Faribault (MN) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Faribault (MN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Faribault (MN)
6,234
Total Investors in Faribault (MN)
889
Investor Owned SFR in Faribault (MN)
844(13.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
760
SFR Owned
645
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
129
SFR Owned
206
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 844 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small investors dominate Faribault County, paying 68.7% premium for homes as they expand portfolios
Small, individual investors define the market in Faribault County, MN, controlling 95.6% of the 844 investor-owned homes. In Q1 2026, these investors paid a steep 68.7% premium over homeowners and acted as aggressive net buyers, expanding portfolios at a 4-to-1 ratio.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 844 SFR properties in Faribault County, with individuals holding a 76.4% majority.
Cash purchases dominate investor portfolios, with 686 properties owned outright compared to 158 that are financed. The vast majority of these holdings, 799 properties, are utilized as rentals, signaling a strong focus on income generation.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Investors paid a stunning 68.7% premium over homeowners in Q1 2026, averaging $325,662 per property.
This represents a dramatic reversal from a year prior when landlords enjoyed a 49.5% discount in Q1 2025 ($89,983 vs $178,056). The price gap has swung by over 118 percentage points in just twelve months, indicating a major shift in market dynamics.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 13.2% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025, totaling 10 homes.
Small 'mom-and-pop' investors were solely responsible for this activity, accounting for 100% of landlord purchases. First-time investors (Tier 01) led the charge, acquiring 7 of the 10 properties through 9 new entities.
Ownership by Tier
'Mom-and-pop' landlords overwhelmingly control the market, owning 95.6% of all investor-held SFRs.
Single-property investors alone account for two-thirds of the rental housing stock, holding 576 properties (67.0% of the total). In stark contrast, institutional-scale investors have zero presence in Faribault County.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier.
In the 6-10 property tier, companies own 67.1% of the homes. This corporate dominance escalates sharply in the 21-50 property tier, where companies own 93.8% of the assets.
Geographic Distribution
The 56013 zip code (Blue Earth) has the most investor-owned properties at 207.
However, the highest concentration of investors is in the 56047 zip code (Frost), where landlords own 47.4% of all SFRs. The 56027 zip code (Elmore) is another hotspot, with a 24.0% investor ownership rate.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers, purchasing 4 homes for every 1 they sold in Q1 2026.
This net buying activity has accelerated significantly. The buy-to-sell ratio increased from 1.86 in 2024 to 2.57 in 2025, and has now surged to 4.0 in the first quarter of 2026, signaling strong confidence.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 11.7% of all property transactions in Q1 2026.
New, single-property investors paid the highest prices, averaging $355,495 per home. This is more than four times the $87,000 average paid by more established small landlords (6-10 properties), showing a vast difference in acquisition strategy.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 844 SFR properties in Faribault County, with individuals holding a 76.4% majority.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a 13.5% share of the single-family residential market in Faribault County, with a total portfolio of 844 properties.

The market is overwhelmingly characterized by individual ownership, as these landlords control 645 properties (76.4%), while companies own the remaining 206 properties (24.4%).

This individual dominance extends to the entity level, with 760 individual landlords making up 85.5% of all investors, compared to just 129 company landlords.

A key financial characteristic of this market is the preference for cash transactions. A significant 81.3% of the investor portfolio (686 properties) is owned free-and-clear, far outpacing the 158 properties (18.7%) that are financed.

The portfolio's primary use is clear, with 799 properties (94.7%) identified as rented. This demonstrates a strong and established rental market driven by local investors.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Investors paid a stunning 68.7% premium over homeowners in Q1 2026, averaging $325,662 per property.
Detailed Findings

In a striking market reversal, landlords paid a significant 68.7% premium over traditional homeowners in Q1 2026, indicating intense competition for desirable properties.

The average landlord acquisition price soared to $325,662, a full $132,670 higher than the homeowner average of $192,992 for the same period.

This recent premium marks a dramatic departure from historical trends. As recently as Q1 2025, landlords secured properties at a deep 49.5% discount, paying on average $88,073 less than homeowners.

The quarter-over-quarter trend reveals a rapid erosion of the investor discount, which flipped from a 3.7% discount in Q2 2025 to a 68.7% premium in Q1 2026.

This pricing behavior suggests that investors in Faribault County are targeting a different segment of the market than traditional buyers or are willing to pay substantially more to acquire properties in the current competitive landscape.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 13.2% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025, totaling 10 homes.
Detailed Findings

Landlords captured a 13.2% share of the Faribault County market in Q4 2025, purchasing 10 out of the 76 total SFR properties sold.

Acquisition activity was exclusively driven by 'mom-and-pop' landlords, who are defined as owning 1-10 properties. This segment accounted for 100% of investor purchases during the quarter.

The market saw an influx of new participants, with the single-property tier representing 70% of all landlord-purchased properties (7 homes).

A total of 9 new entities entered the single-property landlord space, signaling continued grassroots interest from small-scale investors in the local rental market.

Institutional investors with portfolios of 1,000 or more properties made no acquisitions in Q4, confirming that the local market operates independently of large-scale corporate buying.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
'Mom-and-pop' landlords overwhelmingly control the market, owning 95.6% of all investor-held SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Faribault County is defined by small-scale ownership, with 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) controlling a commanding 95.6% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Single-property landlords are the bedrock of the market, owning 576 properties, which constitutes 67.0% of the entire investor portfolio. This highlights the importance of first-time and small investors to the local housing supply.

The concentration at the smallest end of the market is stark: the two smallest tiers (portfolios of 1 and 2 properties) combined own 72.9% of all investor-held homes.

Mid-size investors (11-1000 properties) have a very limited footprint in the county, collectively owning just 4.4% of the properties.

Institutional investors with portfolios exceeding 1,000 properties have no presence in Faribault County, underscoring its character as a market driven by local and individual real estate investing strategies.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the foundation of the rental market, owning 86.3% of single-property portfolios and 80.4% of two-property portfolios.

A clear transition to corporate ownership occurs as portfolios grow. Companies become the majority holders for the first time in the 6-10 property tier, controlling 53 of the 79 properties (67.1%).

This trend toward professionalization intensifies in larger tiers. In the 11-20 property tier, companies own 61.9% of homes, and their share jumps to an overwhelming 93.8% in the 21-50 property tier.

While individuals own the most properties overall (645), this data shows that companies strategically control the larger, more consolidated portfolios in Faribault County.

This ownership pattern illustrates a typical investor lifecycle: individuals start small, and those who scale their operations often transition to a corporate structure for liability protection and operational efficiency.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 56013 zip code (Blue Earth) has the most investor-owned properties at 207.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Faribault County is most concentrated by volume in the 56013 zip code (Blue Earth), which hosts the largest number of investor-owned homes at 207.

While 56013 has the highest raw count, the highest market penetration is found in 56047 (Frost), where investors own a remarkable 47.4% of the entire SFR housing stock.

This highlights a key pattern: the areas with the most investor properties are not necessarily those with the highest investor ownership rates. Blue Earth (56013) has a modest 11.7% investor ownership rate despite its high property count.

Other notable hotspots for investor concentration include 56027 (Elmore) with a 24.0% ownership rate and 56014 (Bricelyn) at 18.4%.

These distinct patterns of high volume versus high concentration suggest different investment strategies are at play across the various zip codes within Faribault County, from focusing on larger population centers to dominating smaller communities.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are strong net buyers, purchasing 4 homes for every 1 they sold in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Landlords are consistently and increasingly expanding their portfolios in Faribault County, acting as strong net buyers across all recent timeframes.

In Q1 2026, investors acquired 12 properties while selling only 3, resulting in a net gain of 9 properties and a robust 4-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio.

This trend of accumulation has been building steadily. The buy-to-sell ratio stood at 1.86 for the full year 2024 (52 buys vs. 28 sells) and grew to 2.57 in 2025 (54 buys vs. 21 sells).

The most recent quarter's activity represents the most aggressive period of net buying in recent years, signaling strong investor confidence and a clear strategy of portfolio growth in the local market.

While no data was available for institutional-level transactions, the overall market trend is unambiguously one of expansion driven by smaller, local investors.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 11.7% of all property transactions in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Investors accounted for 11.7% of market transactions in Q1 2026, participating in 12 of the 103 total SFR sales.

All transaction activity was driven by 'mom-and-pop' investors, with single-property buyers making up the bulk of activity with 9 transactions.

A significant pricing disparity exists between new and established investors. Single-property landlords paid an average of $355,495, suggesting they are buying premium, move-in-ready properties to enter the market.

In stark contrast, small landlords in the 6-10 property tier acquired homes for a much lower average price of $87,000, indicating a strategy focused on value-add opportunities or lower-cost housing stock.

Investors exclusively sourced their acquisitions from the open market, with 0% of purchases coming from other landlords, suggesting they are competing directly with traditional homebuyers for inventory.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small investors dominate Faribault County, paying 68.7% premium for homes as they expand portfolios
Holdings
Investors own 844 SFR properties, representing 13.5% of the market in Faribault County, MN. Individual investors hold a 76.4% majority (645 properties) compared to companies at 24.4% (206 properties).
Pricing
In a dramatic market shift, landlords paid a 68.7% premium over homeowners in Q1 2026, with an average price of $325,662 versus the homeowner average of $192,992.
Activity
Investor activity accounted for 11.7% of Q1 2026 sales, driven entirely by small landlords. The previous quarter saw 9 new single-property investors enter the market.
Market Share
'Mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control investor housing with a 95.6% share, while institutional investors have no presence in the county.
Ownership Type
Individual investors command portfolios under six properties, but companies become the majority owners in the 6-10 property tier and beyond.
Transactions
Investors are aggressively expanding as net buyers, acquiring 4 properties for every 1 sold in Q1 2026 (12 buys vs 3 sells). Institutional investors were inactive.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Faribault County, MN is fundamentally shaped by small, local investors. This segment owns 844 properties, comprising 13.5% of the county's total SFR housing stock. Ownership is heavily skewed towards individuals, who control 76.4% of these homes. The market structure is granular, with 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) owning a commanding 95.6% of the investor-held portfolio, while institutional-scale investors have no presence whatsoever.

Investor behavior in early 2026 points to aggressive expansion and intense competition. Landlords acted as decisive net buyers, acquiring four properties for every one they sold. This expansion came at a high cost, as investors paid a startling 68.7% premium over traditional homeowners in Q1, signaling a willingness to outbid others for limited inventory. This activity, which accounted for 11.7% of all transactions, was driven entirely by small investors, particularly new entrants who paid the highest average prices to secure their first rental property.

The key takeaway from this market report is that Faribault County is a quintessential mom-and-pop investor market, characterized by portfolio growth and fierce competition. The absence of institutional players and the dominance of individual owners suggest a stable, locally-driven rental environment. However, the significant price premiums paid by investors could create affordability challenges and signal a highly competitive market for all buyers in the coming year.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 08:35 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Faribault (MN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Faribault (MN) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-mn-faribault/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.