Jim Hogg (TX) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Jim Hogg (TX) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Jim Hogg (TX)
1,723
Total Investors in Jim Hogg (TX)
541
Investor Owned SFR in Jim Hogg (TX)
531(30.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
489
SFR Owned
464
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
52
SFR Owned
71
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 531 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Jim Hogg County: A Mom-and-Pop Investor Stronghold Capturing 80% of Home Sales
Investors own 30.8% of all single-family homes in Jim Hogg County, with small-scale landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 96.7% of that portfolio. In Q4 2025, these investors dominated the market by purchasing 80% of all homes sold, demonstrating aggressive, grassroots expansion with zero institutional presence.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 531 SFR properties, with individuals holding 87.4% of the portfolio.
The vast majority of investor-owned properties are held in cash (492 properties) versus financed (39 properties). Of the total portfolio, 519 properties are actively rented, confirming a strong rental focus in the market.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured a 20.8% price discount compared to homeowners in Q3 2025.
This translated to an average savings of $45,738 per property ($174,635 vs. $220,373). However, pricing advantages fluctuate in this low-volume market, as investors paid a 2.7% premium in Q2 2025. No landlord purchases were recorded in Q1 2026.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords dominated the Q4 2025 market, purchasing 80.0% of all homes sold.
All (100.0%) landlord purchases were made by new, single-property investors entering the market. Institutional investors made zero acquisitions, highlighting the market's grassroots nature.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 96.7% of all investor-owned housing.
Single-property landlords alone own 391 homes, a commanding 71.4% of the entire investor portfolio. Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have zero presence in the county.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors own 90.9% of single-property portfolios, with companies only leading in larger tiers.
The ownership structure shifts at the 11-20 property tier, where companies become the majority owners, holding 71.4% of properties. Below this level, individuals are the dominant force.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is almost entirely concentrated in the 78361 zip code, which contains 530 properties.
The investor ownership rate is notably high across the county, reaching 33.3% in the 78360 zip code and 30.8% in 78361. This indicates a significant investor presence in the local housing market.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 11 properties for every 1 sold in 2025.
This trend of accumulation was also evident in 2024, when investors purchased 24 properties and sold only 4. Institutional investors recorded no transactions, indicating all activity stems from smaller players.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords accounted for 80.0% of all market transactions in Q4 2025, buying 4 properties.
All 4 landlord purchases were made by new, single-property investors. Crucially, none of these acquisitions were from other landlords, signifying organic expansion of the rental market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 531 SFR properties, with individuals holding 87.4% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant footprint in Jim Hogg County, owning 531 single-family residential properties, which accounts for 30.8% of the total 1,723 SFRs in the market.

Ownership is overwhelmingly concentrated among 489 individual landlords who control 464 properties, or 87.4% of the investor portfolio. This is in sharp contrast to the 71 properties (13.4%) held by 52 companies.

The financial strategy of these investors leans heavily towards stability and low leverage. A remarkable 492 properties (92.7%) are owned outright with cash, while only 39 are financed.

The portfolio's primary purpose is clear, with 519 properties classified as rented, showcasing a deep commitment to providing rental housing in the county.

This composition of individual, cash-heavy ownership points to a stable, locally-driven investment market rather than one influenced by large, leveraged corporations.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured a 20.8% price discount compared to homeowners in Q3 2025.
Detailed Findings

In the most recent quarter with comparable sales data, Q3 2025, investors demonstrated a strong purchasing advantage, acquiring homes for an average price of $174,635.

This represents a 20.8% discount compared to the $220,373 paid by traditional homeowners, saving investors an average of $45,738 per transaction.

This pricing advantage can be inconsistent, a common trait in low-volume markets. For instance, in Q2 2025, landlords paid a small 2.7% premium, indicating that deal structure and property specifics can heavily influence prices.

A clear long-term appreciation trend is evident, with average acquisition prices for landlords climbing from $106,235 during the 2020-2023 period to over $137,000 in 2024 and 2025.

The absence of any recorded landlord purchases in Q1 2026 suggests a pause in activity, making historical data crucial for understanding market dynamics.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords dominated the Q4 2025 market, purchasing 80.0% of all homes sold.
Detailed Findings

Investor demand surged in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 4 of the 5 total SFRs sold in Jim Hogg County, capturing an 80.0% market share of purchases.

This activity was driven exclusively by new entrants. All 4 properties were purchased by single-property landlords, indicating fresh capital flowing into the rental market.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) accounted for 100.0% of investor acquisitions, while mid-size and institutional investors were completely inactive.

The data reveals a market where growth is fueled by individuals making their first rental property purchase, not by existing landlords expanding their portfolios.

This pattern of entry-level investment underscores the accessibility of the local market and its reliance on small-scale capital.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 96.7% of all investor-owned housing.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Jim Hogg County is unequivocally controlled by small-scale operators. Landlords owning 1-10 properties hold 96.7% of all investor-owned SFRs.

The single-property landlord (Tier 01) is the cornerstone of the market, alone accounting for 391 properties, or a 71.4% share.

The next largest segment, landlords with 3-5 properties, controls a distant 12.2% of the portfolio, showcasing a steep drop-off in portfolio size.

There is no evidence of institutional capital, as investors in the 1,000+ property tier own 0.0% of the market.

This distribution reveals a highly fragmented market composed almost entirely of small, independent landlords, challenging any narrative of corporate consolidation.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors own 90.9% of single-property portfolios, with companies only leading in larger tiers.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the primary owners across most portfolio sizes, particularly at the entry level, where they own 359 of the 395 single-property rentals (90.9%).

This individual dominance continues into the small landlord tiers, with individuals owning 87.5% of two-property portfolios and 80.6% of those with 3-5 properties.

A clear crossover point emerges in the 11-20 property tier. Here, company ownership becomes the majority, controlling 10 of the 14 properties (71.4%).

This trend suggests that as investors scale their operations beyond 10 properties, they are more likely to adopt a formal corporate structure for management and liability purposes.

Despite this shift at a higher tier, the market as a whole remains controlled by individuals, who own 464 of the 531 total investor properties (87.4%).

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is almost entirely concentrated in the 78361 zip code, which contains 530 properties.
Detailed Findings

The geographic focus of investors in Jim Hogg County is incredibly sharp, with virtually all activity occurring in a single area. The 78361 zip code is home to 530 of the 531 investor-owned SFRs.

This intense concentration indicates that local knowledge and targeted strategies drive the market, rather than a broad, county-wide approach to real estate investing.

Investor ownership rates are substantial, signaling a deep market penetration. Investors own one-third (33.3%) of the homes in the 78360 zip code and nearly one-third (30.8%) in the much larger 78361 zip code.

These high percentages far exceed national averages and establish investors as a critical component of the local housing ecosystem.

The data paints a picture of a small but highly saturated investment market, with deep investor involvement in specific neighborhoods.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 11 properties for every 1 sold in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Historical transaction data reveals a clear and sustained strategy of portfolio growth among landlords in Jim Hogg County. In 2025, their buy-to-sell ratio was an overwhelming 11 to 1.

This resulted in a net gain of 10 properties for the year, as investors purchased 11 homes while only selling one.

This behavior is not a recent development. The trend was firmly established in 2024, when landlords bought 24 properties and sold just 4, a 6-to-1 ratio.

This consistent, multi-year pattern of net buying signals strong investor confidence and a commitment to expanding their holdings in the local market.

With zero institutional activity, this accumulation is entirely driven by the mom-and-pop investors who define the area, steadily increasing the supply of rental housing.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords accounted for 80.0% of all market transactions in Q4 2025, buying 4 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investors were the primary movers in the Q4 2025 housing market, participating in 4 of the 5 total SFR transactions and claiming an 80.0% market share.

The entirety of this activity was concentrated at the entry level, with 4 transactions all attributed to new single-property landlords.

This shows that growth is coming from new capital, as individuals make their first foray into real estate investment.

A significant finding is that 0% of these purchases were from other landlords. This means investors are acquiring properties from the homeowner market, thereby increasing the overall stock of rental properties rather than just trading existing assets among themselves.

The lack of transactions in any other tier reinforces that the market's current energy and liquidity are exclusive to the small, mom-and-pop segment.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Dominated by small investors, Jim Hogg County sees mom-and-pop landlords buy 80% of homes amid 0% institutional ownership.
Holdings
Landlords own 531 SFR properties, representing a 30.8% share of the Jim Hogg County market. Individual investors control a commanding 87.4% of this portfolio (464 properties), with companies owning the remaining 13.4% (71 properties).
Pricing
In Q3 2025, investors paid 20.8% less than traditional homeowners, an average discount of $45,738 per property ($174,635 vs. $220,373).
Activity
Investors dominated Q4 2025, purchasing 4 of the 5 homes sold (80.0% market share), all of which were acquired by new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
The market is a mom-and-pop stronghold, with small landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 96.7% of investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) have no presence (0.0%).
Ownership Type
Individual investors overwhelmingly control smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in the 11-20 property tier, signaling a shift to corporate structures as portfolios scale.
Transactions
Landlords are in a strong accumulation phase, acting as net buyers with an 11-to-1 buy/sell ratio in 2025 (11 buys vs. 1 sell). Institutional investors were completely inactive.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Jim Hogg County, Texas is a microcosm of a truly local, grassroots investor ecosystem. Investors own a substantial 531 properties, comprising 30.8% of the county's total SFR housing stock. This market is overwhelmingly shaped by small, independent operators. Individual investors own 87.4% of the rental portfolio, and mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 96.7% of all investor-owned homes. In stark contrast, institutional-scale investors have zero presence, making this a market defined by community-level capital.

Investor behavior is characterized by aggressive acquisition and strategic purchasing. In the last active quarter, Q4 2025, landlords purchased 80.0% of all homes sold, with all activity coming from new, single-property investors. This demonstrates ongoing growth fueled by new entrants rather than large-scale consolidation. These investors also show a keen ability to find value, securing properties at a 20.8% discount to homeowners in Q3 2025. The long-term trend is clear: landlords are committed net buyers, acquiring 11 properties for every one they sold in 2025, steadily expanding the local rental supply.

The key takeaway from these Investor Pulse reports is that the Jim Hogg County housing market is heavily influenced by a large base of small, cash-heavy landlords who are actively growing their holdings. Their deep market penetration, concentrated geographic focus in the 78361 zip code, and consistent net-buying activity make them a powerful and stabilizing force. The absence of institutional players ensures that the market's future will continue to be shaped by the decisions of these independent operators, signaling a stable and predictable rental environment.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 03:44 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Jim Hogg (TX)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Jim Hogg (TX) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-tx-jim_hogg/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.