Hall (NE) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Hall (NE) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Hall (NE)
14,230
Total Investors in Hall (NE)
2,577
Investor Owned SFR in Hall (NE)
2,511(17.6%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,306
SFR Owned
1,916
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
271
SFR Owned
630
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,511 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Hall County's SFR Market, Controlling 87.8% of Rental Homes
Investors own 2,511 single-family properties in Hall County, NE, representing 17.6% of the market. The landscape is defined by small-scale individual owners, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 87.8% of the investor-owned inventory versus a mere 0.1% for institutional firms. In Q1 2026, investors paid 3.8% less than homeowners but have shifted to become net sellers for the first time since before 2024.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 2,511 SFR properties in Hall County, with individuals comprising 76.3% of holdings.
Cash is the preferred financing method, used for 1,652 properties compared to 859 that are financed. The portfolio is heavily rental-focused, with 2,446 properties (97.4%) classified as non-owner-occupied. Individual landlords (2,306) vastly outnumber company landlords (271).
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 3.8% less than traditional homeowners in Q1, an average discount of $9,902 per property.
This price advantage has narrowed substantially from a 23.5% discount ($66,790) seen in Q2 2025. Landlord acquisition prices in Q1 2026 averaged $247,364, slightly higher than the 2025 average of $244,196, indicating stable but competitive pricing.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords accounted for 8.3% of all SFR purchases in Q4 2025, with all activity from new investors.
Mom-and-pop landlords made 100% of the 10 investor purchases, all of which were single-property acquisitions. Institutional investors with 1,000+ properties made zero purchases, showing a complete lack of activity at the top end of the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 87.8% of investor-owned SFRs in Hall County.
In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) own just 3 homes, making up only 0.1% of the investor portfolio. Single-property landlords are the largest group, holding 1,561 properties, which is 59.5% of all investor-owned housing.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners at the 11-20 property tier, though individuals dominate smaller portfolios.
Individuals own 90.8% of single-property portfolios and 54.1% of 6-10 property portfolios. However, companies own 67.7% of 11-20 property portfolios and a staggering 97.8% of 21-50 property portfolios, showing a clear shift at larger scales.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity in Hall County is heavily concentrated in the 68801 zip code, with 1,399 properties.
While 68801 has the highest count, smaller zip codes have the highest saturation, including 68810 (36.1% investor-owned) and 68824 (35.7%). The 68956 zip code shows a 100% investor rate, likely reflecting a small area with very few properties.
Historical Transactions
Landlords shifted to net sellers in Q1 2026, a sharp reversal from strong net buying in 2024 and 2025.
In Q1 2026, landlords sold 12 properties while buying only 11. This contrasts sharply with Year 2025, when they were net buyers of 15 properties (42 buys vs 27 sells), and Year 2024, when they had a net gain of 194 properties (216 buys vs 22 sells).
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 7.1% of all Q1 2026 transactions, exclusively driven by single-property buyers.
All 11 landlord transactions were conducted by investors in the smallest tier, who paid an average of $247,364. These new investors acquired their properties entirely from the open market, with 0% of purchases coming from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 2,511 SFR properties in Hall County, with individuals comprising 76.3% of holdings.
Detailed Findings

In Hall County, investors hold a significant 17.6% of the single-family residential market, totaling 2,511 properties out of 14,230.

The ownership structure is overwhelmingly dominated by 2,306 individual landlords who own 1,916 properties, or 76.3% of the investor portfolio. In contrast, 271 companies own the remaining 630 properties (25.1%).

Cash is the predominant acquisition strategy among landlords in the area. Cash purchases account for 1,652 properties, nearly double the 859 properties that are financed, signaling a well-capitalized investor base.

The portfolio is almost entirely dedicated to rentals, with 2,446 of the 2,511 properties being non-owner-occupied. This 97.4% rental concentration underscores the business focus of these property owners.

The data reveals a highly fragmented market composed of small-scale operators. The large disparity between the number of individual landlords (2,306) and the properties they own (1,916) points to a landscape defined by single-property owners rather than large conglomerates.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 3.8% less than traditional homeowners in Q1, an average discount of $9,902 per property.
Detailed Findings

In the first quarter of 2026, landlords in Hall County purchased properties for an average of $247,364, securing a 3.8% discount compared to the $257,266 paid by traditional homeowners. This translates to a savings of $9,902 per home.

The price gap between landlords and homeowners has tightened dramatically over the past year. The current 3.8% discount is a sharp decrease from the 9.7% gap in Q1 2025 and the remarkable 23.5% ($66,790) discount investors achieved in Q2 2025.

This narrowing discount suggests increasing competition in the market, forcing investors to pay closer to retail prices to acquire properties.

While historical data for 2020-2023 is unavailable, recent pricing shows a slight upward trend. The Q1 2026 average price of $247,364 is modestly above the average of $244,196 for all of 2025, reflecting steady market valuation.

The significant volatility in the landlord discount, from a high of 23.5% to a low of 1.8% in the past year, highlights a dynamic market where deal availability and investor purchasing power can shift rapidly from one quarter to the next.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords accounted for 8.3% of all SFR purchases in Q4 2025, with all activity from new investors.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing activity in Q4 2025 was modest, with landlords acquiring 10 of the 120 total SFR properties sold in Hall County, representing an 8.3% market share.

The entirety of this activity was driven by the smallest investors. All 10 properties were purchased by landlords in the 'single-property' tier, indicating that market growth is coming exclusively from new entrants and first-time landlords.

A total of 11 new landlord entities entered the market to acquire these 10 homes, pointing to some co-ownership arrangements among these new investors.

There was zero acquisition activity from mid-size or institutional investors during the quarter. This highlights a market completely dependent on small, local operators for rental housing growth.

The data clearly shows that the new supply of rental housing in Hall County is not being driven by large corporations but by individuals making their first real estate investing purchase.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 87.8% of investor-owned SFRs in Hall County.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Hall County is unequivocally dominated by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, control a combined 87.8% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Single-property landlords form the bedrock of the rental market, owning 1,561 properties. This single group accounts for 59.5% of the entire investor-owned housing stock, demonstrating extreme market fragmentation.

The influence of large-scale investors is statistically negligible. Institutional firms (1,000+ properties) own a total of just 3 properties, representing a mere 0.1% of the market share.

Mid-size investors (11-100 properties) also have a limited footprint, collectively owning 318 properties or 12.1% of the investor-held inventory.

This ownership distribution challenges the narrative of corporate consolidation in housing markets, revealing a local rental ecosystem almost entirely supported by small, individual landlords.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners at the 11-20 property tier, though individuals dominate smaller portfolios.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the primary owners of smaller rental portfolios in Hall County. They own 90.8% of single-property holdings (1,437 properties) and maintain a majority of 54.1% in the 6-10 property tier.

A clear transition to corporate ownership occurs as portfolio sizes increase. The crossover point is the 11-20 property tier, where companies own a 67.7% majority (111 properties).

Company dominance becomes nearly absolute in larger portfolios. In the 21-50 property tier, companies own 134 of 137 properties, a commanding 97.8% share.

This pattern indicates a distinct operational difference: individuals tend to manage a few properties, while scaling beyond 10 properties typically involves forming a corporate entity for liability and operational purposes.

Even within the single-property tier, 145 properties (9.2%) are held by companies, suggesting some investors incorporate from their very first purchase.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity in Hall County is heavily concentrated in the 68801 zip code, with 1,399 properties.
Detailed Findings

The geographic distribution of investor-owned properties in Hall County is highly concentrated. The 68801 zip code is the epicenter of activity, containing 1,399 properties, which is more than half of the total investor portfolio in the county.

Following distantly is the 68803 zip code, with 748 investor-owned homes. Together, these two zip codes represent the core of the local rental market.

However, the highest rates of investor ownership are found in smaller, more rural zip codes. Top areas by penetration include 68810 (36.1%), 68824 (35.7%), and 68883 (32.5%), indicating these are significant investor hotspots relative to their size.

The 68956 zip code reports a 100% investor ownership rate, a statistical outlier likely representing an area with only one or a few SFR properties, all of which happen to be rentals.

This contrast between high-volume areas (68801) and high-percentage areas (68810, 68824) reveals different investment dynamics, with activity centered in the urban core but saturation peaking in outlying communities.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords shifted to net sellers in Q1 2026, a sharp reversal from strong net buying in 2024 and 2025.
Detailed Findings

A significant shift in market behavior occurred in the first quarter of 2026, as landlords in Hall County became net sellers for the first time in recent years. They sold 12 SFR properties while purchasing only 11.

This represents a stark reversal from the aggressive accumulation seen previously. In 2024, landlords were formidable net buyers with a ratio of nearly 10 buys for every sale (216 buys vs. 22 sells).

The buying momentum continued, albeit at a slower pace, through 2025, which ended with landlords as net buyers of 15 properties (42 buys vs. 27 sells).

The pivot to a net-seller position in Q1 2026 could signal a response to changing market conditions, such as peaking property values or a less favorable purchasing environment.

There is no transaction data available for institutional investors, but the overall market trend is a clear deceleration of acquisition activity and a move toward portfolio trimming.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 7.1% of all Q1 2026 transactions, exclusively driven by single-property buyers.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlord activity constituted a small portion of the overall market, with investors involved in 11 of the 154 total SFR transactions, a 7.1% share.

All 11 of these transactions were purchases made by investors in the single-property (Tier 01) category. This confirms that the only active buyers in the market are new entrants or those adding a second property.

The average purchase price for these small investors was $247,364. With no activity from larger tiers, it is impossible to compare pricing strategies across investor sizes for the quarter.

Notably, 0% of these purchases were from other landlords. This indicates that new investors are acquiring homes from traditional homeowners, not from churn within the investor community.

The complete absence of transactions from mid-size and institutional tiers reinforces the narrative of a market where all recent growth is generated at the grassroots level.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Hall County's housing market is defined by small mom-and-pop landlords who own 87.8% of investor properties and are now pivoting to become net sellers.
Holdings
Landlords own 2,511 SFR properties in Hall County, representing 17.6% of the market. Individual investors hold a 76.3% majority share of these properties (1,916 homes) compared to companies at 25.1% (630 homes).
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords secured a 3.8% discount compared to homeowners, paying $247,364 on average versus $257,266, a price advantage of $9,902 per property.
Activity
Landlord purchase activity has slowed, capturing 8.3% of Q4 2025 sales (10 properties). All 10 purchases were by 11 new single-property landlord entities, with zero acquisitions by institutional investors.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly dominate the market, controlling 87.8% of investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+) hold a negligible 0.1% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors own the vast majority of small portfolios, but a clear crossover occurs at the 11-20 property tier, where companies become the majority owners with a 67.7% share.
Transactions
After years of accumulation, landlords became net sellers in Q1 2026 (11 buys vs. 12 sells), a major trend reversal from being strong net buyers in 2024 and 2025.
Market Narrative

The real estate investor landscape in Hall County, Nebraska, is fundamentally shaped by small, independent operators, not large institutions. Investors own 2,511 single-family homes, or 17.6% of the total market. This portfolio is firmly in the hands of mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who control a commanding 87.8% of all investor-owned properties. In stark contrast, institutional firms have a nearly nonexistent footprint, owning just 0.1% of the inventory. The ownership base is composed primarily of individuals (76.3%) rather than companies, underscoring the local, fragmented nature of the rental market.

Investor behavior has recently shifted from accumulation to disposition. After being strong net buyers in 2024 and 2025, landlords became net sellers in Q1 2026. While they still find value, securing a 3.8% discount ($9,902) compared to homeowners in Q1, their purchasing activity has diminished, representing just 7.1% of transactions. All recent acquisition activity has come from new, single-property landlords, with no purchases recorded from mid-size or institutional tiers. This suggests the market is being driven by new entrants rather than the expansion of existing large portfolios.

The key takeaway from this market reports dashboard is that Hall County’s rental market is a grassroots ecosystem. The narrative of corporate consolidation does not apply here. Instead, the market's health and the supply of rental housing depend on thousands of individual owners. The recent pivot to net selling, combined with a narrowing price advantage, suggests the most aggressive phase of investor acquisition has passed. The future of the local market will be defined by the decisions of these small-scale landlords as they navigate a more competitive and mature investment environment.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 11:25 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Hall (NE)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Hall (NE) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ne-hall/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.