Morrison (MN) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Morrison (MN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Morrison (MN)
13,204
Total Investors in Morrison (MN)
2,505
Investor Owned SFR in Morrison (MN)
2,120(16.1%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,120
SFR Owned
1,688
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
385
SFR Owned
487
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,120 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Morrison County with 98.3% of Holdings, Defying Institutional Trends
In Morrison County, investors own 2,120 SFR properties, representing 16.1% of the market. Small landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 98.3% of this portfolio, with institutional investors holding just 0.1%. While landlords are strong net buyers overall, the institutional segment was a net seller in 2025, and a surprising Q1 2026 price reversal saw investors paying 18.7% more than traditional homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 2,120 SFR properties in Morrison County, with individuals holding a dominant 79.6% share.
Cash purchases far outweigh financing, with 1,662 properties owned outright compared to 458 financed. Individual investors own 1,688 properties, while companies own 487. The market consists of 2,120 individual landlords and 385 company landlords.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid a surprising 18.7% premium over homeowners in Q1 2026, a sharp reversal from 2025 discounts.
This Q1 premium of $54,291 ($344,350 vs $290,059) contrasts sharply with the consistent 16-18% discounts landlords secured in 2025. For example, in Q3 2025, landlords paid $57,007 less than homeowners.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 14.5% of all SFR properties sold in the most recent quarter, totaling 10 purchases.
Mom-and-pop landlords were exclusively active, accounting for 100.0% of all investor purchases. Activity was split between new entrants (5 properties by 6 single-property entities) and small landlords (5 properties by 3 entities with 3-5 homes).
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 98.3% of investor-owned SFRs in Morrison County.
In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) own just 0.1% of the investor portfolio, or 3 properties. Single-property landlords alone account for 79.5% of all investor-owned homes.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, holding 54.9% of homes in that segment.
While individuals dominate smaller portfolios, owning 83.4% of single-property rentals, companies represent a larger share in bigger tiers. For portfolios of 11-20 properties, companies own 94.4% of the homes.
Geographic Distribution
Geographic distribution data for investor activity within Morrison County zip codes is not available.
Detailed breakdowns of investor-owned property counts and ownership percentages at the zip code level were not provided. Analysis of hyper-local concentration patterns is therefore not possible.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Morrison County are strong net buyers, acquiring 15 properties for every 2 they sold in Q1 2026.
This net buyer trend is consistent, with 151 buys vs 28 sells in 2025 and 168 buys vs 34 sells in 2024. However, the institutional tier is a net seller, divesting more properties than it acquired in 2025 (1 buy vs 2 sells).
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlord transactions accounted for 14.3% of all market activity in the most recent quarter, with 15 total transactions.
All 15 of these transactions were conducted by mom-and-pop landlords. A massive price disparity was observed, with single-property investors paying an average of $421,667, while small landlords (3-5 properties) paid only $112,400.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 2,120 SFR properties in Morrison County, with individuals holding a dominant 79.6% share.
Detailed Findings

In Morrison County, investors hold 2,120 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, accounting for 16.1% of the total 13,204 SFRs in the market. This demonstrates a significant, yet not overwhelming, investor presence in the local housing landscape.

Individual real estate investing is the primary driver of the rental market, with individual owners holding 1,688 properties, or 79.6% of the investor portfolio. In contrast, company-owned properties number 487, making up the remaining 23.0%.

The ownership structure is further reflected in the entity counts, where 2,120 individual landlords vastly outnumber the 385 company landlords. This highlights a market characterized by many small-scale participants rather than a few large corporate entities.

Cash is the preferred method of acquisition and holding. A total of 1,662 investor-owned properties are held free and clear, compared to just 458 that are financed. This 3.6-to-1 cash-to-financed ratio suggests a well-capitalized and low-leverage investor base in the county.

The portfolio is heavily focused on rental income, with 2,074 properties classified as rented. This represents 97.8% of the total investor-owned stock, underscoring the rental-centric strategy of landlords in Morrison County.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid a surprising 18.7% premium over homeowners in Q1 2026, a sharp reversal from 2025 discounts.
Detailed Findings

A dramatic shift in acquisition pricing occurred in Q1 2026, where landlords paid an average of $344,350, a substantial $54,291 (18.7%) premium compared to the $290,059 paid by traditional homeowners. This marks a significant departure from previous trends.

This recent premium directly reverses the pattern seen throughout 2025. In Q3 2025, landlords secured an 18.5% discount ($251,749 vs $308,756), and similar discounts of 18.1% in Q2 and 16.5% in Q1 were recorded. This consistent discount vanished and inverted in the new year.

Comparing prices over time reveals market appreciation. The average landlord acquisition price of $329,337 in 2024 rose from the 2020-2023 average of $249,794, indicating a 31.8% increase in asset values for investors post-pandemic boom.

The sudden flip from a deep discount to a significant premium suggests a potential shift in market dynamics. This could be driven by increased competition for limited inventory, or a change in the type of properties being targeted by investors in early 2026.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 14.5% of all SFR properties sold in the most recent quarter, totaling 10 purchases.
Detailed Findings

In the most recent quarter of activity (Q4 2025), landlords purchased 10 of the 69 total SFRs sold in Morrison County, capturing 14.5% of the market share. This indicates steady, but not dominant, acquisition activity from investors.

The entirety of investor purchasing activity came from mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who bought all 10 properties. Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties made zero acquisitions, highlighting their absence from the local market's growth.

New market entrants made a strong showing, with 6 new single-property landlord entities acquiring 5 homes. This signals healthy grassroots growth in the rental market, as new investors take their first step into property ownership.

The remaining activity came from existing small landlords in the 3-5 property tier. Three of these entities purchased 5 properties, demonstrating continued portfolio building among established local investors.

The data clearly shows that the market's investor activity is fueled by small, local players rather than large-scale corporate buyers. The focus is on incremental growth from both new and existing small landlords.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 98.3% of investor-owned SFRs in Morrison County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Morrison County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, control a massive 98.3% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Single-property landlords are the bedrock of the market. This tier alone, comprising investors with just one rental property, holds 1,726 homes, which represents 79.5% of the entire investor-owned portfolio.

Mid-size landlords (11-1,000 properties) have a very small footprint, collectively owning just 35 properties or 1.5% of the investor market. This further emphasizes the lack of scale among investors in the region.

At the top end of the market, institutional investors with portfolios of over 1,000 properties have a negligible presence. They own a mere 3 properties, accounting for only 0.1% of the investor-owned housing stock, debunking any narrative of a corporate takeover in this county.

This distribution, detailed in our property ownership by owner type report, shows a highly fragmented market. The rental housing supply is provided by a large number of individual community members rather than a small number of large corporations.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, holding 54.9% of homes in that segment.
Detailed Findings

A clear crossover point exists where company ownership surpasses individual ownership. In the 6-10 property tier, companies own 39 properties (54.9%) compared to the 32 properties (45.1%) held by individuals, marking the transition to a more corporate structure for larger portfolios.

Individual landlords are the definitive force in smaller tiers. They own 1,468 (83.4%) of single-property rentals and 107 (69.9%) of two-property portfolios, demonstrating that the entry-level of the market is primarily driven by personal investment.

As portfolio sizes increase, company ownership becomes progressively more dominant. In the 11-20 property tier, company-held properties account for 17 of the 18 homes, a commanding 94.4% share, suggesting that scaling often involves formal incorporation.

Even with company dominance in larger tiers, the overall market remains skewed toward individuals due to the sheer volume of single-property landlords. Of all investor properties, 1,688 are owned by individuals versus 487 by companies.

This pattern indicates different strategies and structures based on scale. Individuals fuel market entry and small-scale operations, while companies are the preferred vehicle for managing larger, more complex portfolios in Morrison County.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Geographic distribution data for investor activity within Morrison County zip codes is not available.
Detailed Findings

Analysis of the geographic distribution of investor-owned properties within Morrison County is not possible with the current data. Specific counts and ownership percentages for zip codes like 56307, 56331, and 56336 were unavailable.

Without this localized assessor data, identifying specific neighborhoods or towns with higher or lower concentrations of landlord ownership is unfeasible. It is unclear if investor activity is evenly spread or clustered in particular areas.

Similarly, a comparison of investor acquisition prices across different sub-geographies of the county cannot be performed. This prevents an analysis of whether investors are targeting more affordable or more premium sub-markets.

The lack of zip-code-level detail means we cannot distinguish between regions with the highest absolute number of investor properties versus those with the highest percentage rate of investor ownership.

Future Investor Pulse reports with more granular data would be required to uncover these crucial hyper-local investment patterns within Morrison County.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Morrison County are strong net buyers, acquiring 15 properties for every 2 they sold in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Morrison County are aggressively expanding their portfolios, consistently operating as net buyers. In Q1 2026, they purchased 15 properties while selling only 2, demonstrating strong confidence in the local market.

This trend of accumulation is not new. In 2025, investors bought 151 SFRs and sold just 28, for a net gain of 123 properties. The pattern was similar in 2024, with 168 buys and 34 sells, resulting in a net gain of 134 properties.

A significant divergence in strategy appears when segmenting by size. While the overall market is in acquisition mode, the institutional tier (1,000+ properties) acted as a net seller in 2025, with only 1 purchase against 2 sales.

This contrast reveals a key market dynamic: small, local landlords are the engine of growth, actively buying and holding properties. Meanwhile, the very small contingent of large-scale investors is divesting, signaling a potential strategic retreat from the county.

The data on historical transactions paints a clear picture of a market where mom-and-pop investors are doubling down on their investments, while the largest players are reducing their exposure.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlord transactions accounted for 14.3% of all market activity in the most recent quarter, with 15 total transactions.
Detailed Findings

In the most recent quarter, landlords were involved in 15 of the 105 total SFR transactions in Morrison County, capturing a 14.3% share of market activity. All of this activity was driven by mom-and-pop investors.

A striking price difference emerged between investor tiers. Single-property landlords paid the highest average price at $421,667 per transaction. This suggests new entrants may be paying a premium to enter the market or are targeting higher-quality assets.

In sharp contrast, investors in the 3-5 property tier paid a significantly lower average price of just $112,400. This $309,267 price gap indicates that more experienced small landlords may be more adept at finding undervalued properties or are targeting a different class of housing stock.

Inter-landlord activity was minimal. Of the 6 transactions by single-property investors, only 1 (16.7%) was purchased from another landlord. None of the 9 transactions by the 3-5 property tier came from other investors, indicating most acquisitions are from traditional homeowners.

No transactions were recorded for institutional investors, reinforcing their passive role in the county's transactional market during this period. The transactional flow is clearly dominated by smaller investors making deals with homeowners.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small, individual landlords control 98.3% of Morrison County's investor market and remain aggressive net buyers.
Holdings
Investors own 2,120 SFR properties, 16.1% of Morrison County's market, with individual investors holding a dominant 1,688 (79.6%) of these homes compared to 487 (23.0%) by companies.
Pricing
In a stark Q1 2026 reversal, landlords paid an 18.7% premium over homeowners ($344,350 vs $290,059), a sharp contrast to the consistent 16-18% discounts they secured throughout 2025.
Activity
Landlords captured 14.5% of sales in the last active quarter, with mom-and-pop investors accounting for 100% of the 10 purchases and 6 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
The market is dominated by small landlords (1-10 properties) who control 98.3% of investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) have a negligible footprint at just 0.1% (3 properties).
Ownership Type
Individual investors overwhelmingly control smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in the 6-10 property tier, holding 54.9% of homes in that segment.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 7.5x buy/sell ratio in Q1 2026 (15 buys vs 2 sells), though the small institutional segment acted as a net seller in 2025.
Market Narrative

The real estate investor market in Morrison County, MN, is fundamentally a story of local, small-scale ownership. Investors hold 2,120 single-family properties, comprising 16.1% of the county's total SFR housing stock. The market composition heavily favors individual owners, who control 1,688 homes (79.6%), over companies. This dynamic is most pronounced in the tier distribution: mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) command an overwhelming 98.3% of the investor-owned portfolio, while institutional firms with over 1,000 properties have a nearly non-existent share of 0.1%.

Investor behavior underscores this grassroots dominance. Landlords are consistently net buyers, acquiring properties at a 7.5-to-1 ratio in Q1 2026. This activity is driven entirely by mom-and-pop investors, including 6 new single-property landlords who entered the market in the last active quarter. However, pricing behavior has been volatile. After securing discounts of 16-18% against homeowners for all of 2025, landlords paid a surprising 18.7% premium in Q1 2026. This suggests escalating competition or a shift in acquisition strategy. In a revealing contrast, while small investors are accumulating properties, the county's tiny institutional segment was a net seller in 2025.

The key takeaway from this market reports dashboard is that Morrison County's rental market is controlled and shaped by community-level investors, not large corporations. The narrative of a 'Wall Street' takeover of housing does not apply here. Instead, the market's health and growth depend on the financial decisions of thousands of individual owners. The recent price premium paid by investors is the most critical trend to watch, as it could signal intensifying competition for limited housing supply, potentially impacting affordability for all buyers in the county.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 08:44 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Morrison (MN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Morrison (MN) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-mn-morrison/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.