Ohio (IN) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Ohio (IN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Ohio (IN)
1,481
Total Investors in Ohio (IN)
172
Investor Owned SFR in Ohio (IN)
148(10.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
152
SFR Owned
115
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
20
SFR Owned
34
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 148 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Ohio County with 90.8% ownership, securing an average 31.2% discount on properties.
Investors own 10.0% of the SFR market in Ohio County, IN, with small landlords controlling 90.8% of that portfolio versus a minimal 1.3% for institutions. In the last quarter, landlords purchased 23.5% of all properties sold, paying 31.2% less than traditional homeowners. Activity was split between new single-property investors and large institutions, with no mid-market participation.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 148 SFR properties in Ohio County, with individual landlords holding 77.7% of the portfolio.
The vast majority of investor properties are owned with cash (133 properties) versus being financed (15 properties). The portfolio is almost entirely rental-focused, with 98.6% of holdings (146 of 148 properties) classified as non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q1, landlords paid $194,499 per property, a 31.2% discount compared to traditional homeowners.
The price gap between landlords and homeowners has narrowed significantly from the 65.0% discount observed in 2025-Q1. This suggests a more competitive purchasing environment for investors. Pricing data comparing individual and company buyers is not available.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 23.5% of all SFR properties sold in Ohio County this quarter.
Acquisition activity was polarized, with mom-and-pop (single-property) and institutional (1000+) investors each accounting for 50.0% of landlord purchases. Two new landlords entered the market, each buying a single property.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 90.8% of investor-owned SFRs in Ohio County.
Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a minimal presence, owning just 1.3% of the investor-owned inventory. Single-property landlords are the backbone of the market, controlling 73.7% of all investor-owned homes on their own.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become majority owners at the two-property tier, an unusually early crossover point.
While individuals dominate the single-property tier with 91.2% ownership, companies hold 54.5% of properties in the two-property tier. The data does not show a clear linear progression, as individuals regain majority status in the 3-10 property range.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity in Ohio County is highly concentrated, with the 47040 zip code holding 77.7% of all investor-owned homes.
The 47040 zip code contains 115 investor-owned properties and has the highest investor ownership rate at 10.4%. The next most active zip code, 47001, has just 23 investor properties.
Historical Transactions
Landlords shifted from net buyers to net sellers in mid-2025, signaling a change in market sentiment.
In 2024, landlords were strong net buyers with 8 buys versus 3 sells. This slowed in 2025, and in Q2 2025 they became net sellers, with 1 buy and 3 sells. Data on landlord-to-landlord sales is unavailable.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords participated in 16.7% of all SFR transactions in the most recent quarter.
A massive pricing gap exists between investor types, with institutional buyers paying 69.0% less than new mom-and-pop landlords ($111,700 vs. $360,097). None of the landlord purchases were from other investors.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 148 SFR properties in Ohio County, with individual landlords holding 77.7% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a 10.0% share of the Single-Family Residential market in Ohio County, IN, owning 148 out of 1,481 total SFR properties.

The ownership landscape is dominated by 152 individual landlords who control 115 properties, representing 77.7% of the investor-owned housing stock. In contrast, 20 corporate entities own the remaining 34 properties (23.0%).

This market shows a strong preference for all-cash acquisitions, with 133 properties (89.9%) owned outright, compared to only 15 properties (10.1%) that carry financing. This indicates a well-capitalized and low-leverage investor base.

The portfolio's purpose is overwhelmingly geared towards rental income, as 146 of the 148 investor-owned properties are classified as rented or non-owner-occupied. This 98.6% rental concentration highlights a clear focus on buy-and-hold strategies.

The ratio of individual to company landlords is heavily skewed, with individuals making up 88.4% of all investor entities in the county, reinforcing the 'mom-and-pop' character of the market.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q1, landlords paid $194,499 per property, a 31.2% discount compared to traditional homeowners.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Ohio County, IN demonstrated significant purchasing advantages in Q1, acquiring properties for an average price of $194,499. This was $88,033 less than the $282,532 paid by traditional homeowners, representing a substantial 31.2% discount.

While still significant, the Q1 discount marks a sharp tightening of the price gap over the last year. For comparison, landlords secured a massive 65.0% discount in 2025-Q1 and a 60.6% discount in 2025-Q2, signaling that the market is becoming more competitive for investors.

Landlord acquisition prices show considerable volatility, climbing from an average of $72,500 in Q1 2025 to $194,499 in Q1 2026. This fluctuation suggests investors are acting opportunistically rather than following a steady price appreciation curve.

The consistent ability to purchase below the homeowner market rate highlights investors' effectiveness in identifying undervalued assets or negotiating favorable terms.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 23.5% of all SFR properties sold in Ohio County this quarter.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for 23.5% of the total market in the last quarter, with landlords acquiring 4 of the 17 SFRs sold in Ohio County, IN.

The quarter's buying activity was unusually concentrated at the market's extremes. Mom-and-pop investors and institutional investors each purchased 2 properties, splitting the investor market share at a perfect 50.0% each.

This activity signals the entrance of 2 new landlords into the market, as both mom-and-pop purchases were made by entities acquiring their first rental property.

Notably, mid-size landlords (Tiers 05-08) were completely inactive, making zero acquisitions. This suggests a market dynamic where only new entrants and the largest-scale players are currently expanding their portfolios.

The equal split between the smallest and largest investor types is a distinct pattern, indicating that opportunities are being seized by those just starting out and those with the most significant capital, bypassing the middle segment entirely.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 90.8% of investor-owned SFRs in Ohio County.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Ohio County, IN is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords, who own between 1 and 10 properties, control a commanding 90.8% of all investor-owned SFRs.

This market structure defies the narrative of corporate dominance, as institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible footprint, holding just 2 properties, which accounts for only 1.3% of the local investor portfolio.

The market is highly fragmented, with the single-property tier being the largest segment by a wide margin. These 112 landlords, each with one rental, own 73.7% of the entire investor-owned housing stock.

The 'long tail' of small investors is profound, as the top four tiers (1-10 properties) collectively represent the vast majority of ownership, leaving very little market share for larger portfolio holders.

Mid-size to large investors (11-1000 properties) collectively own just 8.6% of the portfolio, reinforcing the conclusion that the local rental market is supported almost entirely by small, local landlords.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become majority owners at the two-property tier, an unusually early crossover point.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the bedrock of the entry-level market in Ohio County, IN, owning 103 of 112 properties (91.2%) in the single-property tier.

A surprising structural shift occurs as soon as a portfolio expands. Companies become the majority owner in the two-property tier, controlling 6 of the 11 properties (54.5%) in this small but crucial segment.

However, the path to incorporation is not linear. Individuals reappear as the dominant owner type in the 3-5 property tier (71.4%) and the 6-10 property tier (100.0%).

This unusual pattern suggests that while some investors choose to incorporate early, many others continue to expand their portfolios under personal ownership, indicating diverse strategies for asset protection and management.

Despite the early crossover, the overall market remains heavily weighted toward individuals, who own 77.7% of all investor-held properties across all tiers combined.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity in Ohio County is highly concentrated, with the 47040 zip code holding 77.7% of all investor-owned homes.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Ohio County, IN is defined by hyper-local concentration rather than broad distribution. A single zip code, 47040, is the undisputed hub of investor activity, containing 115 of the 148 total investor-owned properties.

This concentration means that 77.7% of all investor-owned housing in the county is located within this one area, which also boasts the highest ownership rate at 10.4%.

There is a dramatic drop-off in activity outside of this core market. The second-ranked zip code, 47001, contains only 23 investor-owned properties (a 9.6% rate), less than a fifth of the leader.

Together, just two zip codes (47040 and 47001) account for 138 properties, or 93.2% of the entire investor portfolio in the county, highlighting extremely targeted acquisition strategies.

This data reveals that understanding the local market requires a focus on specific neighborhoods, as county-level analysis alone would obscure these critical geographic patterns.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords shifted from net buyers to net sellers in mid-2025, signaling a change in market sentiment.
Detailed Findings

After a period of portfolio growth, landlords in Ohio County, IN pivoted to become net sellers in the second quarter of 2025. During that period, they sold 3 properties while acquiring only 1, a reversal from previous trends.

This shift contrasts sharply with 2024, when investors were strong net buyers, adding 8 properties while only selling 3. For the full year of 2025, they were marginal net buyers (5 buys vs. 4 sells), indicating the slowdown occurred in the latter half of the year.

Transaction volume has also tapered off, with total landlord transactions decreasing from 11 in 2024 to 9 in 2025. This suggests a cooling market with less churn among investors.

The recent move toward selling indicates a potential strategic shift, possibly to realize gains after a period of appreciation or to react to changing market conditions.

Data on institutional-only transactions and inter-landlord trading was not available, limiting the analysis to the overall market trend.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords participated in 16.7% of all SFR transactions in the most recent quarter.
Detailed Findings

In the most recent quarter, landlords were involved in 4 of the 24 total SFR transactions in Ohio County, IN, capturing a 16.7% share of market activity.

A dramatic pricing difference between the active investor tiers highlights divergent acquisition strategies. Institutional investors (1000+ tier) paid an average of just $111,700 per property.

In stark contrast, new single-property landlords paid an average of $360,097, a difference of $248,397. This means institutions acquired properties for 69.0% less than new market entrants, likely by targeting different types of housing assets or leveraging scaled purchasing power.

The market for investor-to-investor sales was non-existent this quarter, as 0% of landlord acquisitions came from other landlords. All purchases were sourced from the broader market, such as from homeowners.

Transaction activity was confined to the smallest and largest investors, with both the single-property and 1000+ property tiers each making 2 purchases. Mid-size investors remained on the sidelines.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords control 90.8% of Ohio County's investor market, paying 31.2% less than homeowners.
Holdings
Landlords own 148 SFR properties in Ohio County, IN, representing 10.0% of the total market. Individual investors are the dominant force, holding 115 of these properties (77.7%) compared to 34 (23.0%) owned by companies.
Pricing
In Q1, landlords demonstrated significant buying power by paying an average price of $194,499, which is 31.2% ($88,033) below the $282,532 average paid by traditional homeowners.
Activity
Investors purchased 23.5% of homes sold in Q1 (4 properties), with activity split evenly between 2 new single-property landlords entering the market and 2 purchases by institutional investors.
Market Share
The investor market is highly fragmented, with small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 90.8% of investor-owned homes, while institutional investors (1000+) own a minimal 1.3%.
Ownership Type
While individual investors are prevalent overall, corporate structures appear early, as companies become the majority owners (54.5%) in the two-property tier, a key crossover point.
Transactions
While historically net buyers, landlords in Ohio County became net sellers in mid-2025. In the most recent quarter, they were involved in 16.7% of all transactions, with institutional buyers paying 69.0% less than new entrants.
Market Narrative

The real estate investing landscape in Ohio County, IN, is overwhelmingly defined by small, individual operators, not large corporations. Investors own 148 single-family homes, making up 10.0% of the county's total SFR market. This portfolio is firmly in the hands of mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who control a staggering 90.8% of all investor-owned properties. In stark contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have a minimal footprint, owning just 1.3%. Ownership is primarily individual (77.7%) rather than corporate (23.0%), underscoring the fragmented, grassroots nature of the local rental market.

Investor behavior in the last quarter reveals a market of extremes and savvy purchasing. Landlords acquired 23.5% of all homes sold, securing them at a 31.2% discount compared to traditional homeowners. This activity was polarized: two new landlords entered the market by purchasing their first property, while large institutional investors also acquired two properties. This left mid-sized investors completely inactive. A massive price gap emerged, with institutions paying an average of $111,700, nearly 70% less than the $360,097 paid by new entrants, highlighting vastly different acquisition strategies targeting separate segments of the market.

The key takeaway for Ohio County is that the rental market is sustained by a large base of small landlords who are adept at finding value. While institutions are present, their impact is negligible compared to the collective power of individuals. The recent shift from net buying to net selling and the bifurcation of purchasing activity suggest a dynamic market. Future trends will depend on whether new mom-and-pop investors continue to enter and if the significant price advantage for all investors persists in an increasingly competitive environment.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 04:49 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Ohio (IN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Ohio (IN) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-in-ohio/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.