Raleigh (WV) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Raleigh (WV) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Raleigh (WV)
26,161
Total Investors in Raleigh (WV)
9,681
Investor Owned SFR in Raleigh (WV)
9,157(35.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
9,175
SFR Owned
8,195
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
506
SFR Owned
1,005
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 9,157 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Raleigh County with 96.3% Ownership, Buying at a 39.4% Discount
Investors own 35.0% of the single-family housing in Raleigh County, WV, a market overwhelmingly controlled by small landlords (96.3%) rather than institutions (0.0%). In Q1 2026, these investors acquired 28.7% of all properties sold, paying an average of 39.4% less than traditional homeowners and continuing their trend as strong net buyers.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 9,157 SFRs (35.0% of market), with individuals holding 89.5%.
Cash purchases dominate the portfolio, with 8,187 properties owned outright versus just 970 financed. The portfolio is heavily rental-focused, with 97.9% of all investor-owned properties (8,962) being non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Investors paid 39.4% less than homeowners in Q1, an average discount of $81,738.
This substantial discount marks a return to trend after Q1 2025, where investors briefly paid a 3.9% premium. The current average Q1 price of $125,558 is below the 2020-2023 pandemic-era average ($129,869), indicating a price decline.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 28.7% of all SFR properties sold in the most recent quarter.
Mom-and-pop investors drove this activity, accounting for 87.0% of all landlord purchases. New single-property landlords were the largest group, with 17 new entities making up 73.9% of investor acquisitions.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 96.3% of investor-owned SFRs.
Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible presence, owning just 2 properties, or 0.0% of the market. Single-property landlords form the largest segment, holding 59.6% of all investor-owned homes.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owner at the 11-20 property tier, holding 76.8% of SFRs.
Individual landlords overwhelmingly control smaller portfolios, owning over 95% of single and two-property holdings. However, in the 21-50 property tier, company ownership rises to 99.0%, showing a clear shift as portfolios scale.
Geographic Distribution
Investor ownership is highly concentrated, with zip code 25801 holding 4,127 properties.
This single zip code accounts for 45.1% of all investor-owned SFRs in Raleigh County. The areas with the highest ownership rates (up to 100%) are distinct from those with the highest counts, indicating smaller, saturated sub-markets.
Historical Transactions
Landlords remain strong net buyers, acquiring 2.56 properties for every one sold in Q1.
This net buyer position is a long-term trend, with buy-to-sell ratios reaching 5.8x in 2025 and 4.07x in 2024. However, the total volume of 23 acquisitions in Q1 signals a significant slowdown compared to the quarterly average of 87.5 in 2024.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 28.4% of all Q1 property sales, totaling 23 transactions.
New, single-property investors drove activity, executing 17 of the 23 transactions. These new entrants sourced 17.6% of their properties from other landlords. Purchase prices varied significantly by tier, from $49,000 to $186,967.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 9,157 SFRs (35.0% of market), with individuals holding 89.5%.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 35.0% of the single-family residential market in Raleigh County, totaling 9,157 properties out of 26,161.

The landscape is defined by individual investors, who own 8,195 properties (89.5%), compared to just 1,005 properties (11.0%) owned by companies. This is further reflected in the entity count, with 9,175 individual landlords and only 506 company landlords.

Financial strategies lean heavily towards all-cash ownership. The portfolio includes 8,187 properties owned with cash, dwarfing the 970 properties that are financed. This 8.4-to-1 ratio indicates a low reliance on leverage among local investors.

Nearly the entire investor portfolio is dedicated to rentals, with 8,962 properties classified as rented. This represents 97.9% of all investor-owned homes, underscoring a clear focus on generating rental income.

The combination of high individual ownership and a preference for cash purchases suggests that the typical approach to real estate investing in this market is conservative and driven by smaller, independent operators.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Investors paid 39.4% less than homeowners in Q1, an average discount of $81,738.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords acquired properties at a significant 39.4% discount compared to traditional homeowners. Investors paid an average of $125,558, while homeowners paid $207,296, a price gap of $81,738 per property.

This deep discount represents a sharp return to the historical norm after an anomalous Q1 2025, when landlords paid a 3.9% premium ($8,771) over homeowners. The discount has fluctuated but remained substantial in recent quarters, including 42.6% in Q3 2025 and 32.0% in Q2 2025.

Investor acquisition prices in Q1 2026 ($125,558) have fallen below the average price seen during the 2020-2023 boom years ($129,869). This suggests a market correction and potentially more favorable buying conditions for investors.

The consistent ability to purchase properties well below the homeowner market rate is a key strategic advantage for investors in Raleigh County, enabling stronger returns and quicker paths to profitability.

The volatility in quarterly pricing, especially the premium paid in early 2025, indicates that while the discount is typical, market conditions can shift rapidly.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 28.7% of all SFR properties sold in the most recent quarter.
Detailed Findings

Investors were a major force in the most recent quarter's market, purchasing 23 of the 80 single-family homes sold, which translates to a 28.7% market share.

The acquisition activity was dominated by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) accounted for 20 of the 23 purchases, representing 87.0% of all investor buying activity.

New market entrants were the primary drivers. Investors buying their very first rental property (Tier 01) made up the largest segment, with 17 new entities acquiring 17 properties, or 73.9% of the investor total.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) made zero purchases, highlighting their absence from the local acquisition market.

The data clearly shows that market growth is fueled from the bottom up, with a steady stream of new, small landlords entering the market rather than consolidation by large players.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 96.3% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Raleigh County is overwhelmingly composed of small landlords. Those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) collectively control 96.3% of all investor-owned single-family homes.

Single-property landlords are the bedrock of the market, owning 5,739 properties. This single tier accounts for 59.6% of the entire investor-owned housing stock.

Together, landlords with just one or two properties (Tiers 01 and 02) control a combined 81.4% of the market (59.6% + 21.8%), demonstrating extreme concentration at the smallest end of the investor spectrum.

Conversely, institutional-scale investors (1,000+ properties) have virtually no footprint, with just 2 properties registered, which rounds to 0.0% of the market share.

This ownership structure defies the common narrative of corporate consolidation, revealing a market that is highly fragmented and reliant on local, small-scale operators.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owner at the 11-20 property tier, holding 76.8% of SFRs.
Detailed Findings

Ownership structure shifts dramatically as portfolio sizes increase. While individuals dominate the market overall, companies become the majority owners in larger tiers.

The clear crossover point occurs in the 11-20 property tier (Small-medium), where companies own 156 properties, or 76.8% of the homes in that segment.

At the smaller end, individual ownership is nearly absolute. In both the single-property and two-property tiers, individuals own 95.1% of the homes.

This trend accelerates in the 21-50 property tier, where company ownership reaches 99.0%, with only one property in this segment owned by an individual.

This pattern suggests a professionalization curve: investors operate as individuals when starting out but tend to incorporate their holdings into a company structure as they scale their portfolios beyond 10 properties.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor ownership is highly concentrated, with zip code 25801 holding 4,127 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Raleigh County is geographically concentrated to an extraordinary degree. The 25801 zip code is the epicenter, containing 4,127 investor-owned properties.

This single area accounts for 45.1% of the entire investor portfolio of 9,157 properties in the county, indicating a highly targeted investment strategy.

The sub-markets with the highest percentage of investor ownership are different from the ones with the highest raw counts. For example, zip codes 25856 and 25818 show 100.0% investor ownership, suggesting these are likely very small areas where every property is a rental.

Zip code 25827 stands out as a key investor market, appearing in the top lists for both total count (342 properties) and ownership rate (37.1%).

This data reveals that investors are not spread evenly but are focused on specific neighborhoods, with 25801 being the primary target for portfolio building.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords remain strong net buyers, acquiring 2.56 properties for every one sold in Q1.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Raleigh County are consistently expanding their portfolios, acting as strong net buyers. In Q1 2026, they purchased 23 properties while selling only 9, a buy-to-sell ratio of 2.56x.

This behavior is part of a sustained trend of accumulation. In 2025, investors bought 261 properties and sold only 45, for a ratio of 5.8x. Similarly, in 2024, they bought 350 and sold 86, a ratio of 4.07x.

While the net-buyer status continues, the pace of acquisitions has cooled significantly. The 23 purchases in Q1 2026 are well below the quarterly average of 65 in 2025 and 87.5 in 2024.

This slowdown in volume suggests that while investors are still committed to growing their holdings, they may be acting with more caution amid changing market conditions.

Institutional transaction data was not available, indicating this trend is driven by the activity of small-to-mid-size local investors.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 28.4% of all Q1 property sales, totaling 23 transactions.
Detailed Findings

Landlords accounted for 28.4% of all single-family property transactions in Q1, with 23 recorded transactions out of a market total of 81.

Activity was heavily concentrated among the smallest investors. Those buying their first rental property (Tier 01) were responsible for 17 of the 23 landlord transactions, demonstrating that new entrants are the most active buyers.

A notable portion of acquisitions by new landlords came from within the investor community. Of the 17 properties purchased by single-property investors, 3 (17.6%) were bought from other landlords, suggesting a healthy churn of existing rental stock.

Acquisition prices varied widely across different investor tiers. Small-medium landlords (11-20 properties) paid the highest average price at $186,967, while small landlords (6-10 properties) paid the lowest at just $49,000.

This price disparity indicates that different investor segments are targeting different types of properties, with larger investors possibly acquiring higher-value assets while smaller ones focus on more affordable opportunities.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Raleigh County with 96.3% Ownership, Buying at a 39.4% Discount
Holdings
Landlords own 9,157 single-family homes in Raleigh County, WV, representing 35.0% of the total market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors, who own 8,195 properties (89.5%), versus 1,005 (11.0%) for companies.
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords paid an average of $125,558, which is 39.4% less than the $207,296 paid by traditional homeowners. This equates to an average discount of $81,738 per property.
Activity
Investors purchased 28.7% of all homes sold in the most recent quarter, totaling 23 properties. Activity was driven by new entrants, with 17 new single-property landlords joining the market.
Market Share
The market is defined by small operators, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 96.3% of all investor-owned housing. In contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) own a negligible 0.0%.
Ownership Type
Individuals dominate smaller portfolios, owning 95.1% of single-property holdings. Companies become the majority owners in the 11-20 property tier, where they control 76.8% of assets.
Transactions
Investors continue to be strong net buyers, acquiring 2.56 properties for every one sold in Q1 (23 buys vs 9 sells). Data on institutional transactions was not available for this period.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Raleigh County, WV is characterized by the overwhelming dominance of small, independent operators. Investors own a substantial 9,157 properties, or 35.0% of the county's housing stock. This landscape is shaped not by distant corporations but by local individuals, who own 89.5% of these homes. The ownership structure is highly fragmented, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 96.3% of the rental supply, while institutional investors have a near-zero presence at just 0.0%. This data paints a clear picture of a market built by and for the small-scale real estate investor.

Investor behavior is defined by strategic, value-oriented acquisitions. In the first quarter of 2026, landlords purchased 28.7% of all homes sold, underscoring their significant role in market liquidity. They achieved this by securing properties at a remarkable 39.4% discount compared to traditional homeowners, an average savings of $81,738 per home. These investors are consistently expanding their portfolios, acting as net buyers with a 2.56-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in Q1. This growth is fueled by new entrants, with 17 new single-property landlords entering the market this quarter alone.

The key takeaway from this market report is that the narrative of a corporate takeover of housing does not apply in Raleigh County. Instead, the market's health and direction are tied to the decisions of thousands of individual landlords. Their strategy relies on deep market knowledge to acquire properties at a significant discount. While acquisition volumes have recently slowed, their continued status as net buyers signals sustained confidence in the local rental market. The heavy geographic concentration, with 45.1% of investor properties in a single zip code (25801), highlights a targeted approach that is likely to continue shaping local communities.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 06:05 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Raleigh (WV)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Raleigh (WV) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-wv-raleigh/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.