where companies become the majority owners. Even among landlords with 6-10 properties, individuals still own 75.0% of the homes, showing that even as portfolios scale, they tend to remain under personal ownership.

Company ownership remains a small fraction of the market at every level, holding just 5.1% of two-property portfolios and 6.5% of 3-5 property portfolios.

This data illustrates a clear pattern: the path for real estate investor growth in this county is predominantly an individual endeavor, not a corporate one.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in three zip codes: 58854, 58831, and 58835.
Detailed Findings

Geographic concentration is a key feature of the investor market in McKenzie County. The vast majority of activity is centered in a few specific zip codes, with 58854 leading by volume with 719 investor-owned SFRs.

Following the leader, zip codes 58831 (114 properties) and 58835 (111 properties) also represent significant hubs of investor ownership.

While some zip codes lead by sheer volume, others stand out for their saturation. Zip code 58801 is entirely investor-owned (100.0% rate), and 58838 has an investor ownership rate of 70.6%, indicating markets that are primarily composed of rental properties.

There is a clear distinction between areas with high counts and high rates. For example, 58854 has the highest count (719) but a moderate rate of 42.3%, while 58831 has a lower count (114) but a higher rate of 58.5%.

Data for some zip codes like 58621 and 58757 was unavailable, suggesting very low housing stock or transaction levels in those areas.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 50 properties while selling only 2 in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in McKenzie County are in a strong accumulation phase, consistently buying far more properties than they sell. In 2025, they were aggressive net buyers, adding a net of 48 properties to their portfolios (50 buys vs. 2 sells).

This behavior is not a recent trend but a sustained strategy. The pattern was nearly identical in 2024, when investors also added a net of 48 properties (51 buys vs. 3 sells), signaling long-term confidence in the local market.

The buy-to-sell ratio is exceptionally high, reaching 25-to-1 in 2025. This indicates a strong hold strategy among investors and very low portfolio churn.

Activity was also strong in Q2 2025, with landlords purchasing 15 properties while only selling 2, resulting in a net gain of 13 properties in a single quarter.

Institutional transaction data is entirely absent, which aligns with their minimal ownership footprint and reinforces that all market dynamics are driven by smaller, local landlords.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Investors accounted for 38.5% of all property transactions in the most recent quarter.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords played a major role in market liquidity, participating in 38.5% of all transactions by purchasing 5 of the 13 homes sold.

The transaction activity was exclusively driven by new entrants. All 5 investor purchases were made by single-property (Tier 01) landlords, who paid an average of $332,500 per home.

There was zero inter-landlord trading during the quarter. The data shows that 0.0% of these acquisitions were from other landlords, meaning all new rental inventory was converted from the traditional homeowner market.

No other investor tiers, from two-property owners to institutional firms, recorded any transactions, highlighting that market dynamism is concentrated entirely at the smallest end of the investor spectrum.

This transactional behavior suggests that the primary growth mechanism for the local rental market is the creation of new small landlords, not the consolidation of portfolios by existing ones.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate McKenzie County, Owning 99.7% of Rental Homes Amid Aggressive Accumulation
Holdings
Landlords own 1,011 SFR properties, representing 45.3% of the McKenzie County, ND market. Ownership is almost entirely concentrated with individual investors, who hold 980 properties (96.9%), while companies own just 37 (3.7%).
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords purchased homes for 16.4% less than traditional homeowners, securing a $65,119 discount with an average price of $332,500 compared to the homeowner price of $397,619.
Activity
Investors acquired 38.5% of all homes sold in the most recent quarter (5 of 13 properties), with 100% of this activity coming from 5 new single-property landlords entering the market for the first time.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) control a near-total 99.7% of investor-owned housing. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) own just a single property, a 0.1% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the majority owners across all portfolio sizes. Companies never reach a majority, owning just 25.0% of properties even in the 6-10 unit tier, underscoring the market's non-corporate nature.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 25-to-1 buy/sell ratio in 2025 (50 buys vs. 2 sells). Institutional investors recorded no transactions, reflecting their negligible presence in the market.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in McKenzie County, ND is fundamentally defined by small, individual investors. Landlords own a significant 1,011 properties, which amounts to 45.3% of the county's total SFR housing stock. This portfolio is not controlled by Wall Street but by Main Street; mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) hold a near-monopoly with 99.7% of all investor-owned homes, while large institutional firms own just a single property (0.1%). Furthermore, 96.9% of these rental properties are held by individuals, not companies, cementing the local, non-corporate character of the market. This structure is further confirmed by assessor data showing widespread, granular ownership.

Investor behavior reveals a strategy of aggressive accumulation and opportunistic purchasing. In the most recent quarter, landlords acquired 38.5% of all homes sold, with every single purchase made by a new, first-time landlord. This grassroots expansion is fueled by savvy deal-making, as investors paid an average of $332,500 in Q1 2026, a 16.4% discount compared to traditional homeowners. Over the past year, landlords have been staunch net buyers, acquiring 50 properties while only selling 2 in 2025. This demonstrates strong confidence and a clear long-term hold strategy prevalent in the market.

The key takeaway from this Investor Pulse reports is that McKenzie County’s housing market is heavily influenced by a large, growing base of small-scale entrepreneurs. The market's growth comes from converting owner-occupied housing into rentals via new entrants, not through consolidation by large entities. This dynamic creates a highly fragmented and competitive rental landscape, driven by local capital and a deep belief in the area's economic stability. For anyone analyzing this market, understanding the dominance and behavior of the mom-and-pop investor is critical.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 11:06 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography McKenzie (ND)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 McKenzie (ND) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-nd-mckenzie/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.