Day (SD) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Day (SD) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Day (SD)
1,364
Total Investors in Day (SD)
531
Investor Owned SFR in Day (SD)
395(29.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
455
SFR Owned
337
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
76
SFR Owned
74
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 395 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Day County's Investor Market: 100% Mom-and-Pop Domination in a Market with No Recent Sales Activity
Investors own 395 single-family properties in Day County, SD, representing a significant 29.0% of the total market. This ownership is entirely concentrated among mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), with individuals holding 85.3% of the portfolio. The market showed no purchase or transaction activity in the last quarter, indicating a highly stable or illiquid environment dominated by long-term, local investors.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 395 SFR properties, with individual landlords holding a dominant 85.3% share.
The investor portfolio is 100% cash-owned, with no financed properties recorded. Nearly the entire portfolio (394 of 395 properties) is utilized as non-owner-occupied rentals, highlighting a strong focus on rental income generation.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No recent transaction data is available for pricing analysis in Day County.
Without recent sales, it is not possible to compare landlord acquisition prices to those of traditional homeowners or to analyze pricing trends over time. The market's lack of sales activity prevents any meaningful price comparison.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords made zero SFR purchases in Q4 2025, representing 0.0% of market activity.
With no acquisitions, mom-and-pop landlords and institutional investors both recorded zero purchases. The market saw no new landlord entrants in the single-property tier during this period.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) completely dominate, controlling 100.0% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone account for 93.5% of all investor-owned housing. There is no institutional (1000+ properties) ownership in Day County. No recent price data is available to compare acquisition costs across tiers.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors are the majority owners in every single active tier, with no company-dominated segments.
There is no crossover point where companies become majority owners. In the largest active tier (3-5 properties), individuals own 100.0% of the properties. No recent data is available to compare acquisition prices between owner types.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is most concentrated in zip code 57273, with 112 properties.
Zip code 57239 has the highest investor saturation at a rate of 60.9%. Several zip codes, including 57261 (54.9%) and 57422 (51.4%), show investor ownership rates exceeding 50% of the local SFR market.
Historical Transactions
No historical transaction data is available to analyze landlord buying and selling patterns.
The absence of transaction records makes it impossible to determine if landlords are net buyers or sellers. There is no data on inter-landlord transactions or the average prices for buys versus sells.
Current Quarter Transactions
There were zero landlord transactions in Q4 2025, accounting for 0.0% of market share.
All investor tiers, from mom-and-pop to institutional, recorded zero transactions. No inter-landlord trading occurred, and no pricing data is available for the quarter.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 395 SFR properties, with individual landlords holding a dominant 85.3% share.
Detailed Findings

In Day County, investors hold a significant 29.0% of the single-family residential market, controlling 395 out of 1,364 total SFR properties. This indicates a substantial investor presence relative to the market's size.

The ownership structure is overwhelmingly dominated by individual real estate investing, who own 337 properties (85.3%), compared to 74 properties (18.7%) held by companies. This 4.5-to-1 ratio of properties underscores the local, small-scale nature of the rental market.

A defining characteristic of this market is its complete reliance on cash financing. All 395 investor-owned properties were acquired with cash, with zero properties recorded as financed. This suggests investors in this area are well-capitalized and avoid leverage.

The portfolio is almost exclusively dedicated to rentals, with 394 of 395 properties (99.7%) classified as non-owner-occupied. This near-total rental focus shows that investors are primarily buy-and-hold operators rather than flippers or speculators.

The number of individual landlords (455) far outnumbers company landlords (76), reinforcing the finding that the market is driven by small, private investors rather than larger corporate entities.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No recent transaction data is available for pricing analysis in Day County.
Detailed Findings

There is insufficient recent sales data to conduct a meaningful analysis of acquisition pricing in Day County. No transactions were recorded for landlords or traditional homeowners in the latest quarter.

The absence of sales data prevents a comparison between what landlords and homeowners are paying for properties. Consequently, it's impossible to determine if a pricing gap exists in this market.

Historical pricing trends cannot be established. The lack of recent activity means no data is available to track price appreciation or depreciation from previous periods like 2024 or the 2020-2023 timeframe.

It is not possible to analyze pricing differences between individual and company investors due to the complete lack of recent purchasing activity from either group.

The data reflects a market with extremely low liquidity, where properties may not be transacting frequently enough to establish current market-rate pricing benchmarks.

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Landlords made zero SFR purchases in Q4 2025, representing 0.0% of market activity.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing activity came to a complete standstill in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring zero of the zero total SFR properties sold in Day County. This reflects a total lack of market movement during the period.

All investor tiers, from mom-and-pop (Tiers 01-04) to institutional (Tier 09), were inactive, recording zero purchases. This lack of activity was uniform across investors of all sizes.

The market saw no new entrants, as the number of new single-property landlords (Tier 01) purchasing a home was zero. This indicates a pause in the growth of the local investor base.

The complete absence of transactions suggests a period of market equilibrium, illiquidity, or a potential disconnect between buyer and seller expectations, leading to no closed deals.

This halt in activity contrasts with the significant existing investor-owned portfolio, suggesting that current owners are holding their properties rather than expanding their portfolios.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) completely dominate, controlling 100.0% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Day County is exclusively composed of small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) control 100.0% of the 395 investor-owned SFRs.

Market ownership is highly concentrated at the smallest scale. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) are the foundation of the market, owning 375 properties, which constitutes a staggering 93.5% of all investor-held housing.

The next tiers show a sharp drop-off in ownership. Two-property landlords hold 18 properties (4.5%), followed by those with 3-5 properties owning 6 (1.5%), and those with 6-10 properties owning just 2 (0.5%).

There is a complete absence of large-scale investors. Mid-size landlords (11-1000 properties) and institutional investors (1000+ properties) both have a 0.0% market share, highlighting a purely local market structure.

Due to the lack of recent transactions, it is not possible to analyze how acquisition prices may vary by tier. The existing portfolio data reflects long-term holdings rather than recent purchasing behavior.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Key Insight
Individual investors are the majority owners in every single active tier, with no company-dominated segments.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors maintain majority ownership across all portfolio sizes in Day County. There is no tier where companies hold a larger share of properties, reinforcing the market's 'mom-and-pop' character.

In the single-property tier, individuals own 322 of the 375 properties (82.4%), while companies own 69 (17.6%). This is the tier with the highest corporate penetration, yet individuals still hold a commanding lead.

The individual dominance increases in larger tiers. For two-property portfolios, individuals own 15 properties (83.3%) compared to 3 for companies (16.7%).

In the 3-5 property tier, ownership is exclusively individual, with individuals holding all 6 properties (100.0%) and companies holding zero.

The lack of recent sales activity prevents any comparison of acquisition pricing between individual and company investors within these tiers.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is most concentrated in zip code 57273, with 112 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Day County is highly concentrated in a few key zip codes. The area with the highest raw count of investor properties is 57273 (Waubay), with 112 properties, though its ownership rate is 47.1%.

The highest penetration of investor ownership is found in 57239 (Grenville), where investors own 81 properties, representing a remarkable 60.9% of all single-family residences in that area.

Several other zip codes also exhibit extremely high investor ownership rates. These include 57261 (Roslyn) at 54.9%, 57422 (Andover) at 51.4%, and 57434 (Bristol) at 50.0%, indicating that in some parts of the county, investors are the majority property owners.

There is a notable difference between the leaders in total count and ownership rate. While 57274 (Webster) has the second-highest count of investor properties (90), its ownership rate is a much lower 12.6%, suggesting a larger overall housing market.

This geographic clustering highlights specific sub-markets where rental properties are particularly prevalent, likely driven by local demand factors or specific investment opportunities.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Key Insight
No historical transaction data is available to analyze landlord buying and selling patterns.
Detailed Findings

A complete lack of historical transaction data for Day County prevents any analysis of long-term investor behavior. It's not possible to determine buy/sell ratios across different timeframes.

There is no information to establish whether landlords as a group, or institutional investors specifically, have been net buyers or net sellers over time. The market's transactional history is not captured in this dataset.

The volume of inter-landlord trading cannot be assessed. The data does not show what percentage of purchases are from other landlords, which is a key indicator of market liquidity and composition.

Analysis of potential profit margins is not possible, as there are no average buy and sell prices to compare. This limits insights into the financial performance of rental property investments in the area.

The lack of data suggests a stable, buy-and-hold market where properties change hands infrequently, or that such transactions are not being recorded in a way that is accessible for this analysis.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
There were zero landlord transactions in Q4 2025, accounting for 0.0% of market share.
Detailed Findings

The transactional market in Day County was entirely dormant in Q4 2025, with landlords involved in zero of the zero total SFR transactions. This indicates a complete lack of sales activity involving investors.

No investor tier recorded any transactions. This inactivity was consistent across the board, from the smallest single-property owners to any larger entities, had they existed in the market.

As a result of no purchases, there was no inter-landlord trading activity. The percentage of properties bought from other landlords was 0%, reflecting the broader market freeze.

Average purchase prices by tier could not be calculated, as no properties were bought or sold. There is no pricing information to analyze buying strategies among different investor sizes.

The absence of Q4 transactions aligns with the purchasing data, painting a picture of a market where existing owners are holding their assets and no new investors are entering.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Day County's Investor Market: 100% Mom-and-Pop Domination in a Market with No Recent Sales
Holdings
Landlords own 395 SFR properties in Day County, SD, representing 29.0% of the market. Ownership is heavily skewed towards individuals, who hold 337 properties (85.3%) compared to 74 (18.7%) for companies.
Pricing
No recent transaction data is available, preventing any comparison between landlord and homeowner acquisition prices or analysis of pricing trends.
Activity
There was a complete halt in investor activity in Q4 2025, with landlords making 0 purchases, accounting for 0.0% of all sales. No new landlords entered the market during this period.
Market Share
Small, mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) exert total control, owning 100.0% of all investor-held housing, while institutional investors have zero presence.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the dominant owners across all portfolio sizes, holding a majority share in every tier. There is no crossover point where companies overtake individuals.
Transactions
No transaction data was recorded for the quarter, making it impossible to determine if landlords were net buyers or sellers or to calculate a buy/sell ratio.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Day County, South Dakota, is characterized by a significant and highly localized investor presence. Landlords own 395 SFR properties, a substantial 29.0% of the county's total SFR housing stock. The market structure is exclusively small-scale; mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) account for 100% of investor ownership, with no mid-size or institutional players. Ownership is further defined by the dominance of private individuals, who control 337 properties (85.3%), reinforcing the market's grassroots, non-corporate nature.

Investor behavior in Day County points to a stable, long-term, buy-and-hold strategy. The entire investor-owned portfolio is held with cash, indicating a debt-averse and well-capitalized investor base. However, the market is currently static, with zero purchases or transactions recorded in the most recent quarter. This lack of activity prevents any analysis of pricing strategies, such as discounts relative to homeowners, but it strongly suggests a period of market illiquidity where owners are content to hold assets and generate rental income.

The key takeaway from Day County is a portrait of a mature, insulated rental market disconnected from broader national trends. The high investor penetration rates in specific zip codes, some exceeding 60%, suggest that rental housing is a core component of the local real estate ecosystem. The current freeze in activity likely reflects market stability rather than distress. For outside observers, it represents a market with high barriers to entry due to a lack of available properties for sale, dominated by local investors who are not actively selling.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 02:22 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Day (SD)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Day (SD) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-sd-day/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.