Sioux (NE) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Sioux (NE) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Sioux (NE)
217
Total Investors in Sioux (NE)
179
Investor Owned SFR in Sioux (NE)
133(61.3%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
156
SFR Owned
112
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
23
SFR Owned
25
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 133 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Sioux County, NE: A Market of High Investor Ownership and Zero Recent Activity
Investors own a commanding 61.3% of SFR properties (133 homes) in Sioux County, with 98.6% controlled by small mom-and-pop landlords. However, the market is currently frozen, with zero recorded landlord purchases or sales in the latest quarter.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 133 SFRs, 61.3% of the Sioux County market, with individuals holding 84.2% of the portfolio.
The vast majority of these properties are held in cash (117) versus financed (16). Nearly all investor properties (132 of 133) are classified as rentals, indicating a strong focus on buy-and-hold strategies.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No recent landlord acquisition data is available for Sioux County to compare against homeowner prices.
Historical data lists an average price of $59,000 in 2024 and $80,800 for the 2020-2023 period, but these figures are not tied to any recorded transaction volume.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords made zero purchases in the latest quarter, representing 0.0% of all market activity.
The complete absence of purchasing activity extends across all investor tiers. No new mom-and-pop landlords entered the market, and no larger entities acquired properties.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 98.6% of investor-owned SFRs in Sioux County.
Single-property landlords alone account for 86.3% of the entire investor portfolio (120 properties). Institutional ownership (1000+ properties) is entirely non-existent at 0.0%.
Ownership by Tier & Type
No recent pricing data exists to compare individual and company acquisition costs in Sioux County.
While individuals dominate smaller portfolios, companies become the majority owners at the 3-5 property tier, holding a 66.7% share. Individuals own 100% of two-property portfolios in the county.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity in Sioux County is hyper-concentrated in the 69346 zip code, which holds 124 of the 133 investor-owned properties.
The 69346 zip code also has an extremely high investor ownership rate of 72.1%. Another zip code, 69301, shows a 100% rate, but this is based on a single property.
Historical Transactions
No historical transaction data is available for Sioux County, preventing any analysis of net buyer/seller status or market liquidity.
Without transaction records, it is not possible to analyze landlord-to-landlord sales percentages, compare buy versus sell prices, or track transaction volume trends over time.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 0.0% of market transactions in the latest quarter, as there were no recorded sales.
No transactions occurred across any investor tier. As a result, no price comparisons between tiers or analysis of inter-landlord trading is possible for this period.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 133 SFRs, 61.3% of the Sioux County market, with individuals holding 84.2% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

In Sioux County, NE, investors have a significant footprint, owning 133 single-family residential properties, which constitutes a remarkable 61.3% of the total 217 SFRs in the market.

The ownership base is overwhelmingly composed of individual investors rather than corporations. Individuals own 112 properties, accounting for 84.2% of the investor portfolio, compared to just 25 properties (18.8%) owned by companies.

A defining characteristic of this market is the preference for all-cash ownership. A total of 117 investor-owned properties are held free and clear, vastly outnumbering the 16 properties that are financed, signaling low leverage among local landlords.

The investor portfolio is almost entirely dedicated to rental purposes. Of the 133 properties held by landlords, 132 are classified as rented, demonstrating a clear focus on generating rental income over other strategies like flipping.

The number of individual landlords (156) far exceeds the number of company landlords (23), reinforcing the local, small-scale nature of real estate investing in the county.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No recent landlord acquisition data is available for Sioux County to compare against homeowner prices.
Detailed Findings

A direct comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners for the current quarter is not possible due to a complete lack of transaction data in Sioux County, NE.

The absence of recent sales indicates an extremely illiquid or stalled market, where properties are not actively trading hands. This prevents any analysis of potential investor discounts or pricing advantages.

While historical average prices are noted for landlords at $59,000 in 2024 and $80,800 between 2020-2023, the data shows zero properties were purchased in these periods. This suggests the price points may reflect anomalous or unrecorded single transactions rather than broad market activity.

Without active buying and selling, it is impossible to determine price appreciation trends or track how the landlord-homeowner price gap has evolved over time in this specific market.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Landlords made zero purchases in the latest quarter, representing 0.0% of all market activity.
Detailed Findings

The investor purchase market in Sioux County was completely dormant in the most recent quarter, with landlords acquiring zero new SFR properties.

This lack of activity means investors accounted for 0.0% of all SFR sales, a clear indicator of a frozen market where neither new nor existing investors are expanding their portfolios.

Analysis by tier confirms this trend across the board. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who dominate ownership, made no new purchases.

Similarly, there was no activity from institutional investors (Tier 09), which is consistent with their overall 0.0% ownership share in the county.

The data shows no new single-property landlords entered the market, signaling a halt in the growth of the investor base during this period.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 98.6% of investor-owned SFRs in Sioux County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Sioux County is almost exclusively controlled by small-scale operators. Landlords owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) hold a combined 98.6% of all investor-owned SFRs.

The market is defined by its smallest participants. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) represent the largest group by a wide margin, owning 120 properties, which is 86.3% of the total investor portfolio.

As portfolio sizes increase, ownership drops off sharply. Two-property landlords hold 10 properties (7.2%), and those with 3-5 properties own just 6 homes (4.3%).

The narrative of large-scale corporate ownership does not apply here. Institutional investors in Tier 09 (1,000+ properties) have zero presence in the county, holding 0.0% of the market.

Due to the lack of recent transactions, it is not possible to analyze how acquisition prices may vary by tier. The current market structure is one of static, concentrated ownership among very small investors.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
No recent pricing data exists to compare individual and company acquisition costs in Sioux County.
Detailed Findings

In Sioux County, individual landlords form the bedrock of the investor market, owning 105 of the 120 single-property portfolios (84.7%). They also own 100% of the two-property portfolios.

A significant shift occurs in the 3-5 property tier, which is the crossover point where companies become the majority owners. In this tier, companies own 4 properties (66.7%) compared to 2 properties (33.3%) for individuals.

This pattern suggests that as local investors begin to scale their holdings beyond two properties, they are more likely to incorporate for liability or financial reasons.

The largest individual-owned portfolio falls in the 6-10 property tier, which consists of a single property held by an individual.

Due to the absence of recent transactions, a comparison of acquisition prices between individual and company buyers within these tiers is not possible.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity in Sioux County is hyper-concentrated in the 69346 zip code, which holds 124 of the 133 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

The geographic distribution of investor-owned properties in Sioux County is not evenly spread; it is extremely concentrated. The vast majority of activity is centered in the 69346 zip code, which contains 124 of the 133 total investor-owned homes.

This concentration is also reflected in the ownership rate. Within the 69346 zip code, landlords own 72.1% of all SFR properties, marking it as a region with exceptionally high investor penetration.

Other zip codes show minimal investor presence. For example, 69358 has 5 investor-owned properties, and both 69301 and 69339 have just one each.

While the 69301 zip code technically has the highest ownership rate at 100%, this figure is based on a total market size of only one property, making it a statistical anomaly rather than a market trend.

The data clearly points to a single area of focus for investors in the county, with negligible activity elsewhere.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Key Insight
No historical transaction data is available for Sioux County, preventing any analysis of net buyer/seller status or market liquidity.
Detailed Findings

A comprehensive analysis of historical transaction dynamics in Sioux County is not possible as no data on past buy or sell activities was recorded.

This data gap means key market health indicators, such as the buy/sell ratio, cannot be calculated. It is impossible to determine whether landlords have historically been net buyers or net sellers.

The level of market liquidity and internal trading is unknown. There is no information on the percentage of transactions that are landlord-to-landlord, a metric that often reveals the maturity of an investor market.

Furthermore, without buy and sell prices over time, an analysis of potential profit margins or price appreciation within investor portfolios cannot be conducted.

The lack of historical data reinforces the picture of a stable, low-velocity market where properties are held long-term with very infrequent trading.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 0.0% of market transactions in the latest quarter, as there were no recorded sales.
Detailed Findings

The most recent quarter saw a complete halt in transactional activity involving landlords in Sioux County. With zero landlord transactions, their share of the market was 0.0%.

This inactivity was consistent across all investor sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who own 98.6% of the properties, did not transact at all.

There was also no buying or selling activity from mid-size or institutional investors, reflecting a market-wide standstill.

Because no properties were purchased, analysis of purchasing behavior, such as average prices paid by different tiers or the prevalence of landlord-to-landlord sales, is not applicable for this period.

The Q1 transaction data confirms the findings from other sections: Sioux County is a market characterized by static ownership rather than active trading.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small investors dominate Sioux County's housing with 61.3% ownership in a market with no recent sales.
Holdings
Landlords own 133 SFR properties, a 61.3% penetration of the Sioux County market, with individual investors holding 112 of these homes (84.2%).
Pricing
Due to a lack of recent sales activity, no current pricing comparison between landlords and homeowners is available for Sioux County.
Activity
There was zero landlord purchase activity in the latest quarter, resulting in a 0.0% share of sales and no new landlord entries into the market.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control virtually the entire investor market at 98.6%, while institutional investors (1000+) have no presence (0.0%).
Ownership Type
Individuals dominate the market, but companies become majority owners in the small 3-5 property tier, indicating early incorporation as portfolios grow.
Transactions
No landlord transaction data was recorded for the recent quarter, indicating an extremely illiquid market with no net buyer or seller activity.
Market Narrative

The real estate market in Sioux County, Nebraska, is defined by a unique combination of high investor penetration and extremely low market velocity. Investors own a significant 61.3% of the single-family housing stock, totaling 133 properties. This ownership is not driven by large corporations; instead, it is dominated by local, small-scale individuals who own 84.2% of the investor-held homes. The market structure is granular, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling an overwhelming 98.6% of the investor portfolio, leaving no room for institutional capital.

Investor behavior in Sioux County is characterized by buy-and-hold strategies rather than active trading. The market was effectively frozen in the latest quarter, with zero purchases and zero sales recorded among landlords. This lack of transactional activity makes typical performance metrics, such as price comparisons to homeowners or buy/sell ratios, impossible to calculate. The portfolio is largely owned with cash (117 properties) versus financing (16 properties), suggesting a low-risk, long-term approach to asset management common in less liquid markets.

The key takeaway from this investor pulse report is that Sioux County represents a pocket of the U.S. housing market untouched by recent speculative trends. It is a stable, highly-concentrated rental market managed by a small community of local landlords. While the high ownership rate is notable, the complete absence of recent sales activity signals a market with significant barriers to entry and exit, where property changes hands infrequently. This illustrates a stark contrast to more dynamic metropolitan areas, highlighting the diverse nature of real estate investment across different American geographies.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 11:39 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Sioux (NE)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Sioux (NE) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ne-sioux/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.