Merrick (NE) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Merrick (NE) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Merrick (NE)
2,718
Total Investors in Merrick (NE)
777
Investor Owned SFR in Merrick (NE)
596(21.9%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
695
SFR Owned
488
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
82
SFR Owned
117
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 596 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Merrick County's SFR Market is Dominated by Small Landlords Who Became Net Sellers in Q1
Investors own 596 single-family properties in Merrick County, representing 21.9% of the market. This ownership is overwhelmingly concentrated among 'mom-and-pop' landlords (98.9% of holdings), with zero institutional presence. In a significant shift, after years of buying, landlords became net sellers in Q1 2026 while still securing properties at a 20.3% discount compared to traditional homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 596 SFR properties in Merrick County, with individuals holding a dominant 81.9%.
The vast majority of investor-owned properties are held with cash (493 properties) versus being financed (103 properties). An overwhelming 99.2% of the portfolio is non-owner-occupied, indicating a strong rental focus. There are 695 individual landlords compared to just 82 operating as companies.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q1 2026, landlords purchased properties for 20.3% less than traditional homeowners.
Landlords paid an average of $190,000 while homeowners paid $238,258, a discount of $48,258. This pricing advantage has been volatile, ranging from a 61.7% discount in Q3 2025 to an 85.0% premium in Q1 2025, likely due to low transaction volumes and unique property acquisitions.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords accounted for a minimal 4.0% of all SFR purchases in Q4 2025.
The entirety of landlord purchasing activity (100.0%) came from the 'mom-and-pop' segment, with a single new landlord entering the market by purchasing one property. There was zero acquisition activity from institutional investors.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 98.9% of investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone account for 77.7% of all investor-owned housing in Merrick County. There is zero ownership by institutional-scale investors (1000+ properties), confirming a complete absence of large corporate landlords.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority property owners at the 6-10 property tier in Merrick County.
While individuals dominate smaller portfolios, companies own 69.7% of properties in the 6-10 unit tier. For single-property landlords, individuals represent a commanding 89.3% of owners.
Geographic Distribution
The 68826 zip code holds the highest number of investor properties at 301.
While 68826 leads in volume, the 68854 zip code has the highest concentration, with a 50.0% investor ownership rate. Several zip codes, including 68628 and 68663, appear in the top five for both absolute count and ownership percentage, indicating significant investor hotspots.
Historical Transactions
Landlords shifted from strong net buyers in 2024 to net sellers in Q1 2026.
After accumulating a net of 50 properties in 2024 and 7 in 2025, investors reversed course in Q1 2026 with 1 purchase versus 4 sales. There is no institutional transaction activity to compare against, as this market has no institutional presence.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlord transactions made up just 3.0% of total market activity in Q1 2026.
The single landlord transaction was by a 'mom-and-pop' investor in the single-property tier, who paid $190,000. This purchase was not sourced from another landlord, indicating the property was acquired from a homeowner or other seller type.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 596 SFR properties in Merrick County, with individuals holding a dominant 81.9%.
Detailed Findings

In Merrick County, investors hold a significant 21.9% of the single-family residential market, totaling 596 properties out of 2,718 total SFRs. This demonstrates a notable concentration of rental properties within the local housing stock.

Individual investors are the backbone of the market, owning 488 properties, which accounts for 81.9% of the entire investor portfolio. In contrast, company-owned properties number 117, or 19.6%, highlighting the limited corporate presence in the area.

The investor market is comprised of 777 distinct landlords, with 695 being individuals and 82 being companies. This 8.5-to-1 ratio of individual to company landlords further underscores the 'mom-and-pop' character of real estate investing in the county.

A striking 99.2% of investor-held properties (591 of 596) are classified as rented, confirming that the portfolio is almost entirely dedicated to providing rental housing rather than for personal use or speculative holding.

Cash is the preferred method of ownership, with 493 properties owned outright compared to only 103 that are financed. This high cash-to-finance ratio suggests a market of financially stable investors who are less reliant on leverage.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q1 2026, landlords purchased properties for 20.3% less than traditional homeowners.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Merrick County demonstrated a strong pricing advantage in the first quarter of 2026, acquiring properties at an average price of $190,000. This was $48,258, or 20.3%, below the $238,258 average paid by traditional homeowners during the same period.

The price gap between landlords and homeowners shows extreme volatility, which is characteristic of a low-volume market. While Q1 2026 saw a significant discount, landlords paid a massive 61.7% less in Q3 2025 ($70,000 vs $182,549). This contrasts sharply with Q1 2025, where they paid an 85.0% premium, suggesting a one-off purchase of a high-value asset.

The lack of landlord purchases in multiple recent quarters, including Q4 2024 and parts of 2025, signals sporadic rather than consistent acquisition activity. This indicates investors are acting opportunistically rather than systematically scaling their portfolios.

Overall price appreciation is evident when comparing recent activity to the pandemic era. The average acquisition price during 2020-2023 was $121,654, significantly lower than the prices observed in late 2025 and early 2026, reflecting broader market trends.

The extreme fluctuations, especially the 85.0% premium paid in Q1 2025 ($335,000 vs $181,083), highlight how a single atypical transaction can heavily skew quarterly averages in a smaller market like Merrick County.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords accounted for a minimal 4.0% of all SFR purchases in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing activity was minimal in the last quarter of 2025, with landlords acquiring just 1 of the 25 total SFR properties sold. This represents a small 4.0% market share, indicating that traditional homebuyers drove the vast majority of transactions.

The market for new rental properties was exclusively driven by small-scale investors. The single landlord purchase was made by a new, single-property landlord, meaning 100.0% of Q4 investor acquisitions fell into the 'mom-and-pop' category.

This quarter saw the entry of one new landlord into the Merrick County market. This grassroots-level growth, with no activity from larger investors, reinforces the local, small-scale nature of the rental market.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) were completely inactive, recording zero purchases in Q4. This absence stands in stark contrast to narratives of corporate consolidation and highlights a market dominated by individual capital.

The low volume of just one investor purchase for the entire quarter suggests a highly selective and opportunistic buying environment among local landlords, who are not aggressively expanding their portfolios.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 98.9% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Merrick County is unequivocally dominated by small-scale operators. Landlords owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) control a combined 98.9% of all investor-owned single-family homes, leaving virtually no market share for larger entities.

First-time or single-holding investors are the most significant market segment by a wide margin. The single-property tier alone comprises 478 properties, representing 77.7% of the entire investor-owned portfolio.

The market structure shows a steep drop-off after the smallest tiers. While landlords with 1-10 properties are numerous, those with 11-50 properties collectively own just 1.2% of the inventory. This indicates very few local investors scale beyond a small portfolio.

There is absolutely no institutional investor presence in Merrick County. The 1,000+ property tier holds 0.0% of the market, confirming that the local rental stock is entirely in the hands of small and mid-sized local operators.

This distribution reveals a highly decentralized ownership structure, which can contribute to market stability and a diversity of rental options, contrasting sharply with markets that have heavy institutional concentration.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority property owners at the 6-10 property tier in Merrick County.
Detailed Findings

A clear ownership pattern emerges across portfolio sizes in Merrick County: individuals initiate investments, and companies take over as portfolios scale. Individuals own the vast majority of smaller portfolios, including 89.3% of single-property holdings and 74.5% of two-property portfolios.

The strategic crossover point from individual to corporate ownership occurs in the 6-10 property tier. At this level, companies own 23 properties, or 69.7% of the tier's total, while individuals own just 10 (30.3%). This suggests that once a portfolio exceeds five properties, formal incorporation becomes the preferred strategy for management and liability.

Even at the 3-5 property tier, company ownership becomes significant, accounting for 23 properties or 46.0% of the holdings. This marks the transition zone where the ownership structure begins to shift towards corporate entities.

The data clearly shows that the entry point for real estate investor activity is overwhelmingly individual. The dominance of individuals in the single-property (89.3%) and two-property (74.5%) tiers indicates that most landlords start small, under their own name.

This trend provides a roadmap for local investor growth, where scaling beyond a handful of properties correlates strongly with the decision to form a business entity to manage the assets.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 68826 zip code holds the highest number of investor properties at 301.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Merrick County is geographically concentrated, with the 68826 zip code serving as the primary hub. It contains 301 investor-owned SFRs, far surpassing any other area in sheer volume, though its ownership rate is a more moderate 19.8%.

The highest rate of investor penetration is in the 68854 zip code, where investors own 50.0% of the single-family housing stock. This highlights a key distinction between markets with high volume versus those with high saturation.

Several zip codes represent true investor hotspots, demonstrating both high counts and high ownership rates. NE-Merrick-68628 is second in volume (85 properties) and second in penetration (31.2%), while NE-Merrick-68663 is fourth in volume (61 properties) and third in penetration (30.5%).

The top five zip codes by property count (68826, 68628, 68864, 68663, 68827) collectively hold 564 properties, which is 94.6% of all investor-owned SFRs in the county. This illustrates an extremely high level of geographic concentration.

Analyzing these patterns allows for a nuanced understanding of the local market. While some areas attract a large number of investors, others are defined by having a majority of their housing stock controlled by them, each presenting different market dynamics.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords shifted from strong net buyers in 2024 to net sellers in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

A significant shift in investor behavior occurred in early 2026, as landlords in Merrick County became net sellers for the first time in recent years. In Q1 2026, they sold four properties while only acquiring one, resulting in a net disposition of three properties.

This recent selling activity marks a sharp reversal from a period of strong accumulation. In 2024, landlords were aggressive net buyers, adding a net total of 50 properties to their portfolios (55 buys vs. 5 sells).

The buying momentum slowed but continued through 2025, with investors still ending the year as net buyers with a net gain of 7 properties (9 buys vs. 2 sells). The turn to net selling in Q1 2026 could signal a response to changing market conditions or a period of profit-taking.

The transaction data is exclusively reflective of 'mom-and-pop' and mid-size landlord behavior, as there were no recorded transactions by institutional-scale investors in any of the observed periods.

This trend reversal is a critical leading indicator for the local market. A sustained shift from net buying to net selling among the dominant investor class could increase the for-sale inventory available to traditional homebuyers.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlord transactions made up just 3.0% of total market activity in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Investor transaction volume was exceptionally low in the first quarter of 2026. Landlords were involved in only 1 of the 33 total SFR transactions, capturing a minimal 3.0% share of market activity.

All landlord transaction activity was concentrated at the smallest end of the investor spectrum. The lone purchase was made by a single-property (Tier 01) landlord, reaffirming that market dynamics are driven by new or small-scale participants.

The purchase price for this transaction was $190,000, which aligns with the discount-seeking behavior observed in the broader pricing analysis for the quarter. There was no transaction activity from larger landlord tiers to provide a price comparison.

The new landlord acquisition was sourced from outside the investor community, with 0% of purchases coming from other landlords. This shows that the transaction represented a transfer of property from the non-investor market into the rental pool.

The extremely low transaction share suggests that landlords in Merrick County are currently in a holding or divesting pattern rather than one of active expansion, a finding supported by the net-seller status observed in historical transaction data for the same quarter.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Merrick County's real estate market is defined by small investors who control 99% of rentals and shifted to net selling in Q1.
Holdings
In Merrick County, landlords own 596 SFR properties, 21.9% of the total market. Individual investors hold a commanding 81.9% of this portfolio (488 properties), with companies owning the remaining 19.6% (117 properties).
Pricing
Landlords in Q1 2026 purchased properties at a significant 20.3% discount compared to homeowners, paying an average of $190,000 versus the homeowner average of $238,258.
Activity
Investor purchasing was minimal in the latest quarter, with landlords making up just 4.0% of Q4 sales. Activity was driven entirely by a single new landlord entering the market, with zero acquisitions by larger investors.
Market Share
'Mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) have near-total control of the investor market, owning 98.9% of all rental SFRs. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have no presence, owning 0.0% of the market.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate the market, but companies become the majority owners for portfolios in the 6-10 property tier, signaling a clear point of incorporation as investors scale.
Transactions
After being strong net buyers in 2024 and 2025, landlords became net sellers in Q1 2026, with 1 purchase versus 4 sales. There was no transaction activity from institutional investors.
Market Narrative

In Merrick County, Nebraska, the single-family rental market is fundamentally a local, small-investor ecosystem. Landlords own 596 properties, comprising 21.9% of the total SFR housing stock. Ownership is heavily skewed towards individuals, who control 81.9% of these assets. The market structure is defined by 'mom-and-pop' operators (1-10 properties), who command an overwhelming 98.9% of investor-owned homes, while institutional-scale investors have zero footprint in the county.

Investor behavior is characterized by opportunistic acquisitions and, recently, a shift towards selling. In Q1 2026, landlords demonstrated a keen ability to secure value, purchasing properties at a 20.3% discount compared to traditional homeowners. However, their overall activity has diminished significantly. After being strong net buyers in 2024 and 2025, they reversed course to become net sellers in Q1 2026, with sales outpacing buys 4-to-1. This low-volume, high-margin activity suggests a patient, selective approach rather than aggressive expansion.

The key takeaway for Merrick County is the stability and decentralized nature of its rental market. The absence of institutional players and the dominance of small landlords create a landscape less susceptible to national corporate strategies and more influenced by local economic conditions. The recent pivot to net selling by this group is the most critical trend to watch, as it could signal a peak in the local investment cycle and potentially increase the supply of homes available for owner-occupants.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 11:32 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Merrick (NE)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Merrick (NE) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ne-merrick/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.