Crawford (KS) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Crawford (KS) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Crawford (KS)
12,017
Total Investors in Crawford (KS)
3,175
Investor Owned SFR in Crawford (KS)
3,881(32.3%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,866
SFR Owned
2,726
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
309
SFR Owned
1,174
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 3,881 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-pop landlords control 81.6% of Crawford County's investor housing as market share of new purchases slows to 8.0%.
Investors own 3,881 SFRs in Crawford County (32.3% of the market), with individuals holding 70.2% of the portfolio. In Q1 2026, landlords secured a deep 33.9% discount versus homeowners, and after being net sellers in 2025, they have returned to a net-buyer position.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 3,881 SFR properties in Crawford County, with individuals holding a dominant 70.2% share.
The vast majority of investor properties are owned outright, with 3,409 (87.8%) held as cash properties versus just 472 (12.2%) that are financed. The portfolio is heavily rental-focused, with 3,698 properties (95.3%) classified as rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q1 2026, landlords purchased properties for 33.9% less than homeowners, a $68,797 average discount.
The price gap is extremely volatile, swinging from landlords paying a 14.1% premium in Q3 2025 to securing the deep Q1 discount. The average landlord acquisition price in Q1 2026 ($134,212) is 20.9% higher than the 2020-2023 average ($110,959), showing significant long-term appreciation.
Current Quarter Purchases
Investor purchasing activity slowed in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring just 8.0% of all properties sold.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) were responsible for 75.0% of all investor purchases. Activity included two new single-property landlords entering the market, while institutional investors made zero acquisitions.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly dominate the market, controlling 81.6% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a negligible footprint, owning just a single property, which accounts for 0.0% of the investor portfolio. The single-property landlord tier is the largest segment, holding 1,899 properties (47.3%).
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals form the base of the market, but companies become the majority owners at the 11-20 property tier.
In the single-property tier, individuals dominate with 92.2% ownership. The ownership balance shifts rapidly as portfolios grow, with companies controlling 52.8% of properties in the 11-20 unit tier.
Geographic Distribution
Investor ownership is hyper-concentrated, with the 66762 zip code alone containing 2,446 properties, 63.0% of the county's total.
The areas with the highest investor ownership rates differ from those with the highest counts. Zip code 66760 has the highest saturation at 75.0%, while 66712 appears in both top-5 lists for count (277 properties) and rate (39.0%).
Historical Transactions
Landlords shifted from net sellers in 2025 to net buyers in Q1 2026, with a 1.33x buy-to-sell ratio.
This marks a significant change from 2024, when landlords were strong net buyers with a 2.31x buy-to-sell ratio. Transaction volume in 2025 (106 total) was down significantly from 2024 levels (192 total).
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords participated in 8.0% of Q4 2025 transactions, with mom-and-pop investors driving 75% of that activity.
All landlord acquisitions during the quarter came from outside the investor community, with 0% of purchases made from other landlords. Transaction activity was limited to the smallest tiers, with no institutional participation.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 3,881 SFR properties in Crawford County, with individuals holding a dominant 70.2% share.
Detailed Findings

In Crawford County, investors own a significant 3,881 single-family properties, which constitutes 32.3% of the total market of 12,017 SFRs. This high penetration rate indicates a strong presence of real estate investing activity within the local housing ecosystem.

The ownership structure is overwhelmingly tilted towards individuals rather than corporations. Individual landlords own 2,726 properties, accounting for 70.2% of the investor-owned portfolio, while companies own the remaining 1,174 properties (30.2%).

This individual dominance is also reflected in the entity count, where there are 2,866 individual landlords compared to just 309 company landlords. This highlights a market characterized by a large number of small-scale, independent operators.

A defining feature of the local investor market is its financing strategy. An overwhelming 87.8% of the portfolio (3,409 properties) is owned free-and-clear with cash, while only 12.2% (472 properties) is financed. This suggests a low-leverage, risk-averse approach by the majority of landlords.

The portfolio's primary purpose is clear, with 3,698 properties (95.3%) classified as rented. This demonstrates that the vast majority of investor-owned homes are actively serving as rental housing for the community.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q1 2026, landlords purchased properties for 33.9% less than homeowners, a $68,797 average discount.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords demonstrated a keen ability to find value, purchasing properties for an average price of $134,212. This was a substantial 33.9% less than the $203,009 average paid by traditional homeowners, translating to a $68,797 discount per property.

This pricing advantage has been highly inconsistent. In two of the previous four quarters (Q3 and Q1 2025), landlords actually paid a premium over homeowners, at 14.1% and 14.7% respectively. The dramatic shift to a deep discount in the most recent quarter signals a potential change in market dynamics or investor strategy.

Despite the recent discount, acquisition prices have risen considerably since the pandemic era. The Q1 2026 average price of $134,212 represents a 20.9% increase over the average price of $110,959 paid between 2020 and 2023.

The volatility in the landlord-homeowner price gap suggests that investors in Crawford County are opportunistic, paying market premiums when necessary but aggressively pursuing discounts when conditions allow. This contrasts with the more stable purchasing patterns of traditional homeowners.

With no landlord purchases recorded in Q4 2025, the Q1 2026 activity, though limited, marks a re-entry into the market, characterized by highly disciplined, below-market acquisitions.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Investor purchasing activity slowed in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring just 8.0% of all properties sold.
Detailed Findings

Landlord acquisition activity represented a small fraction of the overall market in Q4 2025, with investors purchasing just 4 of the 50 total SFRs sold, a market share of 8.0%. This indicates a cautious or selective purchasing environment for investors at the close of the year.

The driving force behind this limited activity was small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) accounted for 3 of the 4 purchases, making up 75.0% of the total investor buy-side volume.

New entrants continue to fuel the market's base, with 2 new single-property landlords making their first purchase in Q4. This tier alone was responsible for 50.0% of all landlord acquisitions during the period.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) were completely inactive, making zero purchases in Q4. This absence underscores that recent market activity is exclusively a function of smaller, local operators.

The low overall volume combined with the concentration among the smallest tiers suggests a market where large-scale acquisition strategies are not prevalent, and growth is occurring one or two properties at a time.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly dominate the market, controlling 81.6% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Crawford County is defined by small, independent operators, not large institutions. Mom-and-pop landlords, who own between 1 and 10 properties, control a staggering 81.6% of all investor-owned housing, totaling 3,281 properties.

The backbone of this market is the single-property landlord. This tier alone accounts for 1,899 properties, representing 47.3% of the entire investor-owned portfolio, making first-time and small-scale investment the most common form of ownership.

Conversely, institutional-scale ownership is virtually non-existent. The 1,000+ property tier contains just one single property in the entire county, for a market share of 0.0%. This finding directly counters the narrative of widespread corporate ownership in this market.

Mid-size landlords (11-1,000 properties) hold the remaining 18.4% of the portfolio. While they represent a more scaled approach, their collective share is less than a quarter of that held by their mom-and-pop counterparts.

This distribution reveals a highly fragmented and decentralized market structure, suggesting that local market knowledge and small-scale operations are the primary drivers of property ownership in Crawford County.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individuals form the base of the market, but companies become the majority owners at the 11-20 property tier.
Detailed Findings

Ownership structure shows a distinct evolution as investors scale their portfolios. Individuals are the primary owners in smaller tiers, holding 92.2% of single-property portfolios and 81.9% of two-property portfolios.

The transition toward corporate ownership begins as portfolios approach a medium size. In the 6-10 property tier, ownership is nearly evenly split, with individuals at 52.0% and companies holding a substantial 48.0% share.

The crossover point occurs in the 11-20 property tier. At this level, companies become the majority for the first time, owning 52.8% of properties compared to 47.2% for individuals. This indicates that scaling beyond 10 properties often coincides with incorporation for liability or operational purposes.

This pattern reveals a clear lifecycle for investors in the region: starting as individuals and transitioning to a corporate structure as their holdings and complexity grow.

The data highlights that while the market is dominated by a high volume of individual landlords, the larger and more professionalized portfolios are typically held within company structures.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor ownership is hyper-concentrated, with the 66762 zip code alone containing 2,446 properties, 63.0% of the county's total.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals an extreme concentration of investor activity in Crawford County. A single zip code, 66762 (Pittsburg), is home to 2,446 investor-owned properties, accounting for an incredible 63.0% of the entire investor portfolio in the county.

The list of top regions by property count is dominated by a few key areas, with the top five zip codes collectively representing the vast majority of investor holdings. This points to a highly localized investment strategy rather than a broad, county-wide approach.

Interestingly, the markets with the highest raw count of investor properties are not always the ones with the highest penetration rate. Zip code 66760 leads the county with a 75.0% investor ownership rate, and 66746 follows at 60.4%, indicating these smaller markets are heavily saturated with rental properties.

The zip code 66712 stands out as a nexus of both high volume and high concentration. It ranks fourth for total investor properties (277) and fifth for ownership rate (39.0%), making it a significant hub for investment activity.

This geographic distribution, derived from comprehensive assessor data, shows that investment is not uniform. Instead, it is focused on specific submarkets, likely driven by factors like proximity to employers, amenities, or specific housing stock characteristics.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords shifted from net sellers in 2025 to net buyers in Q1 2026, with a 1.33x buy-to-sell ratio.
Detailed Findings

Investor sentiment in Crawford County has shown significant shifts over the past two years. In Q1 2026, landlords returned to being net buyers, acquiring 4 properties while selling 3, a slight accumulation.

This recent activity reverses the trend seen for the full year of 2025, where landlords were net sellers. During 2025, they sold 55 properties while purchasing only 51, indicating a period of slight portfolio contraction or repositioning.

The market environment has changed dramatically since 2024, which was a year of aggressive expansion for landlords. In 2024, investors bought 134 properties and sold only 58, resulting in a strong 2.31x buy-to-sell ratio and significant portfolio growth.

The data for the most recent quarter (Q1 2026) shows transaction volumes remain low compared to historical peaks, but the directional shift back toward net buying could signal renewed confidence or the emergence of new opportunities.

No data on institutional transactions was available, reflecting their minimal presence in the market. All observed activity stems from the broader landlord category, dominated by smaller operators.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords participated in 8.0% of Q4 2025 transactions, with mom-and-pop investors driving 75% of that activity.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords played a minor role in overall market transactions, accounting for just 4 of the 50 total SFR sales, a share of 8.0%. This muted activity level suggests a highly selective approach to acquisitions heading into the new year.

The acquisitions that did occur were concentrated among the smallest investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were responsible for 3 of the 4 transactions, or 75% of investor buying activity. The single-property tier alone accounted for two of these purchases.

A key finding from the quarter's activity is the source of inventory. Landlords made 0% of their purchases from other landlords, indicating that all new acquisitions were sourced from the traditional homeowner market or potentially new construction.

This lack of inter-landlord trading suggests a market focused on expanding the overall rental pool rather than exchanging existing rental assets. Investors are bringing new properties into the rental market, not just churning portfolios.

Pricing data by tier was limited due to the low transaction volume, but the activity clearly shows that the market's transactional base, much like its ownership base, is composed of small, independent investors.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords control 81.6% of Crawford County's investor housing as market share of new purchases slows to 8.0%.
Holdings
Investors own 3,881 single-family properties in Crawford County, representing 32.3% of the total market. Individual investors hold the vast majority with 2,726 properties (70.2%), compared to 1,174 (30.2%) owned by companies.
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords secured properties at a significant 33.9% discount compared to traditional homeowners, paying an average of $134,212 versus the homeowner price of $203,009.
Activity
Investor purchasing cooled in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring just 4 properties, or 8.0% of all market sales. This activity was led by small investors, including 2 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
The investor market is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale operators, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 81.6% of all investor-owned housing. Institutional ownership is virtually non-existent at just 0.0% (1 property).
Ownership Type
Individual investors form the base of the market, but companies become the majority owners once a portfolio grows beyond 10 properties, first taking the lead in the 11-20 property tier (52.8%).
Transactions
After a year as net sellers in 2025, landlords shifted back to being net buyers in Q1 2026 with a 1.33x buy-to-sell ratio (4 buys vs 3 sells). No institutional transaction data was available.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Crawford County, KS, is defined by a deep-rooted, small-scale operator base, a key finding in these Investor Pulse reports. Landlords own 3,881 single-family homes, a substantial 32.3% of the county's entire SFR market. This portfolio is firmly in the hands of local players: individual investors own 70.2% of these properties, and mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 81.6% share. In stark contrast, institutional capital has virtually no presence, owning just a single property. This structure points to a highly fragmented market driven by independent investors, not corporate entities.

Investor behavior in early 2026 reflects a cautious yet opportunistic stance. After a year of net selling in 2025, landlords returned as net buyers in Q1 2026, albeit with low volume. Their purchasing strategy is disciplined, highlighted by a remarkable 33.9% average discount compared to traditional homeowners in Q1. Acquisition activity in the prior quarter (Q4 2025) was minimal, with investors buying just 8.0% of homes sold, primarily sourced from the homeowner market rather than from other investors. This indicates a focus on bringing new supply into the rental pool rather than trading existing assets.

The key takeaway for Crawford County is that its housing market is significantly shaped by a large contingent of small, independent landlords who operate with a low-leverage, cash-heavy approach. Their recent pullback in purchasing volume, coupled with a demand for deep discounts, signals a market where value is paramount. The hyper-concentration of investment in specific zip codes like 66762 suggests that success is tied to hyperlocal knowledge, a domain where local mom-and-pop investors naturally have an advantage over outside capital.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 05:06 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Crawford (KS)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Crawford (KS) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ks-crawford/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.