Costilla (CO) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Costilla (CO) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Costilla (CO)
1,609
Total Investors in Costilla (CO)
1,556
Investor Owned SFR in Costilla (CO)
1,157(71.9%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,433
SFR Owned
1,021
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
123
SFR Owned
143
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,157 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Costilla County, Owning 71.9% of All SFR Properties
In Costilla County, investors own 1,157 single-family properties, a staggering 71.9% of the total market. This ownership is almost entirely in the hands of small investors, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 100% of the investor-owned housing stock. In the most recent quarter, these investors demonstrated significant pricing power, acquiring properties for 44.9% less than traditional homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,157 SFR properties, with individual landlords holding 88.2%.
The vast majority of investor-owned properties, 87.8% (1,016 properties), were acquired with cash rather than financing. The investor portfolio is overwhelmingly rental-focused, with 1,154 of 1,157 properties classified as rented. By entity, individual landlords (1,433) outnumber companies (123) by nearly 12-to-1.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 44.9% less than homeowners in Q1 2026, a $260,500 discount.
The landlord-homeowner price gap is extremely volatile, swinging from a 68.7% premium paid by landlords in Q3 2025 to a 44.9% discount in Q1 2026. This volatility suggests a very thin market where individual transactions can heavily skew quarterly averages. Pricing data by individual versus company investor is not available.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 40.0% of all SFR purchases in Q4 2025.
All (100.0%) of the landlord purchases were made by mom-and-pop investors, specifically two new single-property landlords entering the market. Institutional investors made zero acquisitions.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 100% of investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords are the backbone of the market, owning 1,063 properties, which constitutes 90.7% of all investor-owned housing. There are zero properties held by institutional investors (1000+ portfolio tier).
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owner in portfolios of 3-5 properties.
While individuals dominate the single-property tier with 90.0% ownership (961 properties), companies control 51.5% of the 3-5 property tier and 88.9% of the 6-10 property tier. There are no institutional-sized companies operating in the county.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in three zip codes: 81152, 81133, and 81123.
Investor ownership rates are exceptionally high, peaking at 87.5% in zip code 81138 and 82.4% in 81126. The two areas with the most investor-owned properties, 81152 and 81133, also have high penetration rates of 76.2% and 69.5% respectively.
Historical Transactions
Landlords were strong net buyers in 2025, acquiring 7 properties for every 1 sold.
This net buying trend was consistent throughout recent periods, with a buy-to-sell ratio of 6.0 in Q3 2025 (12 buys vs 2 sells). No data on inter-landlord transactions or institutional activity is available.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords participated in 40.0% of all Q4 transactions, with all activity from new investors.
The 2 landlord purchases were made by single-property tier investors at an average price of $319,500. Zero percent of these acquisitions were from other landlords, indicating that new investors are buying from the homeowner market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,157 SFR properties, with individual landlords holding 88.2%.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Costilla County represents a remarkable 71.9% of the entire single-family residential market, totaling 1,157 properties.

The market is overwhelmingly dominated by 1,433 individual landlords who control 1,021 properties, making up 88.2% of the investor-owned SFR portfolio. In contrast, 123 company entities own the remaining 143 properties (12.4%), underscoring the granular, non-corporate nature of this market.

A defining characteristic of this market is the preference for all-cash acquisitions. A total of 1,016 properties (87.8% of the investor portfolio) are owned outright without financing, compared to just 141 that carry a mortgage. This suggests a high level of liquidity among local investors or a market where financing is less common or accessible.

The portfolio is clearly geared towards rental income, with 1,154 of the 1,157 investor-owned properties being rented. This near-total focus on non-owner-occupied strategies highlights the depth of the rental market in the county.

The ratio of individual landlords to company landlords is approximately 11.7 to 1, reinforcing that the investment landscape is built on small-scale, individual real estate investing rather than large corporate operations.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 44.9% less than homeowners in Q1 2026, a $260,500 discount.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords acquired properties at an average price of $319,500, securing a massive 44.9% discount compared to the $580,000 average paid by traditional homeowners. This represents a $260,500 price advantage for investors in the most recent quarter.

The price gap between landlords and homeowners has shown extreme volatility, indicating a market with low transaction volume. For example, in Q3 2025, landlords paid a 68.7% premium ($265,658 vs. $157,500), while in Q2 2025, they obtained a 32.9% discount ($211,250 vs. $315,000). These dramatic swings suggest that quarterly averages are highly sensitive to the specific properties transacted.

Despite recent price fluctuations, there is a clear upward trend in acquisition prices over the long term. The average price during the 2020-2023 period was $189,688, which rose to an average of $230,573 in 2024 and $252,163 in 2025, signaling steady market appreciation.

The available data does not differentiate acquisition prices between individual and company landlords, making a direct comparison of their purchasing strategies impossible.

The sharp Q1 2026 discount, following quarters of mixed results, highlights the opportunistic nature of purchasing in a low-volume market where investors can potentially find and negotiate highly favorable deals.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 40.0% of all SFR purchases in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

In a quiet fourth quarter with only 5 total SFR sales in Costilla County, landlords were responsible for 2 of those purchases, capturing a significant 40.0% of the market activity.

The entirety of investor purchasing activity came from the smallest tier of landlords. Mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04) accounted for 100.0% of the 2 properties acquired by investors.

Specifically, the activity was driven by new entrants. The 2 properties were purchased by 2 different entities in the single-property tier, indicating the market's growth is fueled by new, small-scale investors rather than portfolio expansion from existing landlords.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) were completely inactive, making zero purchases in Q4. This aligns with the broader ownership data showing a complete absence of large institutional players in this market.

The data reveals a market defined by low transaction volume but a high concentration of investor participation, with all new activity originating at the grassroots level.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 100% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Costilla County is exclusively composed of mom-and-pop landlords. Owners with portfolios of 1-10 properties control 100% of the 1,157 investor-owned SFRs in the area.

The market structure is highly fragmented, with single-property landlords (Tier 01) forming the dominant group. This tier alone accounts for 1,063 properties, representing an overwhelming 90.7% of all investor holdings.

The next largest tiers are far smaller in comparison: two-property landlords own 67 properties (5.7%), and those with 3-5 properties hold 33 (2.8%). This steep drop-off highlights the market's reliance on first-time or small-scale investors.

In stark contrast to national narratives, there is zero presence of institutional investors. The 1000+ property tier (Tier 09) holds 0 properties, indicating this market is not a target for large-scale corporate investment.

The complete control by small landlords suggests a market characterized by local knowledge and smaller, individual transactions, a structure reflected in the available assessor data.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owner in portfolios of 3-5 properties.
Detailed Findings

A clear trend emerges when analyzing ownership by entity type across portfolio sizes: individuals dominate entry-level investing, while companies are preferred for larger portfolios.

Individuals overwhelmingly control the smallest tiers, owning 90.0% of single-property portfolios (961 properties) and 84.1% of two-property portfolios (58 properties).

The crossover point occurs at the 3-5 property tier, where companies take a slight majority, owning 17 properties (51.5%) compared to individuals' 16 properties (48.5%).

This shift to a corporate structure solidifies in the 6-10 property tier, where companies own 8 of the 9 properties, representing an 88.9% share. This suggests that as portfolios grow, investors prefer the liability protection and organizational structure of a company.

Even though companies dominate the largest local tiers, the scale remains small. The largest company-owned portfolios are in the 6-10 property range, with no evidence of larger corporate or institutional ownership.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in three zip codes: 81152, 81133, and 81123.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals that investor ownership in Costilla County is highly concentrated. The top three zip codes by property count, 81152 (462 properties), 81133 (459 properties), and 81123 (203 properties), together account for 1,124 properties, or 97.1% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Investor penetration rates are extremely high across the county. The top five zip codes by ownership percentage all see investors owning more than 69% of the local SFR stock, with 81138 reaching an incredible 87.5% investor ownership rate.

There is a strong correlation between the areas with the highest count of investor properties and those with high ownership rates. For instance, 81152 is #1 by count (462) and #3 by rate (76.2%), indicating deep investor saturation in the most active submarkets.

The zip code 81126 stands out with an 82.4% investor ownership rate, making it the second-highest in the county, despite having a smaller portfolio of only 14 investor-owned properties.

This intense geographic clustering suggests that investor activity is focused on specific communities or land types within the county, rather than being evenly distributed.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Key Insight
Landlords were strong net buyers in 2025, acquiring 7 properties for every 1 sold.
Detailed Findings

Historical transaction data shows landlords in Costilla County have been aggressively expanding their portfolios. Across the full year of 2025, they purchased 35 properties while selling only 5, resulting in a 7-to-1 buy/sell ratio and a net gain of 30 properties.

This pattern of accumulation was consistent in recent quarters. In Q3 2025, landlords bought 12 SFRs and sold just 2, making them strong net buyers. Similarly, in Q2 2025, they were net buyers with 4 purchases and only 1 sale.

The data indicates a clear strategy of acquisition and holding among the investor community in this county, with very little selling pressure or portfolio churn.

There is no transaction data available for institutional (1000+ tier) investors, which aligns with the finding that this tier has no ownership presence in the county.

Furthermore, the provided data does not specify the percentage of transactions that occur between landlords, so the level of internal market liquidity cannot be determined.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords participated in 40.0% of all Q4 transactions, with all activity from new investors.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords were a significant force in the market, participating in 2 of the 5 total SFR transactions, which translates to a 40.0% market share of activity.

All investor transaction volume was driven by the smallest players. The 2 landlord purchases were both made by entities in the single-property (Tier 01) category, reflecting a market where growth comes from new entrants.

These new landlords paid an average of $319,500 for their properties. With no activity from other tiers, it is not possible to compare pricing strategies between small and large investors for this quarter.

Notably, 0% of landlord purchases were sourced from other landlords. This indicates that the new investors acquired their properties from traditional homeowners or other non-investor sellers, expanding the overall pool of rental housing rather than trading existing rental stock.

The absence of institutional transactions reinforces their non-existence in this market, leaving all activity to mom-and-pop buyers.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Costilla County, Owning 71.9% of All SFR Properties
Holdings
Landlords own 1,157 SFR properties, representing a massive 71.9% of Costilla County's market. Ownership is dominated by individual investors, who hold 1,021 of these properties (88.2%), while companies own the remaining 143 (12.4%).
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords demonstrated significant negotiating power, paying an average of $319,500, which is 44.9% less than traditional homeowners ($580,000) and amounts to a $260,500 discount per property.
Activity
Landlords purchased 40.0% of all homes sold in Q4 2025 (2 properties), with all acquisitions made by 2 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) completely control the market with 100% of investor-owned housing. Institutional investors (1000+) have zero presence, and single-property owners alone hold a 90.7% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the primary owners in smaller portfolios, but a shift occurs at the 3-5 property tier, where companies become the majority owners with a 51.5% share.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers in Costilla County, acquiring 7 properties for every 1 they sold in 2025 (35 buys vs. 5 sells). Institutional investors were completely absent from all transaction activity.
Market Narrative

Costilla County, Colorado, presents a unique real estate market defined by an extraordinary level of investor penetration and a complete absence of institutional capital. Investors own 1,157 single-family properties, a staggering 71.9% of the county's entire SFR stock. This market is the exclusive domain of small-scale investors; mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 100% of the investor-owned inventory, with individuals owning 88.2% of those homes. This structure defies the common narrative of corporate landlord expansion and points to a deeply rooted local or regional investment community.

Investor behavior in Costilla County is characterized by aggressive accumulation and opportunistic pricing. In 2025, landlords were strong net buyers, acquiring 7 properties for every one they sold. This expansion continued into Q4 2025, where all new activity came from first-time landlords. Their purchasing power is significant; in Q1 2026, they secured properties for 44.9% less than traditional homeowners, an average discount of $260,500. This, combined with a strong preference for cash purchases (87.8% of holdings), suggests investors here operate with a distinct strategic advantage.

The key takeaway from this Investor Pulse report is that Costilla County is a market shaped entirely by individual, small-portfolio landlords who have achieved a dominant market share. The high ownership rates, concentrated in specific zip codes like 81152 and 81133, and deep purchasing discounts suggest a market with unique characteristics, possibly involving land parcels or other niche properties. For anyone analyzing housing trends, Costilla County serves as a case study in how a market can become thoroughly dominated by a grassroots network of investors rather than large corporations.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 01:23 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Costilla (CO)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Costilla (CO) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-co-costilla/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.