Livingston (IL) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Livingston (IL) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Livingston (IL)
11,212
Total Investors in Livingston (IL)
1,187
Investor Owned SFR in Livingston (IL)
1,275(11.4%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,069
SFR Owned
1,125
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
118
SFR Owned
163
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,275 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Define Livingston County's Market, Controlling 96% of Rental Homes
Individual investors own 88.2% of the 1,275 investor-held SFR properties in Livingston County, which represent 11.4% of the total market. Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 96.1% of these homes, while institutional ownership is nearly non-existent at 0.2%. In recent activity, landlords purchased 19.0% of homes sold, paying 8.6% less than traditional homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Livingston County landlords hold 1,275 SFRs, with individual investors owning a dominant 88.2%.
The majority of holdings are cash-owned, with 1,096 properties compared to just 179 that are financed. A significant 92.4% of the investor-owned portfolio is actively rented, indicating a strong focus on rental income.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Livingston County investors paid 8.6% less than homeowners in Q1, an average discount of $13,153.
The landlord discount has narrowed significantly from a peak of 67.0% in Q1 2025, suggesting a more competitive market. Landlord acquisition prices of $139,722 in Q1 2026 are up 86.8% from the 2020-2023 average of $74,795.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 19.0% of all Livingston County SFRs sold in Q4, totaling 8 properties.
Mom-and-pop investors drove 100% of landlord purchasing activity, with zero properties acquired by institutional-scale investors. Five new single-property landlords entered the market, accounting for 62.5% of all investor acquisitions.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords are the backbone of Livingston County's rental market, controlling 96.1% of investor-owned SFRs.
Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible footprint, owning just 0.2% of the investor portfolio. The largest single segment is first-time landlords, with the single-property tier alone accounting for 53.7% of all investor-held homes.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority property owners only in larger portfolios, starting at the 21-50 property tier.
Individual investors overwhelmingly control smaller portfolios, owning 90.0% of single-property holdings and over 84% in every tier up to 20 properties. The transition is stark: in the 21-50 property tier, company ownership jumps to 96.8%.
Geographic Distribution
Investor property ownership is most concentrated in the 60420 zip code, with 155 properties.
The 60921 zip code has the highest investor penetration rate at 17.0%. This highlights a key difference between areas with high volume versus those with high investor density.
Historical Transactions
Historical transaction data for Livingston County was insufficient to determine net buyer/seller status or inter-landlord activity.
Key metrics such as the buy/sell ratio for all landlords and institutional investors could not be calculated. A comparison of average buy prices versus sell prices to infer potential margins is also not possible with the available data.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 17.0% of Q1 transactions, with all 9 purchases made by mom-and-pop investors.
A distinct pricing inversion occurred, with the smallest investors (single-property) paying the most at $186,500 on average. More experienced small landlords (6-10 properties) paid nearly two-thirds less, averaging just $68,333. No landlord-to-landlord transactions were recorded.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Livingston County landlords hold 1,275 SFRs, with individual investors owning a dominant 88.2%.
Detailed Findings

In Livingston County, investors own 1,275 single-family residential properties, accounting for 11.4% of the total 11,212 SFRs in the market. This demonstrates a significant, yet not overwhelming, investor presence in the local housing landscape.

The ownership structure is heavily skewed towards individuals over corporations. Individual landlords own 1,125 properties, making up 88.2% of the investor portfolio, while companies own the remaining 163 properties (12.8%). This pattern challenges the common narrative of corporate dominance in the rental market.

A look at landlord entities reinforces this finding, with 1,069 individual landlords compared to just 118 company landlords. This indicates that the vast majority of real estate investing in the county is done by small-scale, local operators.

Financing behavior reveals a strong preference for cash acquisitions. Investors own 1,096 properties outright (cash) versus only 179 that are financed. This high cash-to-debt ratio suggests a financially stable and low-leverage investor base.

The portfolio's primary use is clear, with 1,178 of the 1,275 properties identified as rented. This 92.4% rental rate underscores that the overwhelming majority of investor-owned properties are actively contributing to the local rental housing supply.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Livingston County investors paid 8.6% less than homeowners in Q1, an average discount of $13,153.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords in Livingston County demonstrated a distinct pricing advantage, acquiring properties for an average of $139,722. This was $13,153 less than the $152,875 paid by traditional homeowners, representing a significant 8.6% discount.

However, this price gap is shrinking rapidly, indicating increasing competition. The 8.6% discount is a sharp contraction from previous quarters, where landlords enjoyed discounts of 26.2% in Q3 2025, 37.3% in Q2 2025, and an astounding 67.0% in Q1 2025.

The trend suggests that the advantages landlords previously held, such as access to off-market deals or cash offers, are becoming less pronounced in the current market environment.

Despite the narrowing discount, property values have seen substantial growth. The average landlord acquisition price in Q1 2026 ($139,722) marks an 86.8% increase from the average price of $74,795 during the 2020-2023 period, highlighting strong market appreciation.

This long-term price growth, combined with a still-present (though smaller) acquisition discount, continues to make direct-to-seller and off-market strategies valuable for investors seeking to maintain their competitive edge.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 19.0% of all Livingston County SFRs sold in Q4, totaling 8 properties.
Detailed Findings

In the fourth quarter of 2025, landlords were responsible for 19.0% of all SFR purchases in Livingston County, acquiring 8 of the 42 homes sold. This level of activity shows sustained investor interest in the local market.

The entirety of this purchasing activity came from small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) accounted for 100% of the 8 properties bought by investors, with no purchases recorded by mid-size or institutional players.

The market continues to attract new participants, a sign of its perceived health and opportunity. Five of the eight properties (62.5%) were purchased by new, single-property landlords, indicating a strong pipeline of first-time investors entering the rental space.

The remaining acquisitions were made by existing small landlords. One entity in the 3-5 property tier purchased one home, and three entities in the 6-10 property tier acquired two homes between them.

The complete absence of institutional buying activity further solidifies the narrative that Livingston County's investor market is fundamentally driven by local, small-scale operators rather than large corporations.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords are the backbone of Livingston County's rental market, controlling 96.1% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The distribution of property ownership in Livingston County heavily favors small investors. 'Mom-and-pop' landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, control a commanding 96.1% of all investor-owned single-family homes.

This concentration at the small end of the market directly contrasts with narratives of institutional dominance. Large institutional investors (Tier 09, 1,000+ properties) own just 3 properties in the county, representing a mere 0.2% of the total investor portfolio.

The single-property landlord (Tier 01) is the most significant group, owning 726 properties. This tier alone accounts for 53.7% of all investor-owned housing, highlighting the critical role of first-time and small-scale investors in providing rental options.

Mid-size landlords (11-1,000 properties) also have a limited presence, collectively owning just 52 properties, or 3.7% of the investor-owned stock. This further emphasizes the market's reliance on smaller operators.

These figures from assessor data paint a clear picture of a decentralized rental market, where the vast majority of investment properties are managed by local individuals and small businesses rather than large, remote corporations.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority property owners only in larger portfolios, starting at the 21-50 property tier.
Detailed Findings

A clear demarcation exists between individual and company ownership based on portfolio size in Livingston County. Individuals are the primary owners in smaller tiers, while companies dominate the larger, more consolidated portfolios.

Individual investors control 90.0% of properties in the single-property tier and maintain over 84% ownership in every subsequent tier up to the 11-20 property bracket. This underscores the individual's role as the main driver of small-scale rental housing.

The crossover point where companies become the majority is definitive. In the 21-50 property tier, company ownership surges to 96.8%, with companies owning 30 of the 31 properties. This indicates that scaling beyond 20 properties typically involves formal business incorporation.

Even in the 6-10 property tier, individuals still hold a strong majority with 87.9% of the properties (131 homes), showing that many landlords operate personally even as they grow their portfolios to a modest size.

This ownership pattern suggests different strategies: individuals focus on acquiring a few properties, likely for supplemental income or retirement, while corporate structures are employed for larger-scale, professionalized real estate operations.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor property ownership is most concentrated in the 60420 zip code, with 155 properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis of investor holdings in Livingston County reveals specific areas of concentration. The zip code 60420 contains the highest absolute number of investor-owned properties, with a total of 155 homes.

However, the highest concentration rate is found elsewhere. The 60921 zip code has an investor ownership rate of 17.0%, meaning nearly one in six SFRs in that area is investor-owned. This is the highest penetration in the county among zip codes with available data.

This distinction between raw count and percentage is critical. While 60420 has more investor properties, the impact of investor activity on the local market character might be more pronounced in 60921 due to the higher density.

The top five list for investor property count is rounded out by zip codes 60470, 60921 (88 properties), 60946, and 60952, though data for several of these areas was incomplete.

Investors looking for new opportunities can use this data to identify markets with either proven investor success (high counts) or potentially less saturated markets with lower but growing penetration rates.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Historical transaction data for Livingston County was insufficient to determine net buyer/seller status or inter-landlord activity.
Detailed Findings

A full analysis of historical transaction dynamics, including net buying or selling trends, could not be completed for Livingston County due to insufficient data for this period. This section typically reveals the overall direction of the investor market.

Ordinarily, this analysis would calculate a buy-to-sell ratio. A ratio greater than 1.0 indicates that landlords are net buyers, expanding their portfolios, while a ratio less than 1.0 would signal that they are net sellers, contracting their holdings.

Furthermore, the data would allow for a separate examination of institutional (1000+ tier) behavior. This is crucial for understanding whether large-scale investors are entering or exiting the market, which often has a disproportionate impact on market sentiment and pricing.

Another key insight typically derived is the percentage of transactions that occur between landlords. A high rate of inter-landlord sales suggests a liquid and mature investor market where portfolios are actively traded among peers.

Finally, comparing average buy prices to average sell prices over time can provide an implied profit margin and reveal how successfully investors are timing their acquisitions and dispositions. This analysis cannot be performed for Livingston County at this time.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 17.0% of Q1 transactions, with all 9 purchases made by mom-and-pop investors.
Detailed Findings

In the first quarter, landlord transactions represented 17.0% of all SFR market activity in Livingston County, with investors involved in 9 of the 53 total sales. This activity was exclusively driven by small-scale operators.

A striking pricing pattern emerged among different investor tiers. Single-property landlords paid the highest average price at $186,500. In stark contrast, landlords in the 6-10 property tier paid the lowest average price at $68,333, a difference of $118,167 per property.

This price inversion suggests that newer or less experienced investors may be acquiring properties at or near retail prices, while slightly larger, more established small landlords are more adept at sourcing discounted opportunities.

Institutional investors (1000+ tier) were completely absent from the transactional market, recording zero purchases or sales in the quarter. This reinforces their minimal role in the county's housing ecosystem.

Notably, 0% of the landlord purchases were sourced from other landlords. This indicates that investors are acquiring their properties from the traditional market of homeowners and other non-investor sellers rather than trading assets among themselves.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Individual Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Livingston County's Real Estate Market, Controlling 96.1% of Rental Properties
Holdings
Investors own 1,275 single-family residential properties in Livingston County, representing 11.4% of the total market. The ownership is overwhelmingly individual, with non-corporate investors holding 1,125 of these properties (88.2%) compared to just 163 (12.8%) owned by companies.
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords acquired properties at an 8.6% discount compared to traditional homeowners, paying an average of $139,722 versus the homeowner price of $152,875, a savings of $13,153 per property.
Activity
Landlords purchased 19.0% of all homes sold in Q4 2025, with small investors accounting for 100% of that activity. The quarter saw the emergence of 5 new single-property landlords, who comprised 62.5% of investor buyers.
Market Share
The investor market is defined by small operators, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 96.1% of all investor-owned housing. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a minimal 0.2% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the primary owners in smaller portfolios, but a clear shift occurs at scale. Companies become the majority owners in the 21-50 property tier, holding 96.8% of homes in that bracket.
Transactions
Landlords accounted for 17.0% of Q1 transactions, all of which were by small investors. Data was insufficient to calculate a market-wide buy/sell ratio, but a notable pricing trend showed new single-property investors paying the highest prices ($186,500).
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Livingston County, Illinois, is fundamentally shaped by small, individual operators, not large corporations. Investors own 1,275 SFR properties, making up 11.4% of the county's total housing stock. The ownership structure decisively favors individuals, who hold 88.2% of these properties. This dynamic is most evident in the tier distribution: 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 96.1% of investor-owned homes, while institutional investors have a negligible presence at just 0.2%. This structure points to a decentralized rental market built on local ownership.

Investor behavior in the most recent quarters reinforces this small-investor dominance. Landlords acquired 19.0% of homes sold in Q4 2025, with 100% of these purchases made by mom-and-pop investors and five new single-property landlords entering the market. While investors secure pricing advantages, paying 8.6% less than traditional homeowners in Q1 2026, this discount has narrowed significantly from prior quarters. A fascinating pricing inversion shows the newest investors paying the highest prices, suggesting a learning curve in sourcing deals. Historical transaction data was unavailable to determine if investors are currently net buyers or sellers.

The key takeaway from this market report is that Livingston County’s housing market is influenced by a broad base of local investors rather than a consolidated group of large firms. The market continues to attract new entrants, but their initial purchase prices are higher, indicating potential challenges in finding discounted properties. For homeowners and real estate professionals, this means the typical investor is more likely to be a neighbor than a remote Wall Street firm, a fact that shapes local market dynamics, from property maintenance to rental pricing and community engagement.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 04:12 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Livingston (IL)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Livingston (IL) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-il-livingston/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.