Stone (AR) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Stone (AR) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Stone (AR)
3,147
Total Investors in Stone (AR)
1,237
Investor Owned SFR in Stone (AR)
965(30.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,075
SFR Owned
786
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
162
SFR Owned
195
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 965 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Landlords Dominate Stone County, Acquiring Nearly Half of Q1 Homes at a 41% Discount
Investors own 30.7% of Single-Family homes in Stone County, AR, with mom-and-pop landlords controlling 99.0% of that portfolio. In Q1, landlords were net buyers, purchasing 46.9% of all available properties at an average price of $180,867, a significant 40.9% below traditional homeowner prices. Institutional investors have zero presence in this market.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 965 properties in Stone County, with individuals holding a dominant 81.5% share.
The vast majority of investor-owned properties are held in cash (812) versus financed (153). Nearly the entire portfolio is rental-focused, with 958 of the 965 properties classified as non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords in Q1 paid $180,867 per property, a staggering 40.9% discount compared to homeowners.
This Q1 discount of $125,317 marks a sharp reversal from Q3 2025, when landlords paid a 10.4% premium. The price advantage for landlords has been highly volatile, fluctuating between significant discounts and occasional premiums over the past year.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 46.9% of all home purchases in the most recent quarter.
Mom-and-pop landlords were responsible for 100% of this activity, purchasing all 15 investor-acquired properties. All 15 of these purchases were made by new, single-property landlords, signaling a fresh wave of small investors entering the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a near-total 99.0% of investor-owned homes in Stone County.
Single-property landlords alone account for 82.6% of all investor-owned properties. In contrast, institutional investors with 1,000+ properties have zero presence, owning 0.0% of the portfolio.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owner in the 3-5 property tier, a rare exception in an individual-dominated market.
Across all tiers, individual investors own 81.5% of properties. Companies only achieve a majority (56.2%) in the small landlord tier of 3-5 properties, while individuals dominate every other segment, including the single-property tier (84.7%).
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity in Stone County is highly concentrated, with one zip code holding 81% of all properties.
The 72560 zip code contains 784 of the 965 investor-owned properties. While some smaller zip codes have higher percentage rates of investor ownership, such as 72530 at 43.8%, none come close to the sheer volume in 72560.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Stone County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 5 properties for every 1 they sold in Q1 2026.
This trend of accumulation is consistent, with a buy-to-sell ratio of 12.25 in 2025 (98 buys vs 8 sells) and 10.38 in 2024 (83 buys vs 8 sells). There have been no recorded transactions by institutional investors.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 42.6% of all Q1 property transactions, all by single-property buyers.
These new landlords paid an average of $180,867. Only 10.0% of their purchases were from other landlords, showing they are primarily acquiring homes from the traditional market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 965 properties in Stone County, with individuals holding a dominant 81.5% share.
Detailed Findings

In Stone County, AR, investors hold a significant 30.7% of the single-family residential market, totaling 965 properties out of 3,147.

Individual investors are the primary force, owning 786 properties, which constitutes 81.5% of the investor-owned housing stock. Companies hold the remaining 195 properties, or 20.2%.

A defining characteristic of this market is the preference for cash transactions. A commanding 84.1% of investor properties (812) were acquired with cash, compared to just 15.9% (153 properties) that are financed.

The portfolio is almost exclusively dedicated to rentals, with 958 of the 965 properties being non-owner-occupied. This highlights a clear focus on generating rental income rather than short-term flipping.

The number of individual landlords (1,075) far surpasses company landlords (162), underscoring the granular, small-scale nature of real estate investing in the county.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords in Q1 paid $180,867 per property, a staggering 40.9% discount compared to homeowners.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords in Stone County achieved a remarkable pricing advantage, paying an average of $180,867 per property. This was 40.9% less than the $306,184 paid by traditional homeowners, representing a massive $125,317 discount on average.

This deep discount is a recent development and shows significant volatility. In Q3 2025, the dynamic was completely inverted, with landlords paying a 10.4% premium ($18,706) over homeowners.

Looking back further, the landlord discount has fluctuated. In Q2 2025, it was 27.5% ($47,752), and in Q1 2025, it was a more modest 6.3% ($10,653), indicating that the Q1 2026 purchasing environment was exceptionally favorable for investors.

Overall price appreciation is evident when comparing recent activity to the 2020-2023 period. The average landlord acquisition price of $180,867 in Q1 2026 is 37.9% higher than the $131,172 average from the 2020-2023 boom years.

The data reveals that investors are adept at finding deals, but their ability to secure properties below market rate varies dramatically from quarter to quarter.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 46.9% of all home purchases in the most recent quarter.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity surged in the last quarter, with landlords acquiring 15 of the 32 total SFRs sold in Stone County, capturing a substantial 46.9% market share.

The activity was driven exclusively by new entrants. All 15 properties were purchased by 20 different single-property landlords (Tier 01), indicating no acquisitions by existing or larger investors.

Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) accounted for 100% of landlord purchases, a clear sign of a market dominated by small-scale participants.

Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) made zero purchases, holding 0.0% of the quarter's landlord acquisition volume, reinforcing their complete absence from this market.

This pattern of new, small investors driving acquisition volume suggests a grassroots expansion of the rental market rather than a consolidation by larger players.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a near-total 99.0% of investor-owned homes in Stone County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Stone County is defined by the overwhelming dominance of small landlords. Mom-and-pop investors (owning 1-10 properties) control 99.0% of all investor-held SFRs.

Single-property landlords are the bedrock of the market, with their 808 properties making up 82.6% of the entire investor portfolio. This highlights the hyper-fragmented nature of ownership.

The next largest tiers are two-property owners at 7.2% and those with 3-5 properties at 8.2%, still firmly in the small landlord category.

There is virtually no mid-size or large-scale ownership. Investors with 11-100 properties are not present, and those with 101-1,000 properties hold just two homes, or 0.2% of the market.

Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have no footprint in Stone County, owning 0.0% of the properties. This market structure directly counters the narrative of large corporations dominating the rental space.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owner in the 3-5 property tier, a rare exception in an individual-dominated market.
Detailed Findings

While individual investors own the vast majority of rental properties in Stone County (81.5%), there is a clear crossover point where company ownership becomes more strategic.

In the tier for landlords owning 3-5 properties, companies hold a 56.2% majority, with 45 properties compared to 35 for individuals. This suggests that once an investor scales beyond two properties, incorporating becomes a more common strategy.

However, this is an anomaly in the broader market. Individuals overwhelmingly dominate the largest segment, with 84.7% ownership of single-property portfolios (697 properties).

Even in larger-but-still-small tiers, individuals maintain control. For portfolios of 6-10 properties, individuals own 90.0%, and for 11-20 properties, they own 75.0%.

This pattern indicates that while some professionalization occurs at the 3-5 property mark, the market remains primarily driven by non-corporate individuals across the spectrum.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity in Stone County is highly concentrated, with one zip code holding 81% of all properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic concentration is extreme in Stone County's investor market. The zip code 72560 is the undisputed hub, containing 784 properties, which accounts for 81.2% of all investor-owned SFRs in the county.

While 72560 leads in volume, other zip codes exhibit higher investor penetration rates. For instance, 72530 has the highest rate with 43.8% of its homes being investor-owned, followed by 72519 (35.5%) and 72650 (35.3%).

This distinction between high-volume and high-percentage areas is critical. While 72560 has the most rentals, smaller neighboring markets have a higher saturation of investors relative to their total housing stock.

The top five regions by investor count are all located within Stone County, with 72680 (36 properties), 72533 (32 properties), 72051 (27 properties), and 72555 (12 properties) trailing far behind the leader.

This data points to a core investment zone in 72560, with smaller, satellite pockets of high investor activity in the surrounding areas.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Stone County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 5 properties for every 1 they sold in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Stone County are firmly in an accumulation phase, consistently buying far more properties than they sell. In Q1 2026, landlords purchased 20 SFRs while selling only 4, a 5-to-1 buy/sell ratio that demonstrates strong bullish sentiment.

This is not a new trend but an acceleration of a long-term pattern. In 2025, investors bought 98 properties and sold just 8, a ratio of 12.25-to-1. The year before, in 2024, they bought 83 and sold 8, a 10.38-to-1 ratio.

The transactional data shows a highly active and growing investor base that is expanding its portfolio. The consistent net positive acquisitions signal confidence in the local rental market.

Institutional investors (1,000+ tier) are entirely absent from the transaction logs, mirroring their 0.0% ownership stake. The market's liquidity and growth are fueled exclusively by smaller players.

The steady pace of net acquisitions over the past several years indicates a structural expansion of the rental housing supply managed by local landlords.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 42.6% of all Q1 property transactions, all by single-property buyers.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords played a role in 20 of the 47 total SFR transactions, a significant market share of 42.6%.

All 20 of these transactions were purchases by investors in the single-property tier, highlighting an influx of new market participants rather than portfolio expansion by existing landlords.

These new investors paid an average price of $180,867, securing properties at a deep discount compared to the wider market.

The market for inter-landlord trading is minimal among new buyers. Only 2 of the 20 properties (10.0%) were purchased from another landlord, indicating that these investors are primarily buying from homeowners or other non-investor sellers.

With no activity from institutional or even mid-sized tiers, the Q1 transaction data confirms that the market's momentum is entirely at the small, entry-level scale.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small individual investors dominate Stone County, AR, buying 47% of Q1 homes at a 41% discount with no institutional competition.
Holdings
Landlords own 965 SFR properties, representing a high 30.7% penetration of Stone County's market. Individual investors are the primary force, holding 786 of these properties (81.5%) compared to companies with 195 (20.2%).
Pricing
Landlords secured an exceptional 40.9% discount compared to homeowners in Q1, paying an average of $180,867 per property versus the homeowner price of $306,184.
Activity
In the most recent quarter, landlords purchased 46.9% of all SFRs sold (15 properties), with 100% of this activity coming from 20 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
The market is entirely controlled by small investors, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) own 99.0% of all investor-held housing, while institutional investors (1,000+ properties) own 0.0%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies surprisingly take majority control (56.2%) in the 3-5 property tier, suggesting a strategic point for incorporation.
Transactions
Investors are aggressive net buyers with a 5.0x buy/sell ratio in Q1 (20 buys vs 4 sells). This accumulation is driven entirely by smaller players, as institutional investors recorded zero transactions.
Market Narrative

In Stone County, Arkansas, the real estate investment landscape is unequivocally controlled by small, individual landlords. Investors own 965 single-family homes, a significant 30.7% of the total market. This portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individuals (81.5%) rather than companies (20.2%). The market structure completely defies the institutional investor narrative, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) owning 99.0% of the investor-held housing stock, while large institutional firms have zero presence.

Investor behavior in Q1 2026 was defined by aggressive and opportunistic acquisitions. Landlords purchased nearly half (46.9%) of all homes sold, with every single purchase made by a new, first-time landlord. They demonstrated remarkable deal-finding capabilities, securing properties for an average price of $180,867, a 40.9% discount compared to traditional homeowners. This activity confirms a long-term trend of accumulation, as landlords were strong net buyers with a 5-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio, consistently expanding their portfolios over the past several years.

The key takeaway for Stone County is that its rental market is a grassroots phenomenon, built and expanded by local individuals, not large corporations. The high rate of investor ownership, combined with the influx of new landlords and their ability to acquire properties at a deep discount, points to a robust and highly localized investment environment. This market is characterized by cash purchases and a clear buy-and-hold strategy, shaping the local housing dynamics through the steady conversion of properties into the rental pool by small-scale operators.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 20, 2026 at 10:26 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Stone (AR)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Stone (AR) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ar-stone/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.