Coshocton (OH) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Coshocton (OH) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Coshocton (OH)
9,953
Total Investors in Coshocton (OH)
1,504
Investor Owned SFR in Coshocton (OH)
1,479(14.9%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,263
SFR Owned
1,085
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
241
SFR Owned
414
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,479 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Command 95% of Coshocton's Investor Market as Institutions Retreat
In Coshocton, OH, investors own 1,479 SFR properties (14.9% of the market), with small mom-and-pop landlords controlling an overwhelming 94.9% of that portfolio. In Q1 2026, landlords secured properties for 9.3% less than traditional homeowners and continued to be strong net buyers, a direct contrast to institutional investors who were net sellers in the prior year.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,479 SFRs in Coshocton, with individual landlords holding 73.4% of the portfolio.
Cash is the dominant financing method, used for 1,094 properties compared to just 385 financed properties. Individual landlords (1,263) vastly outnumber company landlords (241), reinforcing a market driven by smaller-scale operators.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q1 2026, landlords paid 9.3% less than homeowners, securing a $20,130 average discount per property.
This price advantage has narrowed significantly from the previous year, where discounts were as high as 34.1% ($70,127) in Q3 2025. This trend suggests increasing competition for available housing stock in Coshocton.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 18.6% of all single-family homes sold in Coshocton during Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) were responsible for 100% of these acquisitions, with no purchases recorded by institutional investors. The market saw 15 new single-property landlords make their first purchase this quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 94.9% of all investor-owned SFRs in Coshocton.
In stark contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties own just 0.2% of the local investor portfolio, totaling only 3 homes. Landlords with just a single property make up the largest segment, owning 1,027 properties (67.9%).
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the dominant owner type in the 6-10 property tier, holding 74.7% of homes.
This marks a clear shift from smaller portfolios, where individuals are the majority, owning 86.0% of single-property portfolios and 69.7% of two-property portfolios. The crossover point appears as portfolio sizes grow beyond five properties.
Geographic Distribution
The 43812 zip code is the center of investor activity in Coshocton, containing 972 investor-owned properties.
While 43812 leads by volume, other zip codes show higher penetration rates. The 43803 zip code has a 100.0% investor ownership rate, and 43836 follows with a significant 31.2% rate, indicating concentrated investor interest in smaller sub-markets.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 2.38x buy/sell ratio in Q1 2026, acquiring 19 properties while selling 8.
This accumulation strategy is a consistent trend, as landlords were also net buyers in every quarter of 2025. In a significant divergence, institutional investors (1000+ tier) were net sellers in 2025, selling two properties while acquiring only one.
Current Quarter Transactions
Investors were involved in 16.8% of all SFR transactions in Q1 2026, with all 19 deals made by mom-and-pop landlords.
New landlords entering the market paid the highest average price ($210,287), paying a premium to acquire their first property. These new entrants sourced 26.7% of their properties from existing landlords, showing a healthy level of inter-investor trading.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,479 SFRs in Coshocton, with individual landlords holding 73.4% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

In Coshocton, OH, investors hold 1,479 Single Family Residential (SFR) properties, representing 14.9% of the total 9,953 SFRs in the market.

Individual investors are the primary force, owning 1,085 properties, which is 73.4% of the entire investor-owned portfolio. Company investors hold the remaining 414 properties (28.0%).

The entity count further highlights this dynamic: there are 1,263 individual landlords compared to just 241 company landlords, a ratio of more than 5 to 1. This points to a highly fragmented market dominated by small-scale operators rather than large corporations.

Cash transactions are overwhelmingly preferred over financing. Investors own 1,094 properties outright in cash, nearly triple the 385 properties that are financed, signaling a low-leverage investment environment.

The portfolio is heavily focused on rentals, with 1,433 of the 1,479 investor-owned properties identified as rented, underscoring the primary business model for local real estate investing.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q1 2026, landlords paid 9.3% less than homeowners, securing a $20,130 average discount per property.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Coshocton consistently acquire properties at a lower price point than traditional homeowners. In Q1 2026, investors paid an average of $196,605, which is 9.3% less than the $216,735 average paid by homeowners, representing a $20,130 discount.

However, this landlord discount is tightening. The 9.3% gap in the latest quarter is substantially smaller than the advantages seen in 2025, which ranged from 16.3% in Q1 to a peak of 34.1% in Q3. This narrowing margin may indicate rising competition or a shift in inventory quality.

Looking at longer-term trends, property values have seen significant appreciation. The average landlord acquisition price of $194,284 in 2024 is a 75.6% increase from the pandemic-era average of $110,623 (2020-2023).

The most significant price gap occurred in Q3 2025, where landlords paid an average of $135,318 compared to the homeowner average of $205,445, a massive $70,127 (34.1%) difference.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 18.6% of all single-family homes sold in Coshocton during Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords acquired 16 of the 86 total SFR properties sold in Coshocton, capturing an 18.6% share of market activity.

The quarter's purchasing activity was exclusively driven by small investors. Mom-and-pop landlords, owning between 1-10 properties, accounted for all 16 investor purchases (100.0%).

New entrants are a significant driver of demand, with 15 new entities purchasing their first and only rental property. These single-property landlords acquired 12 homes, making up 75.0% of all investor buying activity.

Mid-size and institutional investors were completely absent from the market this quarter, with zero properties purchased by landlords in tiers of 11 properties or more.

This composition of buying activity reinforces that the growth in Coshocton's rental market is fueled by new and small-scale individuals, not by large corporations expanding their portfolios.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 94.9% of all investor-owned SFRs in Coshocton.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Coshocton is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale operators. Landlords owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) control a combined 94.9% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Single-property landlords are the bedrock of the market, holding 1,027 properties, which represents 67.9% of the entire investor portfolio. This highlights the highly fragmented nature of rental ownership in the county.

Conversely, institutional ownership is practically nonexistent. The largest investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) own just 3 properties, a minuscule 0.2% of the investor-owned housing stock.

Even mid-size landlords have a limited presence. Investors owning between 11 and 100 properties collectively hold only 72 properties, or 4.7% of the total.

This distribution challenges the narrative of corporate landlord dominance, showing that the Coshocton rental market is defined by individuals and small local businesses, a key finding available in detailed market reports.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the dominant owner type in the 6-10 property tier, holding 74.7% of homes.
Detailed Findings

Ownership structure shifts decisively as portfolio sizes increase. While individuals dominate the overall market, companies take majority control in larger tiers, a common trend seen in property ownership by owner type report data.

For smaller portfolios, individual ownership is standard. Individuals own 892 of the single-property rentals (86.0%) and 83 of the two-property rentals (69.7%).

The balance remains close in the 3-5 property tier, with individuals still holding a slight majority at 108 properties (53.5%) compared to companies' 94 properties (46.5%).

The crossover point occurs in the 6-10 property tier. Here, companies own 68 properties, representing 74.7% of the tier's holdings, while individuals own just 23 properties (25.3%).

This pattern suggests that as investors scale their operations beyond five properties, they are more likely to incorporate for liability protection, tax purposes, and operational efficiency.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 43812 zip code is the center of investor activity in Coshocton, containing 972 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Coshocton County is highly concentrated geographically. The 43812 zip code is the clear hub, containing 972 investor-owned properties, which represents 16.5% of its total SFR housing stock.

Following at a distance, the 43845 zip code holds the second-highest count with 162 investor properties (11.2% rate), and 43824 has 63 properties (10.4% rate).

However, raw counts don't tell the whole story. Several smaller zip codes exhibit much higher rates of investor penetration, suggesting targeted investment strategies.

Notably, the 43803 zip code shows a 100.0% investor ownership rate, indicating a sub-market composed entirely of rental or investment properties. The 43836 zip code also stands out with a 31.2% investor ownership rate.

This contrast between high-volume and high-percentage areas highlights different types of investment opportunities, from broad activity in core areas like 43812 to niche strategies in smaller, highly-concentrated zip codes.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 2.38x buy/sell ratio in Q1 2026, acquiring 19 properties while selling 8.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Coshocton are actively expanding their portfolios, consistently buying more properties than they sell. In Q1 2026, they acquired 19 homes while only selling 8, demonstrating strong market confidence.

This net buying behavior is not a recent event. Throughout 2025, landlords maintained a positive net acquisition rate, culminating in 114 purchases versus just 49 sales for the full year.

A starkly different strategy is observed at the institutional level. In 2025, investors in the 1000+ property tier were net sellers, acquiring only one property while divesting two. This suggests a strategic retreat or portfolio rebalancing by the largest players.

The transaction data for 2024 shows institutional investors were net buyers (6 buys vs 2 sells), indicating their recent shift to a net seller position is a new development within the last year.

This divergence highlights a key market dynamic: while small, local investors are doubling down on the Coshocton market, the largest national players are reducing their limited exposure.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Investors were involved in 16.8% of all SFR transactions in Q1 2026, with all 19 deals made by mom-and-pop landlords.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords participated in 19 of the 113 total SFR transactions, accounting for a 16.8% share of market activity.

All landlord transactions this quarter were conducted by mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties), with zero activity from institutional or large-scale landlords. This reinforces that small investors are the sole drivers of current market growth.

A notable pricing pattern emerged among tiers. Single-property landlords, often new to the market, paid the highest average price at $210,287. In contrast, more experienced small landlords in the 6-10 property tier paid an average of just $98,000.

This price difference suggests that new entrants may be paying a premium to secure assets, while established small investors are more adept at finding lower-priced deals.

The market shows signs of internal liquidity, as single-property landlords acquired 4 of their 15 properties (26.7%) from other landlords, indicating that existing investor portfolios are a key source of inventory for newcomers.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Command 95% of Coshocton's Investor Market as Institutions Retreat
Holdings
Investors own 1,479 SFR properties in Coshocton, OH, making up 14.9% of the total market. The portfolio is dominated by individual investors, who hold 1,085 properties (73.4%), compared to 414 (28.0%) held by companies.
Pricing
Landlords purchased properties for 9.3% less than traditional homeowners in Q1 2026, achieving an average discount of $20,130 per property ($196,605 vs. $216,735).
Activity
In Q4 2025, landlords accounted for 18.6% of all SFR purchases, with 100% of that activity coming from mom-and-pop investors and 15 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the local market, owning 94.9% of all investor-held housing. Institutional investors (1000+ tier) have a negligible footprint, owning just 0.2% of the portfolio.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the majority in smaller portfolios, but companies become the dominant owner in the 6-10 property tier, holding 74.7% of properties in that segment.
Transactions
Landlords remain strong net buyers with a 2.38x buy/sell ratio in Q1 2026 (19 buys vs. 8 sells), while institutional investors were net sellers in the previous year (1 buy vs. 2 sells), signaling a strategic divergence.
Market Narrative

The real estate investor landscape in Coshocton, Ohio is unequivocally defined by small, local operators. Investors own 1,479 single-family properties, comprising 14.9% of the county's total SFR market. This portfolio is firmly in the hands of individuals, who own 1,085 properties (73.4%). The market structure analysis from this Investor Pulse report reveals a stark contrast in scale: mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 94.9% of all investor-owned homes, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a mere 0.2%, or just 3 properties.

Investor behavior underscores this small-scale dominance. In the last quarter of 2025, landlords were responsible for 18.6% of all home purchases, with 100% of this activity driven by mom-and-pop buyers. These investors demonstrate savvy purchasing, securing a 9.3% price discount compared to traditional homeowners in Q1 2026. Transaction trends show small landlords are in an accumulation phase, consistently acting as net buyers. This is in direct opposition to institutional players, who were net sellers in 2025, suggesting a divergence in strategy where local investors see opportunity while large-scale capital retreats.

The key takeaway for the Coshocton housing market is its resilience and dependence on local capital. The absence of significant institutional ownership means the rental market is less susceptible to the sudden strategy shifts of large corporations. Instead, market dynamics are shaped by the collective actions of over a thousand individual landlords. This fragmented ownership creates a competitive environment where new entrants, though paying a slight premium, can still gain a foothold by acquiring properties from the existing pool of investors, signaling a mature and liquid local marketplace.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 12:35 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Coshocton (OH)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Coshocton (OH) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-oh-coshocton/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.