Bates (MO) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Bates (MO) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Bates (MO)
4,757
Total Investors in Bates (MO)
1,412
Investor Owned SFR in Bates (MO)
1,276(26.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,269
SFR Owned
1,003
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
143
SFR Owned
300
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,276 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Landlords Dominate Bates County, Acquiring 61.1% of Homes and Paying Premiums
Investors own 1,276 SFR properties in Bates County, a significant 26.8% of the market, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 86.2% of that portfolio. In Q1, landlords were aggressive net buyers, involved in 54.1% of all transactions and surprisingly paying a 20.8% premium over traditional homeowners. Institutional investors remain almost non-existent, owning just 0.1% of investor-held properties.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,276 SFR properties in Bates County, with individuals holding 78.6%.
The majority of investor-owned properties are held in cash, with 1,007 properties owned outright compared to 269 that are financed. Of the 1,412 total landlords, 1,269 are individuals, outnumbering companies by nearly 9 to 1. The portfolio is highly focused on rentals, with 1,250 properties classified as rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid a 20.8% premium over homeowners in Q1, averaging $314,351.
This Q1 premium of $54,065 marks a sharp reversal from previous quarters, such as Q3 2025 when landlords secured a 0.6% discount. The pricing behavior is volatile, with landlords also paying a massive 38.1% premium in Q1 2025. This indicates a highly competitive or specialized acquisition strategy in Bates County.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords dominated Q4 activity, purchasing 44 properties, a 61.1% market share.
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) drove this activity, accounting for 30 of the 44 landlord purchases, or 66.7% of the investor total. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) acquired just a single property, highlighting their minimal impact on the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a commanding 86.2% of investor-owned SFRs.
This vast share held by small investors (1-10 properties) leaves a tiny fraction for larger players. Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties own just 0.1% of the investor-held housing stock in Bates County. Single-property landlords alone make up the largest group, holding 886 properties or 65.8% of the total.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners at the 11-20 property tier, a key crossover point.
While individuals dominate smaller portfolios, owning 88.2% of single-property holdings, companies take majority control (51.4%) in the 11-20 property tier. This trend accelerates in the 21-50 property tier, where companies own 63.2% of the properties.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is concentrated in zip code 64730, with 655 investor-owned homes.
While 64730 leads by sheer volume, zip code 64745 has the highest investor penetration rate at 31.2%. Close behind are 64779 (30.9%) and 64730 (29.4%), indicating that multiple areas in Bates County have a high density of rental properties.
Historical Transactions
Investors are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 53 properties while selling only 12 in Q1 2026.
This strong net buying trend has been consistent, with investors being net buyers in every period measured, including a net gain of 189 properties in 2025. Even institutional investors, though small, shifted from being net sellers in 2024 (net -1) to net buyers in 2025 (net +1), signaling a broader accumulation trend.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 54.1% of all Q1 property transactions in Bates County.
In Q1, institutional buyers paid 63.1% less than single-property landlords, at an average price of $125,400 versus $339,958. This massive price gap suggests they are targeting entirely different types of assets. The single institutional purchase was an inter-landlord transaction, sourced from another investor.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,276 SFR properties in Bates County, with individuals holding 78.6%.
Detailed Findings

In Bates County, Missouri, investors hold a significant 26.8% of the Single Family Residential market, totaling 1,276 properties out of 4,757.

Individual investors are the primary force in the local market, owning 1,003 properties, which accounts for 78.6% of the investor-owned housing stock. In contrast, company-owned properties number 300, representing the remaining 23.5%.

A striking financial characteristic of this market is the preference for cash ownership. A total of 1,007 investor properties were acquired with cash, far outweighing the 269 properties that are financed. This suggests a market of financially liquid investors who are less reliant on leverage.

The ownership base is granular, with 1,269 individual landlords compared to just 143 company landlords. This nearly 9-to-1 ratio reinforces the 'mom-and-pop' character of Bates County's real estate investing landscape.

The portfolio is overwhelmingly geared toward generating rental income, with 1,250 of the 1,276 properties identified as rented. This demonstrates a clear strategy among local landlords focused on long-term rental yields rather than speculative flipping.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid a 20.8% premium over homeowners in Q1, averaging $314,351.
Detailed Findings

In a surprising departure from typical market behavior, landlords in Bates County paid a significant premium for properties in the first quarter of 2026. The average landlord acquisition price was $314,351, which is 20.8% higher than the $260,286 paid by traditional homeowners, a cash difference of $54,065 per property.

This trend of landlords paying more is not an isolated event. In Q1 2025, landlords paid an even larger premium of 38.1%, or $98,089 more than homeowners ($355,316 vs. $257,227). This pattern suggests landlords may be targeting specific, higher-value properties or competing fiercely for limited inventory.

However, this premium is not constant, showcasing market volatility. In Q3 2025 and Q2 2025, landlords paid slight discounts of 0.6% ($1,571) and 6.3% ($17,453) respectively. The shift from discounts to substantial premiums indicates fluctuating market dynamics and competitive pressures.

Overall price appreciation is evident when comparing recent activity to historical data. The pandemic-era (2020-2023) average price of $183,571 is significantly lower than prices in 2024 ($200,795) and 2025 ($318,956), signaling strong market growth.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords dominated Q4 activity, purchasing 44 properties, a 61.1% market share.
Detailed Findings

Landlord purchasing activity was exceptionally strong in the most recent quarter, capturing 61.1% of all SFR sales in Bates County. Investors acquired 44 of the 72 total properties sold, demonstrating their position as the primary buyers in the market.

The activity was overwhelmingly driven by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, were responsible for 30 of these purchases, representing 66.7% of all investor acquisitions.

New investors are actively entering the market, with 28 new single-property landlords making their first purchase this quarter. This group alone acquired 20 properties, making up 44.4% of all investor buying activity and signaling a healthy, growing base of small landlords.

Mid-size landlords in the 11-20 property tier also showed significant activity, with just two entities acquiring 13 properties, an average of 6.5 properties each. This indicates strategic portfolio expansion by more established local investors.

Institutional presence was negligible. Only one property was purchased by an investor in the 1,000+ property tier, accounting for just 2.2% of landlord purchases. This data reinforces that the market is defined by local, smaller-scale capital, not large corporations.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a commanding 86.2% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Bates County is unequivocally dominated by small-scale landlords. Mom-and-pop investors (owning 1-10 properties) collectively own 86.2% of all investor-held SFRs, a figure that underscores the community-based nature of the rental market.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the bedrock of this market, holding 886 properties. This single tier accounts for 65.8% of all investor-owned homes, highlighting the importance of first-time and small investors.

In stark contrast, institutional ownership is virtually non-existent. Investors in the 1,000+ property tier (Tier 09) own just 2 properties, representing a mere 0.1% of the investor portfolio. This challenges the common narrative of corporate landlords taking over local housing markets.

Mid-size landlords (11-100 properties) represent a combined 13.4% of the market. This group shows a gradual tapering of ownership as portfolio sizes increase, with tiers like 11-20 properties (5.3%) and 51-100 properties (3.9%) holding modest shares.

The data clearly illustrates a highly fragmented ownership structure. The vast majority of rental properties are managed by local individuals and small businesses, not large, distant corporations, which has significant implications for the local economy and housing stability.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners at the 11-20 property tier, a key crossover point.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly control the entry-level and smaller tiers of the Bates County rental market. They own 88.2% of single-property investor homes and 82.6% of two-property portfolios, establishing them as the primary owners of smaller-scale rental assets.

A significant shift in ownership structure occurs once a portfolio reaches 11 properties. At the 11-20 property tier, companies become the majority owners for the first time, holding 37 properties (51.4%) compared to 35 owned by individuals (48.6%).

This trend toward corporate ownership strengthens in larger tiers. For investors with 21-50 properties, company ownership solidifies to a 63.2% majority, indicating that scaling a rental business in this market often involves formal incorporation for liability and operational efficiency.

Even in the 6-10 property tier, company presence is substantial, with corporations owning 30 properties, or 41.1% of the tier's total. This suggests that many investors formalize their business structure well before reaching a 'mid-size' scale.

The data reveals a clear lifecycle: individuals initiate and dominate the small-portfolio space, while companies are the preferred vehicle for building and managing larger, more complex rental portfolios in Bates County.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is concentrated in zip code 64730, with 655 investor-owned homes.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis within Bates County reveals specific pockets of high investor concentration. The zip code 64730 stands out as the epicenter of investor ownership by volume, containing 655 investor-owned SFR properties.

However, the highest rate of investor ownership is found in zip code 64745, where 31.2% of all SFRs are investor-owned. This indicates a market with particularly strong appeal for rental property investment, despite having a smaller total housing stock.

Several other zip codes also show very high investor penetration. MO-Bates-64779 has an ownership rate of 30.9% (198 properties), and MO-Bates-64730 follows closely with a 29.4% rate. These figures highlight a widespread pattern of high rental density across the county.

The region with the second-highest count of investor properties is MO-Bates-64720, with 250 properties, translating to a 22.6% ownership rate. This demonstrates that investor focus is not limited to a single area but is distributed across several key zip codes.

These patterns of concentration, both in terms of raw counts and ownership rates, are critical for understanding local housing market dynamics, rental availability, and potential investment opportunities within Bates County.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Investors are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 53 properties while selling only 12 in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Bates County are in a clear accumulation phase, consistently buying far more properties than they sell. In Q1 2026, they demonstrated a strong net buyer position, purchasing 53 properties and selling only 12, a buy-to-sell ratio of over 4.4 to 1.

This aggressive buying behavior is a sustained trend, not a one-time event. Throughout 2025, landlords acquired 238 properties while selling just 49, for a net gain of 189 properties. This pattern was also evident in 2024, albeit at a slower pace, with a net gain of 89 properties (146 buys vs. 57 sells).

The momentum appears to be increasing. The 93 properties bought in Q3 2025 represent a recent high point for quarterly acquisition volume, further cementing the net buyer trend.

Even the market's small contingent of institutional investors (1,000+ tier) has shifted its strategy. After being net sellers in 2024 (2 buys vs. 3 sells), they became net buyers in 2025 (4 buys vs. 3 sells), aligning their activity with the broader market trend of portfolio growth.

This consistent, multi-year pattern of net accumulation indicates strong confidence among investors in the Bates County real estate market and points to a growing supply of rental housing.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 54.1% of all Q1 property transactions in Bates County.
Detailed Findings

Investors were the most significant players in the Bates County real estate market in Q1, participating in 53 of the 98 total transactions, a commanding 54.1% market share.

A massive price disparity exists between the smallest and largest investors. Single-property landlords paid the highest average price at $339,958, while the sole institutional buyer paid just $125,400. This 63.1% price difference indicates that large and small investors operate in completely different segments of the market, likely targeting different property conditions or locations.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were the most active, conducting 38 transactions in total. This group's volume dwarfs that of all other investor tiers combined, reaffirming their role as the primary drivers of market activity.

Inter-landlord trading shows strategic repositioning. The institutional investor's only purchase was from another landlord, a 100% inter-landlord rate for that tier. In contrast, only 14.3% of purchases by new, single-property landlords came from other investors, suggesting they are primarily buying from homeowners.

The data reveals distinct strategies across tiers. New landlords appear to be buying traditional housing stock at higher prices, while larger, more sophisticated investors are acquiring properties at a deep discount, potentially through off-market or portfolio deals.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small Landlords Dominate Bates County with 86.2% Ownership, Aggressively Buying 61.1% of Homes Sold
Holdings
Landlords own 1,276 SFR properties, representing 26.8% of Bates County's market, with individual investors overwhelmingly controlling the portfolio at 1,003 properties (78.6%) compared to companies at 300 (23.5%).
Pricing
In a surprising reversal of typical trends, landlords paid a 20.8% premium over traditional homeowners in Q1, with an average acquisition price of $314,351 versus $260,286 for homeowners.
Activity
Landlords acquired 61.1% of all properties sold in the last quarter (44 of 72), a period which saw 28 new single-property landlords enter the market, highlighting robust grassroots investment.
Market Share
The market is defined by small investors, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 86.2% of investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) have a negligible share of just 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but a clear shift occurs at the 11-20 property tier, where companies become the majority owners (51.4%) for the first time.
Transactions
Investors are strong net buyers with a 4.4x buy/sell ratio in Q1 (53 buys vs 12 sells), a consistent trend of accumulation that signals deep confidence in the local market.
Market Narrative

In Bates County, Missouri, the real estate investment market is characterized by the profound dominance of small, local players. Investors command a substantial 26.8% of the entire single-family housing market, holding 1,276 properties. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by individuals, who own 78.6% of these homes (1,003 properties), compared to just 23.5% for companies. The market structure is highly fragmented, with mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) controlling a massive 86.2% of all investor-owned housing, while institutional investors with 1,000+ properties have a nearly invisible footprint at just 0.1%.

Investor behavior in Bates County is aggressive and confident. In the most recent quarter, landlords acquired a majority 61.1% of all homes sold and were involved in 54.1% of all transactions. They are clear net buyers, purchasing 4.4 properties for every one they sold in Q1. In a striking local trend that defies national norms, these investors paid a 20.8% premium over traditional homeowners, suggesting intense competition for desirable properties. This activity is fueled by new entrants, as 28 first-time landlords made purchases, reinforcing the market's grassroots foundation.

The key takeaway from the data is that Bates County's housing market is not being reshaped by large corporations, but by an expanding base of local, individual investors. This dynamic creates a resilient rental market but also fuels intense buyer competition, driving prices up even for investors. The preference for cash purchases and consistent net buying points to a stable, long-term investment strategy focused on rental yields, shaping the future of housing availability and affordability in the region. These trends are vital for anyone looking at market reports to understand local dynamics.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 08:59 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Bates (MO)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Bates (MO) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-mo-bates/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.