Hendricks (IN) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Hendricks (IN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Hendricks (IN)
56,314
Total Investors in Hendricks (IN)
3,036
Investor Owned SFR in Hendricks (IN)
4,525(8.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,314
SFR Owned
1,955
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
722
SFR Owned
2,609
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 4,525 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Hendricks County sees institutional investors divest, while mom-and-pop landlords dominate acquisitions.
Investors own 4,525 SFR properties, 8.0% of the Hendricks County market, with companies surprisingly holding a 57.7% majority of assets. Mom-and-pop landlords control 61.4% of investor properties versus a high 28.7% for institutional investors, who have become net sellers. In Q1 2026, landlords purchased properties for 26.2% less than traditional homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 4,525 homes in Hendricks County, with companies controlling a 57.7% majority.
The investor portfolio is overwhelmingly composed of cash purchases, with 3,291 properties owned outright compared to 1,234 that are financed. Of all investor-owned homes, 4,302 are rentals, representing a 95.1% focus on non-owner-occupied strategies. While companies own more properties, individual landlords are more numerous, with 2,314 individuals versus 722 companies.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured a massive 26.2% discount in Q1, paying $104,690 less than homeowners.
The price gap between landlords and homeowners shows significant volatility, swinging from a 33.5% landlord discount in Q3 2025 to just 3.0% in Q2 2025. Landlord acquisition prices have appreciated 20.1% since the 2020-2023 period, rising from an average of $245,199 to $294,371 in Q1 2026.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords represented 5.9% of all SFR purchases in the latest quarter, acquiring 29 properties.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) dominated investor buying activity, accounting for 18 properties, or 60.0% of all landlord purchases. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) were less active, purchasing only 2 properties for a 6.7% share. The market saw 14 new single-property landlords enter in the quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 61.4% of investor SFRs, but institutions have a major 28.7% share.
Single-property landlords are the largest individual group, owning 1,691 properties, or 36.7% of the investor-owned market. The data reveals a highly concentrated market where two distinct groups, small landlords and large institutions, hold over 90% of all investor properties combined.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals dominate small portfolios, but companies assume control for portfolios of 6+ properties.
Companies own 77.4% of properties in the 6-10 property tier, a clear crossover point from individual ownership. This trend accelerates in larger tiers, with companies owning over 93% of properties in every tier above 10 units. Individual landlords are most concentrated in the single-property tier, holding 1,370 homes (80.3%).
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity in Hendricks County is highly concentrated in Avon, Brownsburg, and Plainfield.
The zip codes 46123 (Avon), 46112 (Brownsburg), and 46168 (Plainfield) collectively contain 2,879 investor-owned properties, representing 63.6% of the county's total. Some smaller zip codes show extremely high investor penetration rates, such as 46103 at 16.8%, compared to the county average of 8.0%.
Historical Transactions
Both all landlords and institutional investors have shifted to become net sellers in Hendricks County.
After being strong net buyers in 2024 (net +218 properties) and 2025 (net +164), the overall landlord market flipped to a net seller position in Q1 2026 (33 buys vs 34 sells). Institutional investors led this reversal, shifting from net buyers in 2024 (net +75) to consistent net sellers through 2025 (net -18) and into Q1 2026 (net -7).
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in just 4.7% of all Q1 transactions, buying 33 properties.
In a surprising reversal of expectations, institutional investors paid a 23.2% premium in Q1, with an average purchase price of $376,313 compared to $305,546 for single-property landlords. Larger landlords were more likely to buy from other investors, with portfolios over 100 units sourcing 50% of their new properties from fellow landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 4,525 homes in Hendricks County, with companies controlling a 57.7% majority.
Detailed Findings

In Hendricks County, investors hold 4,525 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, representing 8.0% of the total 56,314 SFRs in the market. This demonstrates a significant, yet not dominant, investor presence.

A surprising finding is the ownership split: companies own a majority stake with 2,609 properties (57.7%), while individual investors hold 1,955 properties (43.2%). This challenges the national trend where individuals typically hold the vast majority of rental properties.

Despite companies owning more homes, individual investors are far more common. There are 2,314 individual landlords compared to just 722 company landlords. This indicates that company portfolios are, on average, significantly larger than those held by individuals.

The investor market in Hendricks County is heavily focused on rentals, with 4,302 properties (95.1%) classified as non-owner-occupied. This signals a strong orientation towards generating rental income rather than short-term flipping.

Cash is the preferred method of ownership, with 3,291 properties (72.7%) owned free and clear, compared to 1,234 properties (27.3%) that are financed. This suggests a well-capitalized investor base in the county.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured a massive 26.2% discount in Q1, paying $104,690 less than homeowners.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Hendricks County demonstrated a remarkable ability to acquire properties below market rates in the first quarter of 2026. Landlords paid an average of $294,371, which is 26.2% less than the $399,061 paid by traditional homeowners, a cash discount of $104,690 per property.

This pricing advantage is not consistent, highlighting the opportunistic nature of investor purchasing. The discount has fluctuated dramatically in recent quarters, from a high of 33.5% ($137,699) in Q3 2025 to a low of 3.0% ($12,620) in Q2 2025.

Despite securing discounts, the prices landlords pay have risen significantly over time. The average Q1 2026 acquisition price of $294,371 represents a 20.1% increase from the 2020-2023 average of $245,199, reflecting broad market appreciation.

Comparing year-over-year data, average landlord purchase prices have climbed from $323,136 in 2024 to $359,162 in 2025, an 11.1% increase that signals continued upward pressure on acquisition costs for investors.

The substantial discount in Q1 2026 suggests that investors may be targeting distressed or off-market properties that are not available to, or desired by, traditional homebuyers, allowing them to bypass bidding wars and secure lower prices.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords represented 5.9% of all SFR purchases in the latest quarter, acquiring 29 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor acquisition activity in Hendricks County was modest in the last quarter, with landlords purchasing 29 of the 489 total SFRs sold, a market share of 5.9%. This suggests that the majority of homes are being sold to traditional homebuyers.

The bulk of investor purchasing was driven by smaller operators. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) were responsible for 60.0% of all investor acquisitions, purchasing 18 homes.

First-time or single-property investors were the most active group, with 14 new entities acquiring 13 properties. This segment alone accounted for 43.3% of all landlord purchases, indicating a healthy influx of new entrants to the rental market.

In contrast, institutional-scale investors (1000+ properties) had a minimal impact on the acquisitions market, buying just 2 properties, which constituted only 6.7% of the investor total.

Mid-size and large landlords (11-1000 properties) also showed a measured pace, collectively purchasing 10 properties and making up 33.3% of investor buying activity.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 61.4% of investor SFRs, but institutions have a major 28.7% share.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Hendricks County is a tale of two extremes. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) control a definitive majority of investor-owned homes, with a combined 61.4% share.

However, defying national trends, institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a substantial 28.7% of the investor market, with 1,322 properties. This level of institutional concentration is unusually high for a single county and indicates a significant corporate presence.

The single-property landlord tier remains the bedrock of the market, comprising 1,691 properties (36.7% of the total). This is the largest single tier, highlighting the importance of small-scale real estate investing.

Mid-size landlords (11-1000 properties) occupy a much smaller niche in Hendricks County, collectively owning just 460 properties, or 10.0% of the investor-owned housing stock.

The combined dominance of the smallest (Tiers 01-04 at 61.4%) and largest (Tier 09 at 28.7%) investors means that over 90% of the rental stock is controlled by these two groups, with very little in the middle.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individuals dominate small portfolios, but companies assume control for portfolios of 6+ properties.
Detailed Findings

A clear pattern of professionalization emerges when analyzing ownership by portfolio size in Hendricks County. While individual investors form the backbone of smaller portfolios, companies dominate at scale.

Individuals are the clear majority owners in the smallest tiers, holding 80.3% of single-property portfolios, 65.8% of two-property portfolios, and 66.9% of 3-5 property portfolios.

The crossover point occurs decisively in the 6-10 property tier, where companies own 209 properties (77.4%) compared to just 61 for individuals (22.6%). This tier marks the threshold where a corporate structure becomes the standard operating model.

This company dominance becomes near-total in larger portfolios. Companies own 93.0% of properties in the 11-20 tier and over 96% in all tiers with more than 50 properties.

Even within the single-property landlord tier, companies have a foothold, owning 336 properties (19.7%). This suggests some investors use a corporate entity from their very first purchase.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity in Hendricks County is highly concentrated in Avon, Brownsburg, and Plainfield.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Hendricks County is not evenly distributed, but instead shows intense geographic concentration. Three zip codes, 46123 (Avon), 46112 (Brownsburg), and 46168 (Plainfield), are the clear epicenters of activity.

Together, these three areas contain 2,879 investor-owned SFRs, which accounts for 63.6% of all investor properties in the county. The breakdown is 991 properties in 46123, 982 in 46112, and 906 in 46168.

The areas with the highest counts of investor properties do not necessarily have the highest rates of investor ownership. For example, 46123 has an ownership rate of 7.8%, close to the county average, while the much smaller area of 46234 has a higher penetration rate of 12.6% with 445 properties.

Several smaller zip codes exhibit extremely high investor ownership rates, far exceeding the countywide average of 8.0%. Notably, 46103 shows a 16.8% investor ownership rate, suggesting it is a key target for rental property acquisition.

This geographic clustering indicates that investors are targeting specific neighborhoods, likely driven by factors like school districts, rental demand, and property values. Understanding these micro-markets is critical, as highlighted in local market reports.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Both all landlords and institutional investors have shifted to become net sellers in Hendricks County.
Detailed Findings

A significant shift in market dynamics has occurred, with landlords pivoting from acquisition to disposition. After years of being net buyers, including a net gain of 218 properties in 2024 and 164 in 2025, landlords became net sellers in the first quarter of 2026, selling one more property than they bought (33 buys vs. 34 sells).

This trend reversal appears to be led by institutional investors (1000+ properties). While they were aggressive net buyers in 2024, adding 75 properties to their portfolios, they became net sellers in 2025 (selling a net 18 properties) and have continued this trend into Q1 2026 with a net disposition of 7 properties.

The institutional exit is pronounced. In Q1 2026, large institutions sold 9 properties while only acquiring 2. This steady stream of sales from the largest players is adding inventory to the market and signaling a potential strategic retreat from the county.

This shift from accumulation to selling is a critical market indicator. It suggests that large investors may believe the market has peaked or that better opportunities exist elsewhere, a key finding for any real estate investing strategy.

In Q2 2025, while the overall landlord market was still in a strong buying phase (net +101), institutions were already selling, with 19 buys against 29 sells (net -10). This shows that the largest players anticipated the market shift well ahead of smaller landlords.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in just 4.7% of all Q1 transactions, buying 33 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor transaction volume was low in the first quarter of 2026. Of the 699 total SFR transactions in Hendricks County, only 33 involved a landlord purchaser, representing a 4.7% market share. This indicates a quiet quarter for investor acquisitions.

Challenging the notion that scale provides better pricing, institutional investors (1000+ properties) paid the highest average price in Q1 at $376,313. This was 23.2% more than the $305,546 paid by new single-property landlords, suggesting institutions may have targeted higher-quality, move-in-ready assets.

Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) were the most active transactional group, accounting for 21 of the 33 investor purchases (63.6%). This continues the trend of small investors driving new acquisition volumes.

Larger, more established landlords show a greater tendency to acquire properties from their peers. Tiers with over 100 properties sourced 50% of their Q1 purchases from other landlords, compared to just 33.3% for single-property buyers. This suggests a more efficient, interconnected market among professional operators.

The lowest prices were paid by landlords in the 101-1000 property tier, who averaged just $157,817 per purchase. This wide price disparity across tiers, from $157,817 to $376,313, reveals highly specialized and differing acquisition strategies among investor groups.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Institutional investors retreat from Hendricks County as net sellers, while mom-and-pop landlords control 61% of rental housing.
Holdings
Landlords own 4,525 SFR properties, 8.0% of the market in Hendricks County, with company investors holding a 57.7% majority of assets and individual investors owning the remaining 43.2%.
Pricing
Landlords acquired properties at a significant 26.2% discount compared to traditional homeowners in Q1 2026, paying an average of $294,371 versus the homeowner price of $399,061.
Activity
Investor purchasing was muted, accounting for just 5.9% of Q4 sales, though the market still saw the entry of 14 new single-property landlords. Mom-and-pop investors drove 60.0% of all landlord acquisitions.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) control 61.4% of investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) hold an unusually high 28.7% share for a single county.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but a clear professionalization threshold exists at the 6-10 property tier, where companies take over with 77.4% ownership.
Transactions
The market has shifted, with landlords becoming net sellers in Q1 2026 (33 buys vs 34 sells). This move was led by institutional investors, who have been consistent net sellers since early 2025.
Market Narrative

In Hendricks County, Indiana, the investor landscape is marked by a powerful dichotomy. Investors control 4,525 single-family homes, representing 8.0% of the total market. Uncharacteristically, corporate entities own the majority of these assets (57.7%), even though individual landlords are more numerous. The market is defined by two groups: 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties), who control a 61.4% majority, and large institutional investors (1,000+ properties), which hold a surprisingly high 28.7% share.

Recent activity reveals a clear market shift. In Q1 2026, investors demonstrated their deal-finding prowess, acquiring properties for 26.2% less than traditional homeowners. However, their overall acquisition volume has slowed, accounting for just 4.7% of Q1 transactions. Most significantly, the entire investor segment has pivoted from accumulation to disposition. After years as net buyers, landlords became net sellers in Q1 2026, a trend led by institutional investors who began divesting their portfolios more than a year ago.

The key takeaway for the Hendricks County housing market is the institutional retreat. The largest players are actively selling, adding inventory and signaling a potential market peak. While new, small-scale landlords continue to enter, the dominant trend is one of strategic selling by seasoned professionals. This shift, combined with high geographic concentration in areas like Avon and Brownsburg, suggests a market in transition, where opportunities may now lie in acquiring properties from large-scale landlords who are rebalancing their portfolios.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 04:39 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Hendricks (IN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Hendricks (IN) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-in-hendricks/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.