Davison (SD) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Davison (SD) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Davison (SD)
6,005
Total Investors in Davison (SD)
1,263
Investor Owned SFR in Davison (SD)
1,151(19.2%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,154
SFR Owned
979
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
109
SFR Owned
172
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,151 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Davison County's Investor Market: Dominated by Cash-Rich Mom-and-Pops in a Period of Zero Activity
Investors own 1,151 single-family properties in Davison County, representing 19.2% of the market. The landscape is entirely controlled by small, individual landlords (96.6% mom-and-pop) who own their portfolios with 100% cash. Recent market activity was non-existent, with zero investor purchases or sales recorded in the latest quarter.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors hold 1,151 SFR properties, with individuals owning a dominant 85.1% share.
A striking 100% of all investor-owned properties (1,151) are held in cash, with no financing recorded. Of these, 1,108 properties (96.3%) are actively rented, indicating a strong buy-and-hold rental strategy.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No recent landlord or homeowner sales activity was recorded, preventing a price comparison.
The absence of transaction data for recent timeframes, including 2020-2023 and the current quarter, suggests an extremely low-liquidity market. Therefore, analysis of pricing trends or the typical landlord-homeowner price gap is not possible.
Current Quarter Purchases
Investors made zero SFR purchases in Q4 2025, accounting for 0.0% of market activity.
Both mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) and institutional investors (Tier 09) recorded zero purchases this quarter. This indicates a complete halt in acquisition activity across all investor sizes.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 96.6% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have zero presence in this market, owning 0.0% of the investor-held housing. Due to a lack of recent transactions, price analysis by tier is unavailable.
Ownership by Tier & Type
No pricing data is available to compare individual and company acquisition costs.
Companies become the majority property owner at the 6-10 property tier, holding a 51.7% share. Despite this, individuals dominate every other tier where both exist, including 89.8% of single-property portfolios.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in one area, with zip code 57301 holding 947 properties.
While 57301 has the highest count, other zip codes show higher penetration rates. Zip code 57334 has a 41.4% investor ownership rate, and 57363 has a 36.3% rate, indicating deeply saturated rental sub-markets.
Historical Transactions
A lack of historical transaction data prevents analysis of buy/sell ratios or inter-landlord trades.
No buy or sell transactions were recorded for any landlord type, including institutional investors, across all available timeframes. This makes it impossible to determine if landlords are net buyers or sellers or to analyze transaction prices.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 0.0% of SFR transactions in Q1, with zero deals recorded.
No transactions were made by any investor tier, from mom-and-pops to institutions. Consequently, there was no inter-landlord trading, and no purchase price data is available for the quarter.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors hold 1,151 SFR properties, with individuals owning a dominant 85.1% share.
Detailed Findings

In Davison County, real estate investor activity is a significant component of the housing market, with 1,151 single-family residential properties, or 19.2% of the total 6,005 SFRs, being investor-owned.

Individual investors form the bedrock of this market, holding 979 properties, which accounts for a commanding 85.1% of all investor-owned SFRs. In contrast, company-owned portfolios consist of 172 properties, making up the remaining 14.9%.

A defining characteristic of this market is the complete absence of leverage; 100% of the 1,151 investor-owned homes are owned outright with cash. This indicates a highly conservative and financially stable investor base that is insulated from interest rate fluctuations.

The primary strategy for investors in this region is generating rental income. A total of 1,108 properties, or 96.3% of the investor portfolio, are classified as rented, underscoring a long-term buy-and-hold approach rather than short-term speculation.

The market comprises 1,263 distinct landlord entities, with individual landlords (1,154) outnumbering company landlords (109) by more than a 10-to-1 ratio, reinforcing the small-scale nature of property investment in the county.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No recent landlord or homeowner sales activity was recorded, preventing a price comparison.
Detailed Findings

Analysis of acquisition pricing and market trends in Davison County is constrained by a lack of recent sales data. There were no recorded SFR property purchases by either landlords or traditional homeowners in the latest quarter.

Similarly, looking at the pandemic-era boom from 2020-2023, the data shows zero properties acquired by landlords, with a placeholder average price of $97,000, indicating minimal to no activity during a period of national market acceleration.

This absence of transactions makes it impossible to calculate the typical price gap often observed between what landlords and homeowners pay. There is no data to establish a trend, determine if a discount exists, or track price appreciation in recent years.

The data suggests that the current investor portfolio in Davison County is composed of long-term holdings, with very little recent turnover or new acquisitions. The market appears static rather than dynamic, with investors holding existing assets instead of actively trading.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Investors made zero SFR purchases in Q4 2025, accounting for 0.0% of market activity.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, the investor acquisition market in Davison County was completely dormant, with landlords purchasing zero of the zero total SFR properties sold. This reflects a total pause in market activity.

Breaking down the inactivity by investor size, mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) acquired 0 properties, representing 0.0% of the non-existent investor purchasing.

Likewise, institutional investors with portfolios of 1,000+ properties also made no acquisitions, accounting for 0.0% of landlord purchases.

The lack of new entrants is also notable, as no new single-property landlords (Tier 01) purchased homes this quarter. This signals a barrier to entry or a lack of motivation for new investors to join the market at this time.

Overall, Q4 2025 was characterized by a complete lack of purchasing from the investor community, suggesting a stable, hold-oriented market with no current appetite for expansion.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 96.6% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure in Davison County is unequivocally dominated by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04), control 96.6% of all investor-owned single-family homes.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) are the largest single group, owning 786 properties, which constitutes 64.4% of the entire investor portfolio. This highlights the highly fragmented and small-scale nature of the rental market.

Mid-size landlords (11-1000 properties) hold a marginal share, with Tiers 05 (11-20 properties) and 06 (21-50 properties) collectively owning just 42 properties, or 3.4% of the total.

In stark contrast to national headlines, institutional-scale investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have absolutely no footprint in Davison County, with 0.0% ownership. This market is exclusively driven by local and regional landlords.

Due to the lack of sales activity across all timeframes in the provided data, it is not possible to compare acquisition prices between different investor tiers to determine if larger players achieve better pricing.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Key Insight
No pricing data is available to compare individual and company acquisition costs.
Detailed Findings

In Davison County's investor market, individuals own the vast majority of properties (85.1%). However, ownership dynamics shift at specific portfolio sizes. Companies first surpass individuals in the small landlord tier of 6-10 properties, where they own 46 homes (51.7%) compared to 43 homes (48.3%) for individuals.

This crossover point is an anomaly, as individuals regain 100% ownership in the next largest tiers, 11-20 and 21-50 properties. This suggests that corporate investment is highly concentrated in a specific small-portfolio strategy rather than scaling up.

Individual landlords show overwhelming dominance in the entry-level tiers, owning 706 of single-property portfolios (89.8%) and 112 of two-property portfolios (84.8%).

The largest portfolios in the county, which fall in the 11-50 property range, are exclusively held by individuals, indicating that the largest local landlords operate personally rather than through corporate structures.

A lack of recent transaction data prevents any analysis of pricing differences between individual and company buyers, either overall or within specific tiers.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in one area, with zip code 57301 holding 947 properties.
Detailed Findings

The geographic distribution of investor-owned properties in Davison County is extremely concentrated. The vast majority of holdings, 947 properties, are located within the 57301 zip code.

This primary zip code, 57301, has an investor ownership rate of 17.4%, which is slightly below the county-wide average of 19.2%, suggesting it is a large but not overly saturated market.

In contrast, smaller surrounding areas exhibit much higher investor penetration. Zip code 57334 leads the county with a 41.4% ownership rate (92 investor properties), meaning more than two in five homes are investor-owned.

Similarly, zip code 57363 shows significant investor saturation, with a 36.3% ownership rate from 109 properties. These smaller sub-markets represent the most concentrated pockets of rental housing in the county.

The data for zip code 57328 is incomplete, preventing an analysis of its investor ownership count or rate.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Key Insight
A lack of historical transaction data prevents analysis of buy/sell ratios or inter-landlord trades.
Detailed Findings

The provided dataset contains no historical transaction records for landlords in Davison County, which indicates a market with extremely low to non-existent turnover in recent periods.

As a result, it is not possible to determine if landlords are net buyers or net sellers. There is no data to calculate a buy/sell ratio or to track how this metric may have changed over time.

Analysis of inter-landlord trading is also not feasible. The data does not allow for a measurement of what percentage of purchases are from other landlords, a key indicator of market liquidity and composition.

Similarly, the transaction patterns of institutional investors (1000+ tier) cannot be assessed, as this group has no properties and no recorded transactions in the county.

Without transaction data, a comparison of average buy prices versus sell prices to understand potential investor profit margins or market-timing strategies cannot be performed.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 0.0% of SFR transactions in Q1, with zero deals recorded.
Detailed Findings

The first quarter was completely static for real estate investors in Davison County, with zero transactions recorded out of zero total SFR market transactions. This put the landlord share of market activity at 0.0%.

This inactivity was consistent across all investor sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) did not purchase or sell any properties during the quarter.

The complete lack of deals means there is no data on Q1 purchase prices by tier, preventing any comparison of spending patterns between small and large investors.

Inter-landlord trading, a measure of liquidity within the investor community, was also non-existent, with 0% of transactions being sourced from other landlords.

This lack of transactional activity contrasts with the significant number of existing holdings, suggesting the market is characterized by very long-term holds and is not currently in an expansion or disposition phase.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Davison County's investor market is a static, cash-fueled ecosystem dominated by small landlords with no recent activity.
Holdings
Investors own 1,151 SFR properties, representing 19.2% of Davison County's market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors (979 properties, 85.1%) versus companies (172 properties, 14.9%).
Pricing
A complete lack of recent transaction data for either landlords or homeowners prevents any analysis of acquisition prices or market trends.
Activity
Q1 market activity was at a standstill, with landlords purchasing 0 properties and accounting for 0.0% of all sales. No new single-property landlords entered the market.
Market Share
Small, 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) exert total control over the market, owning 96.6% of all investor housing, while institutional investors have zero presence (0.0%).
Ownership Type
While individuals dominate ownership overall, companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 6-10 properties, controlling 51.7% of homes in that specific tier.
Transactions
No buy or sell transactions were recorded for any landlord group in Q1, making it impossible to determine a net buyer/seller status or a buy/sell ratio.
Market Narrative

In Davison County, the real estate investing landscape is defined by small, local operators. Investors hold a significant 1,151 single-family homes, 19.2% of the total market, but this portfolio is highly fragmented. Individual investors own a dominant 85.1% of these properties, while 'mom-and-pop' landlords with 1-10 homes control a massive 96.6% of all investor-owned stock. In stark contrast, institutional investors with 1,000+ properties have zero presence, underscoring a market untouched by large-scale corporate capital.

Investor behavior in this county is exceptionally conservative and focused on long-term holds. A remarkable 100% of all investor properties are owned outright with cash, completely insulating the market from mortgage rate volatility. This stability, however, is coupled with extremely low liquidity. Analysis of recent quarters, including Q1, reveals zero purchase or sale transactions by investors. This halt in activity prevents any analysis of pricing advantages or current buying trends, suggesting that investors are holding assets rather than actively trading them.

The key takeaway from this Investor Pulse report is that Davison County represents a stable, insulated, and mature rental market. It is not a speculative or high-growth environment but rather one where local, cash-rich investors provide rental housing for the long term. The market's future will be dictated by the decisions of these thousands of small landlords, not by national trends or institutional strategies. The extreme geographic concentration in zip code 57301 further points to a localized ecosystem operating on its own distinct principles.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 02:21 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Davison (SD)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Davison (SD) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-sd-davison/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.