Saline (IL) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Saline (IL) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Saline (IL)
8,205
Total Investors in Saline (IL)
1,132
Investor Owned SFR in Saline (IL)
1,016(12.4%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,060
SFR Owned
943
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
72
SFR Owned
90
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,016 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Saline County's Real Estate Market, Acquiring Properties at a 71% Discount
Investors own 1,016 SFR properties in Saline County, IL, representing 12.4% of the market. This ownership is overwhelmingly concentrated among small, individual landlords (94.1%), who were strong net buyers in Q1 2026, purchasing properties at an average discount of 71.0% compared to traditional homeowners. Institutional investors have a negligible presence, owning just 0.3% of the investor-held housing stock.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,016 properties in Saline County, with individuals holding 92.8% of them.
The majority of investor-owned properties are held in cash (898) versus being financed (118). A total of 961 properties are actively rented, making up the vast majority of the 1,016-property portfolio.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords in Saline County paid 71.0% less than homeowners in Q1 2026, a $100,840 discount.
This massive discount represents a significant widening from previous quarters; for example, the discount was 26.2% in Q1 2025. This trend highlights an increasing ability for investors to secure properties far below the typical market rate paid by homeowners.
Current Quarter Purchases
Investors purchased 15.0% of all SFR properties sold in Saline County during the last quarter.
Mom-and-pop landlords were responsible for 100% of these 9 investor purchases. Activity was led by the creation of 5 new single-property landlords, signaling healthy grassroots entry into the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 94.1% of investor-owned SFRs.
This dominance leaves a negligible footprint for larger investors. Institutional landlords in the 1000+ property tier own just 0.3% of the investor-held housing stock in Saline County.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors dominate every small and large portfolio tier except for the 21-50 property range.
Companies only become the majority owner in the small 21-50 property tier, holding 75.0% of properties. However, this tier is tiny, containing only 4 properties in total.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is concentrated in Harrisburg (62946), which holds 495 investor-owned properties.
While Harrisburg has the highest count, the zip code 62965 has the highest investor penetration rate at 26.9%. Other key areas for investors include Carrier Mills (62917) and Eldorado (62930), both with a 13.9% ownership rate.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Saline County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 9 properties for every 1 they sold in Q1 2026.
This trend of accumulation is not new; landlords were also strong net buyers in 2025 (35 buys vs. 22 sells) and 2024 (49 buys vs. 16 sells). No institutional transaction data was available, consistent with their minimal presence.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 12.9% of all Saline County SFR transactions in the most recent quarter.
All 9 of these transactions were conducted by mom-and-pop investors. Notably, 0% of these purchases were from other landlords, indicating that investors are acquiring their inventory from the traditional homeowner market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,016 properties in Saline County, with individuals holding 92.8% of them.
Detailed Findings

In Saline County, IL, investors hold a total of 1,016 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, which constitutes 12.4% of the total 8,205 SFRs in the market. This highlights a significant, yet not dominant, investor presence in the local housing landscape.

Individual investors are the overwhelming force, owning 943 properties, or 92.8% of the investor-owned portfolio. In contrast, company-owned properties number just 90, accounting for only 8.9%, underscoring the market's reliance on local, small-scale real estate investing rather than corporate ownership.

The investor base itself is composed of 1,132 distinct landlord entities, with individuals again making up the vast majority at 1,060 (93.6%) compared to just 72 company entities. This nearly 15-to-1 ratio of individual to company landlords reinforces the grassroots nature of the rental market in the county.

A strong preference for all-cash ownership is evident, with 898 properties owned outright versus only 118 that are financed. This suggests that investors in this market are well-capitalized and may be less sensitive to interest rate fluctuations.

The portfolio is heavily focused on rental income, with 961 of the 1,016 properties identified as rented. This demonstrates a clear strategy of long-term holding and cash flow generation among Saline County's investor community.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords in Saline County paid 71.0% less than homeowners in Q1 2026, a $100,840 discount.
Detailed Findings

A staggering price gap exists between what landlords and traditional homeowners pay in Saline County. In Q1 2026, investors acquired properties for an average of $41,133, which is 71.0% less than the $141,973 average paid by homeowners, representing a massive discount of $100,840 per property.

This price advantage for investors has been consistently large but widened dramatically in the most recent quarter. In Q2 2025, the discount was an even larger 81.8% ($119,062), while it was narrower in Q1 2025 at 26.2% ($27,777), indicating significant volatility in the types of properties investors are acquiring.

The average acquisition price for landlords has fluctuated, with an average of $64,411 in 2024 and $48,449 in 2025. This is considerably lower than homeowner prices, suggesting a consistent strategy of targeting undervalued or off-market properties.

The data reveals a clear pattern of investors operating in a different price tier than the general market. This ability to purchase at such a deep discount is a primary driver of investor activity and profitability in the region.

The persistence of this gap across multiple quarters suggests that landlords are not directly competing with traditional homebuyers for the same inventory. Instead, they are likely leveraging specialized strategies to find and secure deals well below market value.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Investors purchased 15.0% of all SFR properties sold in Saline County during the last quarter.
Detailed Findings

Landlords captured a significant portion of the market in the last quarter, purchasing 9 of the 60 total SFR properties sold, which accounts for a 15.0% market share. This level of activity indicates a steady and influential investor presence in Saline County.

The entirety of this purchasing activity came from mom-and-pop investors in Tiers 01-04. Institutional investors (Tier 09) made zero acquisitions, reinforcing that the market's growth is driven by small, local operators.

New entrants are a key component of market activity. Five new single-property landlords entered the market, accounting for 55.6% of all investor-purchased properties. This demonstrates a low barrier to entry and continued interest from first-time investors.

The remaining acquisitions were made by a single entity in the 3-5 property tier, which purchased 4 properties (44.4% of the investor total). This highlights that even the more active buyers are small-scale operators consolidating small portfolios.

The complete absence of purchases from mid-size or institutional tiers shows a highly fragmented market where scale does not currently play a role in acquisition strategy. All activity is concentrated at the smallest end of the investor spectrum.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 94.1% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure in Saline County is unequivocally dominated by small investors. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04), control a massive 94.1% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone are the backbone of the market, holding 735 properties, which represents 69.3% of the entire investor portfolio. This highlights the hyper-fragmented nature of rental ownership in the county.

In stark contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties (Tier 09) have a nearly nonexistent presence, controlling just 3 properties, or 0.3% of the investor-owned market. This finding runs counter to narratives of corporate landlord takeovers.

Mid-size investors also play a very limited role. Landlords owning between 11 and 100 properties collectively hold only 34 properties, a mere 3.3% of the total investor portfolio.

Even the 'Large' tier of landlords (101-1000 properties) is comprised of smaller-scale operators, with just 26 properties (2.5%) in this category. The data consistently shows that the Saline County rental market is built on small, independent ownership.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors dominate every small and large portfolio tier except for the 21-50 property range.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors maintain majority ownership across nearly every portfolio size in Saline County. In the crucial single-property tier, individuals own 693 of 735 properties (93.0%), demonstrating that new market entrants are overwhelmingly individuals, not corporations.

The crossover point where companies become the majority owners is the 21-50 property tier. In this small segment, companies own 3 of the 4 properties (75.0%). However, the limited size of this tier makes the crossover statistically insignificant for the broader market.

Even at larger scales, individuals persist as the primary owners. In the 101-1000 property tier, individuals own 25 of the 26 properties (96.2%), a surprising finding that shows even sizable portfolios are personally held.

Company ownership is most concentrated in percentage terms in the 21-50 property tier, but in terms of property count, their largest holding is in the single-property tier, with 52 properties.

This ownership pattern reveals that forming a company is not a prerequisite for scaling a rental portfolio in Saline County. The market is defined by individual capital and management, from the first-time landlord to those holding dozens of properties.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is concentrated in Harrisburg (62946), which holds 495 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals specific pockets of investor concentration within Saline County. The zip code 62946 (Harrisburg) is the epicenter of investor ownership by volume, with 495 investor-owned SFRs, representing an 11.6% ownership rate.

However, the highest market penetration is found elsewhere. The zip code 62965 shows the highest density of investor activity, with 26.9% of its housing stock owned by landlords, indicating a strong focus on this smaller submarket.

Several other zip codes also show significant investor presence. Both 62917 (Carrier Mills) and 62930 (Eldorado) have an investor ownership rate of 13.9%, making them key secondary markets for rental properties in the county.

Eldorado (62930) also stands out for its high volume of investor properties, with 298 in total, making it the second-largest submarket by count after Harrisburg.

This data illustrates that investor strategy varies by location. While some areas attract a high volume of properties, others represent markets with a much higher percentage of rental homes, signaling different types of opportunities for investors.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Saline County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 9 properties for every 1 they sold in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Transaction data reveals a clear and consistent trend of portfolio accumulation among Saline County landlords. In Q1 2026, investors were aggressive net buyers, with 9 purchases against only 1 sale, a buy-to-sell ratio of 9-to-1.

This behavior is part of a multi-year pattern. In the full year 2025, landlords acquired 35 properties while selling only 22, resulting in a net gain of 13 properties. The trend was even stronger in 2024, with 49 buys and 16 sells for a net gain of 33 properties.

The only recent period showing net selling was Q2 2025, when landlords sold 8 properties and purchased 4. This appears to be a short-term anomaly in an otherwise consistent long-term strategy of expansion.

The sustained net buying activity, coupled with the significant discounts observed in acquisition pricing, indicates a confident and opportunistic investor base actively expanding its footprint in the local market.

Given the negligible presence of institutional investors, this accumulation is being driven entirely by small, local landlords who are consistently adding to their portfolios year after year.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 12.9% of all Saline County SFR transactions in the most recent quarter.
Detailed Findings

In the first quarter of 2026, landlords participated in 9 out of 70 total SFR transactions, capturing 12.9% of all market activity. This share, while significant, shows that the majority of sales still involve non-investor parties.

All investor transaction activity was driven by mom-and-pop landlords. Single-property investors (Tier 01) were the most active, conducting 5 transactions, while small landlords (Tier 03) conducted the other 4.

An interesting pricing dynamic emerged between the tiers. The new, single-property landlords paid a significantly higher average price of $73,400, whereas the more established small landlord paid just $25,000 on average. This may reflect different acquisition strategies or property types targeted by new versus existing investors.

A critical finding is that none of the investor purchases came from other landlords (0% inter-landlord transactions). This indicates that investors are sourcing their properties primarily from homeowners or estate sales rather than trading assets among themselves.

The complete lack of transaction activity from institutional or even mid-sized investors further solidifies the view of Saline County as a market defined by small-scale, independent real estate operations.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop investors command Saline County's market with 94.1% ownership, buying at a 71% discount
Holdings
Landlords own 1,016 SFR properties, 12.4% of Saline County's market, with individual investors holding 92.8% of this portfolio compared to just 8.9% for companies.
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords paid 71.0% less than traditional homeowners, securing an average discount of $100,840 per property ($41,133 vs. $141,973).
Activity
Investors purchased 15.0% of all homes sold in the last quarter, with 5 new single-property landlords entering the market and mom-and-pop investors accounting for 100% of activity.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 94.1% of investor-owned housing, while large institutional investors (1000+) own a negligible 0.3%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate nearly all portfolio sizes; companies only gain a majority in the tiny 21-50 property tier, which contains just four properties total.
Transactions
Investors in Saline County are aggressive net buyers with a 9-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 2026, continuing a multi-year trend of portfolio growth.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Saline County, IL is defined by the overwhelming dominance of small, independent operators. Investors own 1,016 single-family homes, representing 12.4% of the total market. This portfolio is firmly in the hands of individuals, who own 92.8% of these properties, compared to just 8.9% for companies. The market structure is hyper-fragmented, with 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 94.1% of all investor-owned housing, while institutional firms with over 1,000 properties have a virtually nonexistent footprint at 0.3%.

Investor behavior in Saline County is characterized by opportunistic acquisitions and steady accumulation. In the first quarter of 2026, landlords were responsible for 15.0% of all home purchases and demonstrated a powerful pricing advantage, paying an average of 71.0% less than traditional homeowners. This translates to a $100,840 discount per property, suggesting a focus on distressed or off-market assets. This activity is fueling growth, with investors acting as strong net buyers, acquiring nine properties for every one they sold in the quarter, a continuation of a multi-year expansionary trend.

The key takeaway for the Saline County housing market is that it operates as a grassroots ecosystem, driven by local capital and independent landlords rather than large corporations. The significant pricing discounts achieved by investors indicate they occupy a separate niche, likely not competing directly with typical homebuyers. This dynamic, combined with consistent net buying, signals a stable and growing rental market managed by a broad base of small-scale owners who are deeply invested in the community.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 04:23 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Saline (IL)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Saline (IL) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-il-saline/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.