Floyd (IN) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Floyd (IN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Floyd (IN)
26,592
Total Investors in Floyd (IN)
3,059
Investor Owned SFR in Floyd (IN)
2,851(10.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,474
SFR Owned
1,999
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
585
SFR Owned
873
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,851 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Floyd County's Investor Market Shifts to Net Selling, Dominated by Mom-and-Pop Landlords
Investors own 10.7% of SFRs in Floyd County, with mom-and-pop landlords controlling a massive 91.3% of that portfolio. After a period of growth, the market has cooled, with landlords becoming net sellers in Q1 2026 and paying a surprising 43.2% premium on their few acquisitions.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 2,851 SFR properties in Floyd County, with individuals holding a 70.1% majority.
Cash purchases dominate investor portfolios, outnumbering financed properties more than 3-to-1 (2,169 vs 682). Of the 2,851 investor-owned homes, 2,762 are classified as rented, a 96.9% rental concentration.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid a 43.2% premium over homeowners in Q1, averaging $474,282 per property.
This Q1 premium of $143,056 marks a sharp reversal from 2025, where landlords often secured deep discounts, such as 34.1% in Q3 and 32.2% in Q1. The data does not provide a price breakdown between individual and company investors.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords represented just 2.0% of all SFR purchases in Q4 2025, acquiring 5 homes.
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) accounted for 100% of all landlord purchase activity. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) made zero acquisitions in the quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly dominate, controlling 91.3% of investor-owned homes.
In contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have a negligible footprint, owning just 0.5% of the investor portfolio (15 properties). The data does not show institutions buying or selling, indicating a static local presence.
Ownership by Tier & Type
The provided data does not contain pricing information to compare individual and company acquisitions.
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, holding 50.6% of properties. This trend accelerates in the 11-20 property tier, where companies own 75.6% of the homes.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is most concentrated by volume in zip code 47119, with 290 properties owned.
The highest rate of investor ownership is in zip code 47117 at 15.1%, followed by 47150 (13.4%). Notably, the area with the most properties (47119) has a relatively low ownership rate of 6.9%.
Historical Transactions
Data on the percentage of purchases from other landlords is not available for Floyd County.
Transaction volume has shifted dramatically. After being strong net buyers in 2024 (235 buys vs 86 sells), landlords became net sellers in 2025 (48 buys vs 62 sells), a trend continuing into Q1 2026 (7 buys vs 16 sells).
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in only 2.1% of Q1 transactions, with just 7 purchases recorded.
All 7 transactions were by mom-and-pop investors, with zero institutional activity. Single-property investors paid a high average of $474,282. None of the landlord purchases in Q1 were from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 2,851 SFR properties in Floyd County, with individuals holding a 70.1% majority.
Detailed Findings

In Floyd County, Indiana, investors own 2,851 single-family residential properties, which constitutes 10.7% of the total 26,592 SFRs in the market.

Individual investors form the foundation of the rental market, holding 1,999 properties or 70.1% of the investor-owned inventory. Companies own the remaining 873 properties, a 30.6% share.

This ownership pattern is even more pronounced when looking at landlord entities, with 2,474 individuals compared to just 585 companies, a ratio of over 4-to-1.

The investor portfolio is overwhelmingly geared towards rentals, with 2,762 of the 2,851 properties (96.9%) classified as rented. This demonstrates a strong focus on buy-and-hold strategies.

Cash is the preferred financing method among landlords in the area. Investors own 2,169 properties outright, compared to just 682 that are financed, showing a deep level of equity in the local rental market.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid a 43.2% premium over homeowners in Q1, averaging $474,282 per property.
Detailed Findings

In a significant market reversal, landlords in Q1 2026 paid an average acquisition price of $474,282, a 43.2% premium over the $331,226 paid by traditional homeowners.

This premium of $143,056 per property stands in stark contrast to the trends observed throughout 2025. For example, in Q3 2025, landlords secured a 34.1% discount, paying $122,225 less than homeowners on average.

The price gap has proven to be highly volatile, swinging from a 32.2% landlord discount in Q1 2025 to a 7.5% premium in Q2 2025, and now a 43.2% premium in Q1 2026.

This volatility is likely influenced by the very low volume of investor acquisitions, where a few high-value purchases can dramatically skew the quarterly average.

Despite quarterly fluctuations, a clear long-term price appreciation trend is visible, with average landlord acquisition prices rising from $211,586 in 2024 to $258,587 in 2025, before the Q1 2026 spike.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords represented just 2.0% of all SFR purchases in Q4 2025, acquiring 5 homes.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing activity was minimal in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring only 5 of the 248 SFRs sold in Floyd County. This represents a market share of just 2.0%.

The entirety of this purchasing activity came from small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (those owning 1-10 properties) were responsible for all 5 acquisitions.

New market entrants were the primary drivers, with the single-property tier accounting for 4 of the 5 purchases (80%). These acquisitions were made by 5 distinct entities, signaling new landlords entering the market.

In sharp contrast, institutional investors with portfolios of 1,000 or more properties were completely absent from the buying market, making no acquisitions during the quarter.

This extremely low purchase volume from the investor segment suggests a period of caution or market saturation, with very few landlords choosing to expand their portfolios in late 2025.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly dominate, controlling 91.3% of investor-owned homes.
Detailed Findings

The investor market structure in Floyd County is defined by small, independent owners. Mom-and-pop landlords, who own between 1 and 10 properties, collectively control 91.3% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Single-property landlords are the largest segment by a wide margin, owning 1,931 homes, which accounts for 65.6% of the entire investor portfolio. This highlights the importance of first-time and small-scale real estate investing in the local market.

The narrative of Wall Street dominating housing does not hold true here. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a minimal presence, owning just 15 properties, or 0.5% of the market share.

Ownership concentration drops off significantly after the smallest tiers. Mid-size landlords (11-100 properties) own a combined 6.2% of the portfolio, while large landlords (101-1,000 properties) hold just 2.0%.

This distribution reveals a highly fragmented market with a long tail of individual owners, indicating a low level of corporate consolidation in the local rental scene.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
The provided data does not contain pricing information to compare individual and company acquisitions.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the predominant owners in smaller portfolio tiers. They own 82.4% of all single-property landlord holdings and 60.5% of two-property portfolios.

The transition to corporate ownership occurs at the 6-10 property tier, which serves as the crossover point. At this level, companies take a slight majority, owning 81 properties, or 50.6% of the homes in that tier.

As portfolios grow, company ownership becomes much more concentrated. Companies own 75.6% of properties in the 11-20 tier and a commanding 86.7% in the 101-1,000 tier.

This pattern suggests a common investor lifecycle: individuals often start small and then incorporate their holdings into a company structure as their portfolio expands to manage liability and assets more formally.

Even so, some investors start with a corporate structure from day one. Companies own 342 properties (17.6%) in the single-property tier, indicating this strategy is not exclusive to larger players.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is most concentrated by volume in zip code 47119, with 290 properties owned.
Detailed Findings

The 47119 zip code contains the highest number of investor-owned properties in Floyd County, with a total of 290 homes held by landlords.

However, the highest concentration or market penetration by investors is found elsewhere. Zip code 47117 leads the county with a 15.1% investor ownership rate, followed closely by 47150 at 13.4%.

A key finding is the divergence between ownership volume and ownership rate. The area with the most investor properties, 47119, has a modest 6.9% ownership rate, suggesting it is a large housing market with broad appeal. In contrast, smaller markets like 47117 have a much higher saturation of rental properties.

Zip codes 47136 and 47124 represent a blend of both high volume and high concentration, with 94 properties at a 10.5% rate and 147 properties at a 9.9% rate, respectively. These areas can be considered significant investment hubs within the county.

Some regions show minimal investor presence. For instance, the 47172 zip code has only 28 investor-owned homes and a low 3.3% ownership rate, indicating a market dominated by traditional homeowners.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Data on the percentage of purchases from other landlords is not available for Floyd County.
Detailed Findings

Landlord market sentiment in Floyd County has undergone a significant reversal, shifting from accumulation to disposition. In 2024, landlords were aggressive net buyers, acquiring 149 more properties than they sold (235 buys vs. 86 sells).

This trend flipped in 2025, when landlords became net sellers, disposing of 14 more properties than they acquired over the year (48 buys vs. 62 sells).

The selling pressure has continued into the new year. In Q1 2026, landlords sold more than double the properties they purchased, with 16 sales against only 7 acquisitions, for a net disposition of 9 properties.

Overall transaction velocity has also slowed considerably since its 2024 peak. The 235 acquisitions by landlords in 2024 plummeted to just 48 for the entire year of 2025.

Institutional investors have been entirely inactive in this market, with no buy or sell transactions recorded in the provided historical data. This confirms that recent market dynamics are driven solely by smaller, local investors.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in only 2.1% of Q1 transactions, with just 7 purchases recorded.
Detailed Findings

Landlord transactions represented a very small slice of the Floyd County real estate market in Q1 2026. Of the 338 total SFR transactions, only 7 were purchases by landlords, a market share of just 2.1%.

All of this limited activity was driven by the smallest investors. Landlords in the single-property tier conducted 5 of the 7 transactions, with the remaining 2 completed by two-property landlords.

Investors entering the market paid a premium price point. The average purchase price for single-property landlords in Q1 was a notably high $474,282, suggesting acquisitions of higher-end properties or heightened competition.

The market showed no signs of inter-landlord trading during the quarter, as 0% of the properties bought by investors were acquired from other landlords. All purchases came from the general market.

Confirming a consistent trend, large institutional investors remained on the sidelines, executing zero transactions in Q1 and having no impact on current market activity.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords control 91.3% of investor housing as the market shifts to net selling.
Holdings
Landlords own 2,851 SFR properties in Floyd County, representing 10.7% of the market. Individual investors hold a 70.1% majority (1,999 properties) compared to companies at 30.6% (873 properties).
Pricing
In a stark reversal, landlords paid a 43.2% premium over homeowners in Q1 2026 ($474,282 vs $331,226), a contrast to the deep discounts seen in 2025.
Activity
Landlord purchase activity was minimal in the last recorded quarter (Q4 2025), capturing just 2.0% of all sales (5 properties), all of which were acquired by mom-and-pop investors.
Market Share
The local market is dominated by small investors, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 91.3% of the rental housing stock. Institutional investors (1,000+) have a negligible 0.5% share.
Ownership Type
Individuals dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in the 6-10 property tier, controlling 50.6% of properties and increasing their share in larger tiers.
Transactions
After being net buyers in 2024, landlords have become net sellers, disposing of 9 more properties than they acquired in Q1 2026 (7 buys vs 16 sells). Institutional investors were inactive.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Floyd County, Indiana, is overwhelmingly characterized by small, local ownership. Investors hold 2,851 SFR properties, making up 10.7% of the county's total housing stock. This portfolio is firmly in the hands of mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who control a commanding 91.3% of investor-owned homes. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a negligible footprint of just 0.5%. The market is also dominated by individuals, who own 70.1% of properties, though companies tend to take over as portfolios grow beyond five properties. For more details on this topic, see our property ownership by owner type report.

Recent investor behavior signals a significant market shift. After a strong year of acquisitions in 2024, where they were net buyers of 149 properties, landlords have pivoted to selling. In Q1 2026, they were net sellers of 9 properties (7 buys vs. 16 sells), continuing a trend that began in 2025. Purchase activity has slowed to a trickle, with landlords accounting for just 2.0% of sales in Q4 2025. Pricing has also been volatile, with the few Q1 2026 acquisitions occurring at a surprising 43.2% premium over what traditional homeowners paid, a sharp reversal from the discounts secured in prior quarters.

The key takeaway for Floyd County is that its rental market is driven by local dynamics, not national institutional trends. The pivot from net buying to net selling suggests that small-scale investors may be taking profits after a period of appreciation or are reacting to local economic conditions. The low transaction volume and volatile pricing indicate a market in a state of adjustment. Future trends will depend on the decisions of thousands of individual mom-and-pop owners who constitute the backbone of the local rental landscape. These dynamics are explored in more depth in our other market reports.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 04:37 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Floyd (IN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Floyd (IN) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-in-floyd/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.