Big Horn (WY) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Big Horn (WY) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Big Horn (WY)
3,293
Total Investors in Big Horn (WY)
2,209
Investor Owned SFR in Big Horn (WY)
1,534(46.6%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,014
SFR Owned
1,360
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
195
SFR Owned
219
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,534 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Big Horn County, Controlling 99.5% of Investor SFRs and Capturing 39.4% Discounts
Investors own 46.6% of all single-family residential properties in Big Horn County, with small, individual landlords controlling 99.5% of that portfolio. In Q1 2026, investors paid 39.4% less than traditional homeowners, signaling a focus on value acquisitions. While the market is in a strong accumulation phase, the county's sole institutional investor is a net seller, reinforcing the dominance of local, small-scale investment.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,534 SFRs in Big Horn County, with individual landlords holding 88.7% of properties.
Cash is the preferred financing method, used for 1,049 properties compared to 485 that are financed. The portfolio is almost entirely focused on rentals, with 1,523 properties (99.3%) classified as rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured a massive 39.4% discount in Q1, paying $203,145 while homeowners paid $335,011.
The price gap between landlords and homeowners has been highly volatile, swinging from a minimal 2.6% discount in Q3 2025 to the current 39.4%. This quarter's $131,866 average discount is the largest observed in the past year.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 36.8% of all single-family homes sold in Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords were responsible for 100% of these purchases, acquiring 15 properties. Activity was concentrated at the smallest scale, with 15 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 99.5% of all investor-owned SFRs in Big Horn County.
In stark contrast, institutional investors with 1,000+ properties own just one single property, representing a mere 0.1% of the market share. The single-property landlord tier alone accounts for 89.0% of all investor holdings.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies assume majority ownership at the 6-10 property tier, signaling a shift to professionalization.
Individual investors overwhelmingly control smaller portfolios, owning 89.6% of single-property holdings. However, in the 6-10 property tier, company ownership jumps to 90.9%.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with zip code 82420 showing an 84.5% investor ownership rate.
The zip code with the most investor-owned properties is 82410 with 368 units. However, several other zip codes, like 82423 (77.8%) and 82412 (75.5%), exhibit even higher saturation rates.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 9.9x buy-to-sell ratio in 2025, while institutional investors are net sellers.
In 2025, landlords collectively purchased 109 properties while selling only 11. In contrast, the sole institutional investor was divesting, selling 3 properties and buying only 2.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlord activity represented 34.5% of all single-family transactions in Q1 2026.
All 20 of these transactions were conducted by mom-and-pop investors, with zero institutional activity. Notably, 0% of these purchases were from other landlords, indicating all acquisitions came from the traditional market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,534 SFRs in Big Horn County, with individual landlords holding 88.7% of properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership has a significant footprint in Big Horn County, with landlords holding 1,534 single-family properties, which accounts for 46.6% of the total 3,293 SFRs in the market.

The market is overwhelmingly characterized by small-scale ownership, with 1,360 properties (88.7%) held by individual investors compared to just 219 (14.3%) owned by companies. This dynamic is also reflected in the entity count, where 2,014 of the 2,209 total landlords are individuals.

A strong preference for all-cash acquisitions is evident, with 1,049 investor-owned properties held free of financing. This figure is more than double the 485 properties that are financed, indicating a well-capitalized investor base that can move quickly on opportunities without relying on traditional lending.

The investor portfolio is almost exclusively dedicated to generating rental income. A total of 1,523 properties are classified as rented, which represents 99.3% of the entire investor-owned SFR stock in the county. This high penetration rate underscores a buy-and-hold strategy focused on rental yields.

This composition of holdings, dominated by individual cash buyers focused on rentals, paints a clear picture of a market driven by local, long-term real estate investing rather than corporate or speculative activity.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured a massive 39.4% discount in Q1, paying $203,145 while homeowners paid $335,011.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords demonstrated a powerful purchasing advantage, acquiring properties for an average price of $203,145. This was $131,866 less than the $335,011 average paid by traditional homeowners, representing a steep 39.4% discount.

The price gap between investor and homeowner acquisitions has shown extreme volatility over the past year. The discount surged from just 2.6% ($7,887) in Q3 2025, highlighting a market where landlord purchasing power can shift dramatically from one quarter to the next.

This fluctuation suggests investors are highly opportunistic, likely targeting distressed properties or off-market deals that are not attracting typical homeowner competition. The ability to secure such a large discount indicates a focus on acquiring assets well below market value.

Comparing prices over a longer period, the average acquisition price during the 2020-2023 boom years was $212,199. The current Q1 2026 price of $203,145 is slightly below this pandemic-era average, suggesting that investors are finding value even as the broader market may have appreciated.

The consistent ability to pay significantly less than homeowners is a core strategic advantage for investors in Big Horn County, allowing them to achieve higher potential returns on their rental portfolios.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 36.8% of all single-family homes sold in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors represented a major purchasing force in the Big Horn County market during Q4 2025, acquiring 14 of the 38 total SFRs sold, a market share of 36.8%.

The entirety of this acquisition activity was driven by small investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) accounted for 100% of the 15 properties purchased by investors, with zero activity from institutional buyers.

The quarter saw a fresh wave of market entrants, with the 'single-property' tier leading all activity. In this tier, 15 new entities acquired 12 distinct properties, signaling a healthy influx of first-time landlords.

Activity was concentrated at the lowest end of the investor spectrum. The two-property tier added just 3 properties across 3 entities, reinforcing that the market's growth is fueled by new, small-scale participants.

This pattern of acquisition, entirely dominated by new and small mom-and-pop buyers, confirms that the competitive landscape for housing in Big Horn County is shaped by local investors, not large corporations.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 99.5% of all investor-owned SFRs in Big Horn County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Big Horn County is defined by the absolute dominance of small landlords. Mom-and-pop investors, who own between 1 and 10 properties, collectively control 99.5% of all investor-owned SFRs.

This concentration at the small end of the market is extreme. Landlords owning just a single property represent the largest group, holding 1,385 properties, which is 89.0% of the entire investor portfolio.

Institutional ownership is practically nonexistent. The 1,000+ property tier contains only one property in the entire county, accounting for a negligible 0.1% of the investor market. This finding directly counters any narrative of large-scale corporate ownership in the area.

Mid-size landlords also have a very small footprint. Tiers representing 11 to 50 properties collectively own just 7 properties, or less than 0.5% of the total. The market structure clearly lacks a significant mid-tier segment.

The data unequivocally shows a highly fragmented market composed almost entirely of small, local landlords, with the investment journey for most beginning and ending with just one or two properties.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies assume majority ownership at the 6-10 property tier, signaling a shift to professionalization.
Detailed Findings

A distinct pattern emerges when analyzing ownership structure by portfolio size. While individual investors form the backbone of the market, companies become the dominant legal structure for larger portfolios.

Individuals overwhelmingly own the smallest portfolios. In the single-property tier, individuals own 1,276 of the properties (89.6%), and in the two-property tier, they own 64 properties (71.1%).

The strategic crossover point occurs in the 6-10 property tier. At this stage, company ownership surges to 90.9% (20 properties), indicating that investors formalize their operations into a corporate entity as their holdings grow beyond a handful of homes.

This trend continues into the small-medium tiers. For portfolios of 11-20 properties, companies own 66.7% of the homes, solidifying the pattern of professionalization with scale.

This data reveals a clear lifecycle for real estate investors in the county: they typically start as individuals and incorporate their business once their portfolio reaches a scale of about 6 properties, likely for liability protection and financial management purposes.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with zip code 82420 showing an 84.5% investor ownership rate.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Big Horn County is not evenly distributed, but rather concentrated in specific geographic pockets. Certain zip codes show extremely high levels of investor penetration, with some communities composed mostly of rental properties.

The zip code 82420 stands out with an 84.5% investor ownership rate, meaning more than 4 out of every 5 single-family homes there are owned by an investor. Other highly saturated areas include 82423 (77.8%) and 82412 (75.5%).

While some areas are defined by high rates, others are notable for high volume. The zip code 82410 contains the highest count of investor-owned properties at 368, which corresponds to a 70.0% ownership rate.

This distinction between high-count and high-rate areas reveals different market dynamics. High-count areas represent the largest hubs of rental housing, while high-rate areas signify markets that are almost entirely shaped by investor activity.

Analysis of detailed assessor data at the zip code level is crucial for understanding these localized pockets of intense investment, as county-wide averages can obscure such concentrations. Note that data for zip code 82401 was not available for rate calculation.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 9.9x buy-to-sell ratio in 2025, while institutional investors are net sellers.
Detailed Findings

The overall investor market in Big Horn County is in a definitive accumulation phase. Transaction data shows landlords are overwhelmingly net buyers, consistently acquiring far more properties than they sell.

In 2025, the net buying activity was particularly strong, with 109 properties purchased versus only 11 sold. This trend was also robust in 2024, with 122 buys and 14 sells, demonstrating a multi-year pattern of portfolio growth across the market.

A significant divergence in strategy appears when isolating institutional activity. The county's single institutional-scale investor (1,000+ properties) was a net seller in 2025, with 2 buys and 3 sells. This retreat from the market runs directly counter to the behavior of smaller investors.

This contrast highlights two parallel stories: a broad base of mom-and-pop landlords are actively growing their presence in the county, while the only large-scale player is reducing its small footprint.

The persistent net buying from the vast majority of investors signals strong confidence in the local rental market and a long-term hold strategy, with little portfolio churn or sell-off activity observed.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlord activity represented 34.5% of all single-family transactions in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

In the first quarter of 2026, investors were involved in 20 of the 58 total single-family property transactions, capturing a 34.5% share of all market activity.

Transaction volume was exclusively driven by the smallest investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (tiers 01-04) accounted for all 20 investor transactions, with 15 of those initiated by single-property landlords. This reinforces that market momentum comes from new and small-scale players.

A crucial finding from the quarter is the source of these acquisitions. None of the 20 properties purchased by investors were bought from other landlords (0.0% inter-landlord). This means investors are expanding the rental pool by acquiring homes from traditional homeowners or new construction, not just trading assets among themselves.

The average purchase price for the most active group, single-property landlords, was $203,145. With zero institutional transactions, a price comparison between the largest and smallest investors is not possible for this quarter.

The data paints a picture of a market where small investors are actively pulling housing stock from the owner-occupied market into the rental market, driving the 34.5% landlord share of transactions.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Big Horn County, Owning 99.5% of Investor SFRs in a 46.6% Saturated Market
Holdings
Investors own 1,534 single-family properties in Big Horn County, representing a significant 46.6% of the total market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by individual investors, who own 1,360 properties (88.7%), compared to 219 (14.3%) owned by companies.
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords acquired properties at a steep 39.4% discount compared to traditional homeowners, paying an average of $203,145 while homeowners paid $335,011, a difference of $131,866.
Activity
Landlord activity accounted for 36.8% of all SFR purchases in Q4 2025, with small investors driving 100% of this volume. The market saw 15 new single-property landlords enter during the quarter, purchasing 12 properties.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) control a near-total 99.5% of all investor-owned housing in the county. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) hold just a single property, representing 0.1% of the share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors form the foundation of the market, but a strategic shift occurs at the 6-10 property tier, where companies become the majority owners (90.9%). This indicates a professionalization of operations as portfolios grow.
Transactions
The investor market is in a strong accumulation phase, with landlords acting as net buyers (109 buys vs. 11 sells in 2025). Conversely, the county's sole institutional investor was a net seller in 2025, divesting from the market.
Market Narrative

The real estate market in Big Horn County, Wyoming is heavily shaped by investor activity, which now accounts for 46.6% of all single-family residential properties. The total investor portfolio consists of 1,534 homes, but this market is not a target for Wall Street. Instead, it is the quintessential mom-and-pop landscape. Small landlords owning 1-10 properties control a staggering 99.5% of investor-owned housing, while individual investors, rather than corporations, hold 88.7% of these assets. Institutional ownership is virtually absent, with only a single property held by a large-scale investor.

Investor behavior in Big Horn County is characterized by aggressive, value-oriented acquisition. In Q1 2026, landlords purchased properties at an average 39.4% discount compared to traditional homeowners, a gap of $131,866 per home. This purchasing power is actively deployed, with investors acquiring 36.8% of all homes sold in the previous quarter. The market is in a clear accumulation phase, as landlords were strong net buyers in 2025 (109 buys vs. 11 sells). This contrasts sharply with the county’s sole institutional player, which was a net seller, highlighting a strategic divergence between local investors and large capital.

The key takeaway for Big Horn County is that its housing market is driven by a large, fragmented base of local investors who are steadily growing their portfolios. The high investor penetration in certain zip codes, some exceeding 80%, suggests that rental housing is the dominant tenure in those communities. The primary market dynamic is the continued conversion of properties from the traditional sales market to the small-investor rental pool, a trend that defines local housing access and affordability. These patterns are critical to understanding the local market, and similar insights can be found in other market reports.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 09:31 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Big Horn (WY)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Big Horn (WY) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-wy-big_horn/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.