Tate (MS) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Tate (MS) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Tate (MS)
7,975
Total Investors in Tate (MS)
1,623
Investor Owned SFR in Tate (MS)
1,535(19.2%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,398
SFR Owned
1,171
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
225
SFR Owned
369
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,535 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Tate County with 92.6% Ownership, Acquiring Properties at a 55% Discount
Investors own 1,535 single-family properties in Tate County, representing 19.2% of the market. Small, individual landlords control a staggering 92.6% of this portfolio, compared to just 0.3% for institutional investors. In Q1 2026, landlords purchased 33.7% of all properties sold, paying an average of 54.6% less than traditional homeowners, while institutional investors remained largely inactive.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,535 SFR properties in Tate County, with individuals holding 76.3% of the portfolio.
The vast majority of investor-owned properties, 1,375 in total, are held in cash, compared to just 160 that are financed. Of the 1,623 total landlords, 1,398 are individuals while 225 are companies. The portfolio is heavily rental-focused, with 1,495 of 1,535 properties (97.4%) classified as non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords in Q1 2026 paid 54.6% less than homeowners, securing a $224,739 average discount.
The price gap between landlords and homeowners has been volatile, ranging from an 8.3% landlord discount in Q3 2025 to a 68.3% discount in Q1 2025. Landlord acquisition prices saw significant appreciation, rising from a 2024 average of $179,882 to a 2025 average of $240,338.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 38.8% of all single-family homes sold in Tate County in Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) dominated investor purchasing activity, accounting for 21 of the 26 properties (80.8%) bought by investors. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) purchased only 3 properties, representing 11.5% of investor acquisitions.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 92.6% of all investor-owned SFRs in Tate County.
Single-property landlords alone own 1,103 properties, accounting for 70.1% of the entire investor portfolio. Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have a negligible presence, owning just 4 properties, which is only 0.3% of the investor-owned market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners at the 11-20 property tier, controlling 85.7% of homes in that segment.
While individuals own 85.7% of single-property portfolios, companies represent 85.7% of portfolios in the 11-20 property range. For portfolios of 6-10 properties, ownership is nearly evenly split, with individuals at 51.1% and companies at 48.9%.
Geographic Distribution
The 38668 and 38618 zip codes contain the highest number of investor-owned properties in Tate County.
The zip code 38618 has both a high concentration of investor properties (716) and a high ownership rate (21.1%). In contrast, 38635 has the highest investor penetration at 25.4% but contains only 17 investor-owned homes.
Historical Transactions
Tate County landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 31 properties while selling only 2 in Q1 2026.
This strong net buying trend is consistent over time, with a 2025 record of 136 buys versus only 14 sells. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ tier) are inactive or divesting, with a neutral record of 1 buy and 1 sell in 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlord transactions accounted for 33.7% of all single-family home sales in Tate County in Q1 2026.
In Q1, institutional investors paid 47.4% less per property than single-property landlords ($136,087 vs $258,611). None of the recorded investor purchases in the quarter were from other landlords, indicating all acquisitions came from the traditional market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,535 SFR properties in Tate County, with individuals holding 76.3% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

In Tate County, investors hold a significant 19.2% of the single-family residential market, totaling 1,535 properties. This portfolio demonstrates a strong focus on real estate investing for rental income, with 97.4% of all investor-owned properties (1,495) being non-owner-occupied.

The market is overwhelmingly dominated by individual investors, who own 1,171 properties, or 76.3% of the total investor portfolio. Companies own the remaining 369 properties (24.0%), highlighting the foundational role of small-scale landlords in the local rental market.

A striking financial characteristic of this market is the preference for cash ownership. A total of 1,375 properties (89.6%) are owned outright without financing, compared to only 160 financed properties. This indicates a well-capitalized investor base that is less sensitive to interest rate fluctuations.

When looking at the entities themselves, the pattern of individual dominance is even more pronounced. There are 1,398 individual landlords compared to 225 company landlords, a ratio of more than 6-to-1. This structure reinforces that the local rental housing supply is primarily managed by a large number of small, independent operators rather than a few large corporations.

The high concentration of rented properties (1,495) underscores the critical role these 1,535 investor-owned homes play in providing rental housing options for the Tate County community. The minimal number of financed properties also suggests a stable ownership base with low leverage.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords in Q1 2026 paid 54.6% less than homeowners, securing a $224,739 average discount.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Tate County demonstrate a consistent ability to acquire properties at a significant discount compared to traditional homeowners. In Q1 2026, landlords paid an average of $187,204, a staggering 54.6% less than the $411,943 average paid by homeowners, representing a cash discount of $224,739 per property.

This pricing advantage for landlords has been a persistent, though fluctuating, market feature. In the prior year, the discount varied significantly by quarter: it was 68.3% in Q1 2025 ($111,093 vs. $350,650), narrowed to 46.9% in Q2 2025, and tightened further to just 8.3% in Q3 2025, before widening again.

Despite purchasing at a discount, the average acquisition price for landlords has been rising, indicating overall market appreciation. The average price paid by investors rose from $179,882 in 2024 to $240,338 in 2025, a substantial increase that reflects broader housing price trends in the area.

The dramatic and variable gap between what investors and homeowners pay suggests different purchasing strategies. Investors may be targeting distressed properties, off-market deals, or properties requiring significant renovation, which are typically priced lower than the move-in-ready homes sought by traditional buyers.

The ability to secure such deep discounts is a primary driver of investor profitability, allowing for healthier margins on rental income or resale. This trend highlights a distinct segmentation in the Tate County housing market, with parallel markets operating at different price points for different buyer types.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 38.8% of all single-family homes sold in Tate County in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity was a major force in the Tate County market in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing 26 of the 67 total SFRs sold, capturing a 38.8% market share. This high level of activity underscores the continued demand for rental properties in the region.

The purchasing landscape was overwhelmingly shaped by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) were responsible for 80.8% of all investor acquisitions, buying 21 properties. This demonstrates that the growth in investor ownership is being driven by local, smaller operators.

New investors are actively entering the market. The single-property tier saw the most activity, with 18 new entities acquiring 14 properties, making up 53.8% of all investor purchases for the quarter. This signals a healthy influx of first-time landlords.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) had a minimal impact, acquiring only 3 properties (11.5% of investor purchases). This low volume challenges the narrative of large corporations dominating the market and reinforces the prevalence of smaller investors.

The data reveals a clear hierarchy of purchasing power. After the dominant single-property tier, small landlords in the 3-5 property tier were the next most active group, purchasing 4 properties (15.4%). This confirms that market activity is heavily concentrated at the smallest end of the investor spectrum.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 92.6% of all investor-owned SFRs in Tate County.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure of investment properties in Tate County is definitively decentralized and dominated by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, collectively own 92.6% of all investor-held single-family homes.

The single-property tier is the bedrock of the local rental market, with 1,103 properties (70.1% of the total) owned by landlords with just one investment home. This highlights the critical role of first-time and small-scale investors in providing housing.

In sharp contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have a nearly non-existent footprint in the county. Their portfolio consists of only 4 properties, making up a mere 0.3% of the investor market. This finding directly counters the common perception of large corporate landlords dominating residential real estate.

Mid-size landlords (11-1000 properties) also hold a relatively small portion of the market. The combined share of all tiers from 11 to 1000 properties accounts for just 7.1% of investor-owned homes. The most significant of these is the 21-50 property tier, which holds 82 properties (5.2%).

This distribution reveals a highly fragmented market where the vast majority of rental properties are managed by local individuals and small businesses, rather than large, centralized institutions. The market's health and stability are therefore closely tied to the financial well-being of thousands of small operators.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners at the 11-20 property tier, controlling 85.7% of homes in that segment.
Detailed Findings

In Tate County, individual investors form the backbone of the small-portfolio rental market, while companies dominate the larger tiers. Individuals own 85.7% of all properties in the single-property tier and 76.4% in the two-property tier, showcasing their prevalence at the entry level of real estate investment.

The transition point from individual to corporate dominance occurs in the mid-size tiers. The 6-10 property tier represents a near-even split, with individuals owning 24 properties (51.1%) and companies owning 23 (48.9%).

A definitive crossover happens in the 11-20 property tier, where companies take a commanding lead, owning 18 properties for an 85.7% majority share. This indicates that as investors scale their operations beyond 10 properties, they are more likely to adopt a formal corporate structure for liability and management purposes.

Even within the 3-5 property tier, a significant portion (25.4%, or 50 properties) are company-owned, suggesting that many investors professionalize their operations early. However, individuals still hold the majority in this tier with 147 properties (74.6%).

This tiered analysis reveals a clear lifecycle of an investor in Tate County: starting as an individual and incorporating into a company as the portfolio grows in size and complexity. The 11-property mark appears to be the key threshold for this strategic shift.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 38668 and 38618 zip codes contain the highest number of investor-owned properties in Tate County.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Tate County is highly concentrated in two primary zip codes: 38668 and 38618. Together, these two areas account for a vast majority of the county's investor-owned properties, with 723 and 716 homes respectively. This reveals specific geographic targets for investment within the county.

The zip code 38618 stands out as a hotspot for both volume and penetration. It not only holds one of the largest inventories of investor properties (716) but also has a high investor ownership rate of 21.1%, indicating that one in five single-family homes there is an investment property.

Analysis of ownership rates reveals different market dynamics. While the 38635 zip code boasts the highest investor ownership rate at 25.4%, its total number of investor-owned properties is very small at just 17. This suggests a niche market or smaller housing stock where investor presence is proportionally high.

Conversely, 38668 has the highest absolute number of investor properties (723) but a slightly lower ownership rate of 18.2% compared to other top areas. This indicates a larger overall housing market where investors have a substantial but less dominant foothold.

The geographic distribution highlights where rental housing is most prevalent. Understanding these concentrations from assessor data is crucial for local planners, developers, and residents to gauge the character of neighborhood housing markets.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Tate County landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 31 properties while selling only 2 in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Tate County are in a strong accumulation phase, consistently buying far more properties than they sell. In Q1 2026, the buy-to-sell ratio was over 15-to-1, with 31 properties purchased and only 2 sold. This demonstrates strong confidence in the local rental market.

This pattern of net buying is not a recent event but a sustained trend. Throughout 2025, landlords acquired 136 properties while disposing of only 14. Similarly, in 2024, they purchased 105 properties and sold 30, affirming a multi-year strategy of portfolio expansion.

The behavior of institutional investors (1000+ tier) starkly contrasts with the overall market. In 2025, they were net neutral, buying one property and selling one. In 2024, they were only slight net buyers, with 5 purchases and 4 sales. This indicates that the market's growth is fueled by smaller investors, while large institutions remain on the sidelines.

The high volume of acquisitions compared to sales signals a tightening supply of for-sale inventory, as more homes are converted to long-term rentals. This activity is a key driver of local housing market dynamics, impacting both prices and availability for traditional homebuyers.

The transactional data provides a clear narrative for this market report: small and mid-sized landlords are actively and confidently expanding their holdings in Tate County, while the largest national players show minimal interest in the area.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlord transactions accounted for 33.7% of all single-family home sales in Tate County in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords were a significant driver of the Tate County real estate market, involved in 31 of the 92 total SFR transactions for a 33.7% market share. This high level of participation underscores their influence on local market velocity and pricing.

A dramatic pricing disparity exists between investor tiers. Single-property landlords paid the highest average price at $258,611 per home. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+ tier) paid the least, averaging just $136,087, a 47.4% discount compared to their smallest counterparts. This suggests institutions may be targeting lower-value assets or securing better deals through scale.

The bulk of transaction activity came from mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who were responsible for 25 of the 31 investor transactions. This mirrors their dominance in overall ownership and confirms their role as the primary drivers of current market activity.

Notably, there was zero inter-landlord trading activity recorded in Q1. All 31 properties purchased by investors came from non-landlord sellers, such as traditional homeowners. This indicates that investors are expanding the total rental pool rather than simply trading assets among themselves.

The price difference between tiers is significant. Large investors (101-1000 properties) also paid a very low average price of $67,378, while small landlords (3-5 properties) paid an average of $100,642. This pattern consistently shows larger, more experienced investors acquiring properties at a lower cost basis.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop investors control 93% of Tate County's rental market and are actively buying at steep discounts
Holdings
Investors own 1,535 SFR properties, 19.2% of Tate County's market, with individual investors holding 1,171 (76.3%) and companies owning 369 (24.0%).
Pricing
Landlords paid 54.6% less than homeowners in Q1 2026, securing an average discount of $224,739 per property ($187,204 vs $411,943).
Activity
In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 38.8% of all SFR sales, with 18 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the market with 92.6% of investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) own just 0.3%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios larger than 10 properties, controlling 85.7% of the 11-20 tier.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 15.5x buy/sell ratio in Q1 (31 buys vs 2 sells), while institutional investors were net neutral in 2025 (1 buy vs 1 sell).
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Tate County, MS is fundamentally shaped by small, independent operators, not large corporations. Investors own 1,535 properties, comprising a significant 19.2% of the county's total SFR housing stock. The ownership is heavily skewed towards individuals, who hold 76.3% of these properties. An analysis of portfolio size reveals an even starker trend: 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 92.6% of all investor-owned homes, while institutional firms (1,000+ properties) have a negligible footprint at just 0.3%. This structure indicates a highly decentralized rental market dependent on the activity of local entrepreneurs.

Investor behavior in the most recent quarter underscores their market influence and strategic advantages. Landlords acquired 33.7% of all homes sold in Q1 2026 and demonstrated a remarkable ability to purchase assets at a discount, paying an average of 54.6% less than traditional homeowners. Transaction data reveals a strong accumulation trend, with landlords acting as aggressive net buyers (31 acquisitions vs. 2 sales in Q1). This contrasts sharply with institutional investors, who have been largely dormant or are net sellers, signaling that market growth is exclusively driven by smaller players. Analysis of available property datasets shows larger investors also pay significantly less per property than new, single-property landlords, suggesting a strategic focus on different asset types.

The key takeaway for Tate County is that its rental housing landscape is, and will likely remain, in the hands of a large base of small-scale investors. This dynamic creates a resilient but fragmented market. While it insulates the area from the shocks of a single large institution divesting, it also means market trends are an aggregate of thousands of individual decisions. The consistent acquisition of properties at a deep discount suggests investors are adept at finding value, which may involve purchasing distressed assets and improving them, thereby contributing to the overall quality of the housing stock. The primary challenge for the broader market is the conversion of for-sale inventory into long-term rentals, which tightens supply for prospective homeowners.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 09:57 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Tate (MS)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Tate (MS) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ms-tate/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.