Franklin (ID) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Franklin (ID) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Franklin (ID)
4,775
Total Investors in Franklin (ID)
598
Investor Owned SFR in Franklin (ID)
506(10.6%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
431
SFR Owned
300
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
167
SFR Owned
225
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 506 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Franklin County's real estate investor market is entirely controlled by small landlords who are actively accumulating properties, with zero institutional presence.
Investors own 506 SFR properties, representing 10.6% of the Franklin County market, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling an overwhelming 97.7% of this portfolio. In Q4 2025, 100% of landlord purchases were made by these small investors. Landlords remain strong net buyers with a 3-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 2026, signaling continued growth in this segment.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 506 SFR properties, with individual landlords holding 59.3% of the portfolio.
The vast majority of investor-owned properties are held with cash (80.0%) versus just 19.9% being financed. An overwhelming 96.8% of the investor portfolio is classified as rented, indicating a strong focus on generating rental income.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid a surprising 28.5% premium over homeowners in Q3 2025, an anomaly in the market.
The price gap has been extremely volatile, with landlords paying premiums of 165.1% in Q1 2025 and 3.1% in Q2 2025. This volatility, coupled with zero reported landlord purchases in recent quarters, suggests a thin market with acquisitions driven by specific, high-value opportunities rather than broad market trends.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 10.7% of all SFR properties sold in Franklin County during Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) were responsible for 100% of these acquisitions, buying all 6 properties. Activity was concentrated at the smallest scale, with 5 new single-property entities entering the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords command 97.7% of investor-owned SFRs, showing near-total market control.
Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have absolutely no presence, holding 0.0% of the market. The single-property landlord is the dominant force, alone controlling 70.3% of all investor-held housing in the county.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the dominant owner type in portfolios of just two or more properties.
While individuals own 69.5% of single-property portfolios, companies own 65.1% of two-property portfolios. This trend accelerates in the 6-10 property tier, where companies control 86.4% of properties, showing a clear strategy of incorporation for growth.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with the 83263 zip code holding 371 properties.
The 83263 zip code alone accounts for 73.3% of all investor-owned properties in Franklin County. In contrast, the 83241 zip code has the highest penetration rate at 75.0%, though this is based on a very small number of total properties.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Franklin County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 4.9 properties for every 1 they sold in 2025.
This trend of accumulation is consistent, with 49 properties bought versus 10 sold in 2025, and 49 bought versus 12 sold in 2024. In the first quarter of 2026, the net buying activity continued with 9 purchases and only 3 sales.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 11.4% of all SFR transactions in Q1 2026, exclusively as buyers.
All 9 of these landlord transactions were made by mom-and-pop investors. Single-property landlords were particularly active, sourcing 42.9% of their new properties from other landlords, showing a robust internal market for rental assets.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 506 SFR properties, with individual landlords holding 59.3% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

In Franklin County, investors hold 506 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, which constitutes 10.6% of the total 4,775 SFRs in the market. This reveals a notable, yet not dominant, investor footprint in the local housing landscape.

Ownership is skewed towards individuals, who own 300 properties (59.3%), compared to companies, which own 225 properties (44.5%). However, the entity count shows a more pronounced split, with 431 individual landlords versus 167 company landlords, highlighting that the typical real estate investing portfolio is small and personally managed.

A striking 96.8% of the investor-owned portfolio (490 properties) is rented. This high concentration underscores that the primary strategy for local investors is buy-and-hold for rental income rather than short-term flipping or speculation.

Cash is the preferred method of acquisition and holding, with 405 properties (80.0%) owned outright, while only 101 properties (19.9%) are financed. This suggests a market of well-capitalized investors who are less reliant on leverage and market financing fluctuations.

The total landlord entity count of 598 overseeing 506 properties indicates that the average portfolio size is less than one property per entity, pointing to a high degree of co-ownership and partnership arrangements among local investors.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid a surprising 28.5% premium over homeowners in Q3 2025, an anomaly in the market.
Detailed Findings

In a significant deviation from typical market behavior, landlords in Franklin County have recently paid substantial premiums compared to traditional homeowners. In Q3 2025, the average landlord acquisition price was $560,190, a staggering $124,347 (or 28.5%) more than the average homeowner price of $435,843.

This trend of paying a premium is not an isolated event. In Q1 2025, landlords paid an average of $1,184,232, representing a 165.1% premium over homeowners. This pattern suggests investors may be targeting unique or higher-value properties not typically sought by the average buyer, or are competing fiercely for limited inventory.

The price volatility is extreme, with premiums fluctuating from 3.1% to 165.1% in 2025. With zero landlord purchases recorded for 2026-Q1 or 2024-Q4, the data indicates that investor buying is sporadic and opportunistic rather than a steady flow of transactions.

Despite recent volatility, property values have shown significant long-term appreciation. The average landlord acquisition price during the 2020-2023 period was $433,208, which jumped to an average of $542,686 in 2025, marking a substantial increase in asset values for long-term holders.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 10.7% of all SFR properties sold in Franklin County during Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Q4 2025 accounted for 10.7% of the total market, with landlords acquiring 6 of the 56 SFR properties sold. This share indicates a consistent but measured presence of investors in the local real estate market.

The entirety of this purchasing activity was driven by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) made up 100% of the quarter's investor acquisitions, completely shutting out mid-size and institutional buyers.

New entrants are the lifeblood of the local investor scene. Landlords in the single-property tier purchased 4 properties, representing 66.7% of all investor buys for the quarter. These purchases were made by 5 distinct entities, signaling fresh capital and new participants entering the rental market.

The acquisition data confirms the absence of large-scale players. Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) made zero purchases, reinforcing the finding that Franklin County's rental market is locally owned and operated.

Beyond new entrants, existing small landlords also expanded their portfolios. One landlord in the 2-property tier and another in the 6-10 property tier each added a property, demonstrating incremental growth among established local investors.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords command 97.7% of investor-owned SFRs, showing near-total market control.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure in Franklin County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, control a staggering 97.7% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Single-property landlords form the bedrock of the market. This tier alone accounts for 365 properties, or 70.3% of the entire investor portfolio, highlighting the prevalence of individuals entering real estate investment one property at a time.

There is a complete absence of institutional capital in the Franklin County SFR market. Investors in the 1,000+ property tier hold 0.0% of the housing stock, a stark contrast to narratives of corporate landlord takeovers in other regions.

Even mid-size investors have a very limited footprint. Landlords owning 11-50 properties collectively hold just 12 properties, or 2.3% of the investor market, further emphasizing the hyper-local, small-scale nature of ownership.

The data from our property datasets shows a steep drop-off in ownership as portfolio size increases. While 365 properties are in Tier 1 (1 property), only 9 are in Tier 5 (11-20 properties), illustrating a market composed of many small players rather than a few large ones.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the dominant owner type in portfolios of just two or more properties.
Detailed Findings

A distinct strategic shift occurs as investors expand their portfolios in Franklin County. While individuals dominate the entry-level single-property tier with 69.5% ownership (260 properties), companies become the majority owners starting at just the two-property level.

The crossover point is immediate and clear. In the two-property tier, companies own 28 properties (65.1%), indicating that investors quickly turn to incorporation as they acquire a second asset, likely for liability protection and operational efficiency.

Company ownership concentration intensifies with scale. For landlords in the 6-10 property tier, companies own 38 properties, an overwhelming 86.4% share, compared to just 6 properties held by individuals.

Even in the smallest mid-size tier (11-20 properties), companies maintain their majority, holding 6 properties (66.7%). This consistent pattern shows that formal business structures are the preferred vehicle for investors serious about portfolio growth.

This data reveals two distinct investor paths: the individual who may stop at one rental property, and the aspiring portfolio builder who incorporates early to facilitate expansion. The rapid transition to company ownership after the first property is a key feature of this market.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with the 83263 zip code holding 371 properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic concentration is a defining characteristic of investor ownership in Franklin County. A single zip code, 83263, is the epicenter of activity, containing 371 investor-owned SFRs, or 73.3% of the county's entire investor portfolio.

While 83263 dominates by sheer volume, the highest rate of investor ownership is found elsewhere. The 83241 zip code has an investor ownership rate of 75.0%, an extreme outlier that suggests a very small area with few total homes, making it highly susceptible to skewed percentages.

Beyond the top zip code, investor presence drops off significantly. The second-largest concentration is in 83237, with only 50 properties, followed by 83286 with 35 properties. This steep decline highlights a targeted geographic strategy among local investors.

The zip codes with the highest investor ownership rates after the 83241 outlier are 83228 (13.5%) and 83232 (11.0%). These areas represent pockets of higher-than-average investor penetration, making them key sub-markets to watch.

The distinction between high-count areas (like 83263) and high-rate areas (like 83241 and 83228) is crucial. It shows that investors are concentrated in the county's main population center by volume, but have achieved higher market saturation in smaller, possibly more rural, communities.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Franklin County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 4.9 properties for every 1 they sold in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Franklin County are in a clear accumulation phase, consistently buying far more properties than they sell. In 2025, landlords demonstrated a strong bullish sentiment with a buy-to-sell ratio of 4.9-to-1, purchasing 49 SFRs while only divesting 10.

This pattern of net buying is a multi-year trend. In 2024, the activity was nearly identical, with 49 buys and 12 sells, resulting in a net gain of 37 properties for the investor community and a 4.1x buy/sell ratio.

The momentum has carried into the current year. For Q1 2026, landlords have already purchased 9 properties while selling only 3, a 3-to-1 ratio that signals continued confidence in the local market and a strategy of portfolio expansion.

Institutional investors (1000+ tier) are entirely absent from these transaction records. Their lack of buying and selling activity reinforces that all market dynamics are being driven by smaller, local players.

The steady rate of acquisitions across recent years, with 49 properties purchased in both 2024 and 2025, suggests a stable and predictable level of investor demand in the Franklin County housing market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 11.4% of all SFR transactions in Q1 2026, exclusively as buyers.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords participated in 11.4% of the 79 total SFR transactions, acquiring 9 properties and underscoring their role as a consistent source of demand in the Franklin County market.

Activity was exclusively concentrated among the smallest investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) accounted for 100% of these transactions, with institutional investors making no moves in the quarter.

A significant portion of investor acquisitions comes from within the community itself. First-time or single-property landlords purchased 7 properties, and 3 of those (42.9%) were bought from other landlords. This indicates a healthy level of churn where rental properties are traded between investors.

The average purchase price for single-property landlords in Q1 was $352,450. As this was the only tier with significant transaction volume, it sets the benchmark for entry-level investment properties in the current market.

The absence of transactions from larger-tiered investors further solidifies the market's character. The transactional flow is dominated by individuals and small companies buying their first, second, or third rental property, often from peers.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop investors fully control Franklin County's rental market, actively buying properties with zero institutional competition.
Holdings
Landlords own 506 SFR properties, representing 10.6% of Franklin County's market. Individual investors hold a 59.3% majority of these properties, with companies owning the remaining 44.5%.
Pricing
Contrary to national trends, landlords in Franklin County have recently paid significant premiums, including paying 28.5% more than traditional homeowners in Q3 2025.
Activity
In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 10.7% of all homes sold, with 100% of this activity driven by mom-and-pop investors and 5 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) have near-total control, owning 97.7% of all investor housing, while large institutional investors (1000+ properties) have zero ownership (0.0%).
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate single-property ownership (69.5%), but companies become the majority owners in portfolios of just two or more properties, controlling 65.1% of that tier.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 3-to-1 buy/sell ratio in Q1 2026 (9 buys vs 3 sells), while institutional investors remain completely inactive on both sides of the transaction ledger.
Market Narrative

In Franklin County, Idaho, the single-family rental market is defined by the complete dominance of small, local investors. Landlords collectively own 506 SFR properties, which is 10.6% of the total housing stock. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who own a staggering 97.7% of all investor-held homes. Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have no footprint here, owning 0.0% of the market. Ownership is primarily held by individuals (59.3%), but there is a clear trend of incorporating as portfolios grow; companies become the majority owners in portfolios of just two or more properties.

Investor behavior in Franklin County is characterized by steady accumulation and opportunistic, high-premium purchases. Landlords are strong net buyers, acquiring properties at a 3-to-1 ratio over sales in early 2026. This continues a multi-year trend of portfolio growth. In Q4 2025, 100% of landlord acquisitions were made by mom-and-pop investors. Unusually, these investors have recently paid significant premiums over traditional homeowners, such as 28.5% more in Q3 2025, suggesting they are targeting specific high-value assets in a tight market rather than seeking discounts. This insight is made possible through detailed assessor data and transaction analysis.

The key takeaway is that Franklin County's investor landscape is the epitome of a grassroots market, entirely free from institutional influence. The market's health and growth are driven by new entrants and the expansion of small, local portfolios. The high rate of cash ownership (80.0%) and the focus on rental properties (96.8% of portfolio) indicate a stable, long-term investment strategy. For anyone analyzing the housing market, Franklin County serves as a case study in how a market can thrive with local capital, where growth is incremental and properties often trade between like-minded small investors.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 02:25 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Franklin (ID)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Franklin (ID) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-id-franklin/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.