Dawson (MT) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Dawson (MT) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Dawson (MT)
1,676
Total Investors in Dawson (MT)
406
Investor Owned SFR in Dawson (MT)
371(22.1%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
373
SFR Owned
332
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
33
SFR Owned
42
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 371 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Dawson County's rental market is a mom-and-pop stronghold, with individual investors controlling 99.5% of properties and buying at a 43% discount.
Investors own 371 SFR properties, 22.1% of the market, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 99.5% of that portfolio. In Q1 2026, landlords acquired 25.0% of all properties sold, paying a remarkable 43.0% less than traditional homeowners. The market is defined by consistent net buying from small, individual investors, with institutional firms having zero presence.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 371 SFRs in Dawson County, with individuals holding a dominant 89.5% share.
The vast majority of holdings are paid in cash (307 properties) versus financed (64 properties). Out of 371 investor properties, 363 are designated as rentals, representing a 97.8% focus on non-owner-occupied assets.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords bought at a 43.0% discount in Q1, paying $104,797 less than homeowners.
The price gap is highly volatile, swinging from a 53.8% landlord premium in Q1 2025 to a 43.0% discount in Q1 2026. This indicates an opportunistic, non-uniform purchasing strategy. Data on individual versus company pricing is not available.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 25.0% of all SFR properties sold in Dawson County during Q1.
Activity was entirely driven by small investors, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) accounting for 100% of all landlord purchases. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) made zero acquisitions, showing no presence in the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 99.5% of Dawson County's rental housing.
The market is exclusively controlled by small landlords, with no presence from institutional investors (0.0% ownership). Price data by tier is unavailable, but Q1 purchasing was entirely from the single-property tier. Institutional investors are not a factor in this market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors dominate all portfolio sizes, holding 90.3% of single-property portfolios and 73.7% of 6-10 property portfolios.
Unlike larger markets, there is no crossover point where companies become the majority owners in Dawson County. Institutional companies own zero properties. The entire rental market, from single homes to the largest local portfolios, is controlled by individual investors.
Geographic Distribution
The 59330 zip code (Glendive) is the epicenter of investment, holding 352 of the county's 371 investor-owned properties.
While the 59330 zip code has the highest volume, smaller zip codes like 59259 and 59339 show higher penetration rates of 75.0% and 50.0% respectively, albeit with very few properties. This suggests investment is highly concentrated in the county's main population center.
Historical Transactions
Investors in Dawson County are consistent net buyers, acquiring 22 properties while only selling 9 in 2025.
The net buying trend continued in Q1 2026 with 3 purchases versus only 1 sale. Transaction volume appears to be consistent year-over-year, with 26 purchases in 2024 and 22 in 2025. Data comparing average buy and sell prices is not available.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlord activity accounted for 25.0% of all single-family transactions in Q1 2026.
All Q1 landlord transactions were made by new mom-and-pop investors (Tier 01) at an average price of $138,669. Institutional investors made no transactions. Notably, 0% of these purchases came from existing landlords, indicating new supply entering the rental market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 371 SFRs in Dawson County, with individuals holding a dominant 89.5% share.
Detailed Findings

In Dawson County, investors hold 371 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, which constitutes 22.1% of the total 1,676 SFRs in the market. This reveals a significant investor presence in the local housing stock.

The ownership structure is overwhelmingly dominated by individuals. Individual investors own 332 properties, or 89.5% of the investor-owned portfolio, compared to just 42 properties (11.3%) owned by companies. This highlights a market driven by local real estate investing rather than corporate interests.

Analysis of financing shows a strong preference for cash acquisitions. Investors own 307 properties outright (cash), more than four times the 64 properties that are financed. This suggests that many investors in the area are well-capitalized and operate with low leverage.

The portfolio is heavily geared towards rental income. A total of 363 of the 371 investor-owned properties are classified as rented, meaning 97.8% of the portfolio is actively used for non-owner-occupied purposes. This indicates a clear focus on generating rental yield.

The market comprises 406 distinct landlord entities, with 373 being individuals and 33 being companies. The higher number of individual landlords compared to their property count underscores the prevalence of small-scale, mom-and-pop operations.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords bought at a 43.0% discount in Q1, paying $104,797 less than homeowners.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, investors demonstrated a remarkable ability to acquire properties below market rates, paying an average of $138,669. This was a substantial 43.0% less than the $243,466 paid by traditional homeowners, resulting in a savings of $104,797 per property.

The price advantage for investors is not consistent, showing extreme volatility over the past year. In Q1 2025, landlords paid a staggering 53.8% premium, averaging $333,594 compared to the homeowner average of $216,909. This swing from a significant premium to a deep discount suggests investors are not broadly participating in the market but are instead targeting specific, opportune deals as they arise.

Comparing recent periods, the average landlord acquisition price in 2024 was $134,353, closely aligning with the pandemic-era (2020-2023) average of $135,871. This indicates price stability for investor-targeted properties, even as homeowner prices fluctuate.

The significant discount achieved in Q1 2026 and Q2 2025 (36.2% discount) points to a strategy focused on acquiring undervalued assets, likely off-market or distressed properties that are less appealing to traditional homebuyers.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 25.0% of all SFR properties sold in Dawson County during Q1.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity represented a significant portion of the market in Q1 2026, with landlords purchasing 3 of the 12 total SFRs sold, capturing a 25.0% market share of acquisitions.

The entirety of this purchasing activity came from the smallest investor segment. All 3 properties were acquired by new, single-property (Tier 01) landlords, meaning 100% of Q1 investment was from mom-and-pop operators.

This quarter saw the entry of 3 new landlords into the Dawson County market, each acquiring their first investment property. This signals grassroots growth in the local rental market rather than expansion by existing portfolio holders.

There was a complete absence of activity from larger investors. Mid-size landlords and institutional investors (Tier 09) made zero purchases, reinforcing the character of Dawson County as a market exclusively for smaller, local players.

The concentration of all activity in the Tier 01 category highlights a low barrier to entry and ongoing opportunities for new individuals to begin their real estate investment journey in the area.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 99.5% of Dawson County's rental housing.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Dawson County is defined by the absolute dominance of small-scale landlords. Mom-and-pop investors, those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04), control 99.5% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone account for the vast majority of the rental stock, owning 266 properties, which is 67.5% of the entire investor-owned market. This tier forms the bedrock of the local rental housing supply.

Ownership concentration dissipates rapidly in larger tiers. Landlords with 2 properties hold an 11.2% share, those with 3-5 properties hold another 11.2%, and those with 6-10 properties control 9.6%.

There is virtually no presence of medium to large investors. The small-medium (21-50 properties) and medium-large (51-100 properties) tiers each contain only a single property, representing a combined 0.6% of the market.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have zero ownership in Dawson County. This market structure stands in stark contrast to national narratives about corporate landlord dominance, showing a purely local and small-scale investor ecosystem.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors dominate all portfolio sizes, holding 90.3% of single-property portfolios and 73.7% of 6-10 property portfolios.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the primary owners across every single investor tier in Dawson County, with no portfolio size where companies hold a majority stake. This pattern emphasizes the personal, non-corporate nature of the local rental market.

In the largest tier of new entrants, single-property landlords, individuals own 243 of the 266 properties, a 90.3% share. This shows that the overwhelming majority of new investors are private citizens rather than corporate entities.

Even as portfolios grow, individuals maintain control. In the 6-10 property tier, the largest active segment in the county, individuals own 28 properties (73.7%) compared to 10 for companies (26.3%).

The data reveals no crossover point at which companies become the dominant owner type. In many markets, this shift occurs in mid-size tiers, but in Dawson County, individual ownership prevails throughout.

Company ownership is a minor component of the market, representing only 9.7% of single-property landlords and 11.4% of two-property landlords, with their highest concentration being 26.3% in the 6-10 property tier.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 59330 zip code (Glendive) is the epicenter of investment, holding 352 of the county's 371 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Dawson County is heavily concentrated in a single geographic area. The 59330 zip code, which includes the city of Glendive, contains 352 of the 371 total investor-owned properties, accounting for 94.9% of all investor holdings.

In this primary zip code, the investor ownership rate is 21.3%, indicating that more than one in five single-family homes is investor-owned. This highlights the importance of rental properties to the local housing market.

While 59330 dominates by volume, smaller, more rural zip codes exhibit higher investor penetration rates. For instance, in 59259, investors own 18 properties, representing a 75.0% ownership rate. Similarly, the single investor-owned property in 59339 constitutes 50.0% of that area's SFR stock.

This pattern reveals a clear distinction between investment volume and saturation. The vast majority of capital is deployed in the county's population center, while investment in surrounding rural areas, though representing a higher percentage of the local housing, is minimal in absolute terms.

The data for zip code 59315 was incomplete, preventing a full analysis of that sub-region. However, the available data confirms that Glendive (59330) is the undisputed hub for real estate investor activity in the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Investors in Dawson County are consistent net buyers, acquiring 22 properties while only selling 9 in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Dawson County are consistently in an accumulation phase, acting as net buyers across all recent timeframes. This signals confidence in the local rental market and a long-term hold strategy.

In 2025, investors purchased 22 properties while selling only 9, resulting in a net gain of 13 properties to the overall rental portfolio. This represents a buy-to-sell ratio of 2.44 to 1.

The trend was even more pronounced in 2024, when landlords acquired 26 properties and sold only 2, a net increase of 24 properties and a powerful 13-to-1 buy/sell ratio.

The net-buyer position continued into the most recent quarter, Q1 2026, with 3 acquisitions against just 1 disposition. This consistent behavior shows a steady expansion of investor portfolios in the county.

Institutional investors (1000+ tier) recorded no transactions during any of these periods, underscoring that all market dynamics are driven by smaller, local landlords.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlord activity accounted for 25.0% of all single-family transactions in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords were a key component of market activity, participating in 3 of the 12 total SFR transactions for a 25.0% market share. This level of participation underscores their role in providing market liquidity.

All transaction activity was driven by new entrants. The 3 landlord purchases were all made by single-property (Tier 01) investors, who paid an average price of $138,669 for their first rental homes.

Significantly, none of the investor purchases in Q1 were from other landlords. The 0% 'Bought From Landlords' rate means that investors were acquiring properties from homeowners or other sources, thereby expanding the total rental housing pool rather than just trading existing rental assets.

No transactions were recorded by mid-size or institutional investors, confirming that the transactional market, like the ownership market, is exclusively the domain of mom-and-pop operators.

The focus on new, small-scale acquisitions at prices well below the homeowner average suggests a healthy and accessible market for individuals looking to start their investment portfolios.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Dawson County's rental market is a mom-and-pop stronghold, with individual investors controlling 99.5% of properties and buying at a 43% discount.
Holdings
Investors own 371 SFR properties, representing 22.1% of Dawson County's market. Ownership is dominated by individual investors holding 332 properties (89.5%), while companies own just 42 (11.3%).
Pricing
In Q1, landlords paid an average of $138,669, a significant 43.0% less than traditional homeowners ($243,466), securing a discount of $104,797 per property.
Activity
Landlords comprised 25.0% of all Q1 market purchases, with all 3 acquisitions made by new, single-property investors entering the market for the first time.
Market Share
The market is almost exclusively controlled by small landlords (1-10 properties), who own 99.5% of all investor-held housing, while institutional investors have no presence (0.0%).
Ownership Type
Individual investors command ownership across all portfolio sizes, from single-property (90.3%) to small portfolios (73.7% of 6-10 unit owners). There is no tier where companies are the majority owner.
Transactions
Investors in Dawson County are consistent net buyers, with 3 purchases versus 1 sale in Q1 2026. Institutional investors are entirely absent from transactional activity.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Dawson County, Montana, is a definitive example of a market dominated by local, individual participants. Investors own 371 single-family properties, a 22.1% share of the county's total SFR housing stock. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who account for 99.5% of all investor-owned homes. The market structure is further defined by the prevalence of individual owners (89.5%) over companies (11.3%), with institutional investors having zero presence. This composition reflects a grassroots rental market, built and maintained by community-level operators, a sharp contrast to the corporate narratives often seen in larger metropolitan areas. For more details on local markets, explore our market reports.

Investor behavior in Dawson County is characterized by strategic, value-oriented acquisitions and consistent portfolio growth. In the first quarter of 2026, landlords purchased 25.0% of all homes sold, demonstrating significant market influence. They achieved these acquisitions at a striking 43.0% discount compared to traditional homeowners, paying an average of $138,669. This activity was driven entirely by new, single-property investors entering the market. Historically, investors have been strong net buyers, consistently adding more properties than they sell, signaling long-term confidence in the local rental economy. This is supported by deep property-level insights derived from accurate assessor data.

The key takeaway from Dawson County is the resilience and dominance of the small, independent landlord. This market operates entirely outside the sphere of institutional capital, creating an environment where individuals can enter and build portfolios. The significant purchasing discounts suggest that these investors are skilled at finding off-market or undervalued opportunities. For the local housing market, this means a substantial portion of the rental supply is managed not by distant corporations, but by local owners, creating a distinct and stable investment ecosystem.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 10:09 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Dawson (MT)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Dawson (MT) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-mt-dawson/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.