Moffat (CO) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Moffat (CO) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Moffat (CO)
4,014
Total Investors in Moffat (CO)
1,449
Investor Owned SFR in Moffat (CO)
1,101(27.4%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,317
SFR Owned
953
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
132
SFR Owned
150
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,101 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Moffat County, Owning 99.1% of Investor SFRs and Acquiring 25.5% of Homes in Q1
In Moffat County, investors own 1,101 SFR properties, a significant 27.4% of the market. This ownership is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (99.1%) versus a mere 0.2% for institutional investors. In Q1 2026, landlords remained strong net buyers with a 4.0x buy/sell ratio, though pricing behavior was volatile, with investors paying a 3.8% premium compared to traditional homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,101 SFRs, 27.4% of the Moffat County market, with individuals holding 86.6%.
The majority of these properties (717) are owned outright with cash, compared to 384 that are financed. Nearly all investor-owned properties in the county (99.0%) are operated as rentals, indicating a strong focus on long-term investment.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid a 3.8% premium in Q1 2026, averaging $354,545 vs homeowners at $341,564.
This Q1 premium marks a dramatic reversal from previous quarters, showcasing extreme price volatility. Landlords secured a 32.5% discount in Q3 2025 and an 8.3% discount in Q2 2025, indicating that buying advantages fluctuate significantly in this market.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 26.5% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025.
Activity was entirely driven by mom-and-pop investors, who accounted for 100% of the 9 landlord purchases. All acquisitions were made by 12 new single-property landlord entities, signaling fresh entrants into the rental market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 99.1% of investor-owned homes in Moffat County.
This market is overwhelmingly comprised of the smallest investors, as the single-property tier alone owns 84.9% of all investor SFRs. In stark contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties own just 0.2% of the local portfolio.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners only in larger portfolios of 21-50 properties.
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate every smaller tier, holding 89.1% of single-property portfolios and 87.5% of two-property portfolios. Companies represent a small fraction of the market but are more concentrated in larger holdings.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is hyper-concentrated, with zip code 81625 holding 86% of all investor-owned SFRs.
While 81625 has the highest volume with 947 properties, smaller zip codes show much higher saturation rates. Zip codes 81653 and 81640 are 100.0% and 75.9% investor-owned respectively, indicating pockets of extremely high rental density.
Historical Transactions
Investors remained strong net buyers in Q1 2026, with a 4-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio.
Landlords purchased 12 homes while selling only 3 in Q1, continuing a multi-year trend of portfolio growth. However, the overall acquisition pace has slowed from its peak, with annual buys dropping from 77 in 2024 to 49 in 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 25.5% of all real estate transactions in Q1 2026.
Activity was exclusively driven by the smallest investors, with all 12 landlord purchases made by single-property landlords at an average price of $354,545. Only one of these transactions (8.3%) was a landlord-to-landlord sale.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,101 SFRs, 27.4% of the Moffat County market, with individuals holding 86.6%.
Detailed Findings

In Moffat County, investors hold a significant 1,101 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, which constitutes 27.4% of the total 4,014 SFRs in the market. This high penetration rate highlights the importance of real estate investing in the local housing ecosystem.

Individual investors are the primary force, owning 953 properties, or 86.6% of the investor-owned portfolio. Company-owned properties, totaling 150, make up the remaining 13.6%, underscoring the market's reliance on smaller, non-corporate landlords.

The financing profile of these holdings reveals a preference for cash purchases. A total of 717 properties are owned free-and-clear, substantially outnumbering the 384 properties that carry a mortgage. This suggests many local investors have strong capital positions and may be less sensitive to interest rate fluctuations.

The portfolio is almost entirely dedicated to rental housing. Of the 1,101 investor-owned SFRs, 1,090 are classified as rented properties. This 99.0% rental rate demonstrates a clear strategy focused on generating rental income rather than short-term speculation.

When looking at the landlords themselves, the individual dominance is even more pronounced. There are 1,317 individual landlords compared to just 132 company entities, a ratio of nearly 10 to 1. This structure defines the local market as one built on small-scale, personal investment.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid a 3.8% premium in Q1 2026, averaging $354,545 vs homeowners at $341,564.
Detailed Findings

In a surprising turn, landlords in Moffat County paid more than traditional homeowners in Q1 2026, with an average acquisition price of $354,545 compared to the homeowner average of $341,564. This represents a $12,981 premium, or 3.8%, paid by investors.

This recent premium defies the typical investor discount and highlights extreme volatility in pricing dynamics. The price advantage for landlords has swung wildly over the past year, from a massive 48.6% premium in Q1 2025 to a deep 32.5% discount in Q3 2025.

The Q3 2025 data shows landlords paying just $236,769 on average, a staggering $114,072 less than homeowners, who paid $350,841. This fluctuation suggests that investor purchase prices are highly dependent on the specific properties available in a given quarter in this low-volume market, rather than a consistent market-wide discount.

Comparing prices across longer timeframes, the average acquisition price during the 2020-2023 boom period was $224,118. This is significantly lower than prices in 2024 ($278,422) and 2025 ($272,548), reflecting broad market appreciation over the last few years.

The lack of a consistent discount suggests that investors in Moffat County may not be relying on sourcing undervalued properties but are instead competing directly with retail buyers for available inventory, with outcomes varying greatly quarter to quarter.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 26.5% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

During Q4 2025, landlords demonstrated significant market activity, acquiring 9 of the 34 total SFRs sold in Moffat County. This accounts for a 26.5% share of all purchases, indicating strong and persistent investor demand.

The acquisition activity was exclusively concentrated at the smallest end of the investor spectrum. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were responsible for 100% of investor purchases during the quarter, with no activity from mid-size or institutional players.

Further analysis reveals that all 9 properties were purchased by investors in the single-property tier. This group consists of 12 distinct entities, suggesting the entry of 12 new landlords into the market, some possibly through co-ownership arrangements.

The complete absence of purchases from investors in Tiers 05 through 09 highlights that market growth is being driven from the ground up. New, small-scale investors are the sole source of acquisition momentum, a key feature of Moffat County's investor landscape.

With 0% of purchases coming from institutional investors, the data counters the narrative of large corporations dominating new acquisitions. Instead, it points to a healthy, decentralized market of local buyers expanding the rental housing supply one property at a time.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 99.1% of investor-owned homes in Moffat County.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure in Moffat County is defined by the dominance of small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords, who own between 1 and 10 properties, collectively control 99.1% of all investor-owned SFRs, a figure that showcases an almost total absence of larger players.

The foundation of the investor market is the single-property landlord. This tier alone accounts for 958 properties, representing 84.9% of the entire investor portfolio. This concentration underscores the market's granular, decentralized nature.

Mid-size investors (11-1000 properties) have a negligible presence, collectively owning less than 1% of the investor-held housing stock. This indicates a significant barrier or lack of incentive for portfolios to scale up in this particular market.

Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a near-zero footprint, with just 2 properties, or 0.2% of the investor market share. This finding directly contradicts the common narrative of large corporate landlords controlling residential housing and is a defining characteristic of Moffat County.

This distribution, detailed in the property ownership by owner type report, illustrates a market sustained by local individuals and small family operations rather than consolidated corporate interests. The entire rental housing stock provided by investors is almost exclusively in the hands of the community's smallest landlords.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners only in larger portfolios of 21-50 properties.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the backbone of the Moffat County rental market across nearly every portfolio size. In the largest tier of single-property landlords, individuals own 855 of the 958 properties, an 89.1% share.

The dominance of individual ownership continues into slightly larger portfolios. Individuals own 87.5% of two-property portfolios and 64.7% of portfolios containing 3-5 properties, confirming that small-scale management is the norm.

A clear crossover point emerges in the 21-50 property tier, where companies finally become the majority owners. In this small segment, companies own 2 of the 3 properties, representing a 66.7% share. This is the only tier where a corporate structure is the preferred ownership method.

This pattern suggests that as portfolios grow beyond a certain size, the legal and financial benefits of a corporate structure become more advantageous for management and liability purposes. However, very few investors in Moffat County reach this scale.

Overall, the data shows two distinct strategies: individuals dominate the vast majority of the market with smaller, personally managed portfolios, while a handful of larger portfolios operate under a more formal company structure.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is hyper-concentrated, with zip code 81625 holding 86% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The geographic distribution of investor-owned properties in Moffat County is extremely concentrated. A single zip code, 81625, contains 947 of the 1,101 investor properties, accounting for 86.0% of the entire investor portfolio in the county.

Despite its high volume, the investor ownership rate in 81625 is 25.0%, which is relatively moderate. This indicates it is a larger, mixed-use residential area rather than a pure investor enclave.

In contrast, several smaller zip codes exhibit much higher investor penetration rates, pointing to niche rental markets. Zip code 81653 is 100.0% investor-owned, while 81640 has an investor ownership rate of 75.9%, and 81610 is at 64.6%.

This distinction between high volume and high percentage is crucial. While the bulk of investor activity is in 81625, the most saturated rental markets are found in smaller, more specialized geographic pockets within the county.

These highly saturated areas, like 81640 and 81610, likely cater to specific housing needs, such as workforce or vacation rentals, where traditional homeownership is less common. Understanding this geographic nuance is key to analyzing the local market.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Investors remained strong net buyers in Q1 2026, with a 4-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Moffat County are actively expanding their portfolios, consistently buying more properties than they sell. In Q1 2026, investors were strong net buyers, acquiring 12 SFRs while disposing of only 3, resulting in a net gain of 9 properties and a 4.0 buy-to-sell ratio.

This pattern of accumulation has been consistent over time. In 2025, landlords purchased 49 properties and sold only 11, and in 2024, they purchased 77 while selling just 7. This long-term trend demonstrates a strong belief in the local rental market.

While investors remain net buyers, the pace of acquisitions has moderated recently. The 49 properties bought in 2025 represent a significant decrease from the 77 properties purchased in 2024, suggesting a potential market normalization or a response to higher interest rates and prices.

Transaction data for institutional investors (1,000+ properties) is unavailable, which is consistent with their near-zero ownership footprint in the county. All transactional activity is driven by the smaller mom-and-pop and mid-size segments.

The persistent net-buyer status, even amidst a slowing acquisition rate, signals that local investors are committed to long-term holds and continue to see value in expanding their rental offerings in Moffat County.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 25.5% of all real estate transactions in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for a quarter of the market in Q1 2026, with landlords participating in 12 of the 47 total SFR transactions. This 25.5% share underscores the consistent role investors play in providing market liquidity.

All landlord purchasing activity during the quarter came from the single-property (Tier 01) category. This indicates that Q1 growth was fueled entirely by new entrants or existing landlords adding their very first rental property, reinforcing the market's grassroots nature.

The average purchase price for these new and small landlords was $354,545. With no transactions recorded in any other tier, it's impossible to compare pricing strategies, but it does show the price point at which new investors are entering the Moffat County market.

Inter-landlord activity was minimal. Only 1 of the 12 investor purchases (8.3%) was sourced from another landlord. This suggests that most new inventory for investors is coming from the traditional homeowner market rather than from portfolio churn among existing investors.

The concentration of all transactions within the smallest tier is the defining story of Q1. The market's dynamism comes not from large players trading assets, but from a steady flow of new individuals making their first foray into real estate investment.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Moffat County's investor market is defined by small landlords, who own 99.1% of rental homes and drove 25.5% of Q1 sales.
Holdings
Landlords own 1,101 SFR properties, representing a significant 27.4% of the Moffat County market. Individual investors hold the vast majority with 953 properties (86.6%), while companies own 150 (13.6%).
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords paid a 3.8% premium over homeowners ($354,545 vs $341,564), a sharp reversal from prior quarters that highlights significant price volatility in the low-volume market.
Activity
Investors accounted for 25.5% of Q1 2026 transactions, with all 12 purchases made by new or single-property landlords. This grassroots activity shows the market continues to expand from the bottom up.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) have near-total control of the market, owning 99.1% of investor-held housing. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+) own just 0.2%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in the 21-50 property tier, marking a clear crossover point for ownership strategy at scale.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 4.0x buy/sell ratio in Q1 2026 (12 buys vs 3 sells), continuing a long-term trend of portfolio accumulation. No institutional transaction activity was recorded.
Market Narrative

In Moffat County, Colorado, the real estate investor landscape is a testament to the power of the small, local landlord. Investors own a substantial 1,101 single-family properties, a 27.4% share of the total market. This portfolio is overwhelmingly in the hands of individuals, who own 86.6% of these homes. The market structure detailed in our market reports shows near-total dominance by mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties), who control 99.1% of investor housing, while large institutional firms own a mere 0.2%.

Investor behavior in Q1 2026 underscores these themes. Landlords were active, accounting for 25.5% of all market transactions, and continued to be strong net buyers with a 4-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio. All purchasing activity came from new, single-property landlords, signaling grassroots market expansion. Pricing dynamics were volatile; after several quarters of securing discounts, investors paid a 3.8% premium over homeowners in Q1, suggesting they are competing directly for limited inventory rather than relying on off-market deals.

The key takeaway from Moffat County is that a high investor-ownership rate does not necessarily mean corporate control. Here, the market is characterized by decentralization, local ownership, and consistent growth driven by new entrants. This dynamic creates a stable rental housing supply managed by community members, a model that contrasts sharply with the institutional consolidation seen in major metropolitan areas. The market's future will be shaped not by boardroom decisions, but by the ongoing investment choices of hundreds of individual landlords.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 02:10 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Moffat (CO)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Moffat (CO) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-co-moffat/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.