Yuma (CO) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Yuma (CO) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Yuma (CO)
3,352
Total Investors in Yuma (CO)
1,115
Investor Owned SFR in Yuma (CO)
1,026(30.6%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
966
SFR Owned
824
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
149
SFR Owned
218
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,026 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Command 98% of Yuma County's Landlord-Owned Housing
In Yuma County, CO, investors own 1,026 SFR properties, a significant 30.6% of the market. The market is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale operators, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 98.0% of the investor-owned housing stock, while institutional ownership is nonexistent at 0.0%. In 2026-Q1, landlords were strong net buyers and captured 34.6% of all home sales, with all purchases made by these smaller investors.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,026 properties, 30.6% of the market, with individuals holding 80.3%.
The portfolio is heavily weighted towards cash purchases, with 793 properties owned outright versus 233 that are financed. Of all landlord-owned properties, 993 (96.8%) are confirmed rentals, indicating a strong focus on non-owner-occupied strategies.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid a 158.9% premium in Q1, an anomaly driven by low transaction volume.
This Q1 premium of $419,309 breaks a consistent historical trend of landlord discounts, which ranged from 3.6% ($11,947) to 49.6% ($187,230) throughout 2025. This reversal is attributed to a single high-value purchase skewing the quarter's average.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 34.6% of all SFR properties sold in the most recent quarter.
Mom-and-pop landlords were responsible for 100% of these 9 investor purchases. Activity was led by new market entrants, with 8 single-property landlords acquiring one home each.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a commanding 98.0% of investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone own 64.4% of all investor-held housing, representing 688 properties. Institutional ownership (1000+ properties) is entirely absent from Yuma County at 0.0%.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become majority owners only in the 6-10 property tier, controlling 63.0%.
Across all smaller tiers, individual landlords maintain overwhelming control, holding 85.4% in the single-property tier and 78.4% in the two-property tier. The 6-10 property tier represents the clear crossover point for professionalization.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with two zip codes holding 75.5% of properties.
Zip codes 80758 and 80759 contain 389 and 386 investor-owned properties, respectively. However, the highest penetration rates are in smaller zip codes like 80727 (52.0%) and 80755 (50.0%), where investors own over half the housing stock.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Yuma County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 9 properties for every 1 sold in Q1.
This trend of accumulation is consistent over time, with a buy-to-sell ratio of 3.5x in 2025 (60 buys vs 17 sells) and a ratio of 8.4x in 2024 (59 buys vs 7 sells). Institutional transaction data is nonexistent, as they have no market presence.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 28.1% of all Yuma County property transactions in Q1.
Mom-and-pop investors drove 100% of this activity, with 8 transactions from new, single-property landlords and 1 from a small landlord. The small landlord's purchase came from another investor, a $700,000 deal that skewed the quarterly price average.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,026 properties, 30.6% of the market, with individuals holding 80.3%.
Detailed Findings

In Yuma County, CO, real estate investors hold a significant footprint, owning 1,026 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties. This represents 30.6% of the total 3,352 SFR properties in the market, a substantial concentration of ownership.

Individual investors are the primary drivers of the rental market, owning 824 properties, which accounts for 80.3% of the total investor portfolio. Company-owned properties, while notable, comprise a smaller share at 218 properties (21.2%).

A striking financial characteristic of this market is the preference for cash ownership. A total of 793 properties (77.3% of the portfolio) are owned free and clear, compared to just 233 properties (22.7%) that are financed. This indicates a market with low leverage and high equity.

The data on landlord entities mirrors the property ownership split, with 966 individual landlords compared to 149 company landlords. This 6.5-to-1 ratio of individuals to companies underscores the 'mom-and-pop' nature of the local investment scene.

The portfolio's purpose is clear: 993 of the 1,026 investor-owned properties are rented. This 96.8% rental rate confirms that the vast majority of these holdings are actively used as investment rental properties rather than second homes or other uses.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid a 158.9% premium in Q1, an anomaly driven by low transaction volume.
Detailed Findings

In 2026-Q1, landlord acquisition prices in Yuma County averaged $683,250, a staggering 158.9% premium over the traditional homeowner average of $263,941. This difference of $419,309 is a significant outlier compared to historical data.

This Q1 premium starkly contrasts with all four preceding quarters. Throughout 2025, landlords consistently secured properties at a discount, paying 32.7% less in Q3 ($296,100 vs $439,688), 49.6% less in Q2 ($190,438 vs $377,668), and 3.6% less in Q1 ($317,909 vs $329,856).

The massive shift from a deep discount to a large premium is directly attributable to extremely low transaction volume in the quarter. Analysis of Q1 transactions reveals a single purchase by a small landlord for $700,000, which heavily skewed the average for the mere 9 total landlord purchases.

Historically, acquisition prices show steady appreciation, rising from an average of $237,421 in the 2020-2023 period to $292,617 in 2024. The 2025 average settled at $234,665, showing some price moderation before the anomalous Q1 2026 figure.

The long-term trend of landlords paying less than homeowners suggests strategic acquisition methods, such as off-market deals or purchasing properties needing renovation. The Q1 2026 data should be viewed as an exception that proves the rule, highlighting the volatility of pricing metrics in markets with few transactions.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 34.6% of all SFR properties sold in the most recent quarter.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity was robust in the latest quarter, with landlords purchasing 9 of the 26 total SFRs sold in Yuma County. This activity gives landlords a significant market share of 34.6% for quarterly acquisitions.

The market's buying activity is exclusively driven by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) accounted for all 9 acquisitions, or 100% of investor purchasing volume.

New landlords are the most active segment. Investors in the single-property tier made 8 of the 9 purchases (88.9%), signaling a steady stream of new entrants into the Yuma County rental market.

A single purchase was made by a small landlord in the 3-5 property tier, representing the remaining 11.1% of investor buying activity. This highlights a concentration of acquisitions at the smallest end of the investor spectrum.

In stark contrast, there was zero acquisition activity from institutional investors (1,000+ properties) or even mid-size landlords. This reinforces the local, small-scale character of real estate investing in the area.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a commanding 98.0% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure in Yuma County is defined by small-scale landlords. Mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04, owning 1-10 properties) collectively own 98.0% of all investor-held SFRs, demonstrating near-total market dominance.

First-time or single-holding investors form the bedrock of the market. The single-property tier alone accounts for 688 properties, representing 64.4% of the entire investor-owned portfolio.

Ownership concentration decreases sharply as portfolio size increases. Two-property landlords hold 11.5% (123 properties), while landlords with 3-5 properties hold 17.9% (191 properties).

The larger tiers have a negligible presence. Mid-size landlords (11-100 properties) own a combined 20 properties, just 2.0% of the market. There is no institutional-scale (1,000+ properties) ownership recorded in Yuma County.

This distribution reveals a highly fragmented market powered by local, individual investors rather than large corporations, challenging the common narrative of institutional takeovers in residential real estate.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become majority owners only in the 6-10 property tier, controlling 63.0%.
Detailed Findings

Individual landlords dominate the smaller portfolio tiers in Yuma County. They own 590 properties (85.4%) in the single-property tier and 98 properties (78.4%) in the two-property tier, showing that market entry is primarily an individual pursuit.

The transition to majority company ownership occurs specifically in the 6-10 property tier. In this segment, companies own 29 properties, a 63.0% share, while individuals own just 17 (37.0%), marking a clear shift toward formalized business structures as portfolios grow.

Even in the 3-5 property tier, individuals still hold a strong majority with 134 properties (68.4%), compared to 62 properties (31.6%) for companies. This indicates that operating as an individual remains the preferred method for landlords well beyond their first investment.

Interestingly, the small-medium tier of 11-20 properties is composed entirely of individuals, who own all 19 properties. This could reflect a small sample size or a local pattern of individuals building moderately sized portfolios without incorporating.

This data illustrates a distinct lifecycle in Yuma County's investor market: individuals build small portfolios, and only those scaling beyond five properties tend to adopt a corporate structure.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with two zip codes holding 75.5% of properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic concentration is a defining feature of Yuma County's investor market. Just two zip codes, 80758 (389 properties) and 80759 (386 properties), account for a combined 775 properties, representing 75.5% of all investor-owned SFRs in the county.

While concentration by count is high in those two areas, the highest market penetration rates are found elsewhere. In zip code 80727, investors own 52.0% of the SFR housing stock (79 properties), revealing a market where landlords are the majority owners.

Several other small zip codes also show remarkably high investor ownership rates. Both 80755 and 80731 have a 50.0% investor ownership rate, followed by 80807 at 44.4% and 80735 at 42.3%.

This pattern highlights a key distinction between total volume and market saturation. The areas with the most investor properties (80758 and 80759) have ownership rates of 29.1% and 27.0%, respectively. The highest rates are in smaller sub-markets where fewer properties exist overall.

This analysis, based on detailed assessor data, shows that while the bulk of the rental portfolio is in two primary areas, the most investor-saturated neighborhoods are in smaller, more rural zip codes within the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords in Yuma County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 9 properties for every 1 sold in Q1.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Yuma County are in a strong accumulation phase, consistently buying far more properties than they sell. In 2026-Q1, landlords were aggressive net buyers, with 9 acquisitions against only 1 sale, a buy-to-sell ratio of 9-to-1.

This behavior is not a recent development but a sustained trend. In 2025, investors purchased 60 properties while selling only 17, resulting in a net gain of 43 properties for the year. The buy-to-sell ratio was a robust 3.5.

The pace of accumulation was even more pronounced in 2024. During that year, landlords acquired 59 SFRs and sold just 7, a net increase of 52 properties and an impressive 8.4-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio.

Transaction velocity shows some fluctuation but remains active. The 20 buys in 2025-Q2 marked a recent peak in activity, while the 9 buys in 2026-Q1 and 2025-Q3 represent a more moderate, but still positive, pace.

Given the complete absence of institutional investors (1,000+ property tier) in the market, this net buying activity is driven entirely by mom-and-pop and mid-size landlords who are actively expanding their local portfolios.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 28.1% of all Yuma County property transactions in Q1.
Detailed Findings

In the first quarter of 2026, landlords played a major role in the market, participating in 9 of the 32 total SFR transactions in Yuma County. This activity constitutes a 28.1% share of all transactions for the period.

All 9 transactions were conducted by mom-and-pop investors. New landlords entering the market (single-property tier) were the most active, responsible for 8 transactions at an average purchase price of $323,500.

A single, high-value transaction defines the quarter's activity for established investors. One small landlord (3-5 property tier) purchased one property for $700,000, significantly higher than the average paid by new entrants.

This $700,000 purchase was an inter-landlord trade, with the property being acquired from another investor. This was the only landlord-to-landlord transaction of the quarter among the 9 purchases.

In contrast, none of the 8 new landlords acquired their properties from an existing investor. This suggests they are primarily buying from traditional homeowners, while more established landlords may engage in portfolio trades.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small Investors Dominate Yuma County, Owning 30.6% of Homes with 98% Mom-and-Pop Control
Holdings
Landlords own 1,026 SFR properties, representing 30.6% of Yuma County's total market. Individual investors are the dominant force, holding 824 of these properties (80.3%) compared to companies with 218 (21.2%).
Pricing
In a Q1 anomaly driven by a single high-value purchase, landlords paid an average of $683,250, a 158.9% premium over homeowners ($263,941). This reverses the historical trend from 2025 where landlords consistently paid discounts of 3.6% to 49.6%.
Activity
Investors purchased 34.6% of all homes sold in Q1 (9 properties), with 100% of this activity coming from mom-and-pop landlords. The quarter saw 8 new single-property landlords enter the market.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) control a near-total 98.0% of investor-owned housing in Yuma County. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have zero presence in this market.
Ownership Type
Individual investors overwhelmingly control smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, holding a 63.0% share. This tier marks the clear crossover point to corporate ownership.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, with a 9-to-1 buy/sell ratio in Q1 (9 buys vs 1 sell). This continues a strong accumulation trend seen throughout 2024 and 2025.
Market Narrative

The real estate investment landscape in Yuma County, Colorado, is characterized by a remarkable concentration of ownership among small, local investors. Landlords own 1,026 single-family homes, a significant 30.6% of the county's entire SFR housing stock. This market is overwhelmingly controlled by individuals, who own 80.3% of these properties. The structure is the epitome of a 'mom-and-pop' market, with investors holding 1-10 properties commanding 98.0% of the rental portfolio, while institutional-scale investors have absolutely no presence.

Investor behavior in the recent quarter underscores their market influence and growth-oriented strategy. Landlords acquired 34.6% of all homes sold, with every single purchase made by a small-scale operator. These investors are also strong net buyers, acquiring nine properties for every one they sold, continuing a multi-year trend of portfolio accumulation. While pricing data showed an anomalous premium paid by investors in Q1, this was skewed by a single high-value transaction in a low-volume market; historically, these investors have consistently purchased properties at a notable discount compared to traditional homeowners.

The key takeaway from Yuma County is that a high rate of investor ownership does not equate to a corporate takeover. Instead, it reflects a deeply embedded, fragmented market of local individuals building small-scale rental portfolios. With ownership highly concentrated in just two zip codes and some smaller areas seeing investor ownership exceed 50%, the market dynamics are driven by the strategic decisions of hundreds of individual landlords, not a handful of large institutions. This structure, detailed in our comprehensive Investor Pulse reports, suggests a stable, community-integrated rental market with a consistent pattern of gradual, localized growth.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 02:45 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Yuma (CO)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Yuma (CO) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-co-yuma/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.