Weber (UT) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Weber (UT) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Weber (UT)
68,882
Total Investors in Weber (UT)
9,589
Investor Owned SFR in Weber (UT)
7,913(11.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
7,769
SFR Owned
5,702
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
1,820
SFR Owned
2,490
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 7,913 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Landlords Dominate Weber County with 92.6% Ownership as Institutions Retreat
Investors own 11.5% of SFR properties in Weber County, UT, with mom-and-pop landlords controlling 92.6% of that portfolio. In Q1 2026, landlords surprisingly paid a 3.9% premium over homeowners, while institutional investors became net sellers, offloading more properties than they acquired.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 7,913 SFR properties, with individuals holding a 72.1% majority.
The investor portfolio is nearly evenly split between cash and financed properties, with 4,201 owned outright and 3,712 carrying a mortgage. A total of 7,739 investor-owned properties are utilized as rentals. Individual landlords outnumber companies by more than 4-to-1 (7,769 vs 1,820).
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid a surprising 3.9% premium over homeowners in Q1 2026.
In Q1 2026, investors paid an average of $517,079, which was $19,563 more than the traditional homeowner price of $497,516. This contrasts with a historical trend of even higher premiums, such as the massive 38.7% premium ($182,604) observed in Q1 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 16.4% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) dominated acquisition activity, accounting for 93.3% of all landlord purchases. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) made up just 3.4% of investor acquisitions. The market saw 130 new single-property landlords enter in Q4.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords command 92.6% of investor-owned homes in Weber County.
Small investors owning 1-10 properties control 7,475 SFRs, while institutional investors with over 1,000 properties own just 197, or 2.4% of the investor portfolio. The single-property tier alone makes up 77.9% of all investor-owned housing.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners at the 3-5 property tier in Weber County.
Individuals dominate smaller portfolios, owning 78.6% of single-property holdings. However, company ownership surpasses individuals starting at the 3-5 property tier (50.1%) and grows to 97.4% in the 101-1000 property tier.
Geographic Distribution
Investor ownership is highly concentrated, with two zip codes exceeding 34% penetration.
The zip codes 84317 and 84310 show investor ownership rates of 39.3% and 34.7%, respectively, far exceeding the county average of 11.5%. By raw count, 84404 leads with 1,804 investor-owned properties, followed by 84401 with 1,291.
Historical Transactions
While landlords are strong net buyers, institutional investors were net sellers in Q1 2026.
Overall, landlords acquired 192 properties and sold 75 in Q1, a buy-to-sell ratio of 2.56. In contrast, institutional investors sold 8 properties while buying only 7, signaling a slight divestment from the market.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords comprised 14.8% of all Q1 2026 property transactions.
Institutional investors paid 41.9% less than single-property landlords in Q1, at $285,770 vs $492,180. These large investors sourced 71.4% of their new properties from other landlords, compared to just 15% for new buyers.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 7,913 SFR properties, with individuals holding a 72.1% majority.
Detailed Findings

In Weber County, UT, investors hold 7,913 single-family residential properties, which constitutes 11.5% of the total 68,882 SFRs in the market. This highlights a significant, yet not overwhelming, investor presence in the local housing ecosystem.

Individual investors are the primary drivers of the rental market, owning 5,702 properties, or 72.1% of the total investor portfolio. Company-owned properties account for the remaining 2,490 SFRs (31.5%), underscoring the dominance of smaller-scale real estate investing.

The ownership structure by entity count further reinforces this trend, with 7,769 individual landlords compared to just 1,820 company landlords. This 4.3-to-1 ratio indicates the market is composed mainly of small, independent operators rather than large corporate entities.

A near-even split exists between properties owned free-and-clear and those with financing. Investors hold 4,201 properties with cash, while 3,712 are financed. This balance suggests a mature market with both leveraged growth strategies and long-term, stable holdings.

The portfolio is heavily focused on rentals, with 7,739 of the 7,913 investor-owned properties being non-owner-occupied. This rental-to-portfolio ratio of 97.8% confirms that the vast majority of investor activity directly contributes to the local rental housing supply.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid a surprising 3.9% premium over homeowners in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Contrary to national trends, landlords in Weber County paid a premium for properties compared to traditional homeowners in Q1 2026. The average landlord acquisition price was $517,079, a notable 3.9% or $19,563 higher than the average homeowner price of $497,516.

This premium has been a consistent, though fluctuating, feature of the market. In Q1 2025, the gap was exceptionally wide, with landlords paying a staggering 38.7% more than homeowners ($653,952 vs. $471,348), a difference of $182,604 per property.

The price gap has since narrowed significantly, from a 6.5% premium in Q3 2025 down to the current 3.9%. This trend may suggest increasing competition or a shift in the types of properties being targeted by investors versus homeowners.

Despite a cooling from the previous year, prices remain elevated compared to the pandemic era. The average landlord acquisition price during 2020-2023 was $490,287, indicating that the Q1 2026 price of $517,079 still represents a 5.5% appreciation from that period.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 16.4% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for 16.4% of the total market in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 147 of the 894 SFR properties sold in Weber County. This demonstrates a steady and significant demand from the investment sector.

The acquisition landscape is overwhelmingly controlled by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) purchased 139 of the 147 properties, representing 93.3% of all investor buying activity.

New entrants are a major force, with the single-property tier alone accounting for 101 purchases (67.8% of the investor total). These acquisitions were made by 130 distinct entities, signaling a robust influx of first-time landlords into the market.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) had a minimal presence, acquiring just 5 properties. This represents only 3.4% of all landlord purchases, challenging the narrative of large corporations driving market activity.

Mid-size landlords (11-1000 properties) also showed limited purchasing volume, collectively buying only 5 properties in the quarter. The data clearly shows that growth in the investor market is being fueled from the bottom up by new and small landlords.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords command 92.6% of investor-owned homes in Weber County.
Detailed Findings

The distribution of investor-owned properties in Weber County is heavily concentrated among small landlords. Mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04, owning 1-10 properties) control a commanding 92.6% of the entire investor-owned SFR portfolio.

First-time or single-property landlords are the backbone of the market, with 6,285 properties falling into this tier. This represents 77.9% of all investor-owned homes, highlighting the granular, decentralized nature of rental ownership in the county.

Conversely, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have a very small footprint. Their portfolio of 197 properties constitutes just 2.4% of the investor market, a figure that defies the common perception of Wall Street dominance.

Mid-size landlords (11-1000 properties) collectively own 500 properties, making up the remaining 5.0% of the investor-owned housing stock. This segment, while larger than the institutional tier, is still dwarfed by the mom-and-pop category.

This ownership structure, with its vast base of small landlords, suggests a market characterized by local operators rather than large, centralized corporate entities. This has significant implications for market stability, landlord-tenant relationships, and the overall housing economy.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners at the 3-5 property tier in Weber County.
Detailed Findings

A distinct crossover point exists where company ownership surpasses individual ownership in Weber County's investor market. While individuals dominate the entry-level tiers, companies take control as portfolio sizes grow, with the tipping point occurring in the 3-5 property tier where companies own 50.1%.

For single-property landlords, individuals represent 78.6% of all owners (5,100 properties). This share drops to 57.4% for two-property landlords, indicating that many investors incorporate as they expand their holdings.

Once a portfolio reaches 6-10 properties, company ownership becomes the clear majority at 78.4%. This trend intensifies in larger tiers, reaching 78.6% for the 11-20 property tier and peaking at 97.4% for large landlords holding 101-1000 properties.

This pattern reveals a typical growth trajectory for a real estate investor: starting as an individual and later forming an LLC or other corporate entity for liability protection and operational efficiency as the portfolio scales.

Even within the 21-50 property tier, a significant number of properties (89, or 39.4%) remain under individual ownership, showing that not all mid-size investors choose to incorporate.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor ownership is highly concentrated, with two zip codes exceeding 34% penetration.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Weber County is not evenly distributed, with significant geographic concentration in specific zip codes. The highest investor ownership rate is found in 84317, where landlords own 39.3% of the SFR housing stock. This is closely followed by 84310, with a 34.7% investor ownership rate.

These high-penetration areas stand in stark contrast to the county-wide average of 11.5%, indicating targeted investment strategies in these communities. These two zip codes represent pockets of intense rental activity.

When measured by the total number of investor-owned properties, different zip codes emerge as leaders. The 84404 zip code has the highest volume with 1,804 investor properties, followed by 84401 with 1,291 and 84403 with 1,026 properties.

Interestingly, the areas with the highest counts do not have the highest rates. For example, 84404, the leader in count, has a more modest ownership rate of 10.9%. This distinction highlights the difference between large rental markets (high count) and markets dominated by rentals (high percentage).

The top five zip codes by count (84404, 84401, 84403, 84067, 84310) collectively hold 5,809 properties, representing 73.4% of all investor-owned SFRs in the county. This demonstrates a strong concentration of the county's rental housing supply in a few key areas.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
While landlords are strong net buyers, institutional investors were net sellers in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

A significant divergence in strategy is apparent between the overall landlord market and institutional-grade investors. Landlords as a whole remain aggressive net buyers in Weber County, acquiring 192 properties while selling only 75 in Q1 2026. This yields a net gain of 117 properties and a strong buy-to-sell ratio of 2.56x.

This trend of accumulation is consistent over time. In 2025, landlords added a net 455 properties to their portfolios (691 buys vs. 236 sells), and in 2024, they added a net 462 properties (687 buys vs. 225 sells), demonstrating sustained portfolio growth.

However, institutional investors (1000+ tier) are moving in the opposite direction. In Q1 2026, they were net sellers, offloading 8 properties while acquiring only 7. This continues a pattern of retraction, as they were also net sellers for the full year of 2024 (2 buys vs. 4 sells).

While institutions were slight net buyers in 2025 (19 buys vs. 17 sells), their recent activity signals a cooling interest or a strategic pivot to divest from the Weber County market. This retreat by large players occurs while smaller landlords continue to expand their holdings.

This dynamic suggests that the market's growth is being driven by local, smaller-scale operators, while the largest, most capitalized players are reducing their exposure. This is a crucial finding for understanding future market stability and direction.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords comprised 14.8% of all Q1 2026 property transactions.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords were involved in 192 of the 1,299 total SFR transactions in Weber County, capturing a 14.8% share of the market's transactional activity. The bulk of this activity came from mom-and-pop landlords, who were responsible for 175 of the 192 investor transactions.

A massive price gap exists between what small and large investors pay for property. First-time, single-property landlords paid the highest average price at $492,180. In stark contrast, institutional investors paid an average of just $285,770, a 41.9% discount, suggesting they target different types of assets, potentially distressed or bulk portfolios.

The source of acquisitions also differs dramatically by tier. Institutional investors rely heavily on the existing landlord network, with 71.4% of their Q1 purchases (5 of 7 properties) coming from other landlords. This indicates a strategy focused on acquiring established rental properties.

Conversely, new single-property landlords are primarily buying from homeowners. Only 15.0% of their acquisitions (20 of 133 transactions) were from other investors, meaning the vast majority of new rentals are properties being converted from owner-occupancy.

This data reveals two separate markets operating in parallel: a high-priced, homeowner-to-landlord conversion market driven by new investors, and a lower-priced, landlord-to-landlord market for portfolio trading among established and institutional players.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords control 92.6% of investor homes in Weber County as institutions become net sellers
Holdings
Investors own 7,913 SFR properties, representing 11.5% of Weber County's market. Individual investors hold the vast majority with 5,702 properties (72.1%), compared to 2,490 (31.5%) owned by companies.
Pricing
In a surprising local trend, landlords paid a 3.9% premium over traditional homeowners in Q1 2026, with an average acquisition price of $517,079 versus the homeowner price of $497,516.
Activity
Landlords acquired 16.4% of all properties sold in the latest quarter, an activity overwhelmingly driven by small investors. This includes 130 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly dominate the market, controlling 92.6% of investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a minimal 2.4% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the primary owners of smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners once a portfolio grows to the 3-5 property tier, indicating a common path of professionalization.
Transactions
Landlords remain strong net buyers with a 2.56x buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 2026 (192 buys vs 75 sells). In a stark reversal, institutional investors were net sellers, offloading more properties than they acquired (7 buys vs 8 sells).
Market Narrative

In Weber County, Utah, the real estate investment landscape is defined by the dominance of small, local operators, a trend that runs counter to prevailing national narratives. Investors own 7,913 single-family properties, comprising 11.5% of the total market. The ownership structure is heavily skewed towards individuals, who control 72.1% of these assets. An examination of portfolio sizes reveals that mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) command an overwhelming 92.6% of all investor-owned housing, while large-scale institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a marginal 2.4% share.

Investor behavior in Weber County exhibits unique local characteristics, particularly in pricing. In Q1 2026, landlords paid an average of $517,079 per property, a surprising 3.9% premium over traditional homeowners. This pattern suggests intense competition for desirable assets. Transaction data further shows a clear divergence in strategy: landlords overall are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 2.56 properties for every one they sold in Q1. In direct contrast, institutional investors have pivoted to become net sellers, signaling a strategic retreat from the market while smaller investors continue to expand their portfolios.

The key takeaway from this investor pulse report is that the Weber County rental market is built and sustained by an ecosystem of nearly 8,000 individual landlords, not by Wall Street. The growth is fueled by a steady stream of new, single-property investors converting homes into rentals, while the largest players are reducing their exposure and trading existing portfolios at a significant discount. This dynamic creates a resilient, decentralized market but also points to intense competition that drives acquisition costs above homeowner levels, impacting housing affordability for all buyers in the region.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 04:33 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Weber (UT)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Weber (UT) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ut-weber/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.