Steele (ND) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Steele (ND) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Steele (ND)
389
Total Investors in Steele (ND)
130
Investor Owned SFR in Steele (ND)
94(24.2%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
127
SFR Owned
92
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
3
SFR Owned
3
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 94 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Steele County's investor market is 100% controlled by mom-and-pop landlords with zero recent activity.
Investors own 24.2% of the county's SFR market, with individual landlords comprising 97.9% of that total. The market is exclusively controlled by mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties), with zero institutional presence. While landlords were net buyers in 2024, transaction activity halted completely in late 2025.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 94 SFR properties in Steele County, with individuals holding a dominant 97.9% share.
The majority of investor properties are owned free-and-clear, with 75 held as cash properties versus only 19 financed. All 94 investor-owned SFRs are classified as rented, indicating a 100% focus on non-owner-occupied strategies.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q2 2025, landlords acquired properties at a massive 61.8% discount compared to traditional homeowners.
Based on limited Q2 data, landlords paid an average of $83,938 while homeowners paid $220,000, a staggering $136,062 price gap. However, purchase activity has since stalled, with zero landlord acquisitions recorded in Q4 2025 or Q3 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Investor purchasing in Steele County came to a complete halt, with landlords making 0.0% of all SFR purchases in Q4 2025.
Reflecting the market-wide pause, mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) and institutional investors (Tier 09) both recorded zero acquisitions. There was no new landlord entry into the market during the quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop investors exert 100% control over Steele County's rental market, with zero institutional ownership.
Single-property landlords alone own 96.8% of all investor-held SFRs. The market is composed entirely of small-scale investors, with the largest holding just two properties.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors dominate every tier, owning 96.8% of single-property and 100% of two-property portfolios.
Companies have a minimal presence, owning only 3 properties in the single-property tier. A crossover point where companies become the majority owner does not exist in this market.
Geographic Distribution
The heart of investor activity is in zip code 58046, which holds 35 properties and has a 39.8% investor ownership rate.
Zip code 58046 accounts for 37% of all investor-owned properties in Steele County. Other zip codes like 58016 and 58056 show much lower concentrations of investor ownership, at 14.3% and 11.1% respectively.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Steele County were net buyers in 2024, acquiring 5 properties while only selling 1.
The buy-to-sell ratio for landlords in 2024 was 5-to-1, signaling a period of portfolio accumulation. There has been zero recorded transaction activity from institutional investors.
Current Quarter Transactions
Mirroring purchase data, landlord transactions were non-existent in Q4 2025, accounting for 0.0% of market activity.
All investor tiers, from single-property to the largest in the county, recorded zero transactions during the quarter. There was no inter-landlord trading activity observed.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 94 SFR properties in Steele County, with individuals holding a dominant 97.9% share.
Detailed Findings

In Steele County, landlords hold 94 single-family residential properties, representing a significant 24.2% of the total 389 SFRs in the market.

The ownership structure is overwhelmingly dominated by individuals. Individual investors own 92 of the 94 properties (97.9%), while companies own just 3 properties (3.2%), highlighting a classic mom-and-pop market landscape.

A strong indicator of financial stability among local landlords is the high rate of outright ownership. 75 properties (79.8% of the portfolio) are owned with cash, compared to only 19 (20.2%) that are financed, suggesting low leverage across the investor community.

The portfolio is entirely dedicated to rentals, with all 94 investor-owned properties being non-owner-occupied. This 100% rental rate underscores a clear focus on generating rental income rather than short-term speculative flips.

By entity count, the market consists of 130 distinct landlords, of which 127 are individuals and only 3 are companies. This near-total dominance by individual real estate investing participants defines the local market character.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q2 2025, landlords acquired properties at a massive 61.8% discount compared to traditional homeowners.
Detailed Findings

Based on the most recent transactional data from Q2 2025, investors in Steele County secured properties at a significant discount. The average landlord acquisition price was $83,938, which is 61.8% less than the $220,000 average paid by traditional homeowners.

This price difference translates to a raw discount of $136,062 per property for landlords, suggesting investors may be targeting distressed or off-market opportunities not pursued by typical buyers.

However, this pricing data comes from a period of low activity. The market has since cooled considerably, with zero landlord purchases recorded in the final two quarters of 2025, making trend analysis impossible.

Historical pricing from the 2020-2023 period shows an average acquisition price of $124,803, indicating that the most recent Q2 2025 purchase price of $83,938 represents a notable deviation from prior years, likely due to a very small sample size.

The complete absence of landlord acquisitions in Q4 2025 prevents any comparison to homeowner prices for the current period, signaling a pause in investor market activity.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Investor purchasing in Steele County came to a complete halt, with landlords making 0.0% of all SFR purchases in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

The fourth quarter of 2025 was marked by a complete absence of investor activity in Steele County's SFR market. Landlords accounted for zero of the total SFR purchases during this period.

This inactivity was consistent across all investor sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords, who constitute the entirety of the local market, made no purchases, resulting in a 0.0% share of quarterly activity.

Similarly, institutional investors (Tier 09) remained absent from the market, recording zero purchases, consistent with their non-existent presence in the county's overall holdings.

The lack of buying activity also means there were no new entrants into the landlord market. The number of new single-property landlords (Tier 01) acquiring their first rental was zero for the quarter.

This market-wide standstill contrasts with previous periods of activity and points to a potential shift in local market dynamics or a simple lack of available, desirable inventory for investors.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop investors exert 100% control over Steele County's rental market, with zero institutional ownership.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Steele County is the epitome of a mom-and-pop market. Small landlords operating in Tiers 01-04 (1-10 properties) control 100% of the 94 investor-owned SFRs.

Market concentration is exceptionally high at the smallest scale. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone account for 92 properties, representing a massive 96.8% of all investor-owned housing in the county.

The remaining 3.2% of the market is held by landlords in the two-property tier (Tier 02), who own a combined 3 properties. There are no investors with portfolios of three or more properties.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have absolutely no presence in Steele County, holding 0.0% of the market. This defies the common narrative of large corporate landlords and underscores the county's hyper-local ownership structure.

This complete control by small operators, particularly those with just one rental, defines the local market dynamics, influencing everything from rental rates to property maintenance standards.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Key Insight
Individual investors dominate every tier, owning 96.8% of single-property and 100% of two-property portfolios.
Detailed Findings

Ownership in Steele County is almost exclusively in the hands of individual investors across all portfolio sizes. In the dominant single-property tier, individuals own 90 properties (96.8%), while companies own just 3 (3.2%).

In the two-property tier, individual ownership is absolute, with individuals owning 100% of the 3 properties. This reinforces that as local investors expand, they do so as individuals rather than forming corporate entities.

There is no crossover point where companies become the majority owners. Given that the largest portfolio size is two properties, the market structure is firmly controlled by private individuals.

The minimal corporate footprint consists of 3 separate companies that each own a single property, indicating fragmented and small-scale corporate investment rather than a consolidated effort.

This data from the property ownership by owner type report confirms a market where the typical landlord is a local individual, not a remote corporation.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The heart of investor activity is in zip code 58046, which holds 35 properties and has a 39.8% investor ownership rate.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Steele County is highly concentrated geographically. The zip code 58046 stands out as the primary hub, containing 35 of the 94 investor-owned properties in the county.

Not only does 58046 have the highest count, but it also has the highest penetration rate, with investors owning 39.8% of all SFR properties within its boundaries. This indicates a strong preference and opportunity for rental properties in this specific area.

Other areas show much lower levels of investor activity. For instance, the 58056 zip code has only 2 investor-owned properties, for an 11.1% ownership rate.

The 58016 zip code has just one investor property, representing a 14.3% ownership rate, further highlighting the concentration within 58046.

This geographic pattern suggests that market conditions, tenant demand, or property types within 58046 are uniquely favorable for real estate investors compared to the rest of the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Steele County were net buyers in 2024, acquiring 5 properties while only selling 1.
Detailed Findings

Historical transaction data from 2024 shows a clear trend of accumulation among Steele County landlords. Investors acted as net buyers, with 5 purchases compared to only 1 sale over the year.

This activity resulted in a net gain of 4 properties for the landlord community, indicating confidence in the local rental market during that period.

The buy-to-sell ratio of 5.0 demonstrates a strong inclination towards holding and expanding portfolios rather than liquidating assets. For every property an investor sold, five more were acquired by other investors.

There is no transactional data available for landlord-to-landlord percentages, preventing analysis of internal market churn.

Consistent with all other data for the county, institutional investors (1000+ tier) were completely inactive, recording zero buys and zero sells. The transaction market, like the ownership market, is exclusively a mom-and-pop affair.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Mirroring purchase data, landlord transactions were non-existent in Q4 2025, accounting for 0.0% of market activity.
Detailed Findings

The fourth quarter of 2025 was a period of complete transactional dormancy for investors in Steele County. Landlords were involved in zero SFR transactions, representing a 0.0% share of market activity.

This lack of activity was uniform across all tiers. Mom-and-pop landlords, who are the sole participants in the market, made no recorded transactions.

Consequently, there was no inter-landlord trading. The percentage of properties bought from other landlords was 0%, as no acquisitions of any kind took place.

Average purchase prices by tier were all $0 due to the absence of transactions, leaving no data for strategic price analysis between different investor sizes.

This Q4 freeze on transactions indicates a market that is either perfectly stable, with all owners holding, or one facing a lack of motivating factors for either buying or selling.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Steele County's real estate investor market is 100% controlled by local mom-and-pop landlords in a state of transactional hibernation.
Holdings
Landlords own 94 SFR properties, representing 24.2% of Steele County's market, with individual investors holding a commanding 97.9% of that portfolio (92 properties) compared to just 3 properties for companies (3.2%).
Pricing
Based on limited Q2 2025 data, landlords achieved an exceptional 61.8% price discount compared to homeowners, paying $83,938 while homeowners averaged $220,000, though no recent transactions have occurred to confirm this trend.
Activity
Q4 2025 saw a complete halt in investor acquisitions, with landlords purchasing 0 properties and accounting for 0.0% of all sales. Consequently, no new landlords entered the market during this period.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) have absolute control, owning 100% of investor housing. Single-property landlords alone dominate with a 96.8% share, while institutional investors own 0.0%.
Ownership Type
The market is overwhelmingly composed of individuals, who own 97.9% of the investor portfolio. A crossover point where companies become the majority does not exist, as even the few company-owned properties are single-asset holdings.
Transactions
While landlords were net buyers in 2024 with a 5-to-1 buy/sell ratio, all transaction activity ceased in Q4 2025. Institutional investors have no transactional history in the county.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Steele County, North Dakota, is a definitive model of a hyper-local, mom-and-pop market. Investors own 94 single-family homes, which constitutes 24.2% of the county's total SFR inventory. Ownership is overwhelmingly concentrated among private individuals, who hold 92 of these properties (97.9%), versus just 3 held by companies. The entire market is controlled by small-scale operators, with 100% of investor-owned properties held by landlords with fewer than 10 properties. In fact, single-property landlords alone command a staggering 96.8% of the investor market, leaving zero footprint for institutional capital.

Investor behavior in Steele County is characterized by long-term holds rather than frequent trading. While 2024 data shows landlords were net buyers, accumulating 5 properties for every 1 sold, activity came to a complete standstill in the fourth quarter of 2025, with zero purchases or sales recorded. This halt in activity makes recent pricing trends difficult to establish, although sparse data from early 2025 suggests investors can achieve dramatic discounts compared to traditional homeowners. The entire portfolio of 94 properties is dedicated to rentals, with a high proportion (79.8%) owned outright with cash, signaling a stable, low-leverage community of established landlords.

The key takeaway from this Investor Pulse report is that the narrative of corporate landlord dominance does not apply in markets like Steele County. The market's health and stability are dictated by the decisions of 127 individual investors, not institutional funds. The recent pause in transactions may indicate a stable equilibrium where owners are content to hold and collect rent, or it could signal a lack of available properties that meet their investment criteria. For anyone analyzing this market, understanding the motivations and financial stability of these small, individual owners is paramount.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 11:11 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Steele (ND)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Steele (ND) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-nd-steele/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.