Dixie (FL) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Dixie (FL) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Dixie (FL)
3,157
Total Investors in Dixie (FL)
1,416
Investor Owned SFR in Dixie (FL)
994(31.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,304
SFR Owned
914
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
112
SFR Owned
112
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 994 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Investors Dominate Dixie County's Real Estate, Owning 98% of Rentals as Institutions Remain Absent
Investors own 31.5% of all single-family homes in Dixie County, FL, with mom-and-pop landlords controlling a staggering 98.4% of that portfolio. In Q1 2026, these smaller investors were aggressive net buyers, acquiring properties at a 15.6% discount compared to traditional homeowners, while institutional investors had zero market presence or activity.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 994 SFR properties in Dixie County, with individuals dominating at 92.0%.
Cash is the preferred method of ownership, with 839 properties held free-and-clear versus only 155 that are financed. The portfolio is almost entirely composed of rentals, with 989 of the 994 properties (99.5%) being non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q1 2026, landlords bought properties for 15.6% less than homeowners, a $47,404 discount.
The landlord discount is highly volatile, swinging from a 41.9% discount ($116,477) in Q1 2025 to an anomalous 76.3% premium ($153,557) in Q2 2025. Acquisition prices are up 33.7% from the 2020-2023 average of $191,310 to $255,821 in Q1 2026.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 40.8% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025, buying 20 of 49 homes.
Mom-and-pop investors were responsible for 100% of landlord purchases in Q4, with all acquisitions made by new or single-property landlords. Institutional investors made zero acquisitions, highlighting a market completely dominated by small players.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 98.4% of all investor-owned housing in Dixie County.
Single-property landlords alone own 85.4% of the investor-held rental stock (875 properties). In a complete absence of corporate scale, institutional investors own 0.0% of properties in this market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Data on pricing differences between individual and company buyers is not available for this county.
Individual investors overwhelmingly own smaller portfolios, but companies gain share as portfolios grow, reaching a 50/50 split in the 6-10 property tier. There are no institutional-scale companies operating in the county.
Geographic Distribution
The 32680 zip code is the epicenter of investor activity, with 540 investor-owned properties.
The highest concentration is in the 32648 zip code, where investors own 48.5% of all SFRs. The 32359 and 32692 zip codes also show heavy saturation, with investor ownership rates above 43%.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 9-to-1 buy/sell ratio in Q1 2026, while institutions are net sellers.
The net buying trend is consistent, with landlords purchasing over 11 times more properties than they sold in both 2024 and 2025. In contrast, institutional-level transactions show a net selling position over the last two years.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 39.1% of all transactions in Q1 2026, purchasing 27 properties.
All 27 of these landlord transactions were by new or single-property investors, who paid an average of $255,821. These new entrants sourced 7.4% of their purchases from existing landlords, showing some market churn.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 994 SFR properties in Dixie County, with individuals dominating at 92.0%.
Detailed Findings

Investors have a substantial footprint in Dixie County, owning 994 single-family residences, which constitutes 31.5% of the total 3,157 SFR properties in the market.

The ownership landscape is overwhelmingly composed of individual investors, not corporations. Individuals own 914 properties, or 92.0% of the investor-owned housing stock, compared to just 112 properties (11.3%) owned by companies.

Cash is the dominant financing strategy among landlords in this area. A remarkable 84.4% of the investor portfolio (839 properties) is owned outright, dwarfing the 155 properties that are financed.

The portfolio is clearly geared towards generating rental income, with 989 of the 994 properties (99.5%) classified as non-owner-occupied. This high concentration underscores the business-oriented nature of these holdings.

The market structure is highly fragmented, with 1,416 distinct landlord entities for only 994 properties. This indicates widespread co-ownership and a large base of small-scale participants, with individual landlords (1,304) outnumbering company entities (112) by nearly 12 to 1.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q1 2026, landlords bought properties for 15.6% less than homeowners, a $47,404 discount.
Detailed Findings

Landlords demonstrated a significant purchasing advantage in Q1 2026, paying an average of $255,821, which is 15.6% less than the $303,225 paid by traditional homeowners. This amounts to a $47,404 saving per property.

The price gap between landlords and homeowners is inconsistent and subject to extreme fluctuations quarter-over-quarter. For instance, in Q2 2025, landlords paid a surprising 76.3% premium, while in Q1 2025 they secured a massive 41.9% discount, suggesting they may target different property types or face varying competition levels.

Overall acquisition prices have appreciated significantly since the 2020-2023 period. The average price of $191,310 during those years has risen to $255,821 in Q1 2026, a 33.7% increase, signaling a robust market.

The price trend appears to be re-accelerating in 2026. After a slight dip from an average of $244,104 in 2024 to $240,595 in 2025, the Q1 2026 price of $255,821 marks a new recent high.

The reported price volatility may be amplified by low transaction volumes in certain periods, as the averages are derived from a small sample size of purchases.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 40.8% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025, buying 20 of 49 homes.
Detailed Findings

Investors were a major force in the Dixie County market in Q4 2025, purchasing 20 of the 49 available SFR homes and capturing a 40.8% market share of all sales.

The quarter's acquisition activity was exclusively driven by the smallest investors. 100% of landlord purchases (20 properties) were made by mom-and-pop landlords in Tiers 01-04.

Drilling down further, every single investor purchase was made by a new or single-property landlord (Tier 01). This indicates a strong influx of new entrants into the local rental market rather than portfolio expansion by existing players.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) were completely absent from the purchasing market in Q4, making zero acquisitions. This starkly contrasts with the active small real estate investing base and shows a clear divergence in strategy.

The 20 properties acquired by Tier 01 investors were bought by 27 distinct entities, suggesting co-ownership was a common strategy for these new market participants.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 98.4% of all investor-owned housing in Dixie County.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Dixie County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale, mom-and-pop landlords. Tiers 01-04 (1-10 properties) collectively own 98.4% of all investor-held SFRs.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) are the foundation of the market, holding 875 properties, which represents 85.4% of the entire investor portfolio.

There is virtually no mid-size or institutional presence in the county. Landlords with 11-20 properties own just 1.6% of the stock, and institutional investors (1000+ properties) have zero ownership.

Ownership concentration drops off sharply after the first property. Two-property landlords (Tier 02) own 7.4% of the rental stock, and those with 3-5 properties (Tier 03) own 5.4%.

This distribution confirms that the narrative of large corporations buying up housing does not apply to Dixie County. The market is defined by a large number of very small, local investors, a key insight available in property ownership by owner type report.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Data on pricing differences between individual and company buyers is not available for this county.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the vast majority of ownership in smaller portfolio tiers, accounting for 90.1% of single-property landlords and 85.0% of two-property landlords.

As portfolio sizes increase, company ownership becomes more prevalent. The company share grows from just 9.9% in Tier 01 to 20.7% in the 3-5 property tier, suggesting a move to formal business structures as holdings expand.

The crossover point where ownership structure diversifies significantly occurs in the 6-10 property tier, where individuals and companies each hold a 50% share of the properties.

In a notable exception to the trend, the small-medium tier of 11-20 properties is 100% owned by individuals. This suggests the few larger portfolios are held by single high-net-worth individuals rather than corporations.

Overall, the market remains dominated by individuals due to the sheer volume of properties concentrated in the smallest tiers, where they hold over 90% of the assets.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 32680 zip code is the epicenter of investor activity, with 540 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity is highly concentrated in specific zip codes within Dixie County. The 32680 area leads by sheer volume, containing 540 investor-owned properties, which represents 30.8% of its SFR stock.

The highest market penetration rate is found in the 32648 zip code, where nearly half of all homes (48.5%) are investor-owned, though the total count is lower at 98 properties.

Three zip codes exhibit extremely high investor concentration rates over 40%: 32648 (48.5%), 32692 (44.8%), and 32359 (43.2%). This indicates these small areas are prime targets for rental investment.

The top five zip codes by investor count collectively hold 987 of the 994 investor-owned properties in the county, showing that investment is not evenly distributed across the region.

There is a clear distinction between the leader by volume (32680) and the leader by rate (32648). This highlights different market dynamics, with one being a larger market that attracts significant investor presence and the other being a smaller market that is nearly dominated by investors.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 9-to-1 buy/sell ratio in Q1 2026, while institutions are net sellers.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Dixie County are consistently and overwhelmingly net buyers, signaling strong confidence in the local rental market. In Q1 2026, they purchased 9 times more properties than they sold (27 buys vs. 3 sells).

This aggressive acquisition trend has been consistent over the past two years. In 2025, the buy-to-sell ratio was over 11-to-1 (127 buys vs. 11 sells), and in 2024 it was over 12-to-1 (110 buys vs. 9 sells).

A stark divergence exists between the broader market and institutional players. While small investors are accumulating properties, the few institutional transactions show a net selling or neutral position, with 1 buy versus 2 sells in 2024 and an even 2 buys and 2 sells in 2025.

Transaction volume among landlords remains robust, with over 100 properties purchased in both 2024 and 2025, indicating a liquid and active market for smaller investors.

The institutional retreat, though small in volume, combined with the aggressive buying from smaller landlords, suggests a transfer of ownership down-market to local operators. Data on landlord-to-landlord sales was not available.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 39.1% of all transactions in Q1 2026, purchasing 27 properties.
Detailed Findings

Landlords represented a major share of market activity in Q1 2026, conducting 27 of the 69 total SFR transactions for a 39.1% market share.

The entirety of this Q1 investor activity was driven by new or single-property investors (Tier 01), who made all 27 landlord purchases. This signals a continued influx of new capital from small-scale players.

There were zero transactions from mid-size or institutional investors in the first quarter, reinforcing their passive or non-existent role in this market's recent activity.

A small but notable portion of the market involves inter-landlord trading. Of the 27 properties purchased by new investors, 2 were acquired from other landlords, representing a 7.4% landlord-to-landlord transaction rate for this cohort.

The average purchase price for these new market entrants was $255,821, establishing the going rate for entry-level investment properties in Dixie County for the quarter.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small Investors Dominate Dixie County's Real Estate, Owning 98.4% of Rentals as Institutions Remain Absent
Holdings
Landlords own 994 SFR properties in Dixie County, representing a significant 31.5% of the market. Ownership is dominated by individuals, who hold 914 of these properties (92.0%) compared to 112 (11.3%) held by companies.
Pricing
Landlords purchased properties at a 15.6% discount compared to traditional homeowners in Q1 2026, paying an average of $255,821 versus the homeowner price of $303,225 for a savings of $47,404 per home.
Activity
In Q4 2025, landlords acquired 40.8% of all homes sold (20 properties), with 100% of this activity coming from 27 new single-property landlord entities. This momentum continued into Q1 2026, where landlords made up 39.1% of all transactions.
Market Share
The market is controlled by small investors, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) owning 98.4% of all investor-held SFRs. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) have zero ownership in the county.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the primary owners across most portfolio sizes, but companies gain prevalence as portfolios grow, reaching a 50% share in the 6-10 property tier.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 9-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 2026 (27 buys vs. 3 sells). Conversely, the few institutional-level transactions recorded over the past two years indicate they are net sellers.
Market Narrative

In Dixie County, Florida, the real estate investment landscape is fundamentally a story of the small, local landlord. Investors own a substantial 994 single-family homes, accounting for 31.5% of the county's entire SFR market. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who own a staggering 98.4% of all investor properties. Individual investors, rather than corporations, are the primary drivers, holding 92.0% of these assets. Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have no presence here, owning 0.0% of the market, a key finding detailed in our Investor Pulse reports.

Investor behavior underscores a deep confidence in the local market. In the most recent quarter, landlords were involved in 39.1% of all transactions and demonstrated a keen ability to find value, purchasing homes at a 15.6% discount compared to traditional homeowners. This activity is fueled by a constant stream of new entrants; 100% of investor purchases in Q4 2025 were made by single-property landlords. While these small players are aggressive net buyers, acquiring properties at a 9-to-1 ratio over sales, the limited data on institutional players shows they have been net sellers, suggesting a market where large capital is retreating and local capital is doubling down.

The key takeaway for Dixie County is that its rental housing market is decentralized and controlled by a large base of individual community members, not distant corporations. With high ownership concentration in specific zip codes like 32648 (48.5% investor-owned), the market dynamics are dictated by the decisions of thousands of small operators. This structure suggests a market that may be more resilient to the strategic shifts of large-scale funds but is highly sensitive to local economic conditions that affect small business and individual financial health.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 03:25 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Dixie (FL)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Dixie (FL) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-fl-dixie/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.