Lawrence (IN) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Lawrence (IN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Lawrence (IN)
14,160
Total Investors in Lawrence (IN)
1,521
Investor Owned SFR in Lawrence (IN)
1,526(10.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,307
SFR Owned
1,177
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
214
SFR Owned
356
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,526 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Lawrence County with 93.2% Ownership, Acquiring Properties at a 25.4% Discount
Investors own 1,526 single-family homes in Lawrence County, representing 10.8% of the total market. Individual, small-scale landlords are the primary drivers, controlling 93.2% of the investor-owned inventory while institutional firms hold just 0.1%. In recent activity, landlords acted as strong net buyers and secured properties for 25.4% less than traditional homeowners in Q3 2025.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors hold 1,526 SFR properties in Lawrence County, with individuals owning 77.1% of the portfolio.
The vast majority of investor-owned properties, 1,445 out of 1,526, were acquired with cash, compared to just 81 that are financed. Individual landlords (1,307) outnumber company landlords (214) by more than 6-to-1.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured a 25.4% discount compared to homeowners in Q3 2025, paying $31,137 less on average.
The price gap between landlords and homeowners has been highly volatile, swinging from an 18.9% landlord premium in Q1 2025 to a massive 60.0% discount in Q2 2025. Acquisition prices for investors declined from a yearly average of $114,094 in 2024 to $90,878 in 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 13.8% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords drove acquisition activity, accounting for 3 of the 4 total investor purchases (75.0%). New, single-property landlords represented half of all investor buying activity, with 2 new entities entering the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 93.2% of investor-owned SFRs.
In stark contrast, institutional investors in the 1000+ property tier own just 0.1% of the investor-owned housing stock, holding a single property. The single-property landlord tier alone accounts for 64.3% of all investor properties.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, holding 51.8% of assets.
Individual investors overwhelmingly control smaller portfolios, owning 87.7% of single-property holdings. In contrast, companies dominate larger tiers, owning 95.7% of properties in the 101-1000 portfolio size.
Geographic Distribution
The 47421 zip code contains the highest concentration of investor properties with 994 homes.
While 47421 leads in volume, the 47437 zip code has the highest investor ownership rate at 22.2%. This shows that the highest concentration and highest penetration of investors are in different parts of the county.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 23 properties for every 1 they sold in 2025.
This trend continued from 2024, when landlords were also net buyers with 87 purchases versus 37 sales. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ tier) were net sellers in 2024, divesting more properties than they acquired (6 sells vs. 5 buys).
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 10.8% of all property transactions in Q4 2025.
All 4 landlord purchases in the quarter were made by mom-and-pop investors, with no activity from institutional buyers. None of the investor purchases in Q4 were from other landlords, indicating acquisitions were sourced from the general market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors hold 1,526 SFR properties in Lawrence County, with individuals owning 77.1% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

In Lawrence County, investors own 1,526 single-family residential properties, which constitutes 10.8% of the total 14,160 SFRs in the market. This highlights a significant, yet not dominant, investor presence in the local housing landscape.

Individual investors are the definitive force in the market, holding 1,177 properties, or 77.1% of the total investor portfolio. In contrast, company-owned entities hold 356 properties (23.3%), underscoring a market structure built on smaller, private ownership rather than large corporate landlords.

The number of individual landlord entities (1,307) far surpasses company entities (214). This 6-to-1 ratio of individual-to-company landlords further reinforces that the typical real estate investor in this area is a person or small family operation, not a large corporation.

A striking financial characteristic of this market is the preference for cash transactions. An overwhelming 94.7% of investor-owned properties (1,445) are held free of financing, with only 81 properties currently financed. This suggests that investors in Lawrence County operate with high liquidity and low leverage.

Of the investor-owned portfolio, 1,460 properties are classified as rented. This indicates a strong focus on generating rental income, with the vast majority of the 1,526 properties being actively used as investment assets rather than for other purposes.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured a 25.4% discount compared to homeowners in Q3 2025, paying $31,137 less on average.
Detailed Findings

In Q3 2025, investors in Lawrence County demonstrated a significant pricing advantage, acquiring properties for an average of $91,633 while traditional homeowners paid $122,770. This represents a substantial 25.4% discount, or a savings of $31,137 per property for investors.

The price dynamic between landlords and homeowners has shown extreme volatility in recent quarters. In Q1 2025, landlords paid a premium of 18.9% ($104,600 vs $88,000). This completely reversed in Q2 2025, when landlords achieved a staggering 60.0% discount ($20,000 vs $50,000), highlighting a fluctuating and opportunistic market.

Overall acquisition prices for landlords have trended downward recently. The average purchase price fell from $114,094 in 2024 to $90,878 in 2025, a notable decrease that contrasts with the pandemic-era (2020-2023) average of $99,332.

Although 2026-Q1 data on landlord purchases is not available, the recent trend indicates that investors are capitalizing on market conditions to purchase properties well below the prices paid by typical homebuyers.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 13.8% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

In the fourth quarter of 2025, landlords were responsible for 13.8% of all single-family property sales in Lawrence County, acquiring 4 out of the 29 total homes sold. This shows a continued, albeit moderate, level of investor purchasing activity.

The acquisition market is heavily skewed towards small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) made up 75.0% of all investor purchases in Q4, with 3 acquisitions. Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties made no purchases during this period.

New investors entering the market were a key component of Q4 activity. The single-property tier alone accounted for 50.0% of all landlord purchases, with 2 properties acquired by 2 new landlord entities, signaling fresh capital and interest at the smallest scale.

Mid-size investors also showed some activity, with one landlord in the 21-50 property tier making a single purchase, accounting for the remaining 25.0% of investor acquisitions.

The data clearly indicates that the current acquisition landscape in Lawrence County is defined by new and existing small landlords expanding their portfolios, with no purchasing from large institutional players.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 93.2% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Lawrence County is overwhelmingly dominated by mom-and-pop landlords. Investors holding 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) collectively own 93.2% of all investor-owned single-family homes, demonstrating a highly fragmented market controlled by small-scale operators.

The single-property landlord is the bedrock of the local rental market. This tier alone, comprising 1,006 properties, accounts for 64.3% of the entire investor-owned portfolio, highlighting the importance of first-time and small-scale investors.

Contrary to narratives of corporate consolidation, institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible footprint in Lawrence County. This tier controls just a single property, representing only 0.1% of the investor market share.

Mid-size landlords (11-1000 properties) also hold a relatively small portion of the market. Tiers 05 through 08 combined own 105 properties, making up just 6.8% of the total investor portfolio.

This distribution reveals a market structure where the overwhelming majority of rental housing is provided by local, small-portfolio individuals and families, not by large, out-of-state corporations.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, holding 51.8% of assets.
Detailed Findings

While individual investors dominate the overall market, a clear crossover point emerges as portfolios grow. In the 6-10 property tier, companies take a slight majority ownership, holding 71 properties (51.8%) compared to individuals' 66 properties (48.2%).

At the smallest end of the market, individual ownership is nearly absolute. Individuals own 87.7% of single-property portfolios (888 properties) and 67.7% of two-property portfolios (84 properties).

Company ownership becomes increasingly concentrated in larger portfolio tiers. Companies own 81.8% of properties in the 21-50 tier and a commanding 95.7% in the 101-1000 property tier, indicating that scaling operations typically involves incorporation.

This pattern highlights distinct strategies: individuals form the base of the market with smaller holdings, while corporate structures are the preferred vehicle for building larger, more professionalized rental portfolios in Lawrence County.

Even so, the total number of properties held by companies (356) remains significantly lower than those held by individuals (1,177), reinforcing the individual-driven nature of the local market, which can be analyzed with robust assessor data.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 47421 zip code contains the highest concentration of investor properties with 994 homes.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Lawrence County is highly concentrated geographically. The 47421 zip code is the epicenter of investor ownership, with 994 landlord-owned properties, representing an 11.0% ownership rate in that area.

The areas with the highest investor penetration rates are different from the volume leader. The top spot for ownership rate belongs to the 47437 zip code, where 22.2% of homes are investor-owned, followed by 47420 (17.0%) and 47467 (16.7%).

Following the lead of 47421 in total count, the 47446 zip code holds the second-most investor properties with 329, at an 11.6% ownership rate.

The disparity between the top area by count (47421) and the top area by percentage (47437) suggests different market dynamics. One area attracts a large volume of investment, while others, though smaller, have a much higher density of rental properties relative to their total housing stock.

Other notable zip codes for investor activity include 47462 (60 properties, 6.5% rate) and 47451 (50 properties, 10.8% rate).

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 23 properties for every 1 they sold in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Lawrence County have been in a strong accumulation phase, acting as decisive net buyers. In 2025, they purchased 23 properties while selling only one, creating a powerful 23-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio and signaling high confidence in the local market.

The net buying trend is consistent over time. In 2024, landlords also expanded their portfolios, with 87 acquisitions against 37 dispositions, resulting in a net gain of 50 properties.

Institutional investors (1000+ tier) exhibit the opposite behavior. During their last period of activity in 2024, they were net sellers, purchasing 5 properties but selling 6. This retreat by large investors contrasts sharply with the aggressive buying from the broader landlord market.

This divergence highlights a key market dynamic: while smaller, local landlords are actively growing their holdings, the largest institutional players have been reducing their limited exposure in Lawrence County.

The transaction data, available through a comprehensive property data API, clearly illustrates a market where growth is being fueled from the bottom up by smaller investors.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 10.8% of all property transactions in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

In the fourth quarter of 2025, landlords participated in 10.8% of all market transactions, conducting 4 of the 37 total SFR transactions in Lawrence County. This level of activity reflects a steady, but not overwhelming, investor presence in the flow of property sales.

Transaction activity was exclusively driven by smaller investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) accounted for 100% of the quarter's 4 landlord-involved transactions, with institutional investors making no moves.

The most active tier was the single-property group, which was responsible for 2 transactions. The two-property and the 21-50 property tiers each made one transaction, showing broad participation across the smaller end of the investor spectrum.

Notably, there was no inter-landlord trading during the quarter. All 4 properties acquired by investors were purchased from non-landlords (0% bought from landlords), suggesting that investors are sourcing their deals from traditional homeowners or other sellers rather than from each other.

Pricing analysis by tier was not possible due to unavailable data, but the volume data confirms that the transactional market, like the ownership market, is controlled by small-scale investors.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small, local landlords control 93.2% of Lawrence County's investor market, expanding portfolios as institutions retreat.
Holdings
Landlords own 1,526 single-family homes in Lawrence County, representing 10.8% of the market. Individual investors are the dominant force, holding 1,177 properties (77.1%) compared to 356 (23.3%) owned by companies.
Pricing
In the most recent full quarter (Q3 2025), landlords paid 25.4% less than traditional homeowners, securing an average discount of $31,137 per property ($91,633 vs. $122,770).
Activity
Investors purchased 13.8% of homes sold in Q4 2025, with mom-and-pop landlords accounting for 75.0% of that activity. During the quarter, 2 new single-property landlords entered the market.
Market Share
The market is dominated by small landlords (1-10 properties), who control 93.2% of investor-owned housing. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a minimal presence, owning just 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors own the vast majority of smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 6-10 properties and control over 95% of portfolios with 101+ properties.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, with a 23-to-1 buy-sell ratio in 2025 (23 buys vs. 1 sell). Conversely, institutional investors were net sellers in their last active year, 2024.
Market Narrative

The real estate investor market in Lawrence County, Indiana, is fundamentally shaped by small, local operators, not large corporations. Investors own 1,526 single-family homes, or 10.8% of the county's total SFR stock. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who hold a commanding 93.2% share. Individual investors own 77.1% of these properties, far outpacing companies. Meanwhile, institutional investors with 1,000+ properties have a nearly nonexistent footprint, owning just 0.1% of the inventory, challenging the common narrative of Wall Street's market takeover.

Investor behavior underscores this local dominance. In Q4 2025, landlords acquired 13.8% of all homes sold, with small investors driving 75% of that activity. These buyers display savvy purchasing strategies, securing properties at a significant 25.4% discount compared to traditional homeowners in Q3 2025. Transaction data reveals a strong accumulation trend, as landlords were aggressive net buyers in 2025 with a 23-to-1 buy-sell ratio. This contrasts sharply with institutional firms, who were net sellers in their last period of activity, signaling a retreat from the market.

The key takeaway from this market report is that Lawrence County's rental housing market is highly decentralized and built on the foundation of individual enterprise. The market dynamic is one of expansion from the ground up, where small investors, often paying with cash, are actively growing their portfolios by finding deals from the general public. The minimal presence and recent divestment from institutional capital suggest this market remains a stronghold for the traditional, local landlord.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 04:45 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Lawrence (IN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Lawrence (IN) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-in-lawrence/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.