De Baca (NM) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the De Baca (NM) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in De Baca (NM)
228
Total Investors in De Baca (NM)
148
Investor Owned SFR in De Baca (NM)
100(43.9%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
143
SFR Owned
96
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
5
SFR Owned
5
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 100 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

De Baca County's Investor Market: 100% Mom-and-Pop Domination in a Completely Frozen Q1 Market
Investors own 100 single-family properties, a significant 43.9% of the De Baca County market, with small-scale individual landlords controlling 96.0% of this portfolio. The market showed zero transactional activity in Q1 2026 from any buyer type, indicating a stable, illiquid environment dominated by long-term, all-cash holds rather than active trading.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 100 SFRs (43.9% of the market), with individuals holding 96.0% of the portfolio.
All 100 investor-owned properties are held in cash, with zero recorded financing. The entire portfolio is non-owner-occupied, functioning as rental properties.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No Q1 sales were recorded for landlords or homeowners, making price comparisons impossible.
The complete absence of sales activity in recent quarters means no pricing data is available. Consequently, analysis of landlord-homeowner price gaps or pricing trends is not possible for De Baca County.
Current Quarter Purchases
Investors made zero SFR purchases in Q4 2025, accounting for 0.0% of a non-existent market activity.
The complete halt in acquisitions applies to all investor tiers. Mom-and-pop and institutional investors both recorded zero purchases, and no new landlords entered the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) exercise total control, owning 100% of all investor-held SFRs.
Institutional investors with 1,000+ properties have zero presence in De Baca County. The market is exclusively composed of small-scale owners, with single-property landlords alone controlling 95.1% of the investor-owned housing stock.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors own 95% of all landlord properties, with companies holding just 5 homes.
Companies do not achieve majority ownership at any portfolio size in De Baca County. In the single-property tier, individuals own 94 properties versus 5 for companies, and in the two-property tier, individuals own 100%.
Geographic Distribution
Investor ownership is hyper-concentrated in the 88119 zip code, which holds 97 of the 100 investor-owned homes.
The 88119 zip code has a high investor ownership rate of 43.5%. While the 88136 zip code has a 100% investor rate, this is based on a very small sample of only 2 properties.
Historical Transactions
No historical buy or sell transactions were recorded, preventing analysis of market dynamics.
The absence of transaction data makes it impossible to determine if landlords are net buyers or sellers. Metrics like landlord-to-landlord sales or implied profit margins cannot be calculated.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords had a 0.0% share of Q1 transactions, as zero total SFR sales occurred in De Baca County.
With no market activity, transaction volumes across all investor tiers were zero. No data is available to compare purchase prices or inter-landlord trading activity.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 100 SFRs (43.9% of the market), with individuals holding 96.0% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant footprint in De Baca County, owning 100 of the 228 total Single-Family Residential properties, which constitutes a high market penetration rate of 43.9%.

The market is overwhelmingly controlled by small, individual investors rather than corporations. Individuals own 96 of the 100 investor properties (96.0%), while companies own just 5 properties (5.0%).

This individual dominance is further reflected in the entity count, with 143 individual landlords compared to only 5 company landlords operating in the county.

A defining characteristic of this market is the complete absence of leverage. All 100 investor-owned properties were acquired with cash, and none currently have financing, signaling a financially conservative, long-term holding strategy.

The investor portfolio is purely for rental purposes. Every one of the 100 properties is classified as non-owner-occupied and rented, indicating a focus on generating rental income over speculative purchasing.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No Q1 sales were recorded for landlords or homeowners, making price comparisons impossible.
Detailed Findings

No recent sales transactions were recorded for either landlords or traditional homeowners in De Baca County. This lack of activity prevents any direct comparison of acquisition prices between the two groups.

The absence of transactional data means key pricing metrics, such as the typical discount investors achieve compared to homeowners, cannot be calculated for this market.

Furthermore, without sales data from Q1 2026 or preceding quarters, it is impossible to identify any pricing trends, such as appreciation or depreciation, within the local market.

This data void is itself a significant finding, pointing towards an extremely illiquid market where properties are held for long durations with very infrequent turnover.

The market in De Baca County appears to be a 'buy and hold' environment, fundamentally different from more transactionally active regions where pricing analytics are more relevant.

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Investors made zero SFR purchases in Q4 2025, accounting for 0.0% of a non-existent market activity.
Detailed Findings

There was a complete absence of purchasing activity by investors in Q4 2025, with zero properties acquired. This reflects a total market standstill, as non-landlord purchases also totaled zero.

This inactivity was uniform across all investor sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) and institutional investors alike made no new acquisitions during the quarter.

The lack of buying from the single-property tier signifies that no new landlords entered the De Baca County market in Q4 2025, indicating a static and mature ownership base.

The 0.0% market share for landlords is a direct result of zero total transactions occurring in the county, a clear sign of a deeply frozen and illiquid real estate environment.

This contrasts sharply with more dynamic markets and suggests that investment strategies in this area are not focused on short-term acquisition but on long-term ownership of existing assets.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) exercise total control, owning 100% of all investor-held SFRs.
Detailed Findings

Ownership in De Baca County is completely dominated by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, control 100% of the investor-owned SFR market.

The market structure is heavily skewed towards the smallest investors. Landlords with just a single property (Tier 01) own 98 properties, accounting for 95.1% of the entire investor portfolio.

The remaining 4.9% of the portfolio is held by landlords owning two properties, comprising just 5 homes in total.

There is absolutely no institutional investor presence in De Baca County. The 1,000+ property tier (Tier 09) holds zero properties, underscoring the local, small-scale nature of the rental market.

Due to the lack of recent sales, acquisition price analysis by tier is not possible. It cannot be determined if different-sized landlords employ different pricing strategies.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Key Insight
Individual investors own 95% of all landlord properties, with companies holding just 5 homes.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the definitive owners in the De Baca County rental market across all active tiers. They own 94 of the 98 properties (94.9%) in the single-property tier.

Company ownership is minimal, limited to just 5 properties total, all of which are in the single-property tier. This represents only 5.1% of that tier's holdings.

In the next tier up, consisting of owners with two properties, individual ownership is absolute at 100% (5 properties).

Consequently, there is no 'crossover point' where companies become the dominant owner type. The market structure is firmly controlled by individuals throughout.

Without any recent transaction data, it's impossible to compare the acquisition prices or buying strategies between individual and company investors within these tiers.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor ownership is hyper-concentrated in the 88119 zip code, which holds 97 of the 100 investor-owned homes.
Detailed Findings

The vast majority of investor activity in De Baca County is focused within a single geographic area. The 88119 zip code contains 97 of the 100 investor-owned properties, representing 97% of the entire investor portfolio.

This concentration results in a significant investor penetration rate of 43.5% within the 88119 zip code, highlighting its importance as the county's primary rental market.

While the 88136 zip code technically has the highest ownership rate at 100%, this figure is based on a total of only 2 properties, making it an outlier rather than a primary investment hub.

Similarly, the 88134 zip code has an investor ownership rate of 33.3%, but this is derived from only 1 investor-owned property out of 3 total SFRs.

The data clearly shows that investor interest is not evenly distributed but is instead confined almost entirely to one core area, with minimal activity elsewhere in the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Key Insight
No historical buy or sell transactions were recorded, preventing analysis of market dynamics.
Detailed Findings

The historical data for De Baca County contains no records of landlord buy or sell transactions. This complete lack of recorded activity indicates a market with extremely low turnover.

As a result, a buy-to-sell ratio cannot be calculated. It is impossible to determine whether landlords have historically been net buyers or net sellers in this market.

The phenomenon of inter-landlord trading, where investors buy from and sell to each other, appears to be non-existent based on available data. The percentage of transactions between landlords is 0%.

Analysis of average buy and sell prices over time is also not possible, precluding any insights into potential profit margins or price appreciation for investors.

This static market behavior applies to all investor types, as there is no institutional presence and therefore no institutional transaction data to analyze separately.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords had a 0.0% share of Q1 transactions, as zero total SFR sales occurred in De Baca County.
Detailed Findings

The investor share of the transaction market in Q1 2026 was 0.0%. This is because the total number of SFR transactions in De Baca County during the quarter was zero.

This market-wide standstill means there was no transactional activity to analyze across the different investor tiers. Both the smallest mom-and-pop landlords and the largest institutional tiers recorded zero transactions.

Consequently, there is no data on average purchase prices by tier for the quarter. It is not possible to compare what different investor types might have paid for properties.

The level of inter-landlord trading was also zero, as no properties were bought or sold by anyone in the market.

The Q1 transaction data provides definitive evidence of a completely dormant market, reinforcing the theme of a stable, buy-and-hold environment with minimal liquidity.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

De Baca County Investor Market: Dominated by Mom-and-Pop Landlords Amid Zero Q1 Sales Activity
Holdings
Landlords own 100 SFR properties, representing a substantial 43.9% of the market in De Baca County, NM. Individual investors hold a commanding 96.0% of these properties (96 homes), with companies owning the remaining 4.0%.
Pricing
No pricing data is available for Q1 2026, as zero sales were recorded for either landlords or traditional homeowners, indicating a completely illiquid market.
Activity
There was zero purchasing activity in Q1 2026, with landlords acquiring 0 properties for a 0.0% share of all sales. Consequently, no new landlords entered the market.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) control 100% of investor housing in the county. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have no presence.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate ownership across all portfolio sizes, holding 96.0% of the properties. There is no tier at which companies become the majority owner.
Transactions
With zero recorded sales in Q1 2026, the net buyer/seller status for landlords is neutral. There were no transactions to analyze for any investor segment.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in De Baca County, NM, is defined by stability and small-scale ownership. Investors control a significant 100 single-family properties, making up 43.9% of the county's entire SFR market. This portfolio is overwhelmingly in the hands of individuals, who own 96 properties (96.0%), compared to just 5 owned by companies. The market structure entirely consists of 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties), who control 100% of investor-owned homes, while institutional investors have no footprint whatsoever. This composition points to a mature market dominated by local, long-term holders.

Investor behavior in De Baca County is characterized by a lack of transactional activity rather than active trading. The first quarter of 2026 saw zero SFR purchases by any party, landlords or otherwise, resulting in a 0% acquisition share for investors. This complete market freeze means there is no current pricing data to compare investor purchasing power against homeowners. Furthermore, the entire investor portfolio of 100 properties is owned free and clear with cash, indicating a risk-averse strategy focused on stable rental income over leveraged growth. This reflects a classic buy-and-hold approach to real estate investing.

The key takeaway from this market report is that De Baca County is not an active, speculative investment market but a deeply entrenched, illiquid rental market. The high concentration of ownership in the 88119 zip code (97 of 100 properties) and the complete absence of sales activity signal a market where properties rarely change hands. For existing owners, it represents a stable source of income. For prospective buyers, it suggests opportunities are scarce and the market lacks the liquidity seen in more metropolitan areas.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 11:54 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography De Baca (NM)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 De Baca (NM) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-nm-de_baca/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.