Tuscarawas (OH) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Tuscarawas (OH) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Tuscarawas (OH)
28,186
Total Investors in Tuscarawas (OH)
6,188
Investor Owned SFR in Tuscarawas (OH)
5,481(19.4%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
5,515
SFR Owned
4,121
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
673
SFR Owned
1,462
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 5,481 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Landlords Dominate Tuscarawas County, Paying a Shocking 47.6% Premium in Q1
Investors own 5,481 SFR properties (19.4% of the market), with mom-and-pop landlords controlling an overwhelming 91.1% versus just 0.1% for institutional firms. In a stunning reversal, landlords paid a 47.6% premium over homeowners in Q1 2026. Overall, investors remain strong net buyers with a 3.64x buy-to-sell ratio.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 5,481 SFRs in Tuscarawas County, with individuals holding 75.2% of properties.
The investor portfolio is heavily focused on rentals, with 96.6% of properties (5,292) classified as rented. Cash-backed ownership is more common than financing, with 3,415 properties owned outright compared to 2,066 that are financed.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In a dramatic reversal, landlords paid a 47.6% premium over homeowners in Q1 2026.
This $123,613 premium per property ($383,046 vs $259,433) is a complete flip from 2025, when landlords consistently secured deep discounts ranging from 30.9% to 44.7% below homeowner prices. This signals a major shift in acquisition strategy or market conditions.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 30.5% of all SFR properties sold in Tuscarawas County in Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) drove this activity, accounting for 77.2% of all investor purchases (61 properties). Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties made zero acquisitions during the quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a commanding 91.1% of all investor-owned SFRs in Tuscarawas County.
Single-property landlords alone own 67.1% of the entire investor portfolio (3,790 properties). In contrast, institutional investors with 1,000+ properties own just 0.1%, or 3 properties in total.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the dominant owner type for portfolios of 6 or more properties.
While individuals own 89.5% of single-property holdings, companies own 67.4% of properties in the 6-10 unit tier. This corporate ownership escalates to 99.5% in the 21-50 property tier.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated in the 44663 and 44622 zip codes.
The 44663 zip code contains 1,403 investor-owned properties, while 44622 has 950. Some smaller zip codes show extreme saturation, with 44610 at 100% investor ownership and 44653 at 58.5%.
Historical Transactions
Landlords remain aggressive net buyers, acquiring 3.64 properties for every one they sold in Q1 2026.
This trend of accumulation is consistent over time, with a buy-to-sell ratio of 2.94 for the full year 2025 and 2.70 for 2024. Institutional activity is negligible, with only 3 buys and 2 sells in all of 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Investors were involved in 28.1% of all Q1 transactions, with new landlords paying the highest prices.
Single-property investors paid an average of $178,573, significantly more than any other tier. In contrast, mid-size investors in the 11-20 property tier paid the least, at just $56,107 per property.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 5,481 SFRs in Tuscarawas County, with individuals holding 75.2% of properties.
Detailed Findings

In Tuscarawas County, investors hold a significant 19.4% of the single-family residential market, totaling 5,481 properties. This highlights a strong presence of real estate investing activity in the local housing ecosystem.

The ownership structure is overwhelmingly dominated by 5,515 individual landlords, who control 4,121 properties, or 75.2% of the investor-owned portfolio. In contrast, 673 companies own the remaining 1,462 properties (26.7%), underscoring the market's reliance on small-scale, local operators.

The portfolio is primarily geared towards rental income, with 5,292 properties (96.6%) identified as rented. This high concentration confirms that the vast majority of investor-owned homes are active units in the local rental supply.

Cash is the preferred method of holding property among investors in the area. A total of 3,415 properties are owned free-and-clear, substantially outnumbering the 2,066 properties that are financed. This suggests a well-capitalized investor base that is less sensitive to interest rate fluctuations.

The data reveals a market composition defined by individual investors rather than large corporations. With individuals making up 89.1% of all landlord entities, the typical investor in Tuscarawas County is a small, local operator, not a distant institutional firm.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In a dramatic reversal, landlords paid a 47.6% premium over homeowners in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

A stunning pricing anomaly occurred in Q1 2026, where landlords paid an average of $383,046 per property, a 47.6% premium over the $259,433 paid by traditional homeowners. This amounts to an extra $123,613 per acquisition, completely upending historical norms.

This Q1 premium represents a radical departure from the established trend in 2025. Throughout the previous year, landlords consistently purchased properties at a significant discount, paying 44.7% less in Q1 ($134,643 vs $243,500) and 30.9% less in Q3 ($172,098 vs $248,911).

The shift from a deep buyer's discount to a substantial premium is the most significant pricing trend in the market. A discount of nearly $109,000 in early 2025 has transformed into a premium of over $123,000 a year later, indicating a rapid and aggressive change in investor acquisition behavior.

This pricing reversal suggests that investors in early 2026 were targeting higher-value properties or competing fiercely for limited inventory, driving prices well above the typical homeowner benchmark. It challenges the common assumption that investors always acquire properties for less than market value.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 30.5% of all SFR properties sold in Tuscarawas County in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors were a powerful force in the Q4 2025 market, purchasing 79 of the 259 total SFRs sold, which represents a 30.5% market share. This level of activity underscores their significant impact on local housing turnover.

The bulk of acquisition activity was driven by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were responsible for 61 of the 79 investor purchases, or 77.2% of the total. This demonstrates that the market's momentum comes from local operators, not large corporations.

New investors entering the market were particularly active, with 50 new single-property entities acquiring 34 homes. This accounts for 43.0% of all investor purchases in the quarter, signaling a healthy influx of first-time landlords.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09) had no purchasing activity, acquiring zero properties in Q4. This absence highlights the deeply localized nature of the Tuscarawas County investment landscape.

Mid-size investors also played a role, with those holding 11-50 properties acquiring 19 homes (24.1% of the total). However, their activity was still far surpassed by the volume from new and small landlords.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a commanding 91.1% of all investor-owned SFRs in Tuscarawas County.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Tuscarawas County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale operators. Landlords owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) control a combined 91.1% of all investor-held single-family homes, confirming the market is highly fragmented and localized.

First-time or single-holding investors (Tier 01) form the bedrock of the market, owning 3,790 properties. This represents 67.1% of the entire investor-owned SFR stock, making this group the single most important segment.

The influence of large investors is virtually non-existent. Institutional firms in Tier 09 (1,000+ properties) hold only 3 properties in the county, accounting for a mere 0.1% of the investor portfolio. This finding directly counters the narrative of large corporations dominating the housing market.

Mid-size landlords (11-100 properties) represent a smaller but notable segment, controlling a combined 4.8% of the investor-owned inventory. While more consolidated than the mom-and-pop segment, they are still a minor player compared to single-property owners.

This distribution reveals a market structure built on thousands of individual investment decisions rather than a top-down corporate strategy. The health and direction of the local rental market are therefore intrinsically tied to the behavior of these small, independent landlords.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the dominant owner type for portfolios of 6 or more properties.
Detailed Findings

A clear pattern emerges in ownership structure as portfolios grow: individuals dominate entry-level investing, while companies are the vehicle of choice for scaling. Individuals own 89.5% of single-property portfolios and 71.4% of two-property portfolios.

The crossover point occurs decisively in the 6-10 property tier (Tier 04). At this level, companies own 217 properties, or 67.4% of the tier's total, marking the threshold where a corporate structure becomes the preferred method for holding assets.

This trend toward incorporation accelerates significantly in larger tiers. In the 11-20 property tier, companies own 91.3% of the homes. For portfolios of 21-50 properties, company ownership reaches near-total saturation at 99.5%.

This data suggests that as investors expand their portfolios beyond a handful of properties, the operational, liability, and financial benefits of forming a company become critical. The path to professionalization in real estate investment in Tuscarawas County is clearly marked by incorporation.

Even among the smallest portfolios, companies have a presence, owning 10.5% of single-property holdings. This indicates that some investors choose to incorporate from their very first purchase, though it remains a minority strategy at that scale.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated in the 44663 and 44622 zip codes.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Tuscarawas County is not evenly distributed, but rather concentrated in key areas. The 44663 zip code (New Philadelphia) is the epicenter of activity with 1,403 investor-owned SFRs, representing 17.8% of its housing stock.

Following closely is the 44622 zip code (Dover), where investors own 950 properties, accounting for 15.8% of the homes in that area. Together, these two zip codes represent a substantial portion of the county's total investor portfolio.

Some smaller, more rural zip codes exhibit exceptionally high rates of investor ownership, suggesting niche markets or targeted acquisition strategies. The 44653 zip code has a 58.5% investor ownership rate, and the tiny 44610 zip code is 100% investor-owned.

The 43832 zip code (Port Washington) also shows a high penetration rate, with investors owning 19.8% of its SFR properties, totaling 360 homes. This indicates that investment activity extends beyond the two largest towns in the county.

This geographic clustering highlights specific neighborhoods and towns that are particularly attractive to investors, likely due to factors like rental demand, property values, and available inventory. Any analysis of the market must consider these localized hotspots. The full data is available in our market reports dashboard.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords remain aggressive net buyers, acquiring 3.64 properties for every one they sold in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Tuscarawas County is in a strong and sustained accumulation phase. In Q1 2026, landlords purchased 102 properties while selling only 28, resulting in a net gain of 74 properties and a buy-to-sell ratio of 3.64x.

This aggressive buying posture is not a recent development. Throughout 2025, investors bought 294 properties and sold 100 (a 2.94x ratio), and in 2024 they bought 267 while selling 99 (a 2.70x ratio). This demonstrates a consistent, multi-year strategy of portfolio expansion.

The transaction volume shows that market liquidity is healthy, with a steady flow of both acquisitions and dispositions, but the clear imbalance reflects strong confidence in the local market's future.

Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) are not a factor in these market dynamics. Their transaction volume is minimal, with only 3 properties purchased and 2 sold during the entire year of 2025. Their activity is too low to indicate any meaningful trend.

Overall, the transaction data paints a clear picture of a market dominated by smaller to mid-sized landlords who are actively growing their portfolios and demonstrating a long-term commitment to the Tuscarawas County area.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Investors were involved in 28.1% of all Q1 transactions, with new landlords paying the highest prices.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords participated in 102 of the 363 total SFR transactions, a market share of 28.1%. This activity was heavily skewed toward smaller investors, with mom-and-pop tiers (01-04) accounting for 79 of those 102 transactions.

A distinct pricing pattern emerged, revealing that the newest market entrants pay a premium. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) had the highest average purchase price at $178,573 across 50 transactions, suggesting they are paying top dollar to secure their first investment property.

Conversely, more experienced, larger investors appear to secure better deals. The average price drops for larger portfolios, with the 11-20 property tier showing a remarkably low average purchase price of $56,107, indicating a strategy focused on acquiring distressed or lower-value assets.

Inter-landlord trading is a key strategy for mid-size investors. The 21-50 property tier sourced 75.0% of its 12 acquisitions from other landlords, a sign of active consolidation within this segment. In contrast, new investors in Tier 01 acquired only 8.0% of their properties from fellow landlords, relying instead on the open market.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) were completely inactive, recording zero transactions in Q1. This reinforces that the transactional market, like the ownership landscape, is driven entirely by small and mid-sized local operators.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords control 91.1% of Tuscarawas County's investor market and are now paying record premiums
Holdings
Investors own 5,481 SFR properties, representing 19.4% of Tuscarawas County's market. Individual investors hold the vast majority with 4,121 properties (75.2%), while companies own 1,462 (26.7%).
Pricing
In a major market shift, landlords paid 47.6% more than homeowners in Q1 2026, a premium of $123,613 per property ($383,046 vs $259,433), reversing a long-standing trend of securing discounts.
Activity
Landlords accounted for 30.5% of all SFR purchases in Q4 2025, with small landlords (1-10 properties) driving 77.2% of that volume. The market saw 50 new single-property landlords enter during the quarter.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) dominate the market with 91.1% of all investor-owned housing. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) control a negligible 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the primary owners in smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners for investors holding 6 or more properties. Corporate ownership reaches 99.5% for portfolios in the 21-50 property range.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 3.64x buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 (102 buys vs 28 sells), continuing a multi-year accumulation trend. Institutional investors are not a meaningful factor in the transaction market.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Tuscarawas County, OH, is fundamentally shaped by small, local operators, not large institutions. Investors own 5,481 properties, comprising a significant 19.4% of the total SFR housing stock. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who hold a commanding 91.1% share. Individual investors own 75.2% of all investor properties, while institutional firms with over 1,000 homes have a nearly invisible footprint at just 0.1%. This granular ownership structure indicates that the local rental market's dynamics are driven by the collective decisions of thousands of small-scale investors.

Investor behavior in early 2026 signaled a dramatic shift in market conditions. After a year of securing deep discounts, landlords paid a shocking 47.6% premium over traditional homeowners in Q1, an average of $123,613 more per property. This aggression is fueled by a strong accumulation strategy, with landlords maintaining a 3.64x buy-to-sell ratio, acquiring 102 properties while only selling 28. This purchasing activity is led by new entrants, as single-property buyers were the most active group in the market, although they also paid the highest average prices.

The key takeaway from this investor pulse report is that Tuscarawas County is a small investor's market characterized by aggressive accumulation, even at premium prices. The absence of institutional players and the clear crossover to corporate ownership for portfolios larger than five properties highlight a distinct lifecycle for local investors. The market's future will be dictated not by Wall Street, but by the financial sentiment and strategic goals of thousands of Main Street landlords who are continuing to expand their holdings.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 12:56 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Tuscarawas (OH)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Tuscarawas (OH) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-oh-tuscarawas/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.