Ness (KS) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Ness (KS) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Ness (KS)
1,029
Total Investors in Ness (KS)
549
Investor Owned SFR in Ness (KS)
461(44.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
496
SFR Owned
402
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
53
SFR Owned
59
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 461 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Investors Own 44.8% of Ness County SFRs in a 100% Cash Market, But Sales Froze in Q4
Investors own 461 single-family properties in Ness County, representing a significant 44.8% of the total market. This ownership is dominated by small, individual landlords who control 94.9% of the investor portfolio, with all properties owned outright in cash. However, the market showed signs of being completely frozen, with zero landlord or homeowner transactions recorded in Q4 2025.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 461 SFR properties in Ness County, with individuals holding a dominant 87.2% share.
The entire investor portfolio of 461 homes was acquired with cash, as zero properties are currently financed. Of these holdings, 449 properties are actively rented, representing the vast majority of the portfolio.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No recent landlord purchase data is available, preventing a Q4 2025 price comparison.
The lack of transaction data in recent quarters for both landlords and homeowners indicates an extremely illiquid market. No pricing trends can be established for Ness County based on the available information.
Current Quarter Purchases
Investor purchase activity in Ness County came to a complete standstill in Q4 2025.
Landlords acquired zero properties, accounting for 0.0% of all market purchases. This includes a complete lack of activity from both mom-and-pop and institutional investors, indicating a market-wide pause.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 94.9% of investor-owned SFRs.
Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have zero presence in Ness County. The market is exclusively composed of smaller, local investors, with single-property owners alone accounting for 77.9% of all holdings.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors form the majority across all active portfolio tiers in Ness County.
Companies have a minor presence, with their largest share being 15.0% in the two-property tier. There is no crossover point where companies become the majority owners, underscoring individual dominance.
Geographic Distribution
Investor ownership is highly concentrated, with rates exceeding 60% in multiple Ness County zip codes.
The zip code 67521 has the highest penetration at 73.9% investor-owned, though 67560 has the largest number of investor properties at 225. This shows a distinction between high-density and high-rate areas.
Historical Transactions
Historical transaction data is unavailable, indicating extremely low market liquidity and a buy-and-hold environment.
Without buy/sell data, it is impossible to determine if landlords are net buyers or sellers. The absence of data also prevents analysis of landlord-to-landlord activity or profit margins.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 0.0% of market transactions in Q4 2025, reflecting a market-wide halt.
A total of zero SFR transactions were recorded in the quarter for any buyer type, confirming a complete pause in sales activity. This inactivity was consistent across all investor tiers from mom-and-pop to institutional.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 461 SFR properties in Ness County, with individuals holding a dominant 87.2% share.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant footprint in Ness County, owning 461 of the 1,029 single-family properties, which constitutes 44.8% of the entire SFR market. This high penetration rate indicates a strong presence of real estate investing activity relative to the market's size.

The ownership structure is overwhelmingly dominated by individuals rather than corporations. Individual landlords own 402 properties (87.2% of the investor portfolio), while companies own just 59 properties (12.8%), reinforcing a 'mom-and-pop' landlord profile for the area.

A striking feature of this market is its complete reliance on cash financing. All 461 investor-owned properties are held free and clear, with zero properties carrying a mortgage. This suggests a fiscally conservative or debt-averse investor base.

The primary strategy for these landlords is rental income, with 449 properties identified as rented. This accounts for nearly all investor-owned homes, highlighting a focus on long-term buy-and-hold strategies.

The number of individual landlord entities (496) far outnumbers company entities (53), a ratio of more than 9-to-1. This confirms that the market is driven by a large number of small, independent operators rather than a few large firms.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No recent landlord purchase data is available, preventing a Q4 2025 price comparison.
Detailed Findings

A comparative price analysis between landlords and traditional homeowners for Q4 2025 is not possible due to a complete absence of sales transactions recorded for either group during this period.

The lack of recent sales activity points to an extremely quiet or illiquid market in Ness County. This makes it impossible to determine current market values or identify any pricing advantage for investors.

Historical pricing data offers no further clarity, as the 2020-2023 timeframe also shows zero properties purchased by landlords, with an average acquisition price of $44,361 likely reflecting older, static assessor data rather than active sales.

Without transactional data, key market indicators such as price appreciation, the landlord-homeowner price gap, and a comparison between individual versus company acquisition costs cannot be calculated.

The data strongly suggests that Ness County is a market characterized by long-term holds rather than frequent trading, with property ownership remaining static in the latest quarter.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Investor purchase activity in Ness County came to a complete standstill in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Ness County was completely frozen in Q4 2025, with zero properties purchased by landlords. This brought their share of market purchases to 0.0%.

The inactivity was universal across all investor types. Both mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) and institutional investors (Tier 09) recorded zero purchases, indicating a broad-based halt in acquisition activity.

No new landlords entered the market during Q4 2025, as evidenced by zero purchases in the single-property (Tier 01) category. This signals a lack of new investment flowing into the area's rental market.

The total market was equally dormant, with zero single-family residential purchases recorded for any buyer type. This confirms the market pause was not limited to investors but was a county-wide phenomenon for the quarter.

This lack of activity prevents any analysis of which investor tiers were most active, as all were dormant. The data portrays a 'wait-and-see' market with no transactions occurring.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 94.9% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Ness County is defined by small-scale owners. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, command 94.9% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) are the bedrock of the market, owning 366 properties. This represents 77.9% of the entire investor portfolio, highlighting the prevalence of first-time or small-scale investors.

Mid-size and institutional investors are completely absent from the market. There are no properties held by landlords in the 11-1000+ property tiers, with the exception of a single small-medium investor holding 24 properties (5.1%).

This ownership structure defies the narrative of large-scale corporate dominance in rental markets. Ness County's rental housing is provided almost exclusively by local, small-portfolio individuals.

Due to the lack of recent transaction data across all tiers, it is not possible to analyze how acquisition prices may vary by portfolio size.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Key Insight
Individual investors form the majority across all active portfolio tiers in Ness County.
Detailed Findings

Individual landlords are the dominant force in every ownership tier in Ness County. In the largest tier, single-property owners, individuals hold 321 of the 366 properties (87.7%).

Corporate ownership is minimal and does not scale with portfolio size. For instance, in the two-property tier, companies own just 6 properties (15.0%), and in the small-medium tier (21-50 properties), they own only 1 property (4.2%).

Unlike in larger urban markets, there is no 'crossover point' in Ness County where companies become the majority owners. Individual ownership remains above 85% in nearly every segment.

This pattern suggests that the investment environment in Ness County is more conducive to or attractive for private individuals rather than structured corporate entities.

Pricing analysis by owner type within tiers is not feasible, as the lack of recent sales prevents any comparison of acquisition strategies between individuals and companies.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor ownership is highly concentrated, with rates exceeding 60% in multiple Ness County zip codes.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity is not evenly distributed across Ness County, with certain zip codes showing extremely high levels of ownership. Four of the top five zip codes have investor ownership rates above 54%.

The highest concentration is in KS-Ness-67521, where investors own 73.9% of the SFR properties. Similarly, KS-Ness-67584 and KS-Ness-67516 show high rates of 68.3% and 63.5%, respectively.

The area with the most investor-owned homes by volume is KS-Ness-67560, with 225 properties. However, its investor ownership rate of 34.9% is lower than other zip codes, indicating it is a larger market rather than a more saturated one.

This geographic distribution reveals that while the county-wide investor ownership is high at 44.8%, specific local pockets are almost entirely rental markets.

The data suggests that investment strategies are highly localized, targeting specific communities within the county for rental property acquisition.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Key Insight
Historical transaction data is unavailable, indicating extremely low market liquidity and a buy-and-hold environment.
Detailed Findings

A complete lack of historical transaction data for Ness County prevents any analysis of landlord buying and selling behavior over time.

This absence of data is itself a key insight, suggesting that the local real estate market is characterized by very low transaction volumes. Properties are likely held for long durations with infrequent sales.

It is not possible to calculate a buy/sell ratio to determine if landlords have been net accumulators or sellers of property in recent years.

Analysis of inter-landlord trading is also not feasible. We cannot determine what percentage of transactions occur between investors, a key metric for understanding market maturity and liquidity.

Similarly, comparing average buy prices to sell prices to infer potential profit margins cannot be performed. The market's dynamics remain opaque due to the lack of sales to analyze.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 0.0% of market transactions in Q4 2025, reflecting a market-wide halt.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords accounted for 0.0% of the 0 total single-family property transactions in Ness County, indicating a completely dormant market.

The lack of activity was universal across all investor sizes. Transaction volume was zero for every tier, from single-property owners (Tier 01) up to the largest investors.

Consequently, no analysis of purchase price by tier is possible. The data provides no insight into whether smaller or larger investors might pay more or less in this market.

Inter-landlord trading activity was also nonexistent. Zero properties were bought from other landlords, as no purchases of any kind occurred.

The Q4 2025 transaction data confirms the findings from other sections: Ness County's real estate market experienced a period of extreme inactivity with no properties changing hands.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Investors Own 44.8% of Ness County SFRs in a 100% Cash Market, But Sales Froze in Q4 2025
Holdings
Landlords own 461 SFR properties, representing a substantial 44.8% of the Ness County market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors, who own 402 properties (87.2%), compared to just 59 (12.8%) owned by companies.
Pricing
No pricing analysis is possible for Q4 2025 due to a complete lack of sales transactions for both landlords and traditional homeowners, indicating an extremely illiquid market.
Activity
Landlords made zero purchases in Q4 2025, representing 0.0% of a market where no SFR sales were recorded at all. No new landlords entered the market during this period.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control nearly the entire investor market at 94.9%. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have no presence, making it a market exclusively for small-scale operators.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate all portfolio sizes; companies never achieve majority ownership at any tier and hold a peak share of only 15.0% in the two-property tier.
Transactions
Transactional analysis is not possible as zero sales were recorded in Q4 2025. The lack of historical data suggests a highly illiquid market where landlords are long-term holders rather than active traders.
Market Narrative

In Ness County, Kansas, investors have established a significant presence, owning 461 single-family homes, which amounts to 44.8% of the total market. This landscape is shaped not by large corporations, but by small, independent operators. Individual landlords own 87.2% of the investor portfolio (402 properties), while 'mom-and-pop' investors with 1-10 properties control a staggering 94.9% of all rental homes. In a notable display of financial conservatism, the entire 461-property portfolio is owned outright with cash, with no mortgage financing utilized.

The market's behavior is defined by stability rather than activity. In Q4 2025, the real estate market came to a complete standstill, with zero transactions recorded for any buyer type, including investors. This lack of sales prevents any analysis of pricing, including the typical discount investors might achieve compared to homeowners. This inactivity signals a market dominated by long-term, buy-and-hold strategies, where properties are rarely traded.

The key takeaway for Ness County is a mature, highly-penetrated rental market controlled by a large base of debt-free, small-scale landlords. While investor ownership is high, particularly in zip codes like 67521 where it reaches 73.9%, the market is extremely illiquid. The total freeze in Q4 2025 activity suggests that future changes in ownership will be slow and gradual, as existing investors appear content to hold their assets for rental income rather than speculative trading. This provides a stable, though static, environment for the local housing market.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 05:20 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Ness (KS)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Ness (KS) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ks-ness/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.