Chittenden (VT) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Chittenden (VT) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Chittenden (VT)
37,341
Total Investors in Chittenden (VT)
3,758
Investor Owned SFR in Chittenden (VT)
2,891(7.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,934
SFR Owned
2,066
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
824
SFR Owned
908
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,891 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Chittenden County with 99% Ownership, Institutions Absent
Investors own 2,891 single-family homes in Chittenden County, representing 7.7% of the market. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (99.0%), with individual investors holding 71.5% of all properties. In Q1 2026, landlords remained net buyers, acquiring properties at a 5.8% discount compared to traditional homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors hold 2,891 SFR properties, with individuals owning 71.5% of the portfolio.
All 2,891 investor-owned properties are held in cash, with no financing recorded. Of these, 2,817 are confirmed rented, indicating a strong focus on rental income generation. Individuals comprise the majority of landlords, with 2,934 individual entities compared to 824 companies.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 5.8% less than homeowners in Q1 2026, a discount of $33,559.
The price gap between landlords and homeowners has been highly volatile, swinging from a massive 29.9% landlord discount in Q1 2025 to a 5.5% landlord premium in Q3 2025. Landlord acquisition prices have risen from a pandemic-era average of $482,770 to $546,465 in Q1 2026.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 7.4% of all single-family homes sold in Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords were responsible for 93.3% of all investor purchases in the quarter, acquiring 14 of the 15 properties. Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties made zero purchases, highlighting their absence from the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 99.0% of investor-owned SFRs in Chittenden County.
Single-property landlords alone own 83.8% of all investor-held housing, a total of 2,472 properties. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a 0.0% market share, with no properties held in this tier.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors are the majority owners across all small portfolio tiers.
Individuals own 73.9% of properties in the single-property tier and 56.1% in the 3-5 property tier. A crossover point where companies become the majority is not reached in the available data, as individuals maintain a majority in all detailed tiers.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is concentrated in Colchester (05446) and Burlington (05401).
Winooski (05404) has the highest investor penetration rate at 21.0%, followed by Burlington (05401) at 14.1%. Colchester (05446) leads by sheer volume with 480 investor-owned properties, though its rate is lower at 12.1%.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Chittenden County are strong net buyers, acquiring 3.3 times more properties than they sold in Q1 2026.
This trend of accumulation is consistent over time, with landlords maintaining a 3.17x buy-to-sell ratio throughout 2025. In Q1 2026, landlords purchased 20 properties while only selling 6.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 6.7% of all Q1 2026 transactions.
First-time or single-property investors dominated activity, conducting 17 of the 20 landlord transactions. Strikingly, 0% of investor purchases in the quarter were from other landlords, indicating they acquire property exclusively from the non-investor market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors hold 2,891 SFR properties, with individuals owning 71.5% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

In Chittenden County, investors hold a 7.7% share of the single-family residential market, totaling 2,891 properties. The ownership structure is heavily skewed towards private individuals rather than corporations, challenging the narrative of a market dominated by large firms.

Individual investors own 2,066 properties, which accounts for a commanding 71.5% of the investor-owned portfolio. Companies own the remaining 908 properties, or 31.4%, highlighting the significance of small-scale real estate investing in the local housing ecosystem.

A striking financial pattern reveals that 100% of the 2,891 investor-owned properties are held free and clear with no financing. This all-cash position suggests investors in this market are well-capitalized and may be less sensitive to interest rate fluctuations compared to leveraged investors in other regions.

The portfolio is clearly geared towards generating rental income, with 2,817 properties classified as rented. This high rental penetration underscores the primary strategy of local investors: long-term holds for cash flow.

The entity count further reinforces the dominance of small landlords. There are 3,758 distinct landlord entities in the county, with individuals (2,934) outnumbering companies (824) by more than a 3-to-1 margin.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 5.8% less than homeowners in Q1 2026, a discount of $33,559.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, investors in Chittenden County purchased properties at a notable discount compared to the general market. The average landlord acquisition price was $546,465, which is 5.8% less than the $580,024 paid by traditional homeowners, saving investors an average of $33,559 per property.

However, this pricing advantage is not consistent and has shown extreme volatility. In Q3 2025, landlords paid a 5.5% premium, averaging $631,931 versus the homeowner price of $599,158. This fluctuation suggests that investor purchasing strategies may shift opportunistically based on available inventory and market conditions.

Looking back further reveals even larger discounts. In Q1 2025, investors secured properties for just $420,937, a staggering 29.9% discount ($179,929) compared to the homeowner average of $600,866, marking a period of significant buyer advantage for investors.

The average acquisition price for landlords has shown clear appreciation over time. Prices have climbed from an average of $482,770 during the 2020-2023 period to $546,465 in the most recent quarter, reflecting broad market price growth.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 7.4% of all single-family homes sold in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for 7.4% of the Chittenden County market in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 15 of the 202 total SFR properties sold. This moderate purchase share indicates a steady but not overwhelming investor presence in new transactions.

The acquisitions were almost entirely driven by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) purchased 14 of the 15 properties, making up 93.3% of investor buying activity. This demonstrates that the growth in investor-owned housing is fueled by local, small-portfolio owners.

New entrants and single-property owners were particularly active, with this tier alone accounting for 12 property purchases, or 80.0% of the total investor acquisitions. This influx of new landlords signals continued interest in the local rental market.

In stark contrast, institutional-scale investors (1,000+ properties) had no purchasing activity in the quarter, recording zero acquisitions. Their 0.0% share of purchases reinforces that Chittenden County is not a target market for large corporate landlords.

The data shows a concentration of activity at the smallest end of the investor spectrum, with 17 distinct entities making purchases in the single-property tier, further cementing the market's mom-and-pop character.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 99.0% of investor-owned SFRs in Chittenden County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Chittenden County is unequivocally dominated by small-scale landlords. Mom-and-pop investors, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, control 99.0% of all investor-owned single-family residences, a figure that underscores the near-total absence of larger players.

The concentration at the smallest end of the spectrum is profound. Landlords owning just a single property (Tier 01) hold 2,472 homes, which represents 83.8% of the entire investor-owned SFR portfolio in the county. This highlights that the typical investor is a local resident with one rental property, not a corporate entity.

Mid-size landlords (11-1,000 properties) have a negligible presence, collectively owning just 1.0% of the investor-owned housing stock. This segment's minimal share reinforces the market's structural reliance on small, independent owners.

Institutional investors, often a focus of housing market discussions, have a 0.0% ownership share in Chittenden County. This complete lack of institutional presence is a defining characteristic of the local market, differentiating it from many other regions nationwide.

The data paints a clear picture of a decentralized market, with ownership spread across thousands of small landlords rather than being concentrated in a few large portfolios. Accessing detailed assessor data is crucial for understanding such granular ownership patterns.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors are the majority owners across all small portfolio tiers.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the bedrock of the Chittenden County rental market, maintaining majority ownership across every small portfolio tier. In the largest tier, single-property owners, individuals hold 1,880 properties (73.9%) compared to 665 owned by companies (26.1%).

This pattern of individual dominance continues as portfolio sizes increase slightly. For landlords owning two properties, individuals own 60.3% of the homes. For those owning 3-5 properties, individuals still hold a 56.1% majority.

The data does not show a crossover point where companies become the majority owners. The overwhelming concentration of properties in these smaller, individual-dominated tiers suggests that company ownership only becomes a factor, if at all, in the very thin upper tiers of the market which represent a tiny fraction of total properties.

This ownership structure indicates that the decisions driving the local rental market are made by thousands of individual owners rather than a handful of corporate boards. Understanding their behavior requires granular property data API that can differentiate between owner types.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is concentrated in Colchester (05446) and Burlington (05401).
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals that investor ownership in Chittenden County is not evenly distributed, with significant concentration in a few key zip codes. Colchester (05446) and Burlington (05401) are the top two areas by pure volume, holding 480 and 459 investor-owned properties, respectively.

However, when measuring by ownership rate, Winooski (05404) emerges as the most investor-concentrated market. In this zip code, 21.0% of all single-family residences are investor-owned, a rate significantly higher than the county average of 7.7%.

Burlington (05401) also shows a high penetration rate at 14.1%, making it a hotspot for both high volume and high concentration of rental properties. This suggests a strong rental demand in the city's core.

Other areas with notable investor presence include Essex Junction (05452) and South Burlington (05403), although their ownership rates are closer to the county average. The top 5 zip codes by count collectively house a significant portion of the county's entire investor-owned portfolio.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Chittenden County are strong net buyers, acquiring 3.3 times more properties than they sold in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Chittenden County are actively expanding their portfolios, consistently buying more properties than they sell. In Q1 2026, landlords were aggressive net buyers, purchasing 20 single-family homes while only divesting 6, resulting in a net gain of 14 properties and a strong 3.33x buy-to-sell ratio.

This accumulation trend is not a recent phenomenon. It holds true across all recent timeframes. For the full year of 2025, investors bought 130 properties and sold 41, for a net increase of 89 properties and a similarly robust 3.17x ratio. In 2024, the ratio was even higher, with 209 buys to 71 sells.

This sustained net buying activity indicates strong confidence in the local rental market. Investors are clearly in an expansion phase, choosing to reinvest and grow their holdings rather than cashing out on appreciated assets.

As institutional investors are absent from this market, this growth is driven entirely by mom-and-pop and mid-size landlords who are methodically increasing their footprint in the county.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 6.7% of all Q1 2026 transactions.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlord transactions constituted 6.7% of all SFR market activity in Chittenden County, with investors involved in 20 of the 297 total transactions. This reflects a consistent but modest level of direct investor participation in the market's liquidity.

Transaction activity was heavily concentrated among the smallest investors. The single-property (Tier 01) landlord segment was responsible for 17 of the 20 transactions, or 85% of all investor activity. This again shows that the market's dynamism comes from new and small-scale participants.

A critical finding from the Q1 data is the complete absence of inter-landlord trading. Investors made 0% of their purchases from other landlords, meaning all 20 acquisitions came from traditional homeowners or other non-investor sellers. This suggests a lack of portfolio trading and a focus on converting owner-occupied housing to rentals.

An inverse price-to-size relationship emerged in Q1 transactions. Single-property investors paid the highest average price at $572,906, while the one small-medium investor (11-20 properties) paid the lowest at $370,000. This suggests smaller investors may be competing more directly with homeowners for desirable properties, while larger investors target different, lower-priced assets.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Chittenden County's investor market is defined by small, individual landlords who control 99% of holdings while institutions remain absent.
Holdings
Investors own 2,891 SFR properties, 7.7% of Chittenden County's market, with individual investors holding a dominant 71.5% (2,066 properties) and companies owning the remaining 28.5% (908 properties).
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords paid 5.8% less than homeowners, securing an average discount of $33,559 per property ($546,465 vs. $580,024), though this price advantage has been highly volatile in previous quarters.
Activity
Landlords purchased 7.4% of homes sold in Q4 2025, an acquisition pace driven almost exclusively by mom-and-pop investors who accounted for 93.3% of these purchases.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the market with 99.0% of all investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+) have zero presence, owning just 0.0%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, holding 73.9% of single-property assets, and they maintain majority ownership across all reported tiers, with no clear crossover point to company control.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 3.33x buy/sell ratio in Q1 2026 (20 buys vs 6 sells), steadily accumulating properties. Institutional investors are not a factor in transactions.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Chittenden County, VT, is fundamentally a story of the small, local landlord. Investors own 2,891 properties, making up 7.7% of the total SFR housing stock. This market is defined not by corporations, but by individuals, who own 71.5% of these homes. The distribution of ownership is exceptionally granular: mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 99.0% of the investor-owned inventory, while institutional-scale investors have absolutely no presence. This decentralized structure suggests a market driven by community-level economics rather than national corporate strategies.

Investor behavior in Chittenden County is characterized by steady, cash-fueled accumulation. In Q1 2026, investors were strong net buyers, acquiring 3.3 homes for every one they sold, a consistent trend seen over the past two years. They typically purchase at a modest discount, paying 5.8% less than traditional homeowners in the most recent quarter. Activity is concentrated at the entry-level, with single-property investors driving 85% of Q1 transactions. Critically, these acquisitions are sourced entirely from the non-investor market, as 0% of purchases were from other landlords, indicating a consistent conversion of owner-occupied stock to rentals.

The key takeaway for Chittenden County is its insulation from the institutional investment wave seen elsewhere. The market's health and the nature of its rental housing are shaped by thousands of individual owners, nearly all of whom own their properties outright with cash. This financial independence and local focus create a unique and stable market dynamic, but also mean that growth in the rental supply comes directly from the stock of homes available for traditional homebuyers. These detailed market dynamics are often uncovered in comprehensive market reports.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 05:15 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Chittenden (VT)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Chittenden (VT) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-vt-chittenden/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.