Henry (IN) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Henry (IN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Henry (IN)
14,632
Total Investors in Henry (IN)
1,794
Investor Owned SFR in Henry (IN)
2,051(14.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,491
SFR Owned
1,444
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
303
SFR Owned
614
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,051 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Henry County with 84.7% of investor properties as institutions remain on the sidelines.
Investors own 2,051 SFR properties in Henry County (14.0% of the market), with mom-and-pop landlords controlling a commanding 84.7% versus just 0.5% for institutional firms. In Q4 2025, landlords acquired 22.0% of all homes sold, with all purchases made by small investors. Landlords have consistently remained net buyers, expanding their portfolios in the region.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 2,051 SFRs in Henry County, with individuals holding a 70.4% majority.
Investors overwhelmingly use cash, with 1,839 properties owned outright versus just 212 financed. The portfolio is heavily rental-focused, with 1,969 of the 2,051 properties identified as rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured massive discounts in 2025, paying 65.4% less than homeowners in Q3.
The price gap was substantial throughout 2025, with landlords paying $118,158 less than homeowners in Q3 and $123,707 less in Q2. No landlord purchases were recorded in Q1 2026, marking a halt in activity.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 22.0% of all SFR properties sold in Henry County in Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords were exclusively active, accounting for 100% of the 11 investor purchases. Institutional investors made no acquisitions this quarter, highlighting a market driven by small players.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords overwhelmingly dominate Henry County, controlling 84.7% of investor-owned homes.
In contrast, institutional investors with portfolios over 1,000 properties own just 11 homes, a mere 0.5% of the local investor portfolio. Single-property landlords alone account for 60.8% of all holdings.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority property owner over individuals in portfolios of 6-10 properties.
Individuals dominate small portfolios, owning 87.8% of single-property holdings. Companies control the majority in all tiers above five properties, including 82.4% of homes in the 101-1000 tier.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity in Henry County is highly concentrated, with the 47362 zip code holding 1,457 properties.
The 47362 zip code contains the vast majority of investor-owned properties. However, the highest investor ownership rate is 18.5% in the 47351 zip code, followed by 17.5% in 47366.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Henry County are consistent net buyers, acquiring significantly more properties than they sold in 2025.
In 2025, landlords bought 95 properties while selling only 37, for a net gain of 58 homes. Institutional investors flipped from being net sellers in 2024 (net -2) to net buyers in 2025 (net +3).
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 21.6% of all SFR transactions in Henry County during Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop investors drove 100% of landlord transaction activity, led by 7 deals from single-property investors. Notably, 0% of these purchases were from other landlords, indicating acquisitions from the general market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 2,051 SFRs in Henry County, with individuals holding a 70.4% majority.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 14.0% share of the Single-Family Residential market in Henry County, with a total portfolio of 2,051 properties out of the market's 14,632 SFRs.

The ownership structure is dominated by individual investors, who control 1,444 properties, or 70.4% of the investor-owned housing stock. Company-owned properties account for the remaining 614 homes (29.9%).

A defining characteristic of this market is the preference for cash transactions. An overwhelming 1,839 properties (89.7%) in investor portfolios are owned free and clear, compared to just 212 that are financed, signaling a low-leverage, high-equity approach to real estate investing.

This individual dominance is also reflected in the entity count, where 1,491 individual landlords operate in the market, far outnumbering the 303 company landlords.

The primary strategy for these holdings is clear, with 1,969 properties classified as rented, confirming that the vast majority of the investor-owned portfolio is actively generating rental income for its owners.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured massive discounts in 2025, paying 65.4% less than homeowners in Q3.
Detailed Findings

A total halt in investor purchasing occurred in the first quarter of 2026, with zero acquisitions recorded for landlords in Henry County.

Analysis of 2025 data reveals that investors consistently acquired properties at a fraction of the price paid by traditional homeowners. In Q3 2025, landlords paid an average of just $62,636, representing a 65.4% discount, or $118,158 less than the typical homeowner price of $180,794.

This trend was even more pronounced in Q2 2025, when the average landlord purchase price was $58,792. This was a 67.8% discount compared to the homeowner average of $182,499, a price gap of $123,707.

The magnitude of this recurring discount suggests that investors are not competing for the same properties as traditional homebuyers. Instead, they are likely targeting distressed assets, off-market opportunities, or properties requiring significant renovation.

Overall investor acquisition prices have remained relatively consistent over time, moving from an average of $70,749 during the 2020-2023 period to $76,801 for the full year of 2025.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 22.0% of all SFR properties sold in Henry County in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

In the fourth quarter of 2025, investors were a significant force in the market, purchasing 11 of the 50 SFRs sold in Henry County and capturing a 22.0% share of sales activity.

The entirety of this purchasing activity was driven by small, local investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) accounted for 100% of these acquisitions, demonstrating their control over market growth.

In stark contrast, institutional investors with portfolios exceeding 1,000 properties were completely inactive, making zero purchases during the quarter.

Market growth is being fueled by new entrants. Seven of the 11 properties (63.6%) were bought by new, single-property landlords, indicating a healthy influx of first-time investors.

The remaining acquisitions were made by landlords in the 3-5 property tier, reinforcing the notion that the Henry County investor market is built from the ground up by small-scale participants.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords overwhelmingly dominate Henry County, controlling 84.7% of investor-owned homes.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Henry County is defined by highly fragmented, small-scale ownership. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04, holding 1-10 properties) control a commanding 84.7% of all investor-owned real estate.

First-time and single-holding landlords form the foundation of this market. The 'Single-property' tier alone accounts for 1,271 properties, representing 60.8% of the total investor portfolio.

The presence of large-scale investors is negligible. Institutional firms (Tier 09) hold only 11 properties in the county, making up just 0.5% of the investor market and challenging the narrative of corporate dominance.

Even combining all mid-to-large tiers (11 to 1,000+ properties), these larger investors control only 15.3% of the housing stock, further emphasizing the market's reliance on small operators.

This distribution, detailed in the property ownership by owner type report, confirms that Henry County's rental market is sustained by local individuals and small businesses, not large, out-of-state corporations.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority property owner over individuals in portfolios of 6-10 properties.
Detailed Findings

While individual investors own more properties overall (70.4%), a clear pattern emerges as portfolios grow, with companies taking over as the dominant owner type in portfolios of six or more properties.

The specific crossover point occurs in the 'Small landlord (6-10)' tier. In this category, companies own 71 properties (55.9%) compared to the 56 properties (44.1%) held by individuals.

Individual ownership is most heavily concentrated at the entry level of the market. Individuals own 1,119 of the 1,271 single-property landlord homes, an 87.8% share.

As portfolio size increases, company ownership becomes progressively stronger. This trend culminates in the 'Large (101-1000)' tier, where companies hold 28 of 34 properties (82.4%).

This data suggests that while individuals are the primary entry point into the rental market, scaling an investment portfolio often coincides with incorporation, likely for liability protection, financing advantages, and operational efficiency.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity in Henry County is highly concentrated, with the 47362 zip code holding 1,457 properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals that investor ownership is not evenly distributed across Henry County. The vast majority of activity is centered in the 47362 zip code, which is home to 1,457 investor-owned properties.

The concentration in this single area is stark. The next largest sub-markets, zip codes 47356 and 46148, contain just 163 and 161 investor properties, respectively.

A key distinction exists between total volume and market penetration. While 47362 has the highest raw count of properties, the 47351 zip code claims the highest concentration, with 18.5% of its entire SFR stock owned by investors.

Following 47351, the 47366 (17.5%) and 47362 (15.9%) zip codes show the next highest rates of investor saturation, identifying them as key investor hotspots.

This data highlights specific neighborhoods that are particularly attractive to investors, likely due to a combination of factors such as housing affordability, strong rental demand, or a consistent supply of acquirable inventory.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords in Henry County are consistent net buyers, acquiring significantly more properties than they sold in 2025.
Detailed Findings

The overarching transaction trend for landlords in Henry County is one of consistent portfolio growth. In 2025, they were strong net buyers with 95 acquisitions against only 37 sales, resulting in a net increase of 58 properties under investor ownership.

This pattern of accumulation was also evident in 2024, when investors posted a net gain of 26 properties after acquiring 71 homes and selling 45.

The small contingent of institutional investors (1,000+ tier) has shown more volatile behavior on a small scale. They were net sellers in 2024, disposing of 3 properties while acquiring only 1.

However, this trend reversed in 2025, when these large firms became net buyers, adding 4 properties to their portfolios while selling just 1.

Despite the institutional shift, their transaction volume is extremely low. This reinforces that the market's net buying activity and overall direction are driven almost entirely by smaller, local landlords.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 21.6% of all SFR transactions in Henry County during Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

During the fourth quarter of 2025, landlords played an active role in the market, participating in 11 of the 51 total SFR transactions and accounting for a 21.6% share of all sales.

The transaction activity was exclusively driven by mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04), with no recorded activity from mid-size or institutional players.

The smallest investors were the most active participants. Single-property landlords were responsible for 7 of the 11 investor transactions, representing 63.6% of the group's purchasing volume.

A critical insight from Q4 is the source of these properties. None of the 11 landlord purchases were from other landlords (0.0%). This shows investors are acquiring inventory from traditional homeowners or other sources like bank sales and auctions.

This lack of inter-landlord trading suggests a market focused on external acquisition for growth. Investors using a property search tool are likely targeting opportunities outside the existing rental pool rather than trading portfolios among themselves.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Henry County with 84.7% of investor properties as institutions remain on the sidelines.
Holdings
Landlords own 2,051 SFR properties, representing 14.0% of Henry County's market, with individual investors holding 1,444 (70.4%) and companies owning 614 (29.9%).
Pricing
Landlords commanded deep discounts in 2025, paying 65.4% less than homeowners in Q3, a savings of $118,158 per property ($62,636 vs $180,794).
Activity
In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 22.0% of all SFR sales, with 7 new single-property landlords entering the market and mom-and-pop investors accounting for 100% of activity.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 84.7% of investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) own just 0.5%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 6 or more properties.
Transactions
Landlords remain net buyers, acquiring 95 properties and selling 37 in 2025, while the negligible institutional presence shifted from net seller in 2024 to net buyer in 2025.
Market Narrative

The real estate investor market in Henry County, Indiana, is fundamentally a local, small-scale operation. Investors own 2,051 single-family homes, or 14.0% of the total market, but this ownership is highly fragmented. Individual investors are the primary force, holding 70.4% of the properties. The market structure heavily favors mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who control a commanding 84.7% of the investor-owned housing stock. In stark contrast, institutional firms with over 1,000 properties have a negligible footprint, owning just 0.5% of the portfolio, as shown in detailed property ownership by owner type report data.

Investor behavior is characterized by strategic, value-oriented acquisitions and consistent portfolio growth. In Q4 2025, landlords acquired 22.0% of all homes sold, with 100% of this activity driven by mom-and-pop investors. They are adept at finding deals, paying an average of 65.4% less than traditional homeowners in Q3 2025, which suggests a focus on distressed or off-market properties. Landlords are consistently net buyers, adding a net 58 properties in 2025. This activity is predominantly funded by cash, with nearly 90% of investor-owned properties held without financing.

The key takeaway for Henry County is that the single-family rental market is defined by grassroots participation, not corporate consolidation. Growth comes from new, single-property landlords entering the market and small investors gradually expanding their holdings. The absence of institutional players and the deep discounts on acquisitions indicate a market where local knowledge and the ability to purchase and renovate distressed properties are the primary drivers of success. For those tracking market dynamics, Henry County serves as a case study in a highly localized and fragmented investor ecosystem, which can be explored further via the market reports dashboard.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 04:40 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Henry (IN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Henry (IN) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-in-henry/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.