Perry (TN) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Perry (TN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Perry (TN)
2,290
Total Investors in Perry (TN)
1,222
Investor Owned SFR in Perry (TN)
919(40.1%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,168
SFR Owned
861
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
54
SFR Owned
68
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 919 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Perry County's Investor Market, Owning 40% of All SFRs
Investors own 919 single-family homes in Perry County, TN, representing 40.1% of the total market. The landscape is defined by small, individual investors who control 98.4% of this portfolio, with institutional firms entirely absent. In Q1, landlords were aggressive net buyers, acquiring 47.1% of all homes sold while paying 3.3% less than traditional homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 919 SFR properties in Perry County, with individuals holding a dominant 93.7%.
The vast majority of investor properties are held in cash, with 755 cash-owned properties versus only 164 that are financed. Of the 919 total investor properties, 913 are actively rented, demonstrating a strong focus on rental income generation.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q1, landlords paid an average of $324,392, securing a 3.3% discount compared to homeowners.
The price gap between landlords and homeowners is extremely volatile, swinging from a massive 56.3% landlord discount in Q3 2025 to landlords paying a 19.8% premium in Q2 2025. Data comparing individual versus company pricing was not available.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords were a major market force in Q1, acquiring 47.1% of all SFR properties sold.
Mom-and-pop landlords drove 100% of this activity, with all 8 investor purchases made by single-property investors. In contrast, institutional investors made zero acquisitions, highlighting a market dominated by new entrants.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) exert near-total control, owning 98.4% of all investor SFRs.
The concentration is most extreme at the entry-level, where single-property landlords alone hold 88.6% of all investor properties. Institutional investors have zero market presence, and pricing data by tier was not available.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Pricing data comparing individual and company buyers by tier was not available for Perry County.
Individual investors are the majority owners in every portfolio tier, from 95.4% in the single-property tier to 80.0% in the 6-10 property tier. A crossover point where companies become the majority does not exist in this market.
Geographic Distribution
Within Perry County, the 37096 zip code contains the highest number of investor properties at 594.
The highest investor concentration is in the 37033 zip code, where landlords own 68.8% of all SFRs. This contrasts with the 37096 zip code, which has the most properties but a lower ownership rate of 38.5%.
Historical Transactions
Landlords remain strong net buyers with an 11-to-1 buy/sell ratio in Q1, though data on landlord-to-landlord sales is unavailable.
The pace of buying has moderated from a high of 65 purchases in 2024 to 57 in 2025. Institutional investors have been completely inactive, recording no buy or sell transactions in recent years.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 44.0% of all market transactions in Q1, accounting for 11 of 25 total sales.
All 11 investor purchases were made by mom-and-pop landlords, who paid an average of $324,392. Notably, 100% of these acquisitions were sourced from the open market, with zero properties bought from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 919 SFR properties in Perry County, with individuals holding a dominant 93.7%.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership has a significant footprint in Perry County, with landlords holding 919 single-family residential properties, which constitutes 40.1% of the county's entire SFR market.

The ownership structure is overwhelmingly composed of individuals rather than corporations. Individual investors own 861 properties, making up 93.7% of the investor-owned housing stock, while companies own the remaining 68 properties (7.4%).

Cash is the preferred method of ownership, with 755 properties owned outright compared to 164 that carry financing. This 4.6-to-1 ratio of cash-to-financed properties indicates that local investors operate with low leverage.

The portfolio is heavily geared towards rentals, as 913 of the 919 properties (99.3%) are non-owner-occupied. This confirms that the assets are actively managed as part of a real estate investing strategy.

The landlord base itself mirrors this pattern, with 1,168 individual landlords compared to just 54 company entities. This highlights a market built on local, small-scale investment rather than large-scale corporate operations.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q1, landlords paid an average of $324,392, securing a 3.3% discount compared to homeowners.
Detailed Findings

During Q1 2026, landlords acquired properties at an average price of $324,392, which was $10,972 less than the $335,364 paid by traditional homeowners. This represents a 3.3% discount for investors.

However, this pricing advantage is not consistent and shows extreme volatility in prior quarters. In 2025, the differential ranged from landlords paying a 19.8% premium ($37,906 more) in Q2 to securing a staggering 56.3% discount ($134,040 less) in Q3.

This volatility suggests that in a market with few transactions, the average price is highly sensitive to the specific nature of individual deals rather than a stable market-wide trend.

A sharp rise in property values is evident, as the Q1 2026 average landlord acquisition price of $324,392 is more than double the average price recorded for all of 2024 ($156,331) and 2025 ($171,254).

The transaction data for these periods is sparse, indicating these averages are based on a limited number of sales, which requires caution when interpreting long-term trends.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords were a major market force in Q1, acquiring 47.1% of all SFR properties sold.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity was highly pronounced in Q1, with landlords purchasing 8 of the 17 total SFRs sold in Perry County, capturing a substantial 47.1% market share.

The entirety of this purchasing activity originated from the smallest investors. All 8 acquisitions were made by landlords in the single-property tier (Tier 01), indicating that market growth is fueled by new entrants.

These 8 property purchases were attributed to 11 distinct entities, which suggests that co-ownership or partnerships are common among new investors in the area.

Institutional investors with portfolios of over 1,000 properties were completely inactive, recording zero purchases in Q1 and reinforcing the grassroots nature of the local investment scene.

This concentration of activity at the entry-level of the market shows a low barrier to entry and an environment favorable to first-time landlords using a property search to find deals.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) exert near-total control, owning 98.4% of all investor SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Perry County is unequivocally dominated by small-scale operators. Landlords with portfolios of 1-10 properties, known as mom-and-pops, control 98.4% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Ownership is even more concentrated at the very bottom of the market. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone account for 834 properties, representing an 88.6% share of the entire investor portfolio.

In stark contrast, mid-size investors (11-1,000 properties) have a negligible footprint, owning just 1.6% of properties. Institutional investors (Tier 09) are entirely absent from this market, holding zero properties.

This distribution reveals a highly fragmented market structure, primarily composed of individuals who own one or two rental properties rather than a consolidated professionalized industry.

The data did not provide a breakdown of acquisition prices by tier, preventing an analysis of whether larger investors pay more or less than their smaller counterparts.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Pricing data comparing individual and company buyers by tier was not available for Perry County.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the foundational owner type across every portfolio size in Perry County. They own 95.4% of properties in single-property portfolios and still command an 80.0% majority in the 6-10 property tier.

Unlike in larger metropolitan areas, there is no crossover tier in this market where corporate ownership becomes the dominant structure. The investor base remains primarily individuals even as portfolios grow.

While individuals dominate, there is a clear trend of increasing incorporation with portfolio size. The share of company-owned properties grows from just 4.6% in the single-property tier to 20.0% in the 6-10 property tier.

This pattern suggests that as local investors scale their holdings, they are more likely to adopt formal business structures like LLCs for liability and management purposes.

The analysis is limited to smaller portfolio sizes, as there is no significant presence of investors holding more than 10 properties in the provided data.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Within Perry County, the 37096 zip code contains the highest number of investor properties at 594.
Detailed Findings

The highest volume of investor-owned properties within Perry County is concentrated in the 37096 zip code, which is home to 594 units.

However, the most saturated market is the 37033 zip code, where investors own 68.8% of all single-family homes, indicating an area heavily dominated by rental properties.

This highlights a key distinction between volume and penetration. The area with the largest number of investor rentals (37096) has a significantly lower ownership rate (38.5%) than smaller pockets with higher saturation.

High investor penetration is a common theme across the county, with three of the top five zip codes showing investor ownership rates of 39.5% or higher.

A data anomaly was noted for zip code 38485, which appeared in top lists but lacked specific property counts, suggesting a potential reporting gap for that area.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords remain strong net buyers with an 11-to-1 buy/sell ratio in Q1, though data on landlord-to-landlord sales is unavailable.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Perry County are consistently growing their portfolios, acting as strong net buyers. In Q1 2026, they acquired 11 properties for every 1 they sold, continuing a multi-year accumulation trend.

This behavior was even more pronounced in previous years, with a buy-to-sell ratio of 10.8x in 2024 (65 buys vs. 6 sells) and 7.1x in 2025 (57 buys vs. 8 sells).

While still decisively in acquisition mode, the overall transaction velocity has slowed. The 11 purchases in Q1 2026 suggest an annual pace that is below the levels seen in 2024 and 2025.

Institutional investors logged no transaction activity in any period observed. Their absence from both buying and selling underscores that the market's liquidity and growth are driven entirely by smaller players.

The data did not include metrics on inter-landlord trading or comparative buy-and-sell prices, which limits analysis of market churn and potential profit margins.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 44.0% of all market transactions in Q1, accounting for 11 of 25 total sales.
Detailed Findings

Investors played a pivotal role in the Q1 market, participating in 44.0% of all SFR transactions in Perry County. This high share of activity underscores their importance to local market liquidity.

All 11 of these transactions were driven by single-property (Tier 01) landlords. This points to a market where activity is dominated by new investors entering or small investors making incremental additions.

A critical insight is that 0% of these landlord purchases were acquired from other landlords. This indicates that investors are sourcing their deals directly from homeowners or new inventory, not from portfolio churn within the investor community.

The average purchase price for these entry-level investors was $324,392. With no institutional activity, there is no price comparison to be made with larger buyers.

The lack of landlord-to-landlord sales suggests a market where investors tend to buy and hold, rather than flip properties to other investors.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Individual Landlords Define Perry County's Market, Owning 40.1% of All SFRs with Zero Institutional Competition
Holdings
Landlords own 919 SFR properties, representing a significant 40.1% of the Perry County, TN market. This portfolio is dominated by individual investors holding 861 properties (93.7%), while companies own just 68 (7.4%).
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords paid 3.3% less than traditional homeowners, securing an average discount of $10,972 per property ($324,392 vs. $335,364). This follows a period of highly volatile price differentials in 2025.
Activity
Landlords drove 47.1% of Q1 home purchases (8 of 17 sales), with 100% of this activity coming from single-property investors. This activity was carried out by 11 new landlord entities entering the market.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 98.4% of all investor housing in the county. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have no presence, owning 0.0% of the market.
Ownership Type
Individual investors overwhelmingly control portfolios of all sizes, and a crossover point to company majority does not exist. As portfolios grow from 1 to 10 properties, the share of company ownership increases from 4.6% to 20.0%.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, with an 11-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 2026 (11 buys vs. 1 sell). Institutional investors are entirely absent from the transaction market, recording zero buys or sells.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Perry County, TN is characterized by the profound influence of small, local investors. Landlords own 919 homes, a remarkable 40.1% of the county's total SFR housing stock. This landscape is not shaped by Wall Street firms; instead, individual investors own 93.7% of these properties. The market structure is highly fragmented, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 98.4% of the rental inventory, while institutional-scale investors have zero presence. This data, which can be cross-referenced with assessor data, paints a picture of a quintessential grassroots investment community.

Investor behavior in Q1 2026 was defined by aggressive acquisition. Landlords purchased 47.1% of all homes sold, and notably, every single one of these purchases was made by an investor buying their first property. These new entrants paid an average of $324,392, securing a 3.3% discount compared to traditional homeowners. Historically, landlords have been consistent net buyers, with an 11-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in Q1, signaling a strong conviction to expand their portfolios. They source these deals from the open market, with 0% of Q1 purchases coming from other landlords.

The key takeaway from these market reports is that Perry County's housing market is deeply intertwined with small-scale landlord activity. The high ownership rate, dominance of individual investors, and complete absence of institutional capital create a unique environment. This is a market built and sustained by local capital, where new landlords continuously enter to buy and hold properties. The dynamics here stand in stark contrast to narratives of corporate consolidation, showcasing a market segment that remains fundamentally local and entrepreneurial.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 02:57 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Perry (TN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Perry (TN) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-tn-perry/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.