Racine (WI) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Racine (WI) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Racine (WI)
58,184
Total Investors in Racine (WI)
4,480
Investor Owned SFR in Racine (WI)
4,434(7.6%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
3,905
SFR Owned
3,855
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
575
SFR Owned
771
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 4,434 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Racine County with 93.2% Ownership as Institutions Retreat
Investors own 4,434 SFR properties in Racine County (7.6% of the market), with small landlords controlling 93.2% of that portfolio versus a mere 0.3% for institutional investors. In Q1 2026, landlords purchased 8.3% of all homes sold, securing them at a 34.3% discount compared to traditional homeowners. While the overall market saw landlords as strong net buyers, institutional investors were neutral or net sellers, signaling a clear divergence in strategy.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 4,434 SFR properties in Racine County, with individual landlords holding a dominant 86.9% share.
The majority of investor-owned properties are held with cash (3,174) rather than financing (1,260), indicating a well-capitalized investor base. The portfolio is heavily focused on rentals, with 4,190 properties identified as rented. Individual landlords outnumber companies by nearly 7 to 1, with 3,905 individuals compared to 575 companies.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q1 2026, landlords acquired properties for 34.3% less than traditional homeowners, an average discount of $124,582 per home.
This price gap has widened dramatically from just 1.1% ($3,832) in Q1 2025, signaling a growing purchasing advantage for investors. Landlord acquisition prices have appreciated significantly, rising from an average of $194,243 during the 2020-2023 period to $238,450 in the most recent quarter. The data does not separate individual and company prices for a direct comparison.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 8.3% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025, acquiring 30 of the 360 homes on the market.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) completely dominated acquisition activity, accounting for 29 of the 30 purchases (96.7%). In contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) made only a single purchase, representing just 3.3% of investor activity. The market saw 30 new single-property landlord entities emerge this quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 93.2% of all investor-owned SFRs in Racine County.
In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) own just 12 properties, a negligible 0.3% of the investor-owned housing stock. Single-property landlords are the largest group, holding 3,007 properties, which is 65.6% of the total. Pricing data by tier for this geography is not available for a direct comparison.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority property owners only in the 51-100 property tier, holding 50.7% of homes in that segment.
Across all smaller tiers, individual landlords maintain dominant ownership, holding over 72% of properties in every tier from 1 to 50 units. For example, in the single-property tier, individuals own 87.3% of the homes. The data does not provide a direct price comparison between individual and company buyers within tiers.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with the top five zip codes by count holding over half of all investor-owned properties.
The zip code 53403 has the most investor-owned properties at 861, while 53167 has the highest investor penetration rate at 23.5%. The zip code with the highest ownership rate (53167) is not among the top five for total property count, indicating different investor strategies across the county.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Racine County are strong net buyers, acquiring 38 properties while selling only 16 in Q1 2026, a buy-to-sell ratio of 2.38x.
This net buying trend has been consistent, with investors adding a net 94 properties in 2025 and 121 in 2024. In a sharp contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ tier) are net sellers or neutral, offloading a net of 4 properties in 2024 and breaking even in Q1 2026 with one purchase and one sale.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 7.8% of all property transactions in Q1 2026, making 38 purchases out of a total of 488.
A stark pricing difference exists between tiers: institutional investors paid 41.0% less than new mom-and-pop buyers, at $148,200 vs $251,082. The single institutional purchase was acquired from another landlord, suggesting a portfolio transaction, while new buyers sourced only 3.3% of their properties from other investors.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 4,434 SFR properties in Racine County, with individual landlords holding a dominant 86.9% share.
Detailed Findings

In Racine County, investors own 4,434 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, which constitutes 7.6% of the total 58,184 SFRs in the market. This demonstrates a significant but not overwhelming investor presence in the local housing landscape.

Ownership is overwhelmingly skewed towards individual investors, who own 3,855 properties, or 86.9% of the total investor portfolio. Companies own the remaining 771 properties, making up just 17.4% of investor holdings and challenging the narrative that corporations dominate the rental market.

The entity count further highlights the dominance of small-scale operators, with 3,905 individual landlords compared to just 575 company landlords. This ratio of nearly seven individual investors for every one company underscores the granular, 'mom-and-pop' nature of real estate investing in the county.

A significant portion of the investor portfolio is owned outright, with 3,174 properties held in cash versus 1,260 that are financed. This 2.5-to-1 cash-to-financed ratio suggests that many local investors are operating with low leverage and have substantial equity in their holdings.

The portfolio is clearly geared towards generating rental income, as evidenced by the 4,190 properties classified as rented. This high concentration of rental units confirms the primary business model for SFR investors in Racine County.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q1 2026, landlords acquired properties for 34.3% less than traditional homeowners, an average discount of $124,582 per home.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Racine County demonstrate a remarkable ability to acquire properties at a significant discount. In Q1 2026, landlords paid an average of $238,450, which is $124,582 less than the $363,032 paid by traditional homeowners, a massive 34.3% price advantage.

The price gap between landlords and homeowners has expanded dramatically over the past year. The current 34.3% discount is a stark increase from the 8.7% gap in Q2 2025 and the minimal 1.1% ($3,832) difference observed in Q1 2025, suggesting investors are becoming increasingly effective at sourcing deals below typical market rates.

Despite securing discounts, the prices paid by landlords reflect broader market appreciation. The average Q1 2026 acquisition price of $238,450 is 22.8% higher than the average of $194,243 paid during the 2020-2023 period, indicating that even discounted properties are rising in value.

Quarterly price fluctuations show significant volatility. Landlord acquisition prices peaked at $332,393 in Q1 2025 before dropping to the current $238,450, a trend that may reflect shifts in the types of properties being acquired or changing market conditions.

The substantial and widening discount suggests that investors are not directly competing with homeowners for the same on-market properties. Instead, they are likely leveraging strategies such as off-market acquisitions, purchasing distressed assets, or using cash offers to secure favorable terms.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 8.3% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025, acquiring 30 of the 360 homes on the market.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for 8.3% of the Racine County market in the last quarter, with landlords purchasing 30 of the 360 total SFRs sold. This steady acquisition rate shows continued investor demand in the region.

The overwhelming majority of purchasing activity is driven by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were responsible for 96.7% of all investor purchases, acquiring 29 properties and reinforcing their role as the primary engine of investor market growth.

New entrants are a key feature of the current market. Landlords buying their very first investment property (Tier 01) made up the largest group of buyers, purchasing 23 properties, or 76.7% of the investor total. This influx of 30 new landlord entities signals a healthy and accessible entry point for small investors.

Institutional investors with 1,000+ properties had a minimal impact, making only one purchase in the entire quarter. This single transaction accounted for just 3.3% of investor buying activity, underscoring their limited role in the Racine County acquisition market.

The data clearly shows that the narrative of large corporations buying up housing is not reflective of Racine County's reality. The market's growth is fueled by local, small-scale individuals and entities, not by large institutional funds.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 93.2% of all investor-owned SFRs in Racine County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Racine County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale landlords. Those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) collectively hold 93.2% of all investor-owned SFRs, cementing their status as the backbone of the local rental market.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) represent the largest single segment, owning 3,007 properties. This accounts for 65.6% of the entire investor portfolio, highlighting the importance of first-time and small-scale investors to the housing ecosystem.

Conversely, the presence of large-scale institutional investors is almost non-existent. The 1,000+ property tier (Tier 09) owns a mere 12 properties, constituting only 0.3% of investor-owned homes. This finding directly counters the common perception of Wall Street's widespread market takeover.

Mid-size landlords (11-1,000 properties) also hold a relatively small share. Tiers 05 through 08 combined own 314 properties, which is just 6.5% of the total investor portfolio, further emphasizing the market's concentration at the smallest end of the scale.

This ownership structure indicates a highly fragmented market with low consolidation. The rental housing supply is provided by thousands of individual operators rather than a few large corporations, which has significant implications for market stability, competition, and landlord-tenant dynamics.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority property owners only in the 51-100 property tier, holding 50.7% of homes in that segment.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the primary owners across nearly all portfolio sizes in Racine County, maintaining control from the smallest to mid-sized tiers. This pattern only shifts at a much larger scale.

The clear crossover point where companies overtake individuals occurs in the 51-100 property tier. In this segment, companies own 103 properties (50.7%), just edging out the 100 properties (49.3%) owned by individuals. This marks the threshold where corporate structure becomes the more common ownership model.

In the tiers below this point, individual ownership is dominant. For instance, individuals own 87.3% of single-property portfolios, 82.6% of two-property portfolios, and 72.8% of portfolios in the 6-10 property range. This demonstrates that scaling as an individual is the most common path for local investors.

Even in the 11-20 property tier, individuals show strong prevalence, owning 112 properties (83.0%) compared to just 23 (17.0%) for companies. This indicates that formal incorporation is not a prerequisite for building a moderately sized portfolio in this market.

The data suggests a clear lifecycle for investors in Racine County: most start and operate as individuals, and only those who scale to portfolios of more than 50 properties tend to adopt a corporate ownership structure.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with the top five zip codes by count holding over half of all investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Racine County is not evenly distributed but is instead highly concentrated in specific areas. The top five zip codes by property count (53403, 53405, 53402, 53404, 53105) collectively contain 3,276 investor-owned homes, representing 73.9% of the total investor portfolio.

The 53403 zip code leads with the highest volume of investor properties at 861, which represents an investor ownership rate of 12.3%. Following closely are 53405 with 712 properties and 53402 with 622 properties.

There is a key distinction between areas with the highest count and those with the highest percentage of investor ownership. While 53403 has the most properties, the 53167 zip code has the highest penetration rate, with investors owning 23.5% of the housing stock there.

The 53404 zip code is notable for appearing on both lists, with the fourth-highest count of investor properties (564) and the second-highest ownership rate (16.2%). This area represents a clear hub for investor activity.

This geographic concentration suggests that investors are targeting specific neighborhoods, likely driven by factors such as affordability, rental demand, and potential for appreciation. Understanding these localized pockets is crucial for analyzing market dynamics, as county-wide averages can obscure these intense micro-market trends.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Racine County are strong net buyers, acquiring 38 properties while selling only 16 in Q1 2026, a buy-to-sell ratio of 2.38x.
Detailed Findings

The overall investor market in Racine County is in an expansion phase, characterized by strong and consistent net buying activity. In Q1 2026, landlords purchased 38 properties and sold only 16, resulting in a net portfolio growth of 22 properties and a robust 2.38-to-1 buy/sell ratio.

This pattern of accumulation is not new. Landlords have been consistent net buyers over the past two years, adding a net 94 properties to their portfolios in 2025 and a net 121 properties in 2024. This sustained activity signals long-term confidence in the local rental market.

A critical divergence emerges when comparing the total market to institutional investors. While the market as a whole is buying, the 1,000+ property tier is either neutral or divesting. In Q1 2026, they bought one property and sold one. This follows a trend from 2024, where they were net sellers with two buys versus six sells.

This strategic split reveals two different stories: small, local landlords are actively growing their portfolios and increasing their market footprint. In contrast, large-scale institutional players are either trimming their holdings or holding steady, indicating a potential strategic retreat or rebalancing away from the area.

The transaction data confirms that market growth is being driven from the bottom up. The health and direction of the investor market in Racine County are dictated by the actions of thousands of smaller players, not the decisions of a few large funds.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 7.8% of all property transactions in Q1 2026, making 38 purchases out of a total of 488.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords participated in 7.8% of all SFR transactions, with 38 purchases in a market that saw 488 total sales. This level of activity highlights a steady, ongoing investor presence in the market's transactional flow.

Transaction volume was heavily concentrated among the smallest investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) accounted for 36 of the 38 investor transactions (94.7%), with new single-property buyers alone making up 30 of those purchases.

A massive price gap reveals different acquisition strategies between investor tiers. The average purchase price for a new single-property landlord was $251,082. In contrast, the single institutional purchase was acquired for just $148,200, a 41.0% discount compared to the entry-level buyer.

This price disparity suggests institutional buyers are targeting different assets, possibly distressed, off-market, or bulk properties that are unavailable or unappealing to smaller buyers. New investors appear to be competing more directly for on-market properties, resulting in higher acquisition costs.

The source of deals also differs by tier. The institutional investor's purchase came from another landlord (100%), indicating a seasoned portfolio trade. Conversely, new landlords rarely bought from existing investors, with only 1 of 30 transactions (3.3%) coming from a landlord seller, implying they are primarily buying from homeowners.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small Landlords Fuel Racine County's Investor Market, Controlling 93% of Properties as Institutions Divest
Holdings
Landlords own 4,434 SFR properties, representing 7.6% of Racine County's market, with individual investors overwhelmingly holding 86.9% (3,855 properties) and companies owning just 17.4% (771 properties).
Pricing
Landlords paid 34.3% less than homeowners in Q1 2026, securing an average discount of $124,582 per property ($238,450 vs $363,032), a gap that has widened significantly over the past year.
Activity
In Q1 2026, landlords purchased 8.3% of all homes sold (30 properties), an effort almost entirely driven by mom-and-pop investors who accounted for 96.7% of all landlord acquisitions.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) control 93.2% of all investor-owned housing in the county, while large institutional investors (1,000+ properties) own a negligible 0.3% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in the 51-100 property tier, signaling the point where corporate structures become prevalent.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 2.38x buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 (38 buys vs 16 sells), while institutional investors are retreating as net sellers or holding steady (1 buy vs 1 sell).
Market Narrative

The real estate investor market in Racine County, Wisconsin is fundamentally shaped by small, local operators, not large corporations. Investors own 4,434 single-family properties, making up 7.6% of the county's total housing stock. The ownership is heavily skewed towards individuals, who control 86.9% of these properties. This granular structure is most evident in the tier distribution: 'mom-and-pop' landlords owning 1-10 properties command a staggering 93.2% of the investor market, while institutional firms with over 1,000 properties have a nearly invisible footprint at just 0.3%.

Investor behavior in Q1 2026 reveals sophisticated acquisition strategies and a clear divergence between large and small players. Landlords acquired homes at a remarkable 34.3% discount compared to traditional homeowners, a price advantage that has widened significantly over the past year. This purchasing activity is almost entirely driven by small investors, who accounted for 96.7% of landlord acquisitions. While these smaller landlords are aggressively expanding their portfolios as net buyers, institutional investors are taking the opposite stance, acting as net sellers or remaining neutral, signaling a strategic retreat from the market.

The key takeaway from the Racine County market is that it remains a landscape of opportunity for individual investors. The narrative of a corporate takeover of housing does not apply here. Instead, the market is characterized by a constant influx of new, small-scale landlords who are able to find and secure discounted properties. The divergent paths of small, accumulating investors and large, divesting institutions define the current market dynamic, suggesting that future growth and the nature of the rental market will continue to be dictated by these local operators.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 05:46 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Racine (WI)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Racine (WI) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-wi-racine/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.