Converse (WY) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Converse (WY) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Converse (WY)
4,066
Total Investors in Converse (WY)
1,609
Investor Owned SFR in Converse (WY)
1,337(32.9%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,490
SFR Owned
1,221
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
119
SFR Owned
143
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,337 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Converse County a Small Investor Stronghold with 33% Market Share and 99.5% Mom-and-Pop Control
Investors own 1,337 single-family properties in Converse County, representing 32.9% of the total market. This ownership is overwhelmingly dominated by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who control 99.5% of the portfolio, while institutional investors hold just 0.1%. In Q1 2026, landlords purchased properties at an 8.6% discount compared to homeowners, and they remain strong net buyers while institutional capital continues to exit the market.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,337 SFRs in Converse County, 32.9% of the market, with individuals holding 91.3%.
Cash is the preferred financing method, with cash-backed properties (914) more than doubling financed ones (423). The portfolio is heavily focused on rentals, with 1,319 of 1,337 properties (98.7%) classified as non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured an 8.6% discount in Q1 2026, paying $27,303 less than traditional homeowners.
The price gap between landlords and homeowners is extremely volatile, swinging from a 40.7% landlord premium in Q3 2025 to a 24.1% discount in Q1 2025. This volatility points to an opportunistic, low-volume market.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 13.6% of all single-family homes sold in Converse County during Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop investors accounted for 100% of these acquisitions. During the quarter, 7 new single-property landlords entered the market, purchasing 6 of the 8 total investor-bought homes, while no institutional purchases were recorded.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords have near-total market control, owning 99.5% of all investor-held SFRs.
Single-property landlords form the backbone of the market, holding 1,171 properties for an 86.8% share. In stark contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties own just a single property, representing a negligible 0.1% of the market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Ownership is split 50/50 between individuals and companies in the 3-5 property tier, an early crossover point.
Individuals are the dominant force in smaller portfolios, owning 93.6% of all single-property investor homes. This overwhelming majority highlights the grassroots nature of the local rental market.
Geographic Distribution
Investor ownership is highly concentrated in zip code 82637, where 64.9% of all homes are investor-owned.
This single zip code is the epicenter of rental activity, containing 828 of the county's 1,337 investor-owned properties. In contrast, zip code 82633 has a more moderate investor penetration rate of 18.3%.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 7.75x buy-to-sell ratio, while institutional investors are net sellers.
In 2025, landlords acquired 62 properties while selling only 8, resulting in a net gain of 54 homes. Over the same period, institutional investors were neutral, selling the same number of properties they bought (2) and showing a pattern of divestment from 2024.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords participated in 12.2% of all Converse County property transactions in Q4 2025.
All 11 landlord transactions were by mom-and-pop investors, with zero institutional activity. Landlords scaling to a second property paid a premium, with an average price of $351,464 compared to $267,497 for first-time buyers.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,337 SFRs in Converse County, 32.9% of the market, with individuals holding 91.3%.
Detailed Findings

Real estate investors hold a significant footprint in Converse County, owning 1,337 single-family residential properties, which constitutes 32.9% of the county's total 4,066 SFRs.

The market is overwhelmingly characterized by small-scale, individual operators. Individual landlords own 1,221 properties (91.3% of the investor portfolio), compared to just 143 properties (10.7%) owned by companies.

This individual dominance is also reflected in the entity count, with 1,490 individual landlords making up 92.6% of the 1,609 total investors in the market.

When it comes to financing, cash is the predominant strategy. Investors own 914 properties with cash, more than double the 423 properties that are financed, signaling a well-capitalized investor base.

The portfolio is clearly geared towards generating rental income, as 1,319 of the 1,337 properties are non-owner-occupied, representing a rental focus of 98.7%.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured an 8.6% discount in Q1 2026, paying $27,303 less than traditional homeowners.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, investors in Converse County demonstrated a distinct pricing advantage, acquiring properties for an average of $288,489 while traditional homeowners paid $315,792. This represents a significant 8.6% discount, saving investors an average of $27,303 per property.

However, the pricing dynamics in this market are highly volatile from quarter to quarter. This is most evident in Q3 2025, when landlords paid an average of $597,968, a staggering $173,077 (40.7%) premium over homeowners.

In contrast, other recent quarters showed substantial landlord discounts, including a 24.1% discount ($71,845) in Q1 2025 and an 11.1% discount ($39,671) in Q2 2025.

This dramatic fluctuation suggests a market with low transaction volume, where individual high-value or distressed sales can heavily skew quarterly averages.

The consistent ability to secure deep discounts in certain periods indicates that investors are adept at identifying and capitalizing on opportunistic purchases that are not available to the general public.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 13.6% of all single-family homes sold in Converse County during Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, investors were a notable force in the market, purchasing 8 of the 59 total SFRs sold, capturing a 13.6% share of all sales activity.

The quarter's activity was driven exclusively by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) were responsible for 100% of investor acquisitions, with institutional investors making zero purchases.

The market continues to see new grassroots growth, with the single-property tier being the most active. Seven new landlord entities entered the market in Q4, acquiring 6 properties and accounting for 75% of all investor buying.

This influx of new, small investors, coupled with the complete absence of institutional buying, reinforces the county's identity as a market dominated by local, independent operators.

The data shows a clear pattern: the foundation of real estate investing in Converse County is built by individuals purchasing their first or second rental property.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords have near-total market control, owning 99.5% of all investor-held SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure in Converse County is definitively controlled by small investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) own 99.5% of all investor-held SFRs, demonstrating a level of market dominance rarely seen.

First-time and single-property investors are the most significant group by a wide margin. This tier alone accounts for 1,171 properties, representing 86.8% of the entire investor-owned portfolio.

Ownership concentration drops off sharply in larger tiers. Landlords with two properties hold a 6.6% share, and those with 3-5 properties hold 5.8%. All other tiers combined account for less than 1% of the market.

The role of large-scale capital is virtually non-existent. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) own just one property in the entire county, a 0.1% market share that underscores their lack of presence.

This distribution reveals a market built and sustained by local individuals and small businesses, not large corporations or Wall Street firms.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Ownership is split 50/50 between individuals and companies in the 3-5 property tier, an early crossover point.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the bedrock of the Converse County market, particularly at the entry level. They own 1,114 of the single-property portfolios (93.6%) and 72 of the two-property portfolios (80.9%).

The transition point where companies gain an equal footing occurs much earlier than in larger markets. In the small landlord tier of 3-5 properties, ownership is split exactly 50/50, with individuals and companies each owning 39 properties.

This pattern suggests that investors who decide to scale beyond two properties in this market are highly likely to incorporate their holdings for liability and financial purposes.

While companies establish a presence in the 3-5 property tier, the absolute number of properties remains small, reflecting the overall scale of the local market.

The data clearly shows that the path to portfolio growth in Converse County often involves a shift from personal ownership to a more formal corporate structure once an investor moves beyond their initial one or two properties.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor ownership is highly concentrated in zip code 82637, where 64.9% of all homes are investor-owned.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals a powerful concentration of investor activity within Converse County. Zip code 82637 is the undisputed hub, with investors owning 828 properties, which accounts for a staggering 64.9% of all SFRs in that area.

This extremely high penetration rate indicates that zip code 82637 functions as the primary rental market for the county, likely driven by specific local employment or economic factors that fuel strong housing demand.

The second most active area, zip code 82633, also shows a significant investor presence with 509 properties, but at a more moderate ownership rate of 18.3%.

The contrast between these two areas highlights that investor strategy is not uniform across the county but is instead targeted at specific pockets of opportunity.

This hyper-local focus demonstrates sophisticated knowledge by local investors, who concentrate their capital where rental demand is highest, rather than spreading it evenly across the region.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 7.75x buy-to-sell ratio, while institutional investors are net sellers.
Detailed Findings

Transactional data reveals two completely opposite strategies at play in Converse County. Landlords overall are in a strong accumulation phase, consistently acquiring more properties than they sell.

In 2025, this trend was stark: landlords purchased 62 properties and sold only 8, a buy-to-sell ratio of 7.75-to-1 and a net portfolio gain of 54 properties. This pattern was similar in 2024, with 72 buys versus 14 sells for a net gain of 58.

Conversely, institutional investors are actively reducing their exposure or exiting the market entirely. In 2025, the 1,000+ tier was neutral with 2 buys and 2 sells. This follows a trend from 2024, when they were net sellers with 1 buy and 2 sells.

This divergence is a critical market signal: small, local investors are confident and expanding their holdings, while large, institutional capital is retreating.

The market's growth is being fueled from the ground up, as mom-and-pop investors absorb inventory and expand the local rental housing supply.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords participated in 12.2% of all Converse County property transactions in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords were involved in 11 of the 90 total SFR transactions, accounting for a 12.2% share of market activity.

Once again, activity was exclusively driven by mom-and-pop investors. All 11 transactions were executed by landlords in the 1-2 property tiers, with no purchases or sales from larger operators.

A notable pricing pattern emerged among these small investors. Those buying their second property (Tier 02) paid an average of $351,464, which is 31.4% higher than the $267,497 average paid by those buying their first investment property (Tier 01).

This price gap suggests that as investors gain experience and capital, they target higher-value assets for their second purchase, possibly in more desirable locations or with better amenities.

Furthermore, none of the landlord purchases in Q4 were sourced from other landlords. This 0% inter-landlord transaction rate indicates that investors are acquiring properties from the traditional homeowner market, not from other investors liquidating their portfolios.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Converse County, Controlling 99.5% of a 1,337-Property Investor Market
Holdings
Investors own 1,337 single-family homes in Converse County, representing a significant 32.9% of the market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individuals, who own 1,221 properties (91.3%), while companies own the remaining 143 (10.7%).
Pricing
In the first quarter of 2026, landlords acquired properties for 8.6% less than traditional homeowners, an average discount of $27,303 per property ($288,489 vs. $315,792).
Activity
Landlords purchased 13.6% of all homes sold in Q4 2025, an effort driven entirely by mom-and-pop buyers. This included 7 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) exert near-total control over the investor market with a 99.5% ownership share, while large institutional investors (1,000+ properties) hold a negligible 0.1% stake.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the primary force in the market, but companies achieve a 50% ownership stake in portfolios sized at 3-5 properties, a much earlier crossover point than in larger metropolitan areas.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers, acquiring 62 properties versus selling only 8 in 2025. In direct contrast, institutional investors are net sellers, having sold more properties than they bought over the last two years.
Market Narrative

The market report for Converse County, Wyoming, reveals an investment landscape fundamentally shaped and controlled by small, local operators. Investors own 1,337 single-family homes, a substantial 32.9% of the county's entire SFR market. This portfolio is not in the hands of corporations; it is dominated by individuals who own 91.3% of these properties. The data is unequivocal: mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 99.5% of the investor-owned housing stock, while institutional firms (1,000+ properties) have a presence of just 0.1%, or a single property.

Investor behavior reinforces this grassroots structure. In Q4 2025, 100% of landlord purchases were made by mom-and-pop buyers, including 7 new landlords entering the market. These investors display savvy purchasing, securing an 8.6% discount compared to homeowners in Q1 2026. The most telling trend is the divergence in strategy: over the past two years, landlords have been aggressive net buyers (acquiring 62 properties vs. selling 8 in 2025), while the few institutional players have been net sellers, signaling an exit of large capital.

The key takeaway is that Converse County is a thriving ecosystem for the individual real estate investor. The high market penetration, especially in concentrated areas like zip code 82637 where investors own 64.9% of homes, points to a strong and stable rental economy. The retreat of institutional capital, combined with the steady influx of new local buyers, suggests a healthy, self-sustaining market where community-based investors are confidently expanding their portfolios and shaping the future of the local housing supply.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 06:10 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Converse (WY)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Converse (WY) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-wy-converse/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.