Pierce (GA) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Pierce (GA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Pierce (GA)
6,392
Total Investors in Pierce (GA)
1,679
Investor Owned SFR in Pierce (GA)
1,615(25.3%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,552
SFR Owned
1,418
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
127
SFR Owned
203
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,615 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Pierce County, Acquiring 25.3% of Housing at a 45% Discount
Investors own 1,615 single-family properties in Pierce County, GA, representing 25.3% of the total market. This ownership is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (95.6%), who in Q1 paid an average of 45.3% less than traditional homeowners. The market shows strong accumulation, with landlords acting as decisive net buyers and no activity from institutional-scale investors.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,615 SFR properties, with individual landlords holding a dominant 87.8% share.
The vast majority of investor-owned properties, 1,449 in total, were acquired with cash, compared to only 166 that are financed. Investor portfolios are rental-focused, with 1,567 properties identified as rented. Overall, individual investors outnumber companies by more than 12 to 1 (1,552 individuals vs. 127 companies).
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured properties at a 45.3% discount in Q1, paying $109,671 less than homeowners.
This significant price advantage for landlords is a consistent trend, with discounts in the previous three quarters recorded at 37.2%, 38.3%, and a staggering 58.3%. The data shows investors consistently purchase properties for far less than the average homebuyer. No purchases were recorded for 2024 or 2025 in the provided landlord data.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 30.6% of all homes sold in the most recent quarter, with small investors driving 100% of the activity.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) were the only active buyers, acquiring all 15 investor-purchased homes. New and single-property investors (Tier 01) dominated, buying 13 of those properties (86.7%), signaling a healthy influx of new market participants. Institutional investors made zero purchases.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 95.6% of all investor-owned housing, with zero institutional ownership.
The market is highly concentrated at the smallest scale, with single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone owning 1,175 properties, which is 70.6% of the entire investor portfolio. Institutional investors in the 1,000+ property tier have no presence in Pierce County.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals dominate small portfolios, but companies own 90.9% of properties in the 21-50 tier.
The crossover point where companies become the majority owners occurs in the 21-50 property tier. Below this level, individuals are the clear majority, owning 93.3% of single-property portfolios and 88.4% of two-property portfolios. Institutional companies own zero properties in the county.
Geographic Distribution
Blackshear (31516) is the center of investor activity, holding 1,207 investor-owned properties.
While Blackshear leads in sheer volume, other zip codes show higher market penetration. Bristol (31518) has a 33.3% investor ownership rate, and Patterson (31557) follows closely at 29.9%. The small community of Offerman (31556) reports a 100.0% investor ownership rate, suggesting a small area with few, but all investor-owned, properties.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 6 properties for every 1 sold in Q1 2026.
This strong accumulation trend is consistent over time, as landlords were also net buyers throughout 2025 (171 buys vs. 58 sells) and 2024 (51 buys vs. 15 sells). Institutional investors recorded no transaction activity, playing no role in buying or selling.
Current Quarter Transactions
Investors were involved in 27.7% of all property transactions in Q1, with small landlords driving the activity.
Mom-and-pop investors accounted for 17 of the 18 landlord transactions. Single-property landlords were the most active, completing 15 transactions at an average price of $137,111. Only 6.7% of their purchases were from other landlords, showing a preference for buying from homeowners.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,615 SFR properties, with individual landlords holding a dominant 87.8% share.
Detailed Findings

In Pierce County, Georgia, landlords have a significant footprint, holding 1,615 single-family residential properties, which constitutes 25.3% of the total 6,392 SFRs in the market. This high concentration underscores the importance of real estate investing in the local housing ecosystem.

The ownership structure is overwhelmingly dominated by individuals rather than corporations. Individual landlords own 1,418 properties, or 87.8% of the investor-held portfolio, while companies own the remaining 203 properties (12.6%).

This trend extends to the entity level, where 1,552 individual landlords operate in the market compared to just 127 companies, a ratio of over 12 to 1. This highlights a market characterized by small-scale, local investment activity.

Financing patterns reveal a strong preference for cash transactions. A remarkable 1,449 properties in investor portfolios are owned outright, with only 166 properties carrying a mortgage. This suggests investors in this area have high liquidity and may be targeting properties not suitable for traditional financing.

The primary use for these properties is clear, with 1,567 of the 1,615 properties identified as rentals. This focus on rental income generation is the core strategy for investors in Pierce County.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured properties at a 45.3% discount in Q1, paying $109,671 less than homeowners.
Detailed Findings

A dramatic pricing gap separates investor acquisitions from those of traditional homeowners in Pierce County. In the first quarter of 2026, landlords paid an average of $132,509 per property, a staggering 45.3% less than the $242,180 paid by homeowners. This amounts to an average discount of $109,671 per home.

This is not an anomaly but a persistent market feature. In the preceding quarters of 2025, investors consistently paid significantly less: a 37.2% discount in Q3 ($208,867 vs. $332,486), a 38.3% discount in Q2 ($161,003 vs. $261,051), and a massive 58.3% discount in Q1 2025 ($95,621 vs. $229,439).

The persistence and magnitude of this discount suggest that investors are not competing in the same channels as typical buyers. Their acquisition strategy likely involves off-market deals, distressed properties, or other opportunities that allow for purchases well below market value.

Historical pricing data indicates that the average investor purchase price during the 2020-2023 boom period was $165,044. The Q1 2026 average of $132,509 is below this historical benchmark, signaling a potential cooling in the types of assets investors are acquiring or an even greater focus on discounted properties.

This pricing behavior highlights a fundamentally different approach to the housing market, where investors act as liquidity providers for non-traditional sales rather than direct competitors to owner-occupant buyers on the open market.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 30.6% of all homes sold in the most recent quarter, with small investors driving 100% of the activity.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for a significant portion of the Pierce County real estate market in the last quarter, with landlords acquiring 15 of the 49 total SFRs sold, a market share of 30.6%.

All of this purchasing activity came exclusively from mom-and-pop investors operating in Tiers 01-04. Not a single property was acquired by a mid-size or institutional-scale landlord, cementing the market's character as a small investor domain.

The overwhelming majority of acquisitions were made by the smallest players. First-time or single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active group, purchasing 13 properties, which represents 86.7% of all investor buying activity.

This influx of new entrants is significant, with 15 new entities making purchases in the single-property tier. This demonstrates a continuous flow of new capital into the local rental market from small-scale operators.

In stark contrast, institutional investors with portfolios of 1,000+ properties were completely absent from the market, recording zero purchases. This data directly counters the narrative of large corporations dominating housing acquisitions in this area.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 95.6% of all investor-owned housing, with zero institutional ownership.
Detailed Findings

The distribution of investor-owned properties in Pierce County is overwhelmingly concentrated among small-scale landlords. Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) control a combined 95.6% of all investor-held SFRs, demonstrating their foundational role in the local rental market.

This concentration is most pronounced at the very bottom of the scale. Landlords owning just a single property (Tier 01) make up the largest segment, holding 1,175 properties, or 70.6% of the total investor portfolio.

As portfolio sizes increase, the number of properties drops off sharply. Landlords with 2 properties hold 8.8% of the market, those with 3-5 properties hold 11.7%, and those with 6-10 properties hold just 4.5%.

Mid-size investors (11-1,000 properties) collectively own a mere 4.4% of the investor-held housing stock, showing limited scale-up in the region.

Crucially, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1,000+ properties) have a 0.0% share, owning no properties in Pierce County. This finding indicates the local market dynamics are shaped entirely by smaller, independent operators rather than large corporate entities.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individuals dominate small portfolios, but companies own 90.9% of properties in the 21-50 tier.
Detailed Findings

Ownership structure in Pierce County shifts significantly as portfolio sizes grow. For smaller portfolios, individual landlords are the undisputed majority. They own 93.3% of properties in the single-property tier and 88.4% in the two-property tier.

This individual dominance continues into the small landlord tiers, comprising 85.1% of properties for owners with 3-5 homes and 66.7% for those with 6-10 homes.

A clear transition to corporate ownership occurs as investors scale. In the 11-20 property tier, ownership is more balanced, with individuals holding 57.7% and companies 42.3%.

The definitive crossover point is in the 21-50 property tier, where companies take control, owning 40 of the 44 properties (90.9%). This indicates that landlords who reach this scale typically incorporate to manage their larger portfolios.

Despite this shift at the mid-size level, the overall market remains defined by the vast number of properties held by individuals in the smaller tiers, reinforcing the mom-and-pop character of Pierce County's investor landscape.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Blackshear (31516) is the center of investor activity, holding 1,207 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Pierce County is geographically concentrated, with the 31516 zip code (Blackshear) serving as the primary hub. This single area contains 1,207 investor-owned properties, representing the vast majority of investor activity in the county.

The second most active area by count is the 31557 zip code (Patterson), with 323 investor-owned homes. Together, these two zip codes form the core of the rental market in the region.

When analyzing by ownership rate, different areas stand out. The 31518 zip code (Bristol) has the highest penetration among populated areas, with investors owning 33.3% of all SFRs. Patterson (31557) also shows a high concentration, with a 29.9% investor ownership rate.

The 31556 zip code (Offerman) registers a 100.0% investor ownership rate, which likely reflects a very small number of total properties in that postal code that happen to all be rentals, rather than a large-scale investor takeover.

This data illustrates that while volume is centered in Blackshear, high investor penetration is present in several smaller communities throughout the county, indicating a widespread investment strategy across the region.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 6 properties for every 1 sold in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Transaction data reveals that landlords in Pierce County are in a phase of strong portfolio growth. In the first quarter of 2026, they purchased 18 properties while selling only 3, establishing a buy-to-sell ratio of 6-to-1 and demonstrating a clear net-buyer stance.

This pattern of accumulation is not new. It reflects a multi-year trend of expansion. Throughout 2025, landlords acquired 171 properties and sold just 58, and in 2024, they bought 51 and sold 15. This consistent net buying highlights long-term confidence in the local rental market.

The transaction volume shows a steady pace of acquisitions, with an average of over 40 properties purchased per quarter in 2025. This indicates a liquid market where investors are consistently able to find and close on new opportunities.

Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) were entirely absent from the transaction logs, recording zero buys and zero sells in all observed periods. Their lack of activity means the market's transactional dynamics are exclusively driven by the decisions of smaller, independent landlords.

This sustained net buying from mom-and-pop investors is a primary driver of the high 25.3% investor ownership rate in the county, as they steadily absorb available housing stock for rental purposes.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Investors were involved in 27.7% of all property transactions in Q1, with small landlords driving the activity.
Detailed Findings

In the first quarter of 2026, landlords played a major role in market liquidity, participating in 18 of the 65 total SFR transactions, a share of 27.7%. This level of involvement establishes them as a key component of the local real estate ecosystem.

The transaction activity was almost entirely driven by small investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were responsible for 17 of the 18 total investor transactions. This reinforces that market momentum comes from small-scale players, not large firms.

New entrants and single-property owners were the most dynamic group, making 15 transactions. Their average purchase price was $137,111, which aligns with the deep-discount strategy observed across the investor market.

Pricing varied across the active tiers. While the largest group of buyers paid $137,111, one investor in the 3-5 property tier paid a higher price of $187,100, and an investor in the two-property tier secured a deal for just $36,500.

Investors in Pierce County are primarily sourcing their properties from outside the investor community. Only 6.7% of purchases by single-property landlords were from other landlords, meaning the vast majority of acquisitions are from the traditional, owner-occupied market.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small Landlords Define Pierce County's Market, Owning 25% of Homes and Buying at a 45% Discount
Holdings
Landlords own 1,615 SFR properties in Pierce County, GA, representing 25.3% of the market. The portfolio is dominated by individual investors, who hold 1,418 properties (87.8%), compared to 203 (12.6%) for companies.
Pricing
In Q1, landlords paid 45.3% less than traditional homeowners, securing an average discount of $109,671 per property ($132,509 vs. $242,180).
Activity
Landlords purchased 30.6% of all homes sold in the most recent quarter, with 15 new single-property landlords entering the market. Mom-and-pop investors were responsible for 100% of this activity.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 95.6% of investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+) have no presence, owning 0.0% of the portfolio.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in the 21-50 property tier, where they control 90.9% of the assets.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 6.0x buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 (18 buys vs. 3 sells). Institutional investors are completely inactive, with zero recorded transactions.
Market Narrative

The real estate market in Pierce County, Georgia, is fundamentally shaped by a large and active base of small, independent investors. They own 1,615 single-family homes, which accounts for a significant 25.3% of the county's entire SFR housing stock. This landscape is not a corporate one; individual landlords own 87.8% of these properties. The market structure is overwhelmingly 'mom-and-pop,' with investors holding 1-10 properties controlling a massive 95.6% of the rental portfolio. In stark contrast, institutional-scale investors have zero presence, a key dynamic that defines local housing.

Investor behavior in Pierce County is characterized by aggressive acquisition and a sophisticated, deep-discount purchasing strategy. In the most recent quarter, landlords bought 30.6% of all homes sold and are acting as strong net buyers with a 6-to-1 buy-sell ratio. Their most notable tactic is a profound pricing advantage; in Q1, they paid 45.3% less than traditional homeowners, an average savings of $109,671 per home. This suggests a focus on off-market deals, distressed assets, or other opportunities unavailable to the general public, rather than direct competition for listings. Such findings are often derived from comprehensive assessor data combined with transactional records.

The key takeaway is that Pierce County's housing market is heavily influenced by a decentralized network of individual investors who are steadily growing their portfolios. Their ability to acquire properties at a steep discount provides a floor for the market and a source of liquidity for non-traditional sales. This high penetration rate and consistent accumulation make the mom-and-pop landlord the single most significant force in the local investment scene, a trend detailed in Investor Pulse reports that track such market dynamics. The health and direction of the housing market here are intrinsically tied to the continued activity of these thousands of small operators.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 07:44 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Pierce (GA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Pierce (GA) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ga-pierce/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.